Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
MBH1683 | Leading Organisational ChangePrepared by Dr Khairul Anuar
L10 – Organizational Transformations:
Birth, Growth, Decline, and Death
www.mba638.wordpress.com
2
• Appreciate the problems involved in surviving the perils
of organizational birth and what actions founders can
take to help their new organizations survive
• Describe the typical problems that arise as an
organization grows and matures, and how an
organization must change if it is to survive and prosper
• Discuss why organizational decline occurs, identify the
stages of decline, and describe how managers can work
to prevent the failure and even the death or dissolution of
an organization
Learning Objectives
3
• Why do some organisations survive and prosper while others fail or die?
Researchers suggest that we need to understand the dynamics that affect organizations as they seek a satisfactory for with their environment
• Organizational life cycle: A sequence of stages of growth and development through which organizations may pass
• The four principal stages of the organizational life cycle:
– Birth
– Growth
– Decline
– Death
The Organizational Life Cycle
4
Figure 11.1 - A Model of the Organizational Life
Cycle
5
• Organisations pass through these stages at different rates, and
some do not experience every stage
Some companies go directly from birth to death without enjoying
any growth if they do not attract any consumers or resources
Some organisations spend a long time in the growth stage , and
researchers have identified various sub-stages of growth which
an organisations must navigate
There are also sub-stages of decline
Some organisations in decline take corrective action, change
quickly, and turn themselves around
• The way an organization can change in response to the problems it
confronts determines whether and when it will go on to the next
stage in the life-cycle and survive and prosper or fail or die.
The Organizational Life Cycle
6
• Organizational birth: The founding of an organization
• Occurs when entrepreneurs take advantage of
opportunities to use their skills and competences to
create value
• Dell - found new way to market low-priced computers
They saw an opportunity to found an organisation
that could produce lower price products than the
competition
Organizational Birth
7
• A dangerous life cycle stage associated with the greatest chance of failure
– Liability of newness: The dangers associated with being the first in a new environment
– It lacks a formal structure to give its value creation processes and actions reliability and stability.
At first, all it activities are performed by trial and error, organizational structure emerges gradually as decisions are made about roles, rules, and SOPs should be implemented.
In this stage, the structure is flexible and responsive, allowing the org to adapt and perfect its routines to meet the needs of its environment
– Conditions in the environment may be hostile to a new organization – eg resources for example may be scarce or difficult because many established organizations are competing for them
• Entrepreneurs bear this uncertainty because they stand to earn potentially enormous returns if their business takes off
Organizational Birth (cont.)
8
• Population ecology theory: A theory that seeks to explain the factors that affect the rate at which new organizations are born (and die) in a population of existing organizations
– Population of organizations: The organizations that are competing for the same set of resources in the environment
Eg. restaurants in university town (like Cyberjaya) competing to attract environmental resources in the from of $$$ from the student population
Dell, HP, Acer etc to attract environmental resources in the form of $$$ from consumers willing spend in personal computing
– Different organisations within a population may choose to focus on different environmental niches, or particular sets of resources or skills.
– Eg. Initially Dell chose to focus on the mail-order niche of the PC environment, HP focused on business niche, and apple on publishing and higher education niche. Their choices have changed over time to gain access to more resources. Apple started its chain of stores to attract individual customers, and in 2007 Dell decided to expand its sales channels to reach more customers by selling in PCs stores
A Population Ecology Model of Organizational
Birth
9
• Number of births determined by the availability of
resources
– Population density: The number of organizations that
can compete for the same resources in a particular
environment
– Factors that produce a rapid birthrate
• Availability of knowledge and skills to generate
similar new organizations
• New organizations that survive provide role models
and confer legitimacy
• Eg Amazon/Groupon/Uber spin-offs
Population Ecology Model (cont.)
