• Published on

  • View

  • Download

Embed Size (px)





    1 Who are we?

    Are we a piece of creation by God?

    Were our creation totally planned and executed by God?

    Did God or our Creator have any input in our gradual evolution process

    or did we just evolve in our own time?

    2 Did any outside influences got involved at any stage between creation

    and now?

    3 Did God the Creator or Creators at some stage made physical or

    spiritual contact and helped us to compile religious scripture?

    Why do there appear to be so many different physical variances between

    human sapiens, is a specific group more intended than another?

    The above is only a few of the questions we ask from time to time, but

    are there any satisfying answers to these questions?

    Science is most likely the study we could turn to in our efforts to find

    reasonable answers, and religion will probably dispute that.

    Religion is probably the most practised and tried method, but also the

    most illogical, how much value can we put into religion?

    Science is not as new as we might believe and tend to look for logical

    explanations, can we lean more towards science? If we do our belief

    systems might turn us against science or the logic we find in science

    might turn us against religion. Will our own belief systems allow us toreally experiment with science and running the risk of loosing its

    followers in massive droves?

    History have shown that religion tend to be somewhat sceptic on science

    and even called the real hard core scientists heretics.

    Should we however look at our world today science have picked us out

    of medieval chaos and established a relative peaceful society, where theaggressive highly religious are still warring and threatening war on a




    daily basis. We have programs on world wide television asking the

    question; can Armageddon be stopped? Can it? Will science be able to

    convince religion of its fallacy?

    Or will religion have the final say?

    Let us go back to the first question:


    We are part of this place we call earth. According to religion

    (Genesis chapter 1) we were placed here to rule and take care of

    everything else including ourselves. What is on this planet?

    Everything we know and are still investigating, all life forms, whether

    microscopic, or life size realistic, we are supposed to keep it, nurture it,

    and help it survive, but are we?

    From Genesis chapter 2 the message in chapter 1 is thrown out the door.

    Can one say that, or even whisper it?

    In Genesis chapter 2 God suddenly have a couple of trees inparadise, these trees holds certain values, and these values can wake

    mankind up to certain incredible facts and should mankind try to gain

    these incredible values he would be committing a sin against God,

    by becoming a danger to God through acquiring knowledge? We

    learn about a snake, which is responsible for telling mankind that

    there is nothing wrong with acquiring knowledge.

    God however lied to man about dying should they acquire thisknowledge, the snake said they could eat and would not die, which




    mankind did, and they did not die! Then God banished mankind from

    paradise and they had to go and fend for themselves, which mankind did

    quite successfully, I am writing this, and you are reading it which is

    proof of the survival capabilities we have.

    The snake is seen today as Satan by religion and God as the good

    guy, but who was the first liar? According to religion we were created

    by God, and he also lied to us, (Genesis chapter 2 verse 17; You

    must not eat the fruit of that tree, if you do, you will die the same day)

    we are still here! Adam and Eve had children, the world became


    Science enabled us to survive, not religion, the first banished people

    went out into the wilderness and made a living, their own mental and

    physical abilities enabled them to survive, the snake showed them

    how, God kept at them and threatened them with extinction

    throughout the bible should they not worship him, and he tried, he killed

    them by the millions, instigated wars amongst them, promised them

    riches, stole their loot from battles, killed those who did not hand over

    the loot from time to time, its all in the scriptures I am not makingany of this up.

    God even hand picked a nation to be his mouth piece, and declared

    himself as the supreme God, the snake later became Satan or the

    Devil, and this supreme God never killed his main adversary,

    apparently he could have right at the start but he preferred not to, and

    according to scripture decided to keep Satan in order to test us, till

    this very day!

    That God convinced the religious that he operated in mysterious

    ways, he promised one nation that from them the high priests who

    would eventually run this place will be chosen exclusively from them,

    and that at the end of time all the wealth of the nations will be brought

    into a new Jerusalem for their exclusive use, all other nations are called

    infidels by him, religion still use that name, but today we have the

    Christian and Muslim communities calling other nations that, and theyeven hate each other better than they hate the other nations.




    What did that GOD create? Strife, hate, fear, uncertainty, and a

    very possible Armageddon, but more importantly, we were created

    by him or them, (Genesis chapter 1 verse 26; Then God said, andnow we will make human beings; they will be like us and resemble


    We tend to think that Jesus was a part of this religion, but was he? Did

    he fulfil the Old Testament prophecies or not? Was he the son of

    that God, is his father the same father religion has been

    worshipping since day one?