10
• As the environment is populated with a number of successful organizations, birthrate tapers off because:
– Fewer resources are available for newcomers
• First-mover advantages: Benefits derived from being an early entrant into a new environment
• Eg Uber/Amazon/Microsoft
• Includes customer support, recognized brand name, and the best locations for new business like restaurants
• Latecomers enter environ that is partially depleted of the resources that they need to grow – eg banks reluctant to lend money to new comers because chance of survival in competitive environment may be poor
Population Ecology Model (cont.)
11
• Have to compete for resources – which may be more
difficult and expensive to obtain. For new customers,
new company may need to overspend on advertising or
innovation, or they may need to reduce their prices too
much. Existing companies may band together and make
it very hard for new companies to enter the market –
collusion, agreeing to set prices at artificially low levels to
drive out new rivals out of the industry, or erect barriers
to entry
Population Ecology Model (cont.)
12
Figure 11.2 - Organizational Birthrates Over
Time
13
• Survival strategies
– Strategies that organizations can use to gain access
to resources and enhance their chances of survival in
the environment
– r-strategy versus K-strategy
• r-strategy: A strategy of entering a new environment,
they are early entrants
• K-strategy: A strategy of entering an environment late,
after other organizations have tested the environment
Population Ecology Model (cont.)
14
• r-strategy – advantages – first mover advantage and first pick
of the resources in the environment. If able to grow rapidly,
and develop skills and procedures it will increase its chance
of surviving and prospering
• K-strategy – organisation which are established in other
environments and wait to enter a new environments until the
uncertainty in that environments is reduced and the correct way to
compete is apparent.
• Eg Samsung and Sony only entered the cellphone market after
Motorola and Nokia had showed how big the global market size
was. They then use the skills developed in other environment and
use them to develop effective procedures that allow them to
compete with and often dominate organisations following r-strategy.
• In the PC market, IBM which was dominate seller of main frame
computes entered into the PC mkt
Population Ecology Model (cont.)
15
• Specialist strategy versus generalist strategy
– Specialists: Organizations that concentrate their skills
to pursue a narrow range of resources in a single
niche. Eg smartphones
– By focusing their activities in one niche specialists
are often to dev core competencies that allow them to
outperform generalists in that niche.
– Eg offer better customer service. Nvidia – leader in
graphics chips invest all its resources to produce
these state-of-the-art chips and does not invest
resources to compete with Intel or AMD in making
microprocessors or memory chips
Population Ecology Model (cont.)
16
• Specialist strategy versus generalist strategy
– Generalists: Organizations that spread their skills thin to compete for a broad range of resources in many niches . Eg smartphones, inexpensive cell phones, landline phones, pagers, etc
– Generalist can often outcompete specialists when there is considerable uncertainties in the environment and they when resources are changing so that niches emerge and disappear continually.
– Generalist can survive in an uncertain environment because they have spread their resources over many niches.
– If specialist’s niche disappears, however, there is a much higher chance of org failure and death.
Population Ecology Model (cont.)
17
– Specialist & generalist strategy – normally co-exist
in many environments because generate create the
conditions that allow specialist to operate
successfully.
– Eg. large department store stock many different
types of clothing but can stock a limited amount of
each type, eg sportswear. Specialist stores can
stock may offer extensive type of clothing eg
sportswear, and therefore charge a premium price
for their selection of unique cloths.
• Even though there were powerful generalist
around – as Apple has showed with its iPods
and iPhones
Population Ecology Model (cont.)
18
• Process of natural selection
– Two sets of strategies result in: r-Specialist, r-
Generalist, K-Specialist, K-Generalist
• Early in an environment, new organizations are likely to
become r-Specialists
– Move quickly to focus on serving the needs of a
particular group
– As r-Specialists grow, they often become generalists and
compete in new niches
Population Ecology Model (cont.)
19
– K-Generalists move into the market and threaten the
weaker r-Specialists
– The market is dominated by the strongest r-
Specialists, r-Generalists, and K-Generalists
Population Ecology Model (cont.)
20
Figure 11.3 -Strategies for Competing in the
Resource Environment
21
• Natural selection: the process that ensures the survival
of organizations that have the skills and abilities that best
fit with the environment
– Over time, weaker organizations die because they
cannot adapt their procedures to fit changes in the
environment
– Natural selection is a competitive process
Population Ecology Model (cont.)
22
• Organizational growth: The life-cycle stage in which organizations develop value-creation skills and competences that allow them to acquire additional resources
– Organizations can develop competitive advantages by increasing division of labor
– Creates surplus resources that foster greater growth
– Growth should not be an end-in-itself
– Microsoft – took its resources from MS-DOS to develop new software applications to bring in new additional resources. Reason why in 2007 it try to acquire yahoo to compete with google, to acquire Nokia to compete in mobile telecommunications
The Institutional Theory of Organizational
Growth
23
• Institutional theory: A theory that studies how organizations can increase their ability to grow and survive in a competitive environment by becoming legitimate in the eyes of their stakeholders.
• To increase their chances of survival, new orgs adopt many of the rules and codes of conduct found in the institutional environment surrounding them
• Institutional environment: Values and norms in an environment that govern the behavior of a population of organizations.
• For example, in the banking environment comprises of strict rules and regulations on what they can and cannot do, and penalties for breaking the rules.
• Those who follow the rules are considered trust worthy and legitimate by stakeholders, and able to attract resources and improve their chances of survival.
• The best way for a new org to gain and strengthen its legitimacy is to imitate the goals, structure, and culture of successful org in its population.
The Institutional Theory of Organizational
Growth (cont.)
24
• Organizational isomorphism: the similarity
among organizations in a population
– Three processes that explain why organizations
become similar are:
• Coercive isomorphism
• Mimetic isomorphism
• Normative isomorphism
The Institutional Theory of Organizational
Growth (cont.)
25
• Disadvantages of isomorphism
– Organizations may learn ways to behave that have
become outdated and no longer lead to organizational
effectiveness
– Pressure to imitate may reduce the level of innovation
in the environment
The Institutional Theory of Organizational
Growth (cont.)
26
• Greiner proposes 5 sequential growth stages
– Each stage results in a crisis
– Advancement to the next stage requires successfully
resolving the crisis in the previous stage
Greiner’s Model of Organizational Growth
27
Figure 11.4 - Greiner’s Model of Organizational
Growth
28
• Organizational decline: the life-cycle stage that
an organization enters when it fails to anticipate,
recognize, avoid, neutralize, or adapt to external
or internal pressures that threaten its long-term
survival
– May occur because organizations grow too much
Organizational Decline and Death
29
• Effectiveness and profitability
– Assessing an organization’s effectiveness involves
comparing its profitability relative to others
• Profitability: Measures how well a company is
making use of its resources by investing them in
ways to create goods and services that generate
profit when sold
– Short-term profits say little about how well managers
are using resources to generate future profits
Organizational Decline and Death (cont.)
30
Figure 11.5 - The Relationship Between Organizational
Size and Organizational Effectiveness
31
Figure 11.6 - Differences in Profitability
32
• Organizational inertia: The forces inside an
organization that make it resistant to change
– Risk aversion: Managers become unwilling to bear
the uncertainty of change as organizations grow
– The desire to maximize rewards: Managers may
increase the size of the company to maximize their
own rewards even when this growth reduces
organizational effectiveness
Organizational Decline and Death (cont.)
33
– Overly bureaucratic culture: In large organizations,
property rights can become so strong that managers
spend all their time protecting their specific property
rights instead of working to advance the organization
Organizational Decline and Death (cont.)
34
• Changes in the environment
– Affect an organization’s ability to obtain scarce
resources, thereby leading to decline
– Makes it difficult for top management to anticipate the
need for change and to manage the way
organizations change and adapt to the environment
Organizational Decline and Death (cont.)
35
• 5 stages of decline
– Stage 1: Blinded
– Stage 2: Inaction
– Stage 3: Faulty action
– Stage 4: Crisis
– Stage 5: Dissolution
Weitzel and Jonsson’s Model of Organizational
Decline