    Religion claims it to be correct, and when reading scripture and

    discussing it with the priests and pastors they all tell you; yes, most

    definitely! Look there and there, in scripture it is stated, but there are

    also places in scripture which tells a different story. You will not find

    supportive quotes for religion in this document, however you will find

    supportive evidence to disprove the claims of religion, it is my opinion

    that a myriad of writings already exist written by other people to support

    religion. It is not my intention to support neither religion nor atheism, inmy opinion both go out from the point of view that either; God exist but

    due to lack of proof religion believe that he exist or from a atheist point

    of view God do not exist and due to lack of proof they believe he does

    not exist, the belief system of both have the same value, both based on

    the assumption.

    Religion or rather the Christian and Muslim religions including the

    Jewish religion started with a paradise and an obvious lie, (Genesischapter 3 verse 1 and 5, Now the snake was the most cunning animal

    that the Lord God had made. The snake asked the woman, Did

    God really tell you not to eat fruit from any tree in the garden? 2

    We may eat the fruit of any tree in the garden, the woman

    answered, 3 except the tree in the middle of it. God told us not to

    eat the fruit of that tree or even touch it; if we do we will die. 4 The

    snake replied, Thats not true; you will not die. 5 God said that,

    because he knows that when you eat it you will be like God andknow what is good and what is bad.




    In verse 17 of Genesis chapter 2 the Lord God told man after he placed

    him in the Garden of Eden; You may eat the fruit of any tree in the

    garden, 17 except the tree that gives knowledge of what is good andwhat is bad. You must not eat the fruit of that tree; if you do, you

    will die the same day.

    Who lied; God or the snake? Adam and Eve went on to have children

    and we are still here! Plus minus one thousand two hundred and fifty

    pages in very small print have been written after that in an effort to

    prove God never lie, but a couple of pages inside that phenomenal effort

    tends to tell a different story.

    You may ask yourself this; how long is the truth, and what is needed to

    convince someone about an idea. According to scripture Jesus spoke

    many words, should we compare his words with the rest of scripture it is

    my submission that he fell short by a long way in support of it. Jesus

    according to scripture however made some very controversial

    statements, and short ones in a manner of speech.

    One such statement was this: John chapter 8 verse 43 to 44 Why do

    you not understand what I say? It is because you cannot bear to

    listen to my message. 44 You are the children of your father, the

    Devil, and you want to follow you fathers desires. From the very

    beginning he was a murderer and has never been on the side of

    truth, because there is no truth in him. When he tells a lie, he is only

    doing what is natural to him, because he is a liar and the father of

    all lies.

    Religion would argue that these verses are referring to the snake, but

    you are reading this, mankind did not die after they ate from that famous

    tree. While we are talking about this tree, let us try to understand it. The

    fruits of the trees in paradise were knowledge, not a physical act of

    eating, the tree in the middle was knowledge regarded by that God not

    applicable to humans, it would make humans realise that God might

    not be who he claimed to be, and the snake explained it to us.




    Jesus even made a comment about it when he was confronted at one

    stage, he said; Is it not written in your law. I said, ye are gods, if he

    called them gods, unto whom the word of God came, and the

    scripture cannot be broken;/ say ye of him, whom the father havesanctified and sent into this world, thou blasphemes, because I said

    I am the son of God.

    In this he used scripture against itself, according to modern religion this

    is not possible, yet two thousand years ago a man proved its fallacy!

    He even went further and explained in Matthew chapter 23 verse 35 to

    36 who killed some of the prophets he have sent here, backing it up withJohn chapter 10, allow me to explain:

    In the book of Genesis chapter 4 we find that Adam and Eve have two

    sons Cain, a farmer, and Abel, a shepherd. Nowhere in Genesis do we

    read that Abel was a prophet, yet in Matthew chapter 23 verse 35, we

    find out by way of Jesus that Abel were also a prophet, one killed by

    religion to prevent the people from knowing a truth hidden from us by

    religion, and who implemented religion? God, not the snake! Thesnake promoted science!

    In the Old Testament in the book of Zechariah we read in chapter 13

    that the Lord gave the order to kill this prophet in order to scatter the

    sheep. In Matthew chapter 23 verse 35, Jesus told us that religion killed

    Zachariah and in John chapter 10 Jesus explain those who came before

    him, those who were similar to him, those who said they were God, the

    Lord Almighty etc. He did so in no uncertain terms, and yet religionholds a different perspective.

    I quote: John chapter 10 verse 8; All others who came before me are

    thieves and robbers, but the sheep did not listen to them. 9 I am the

    gate. Whoever comes in by me will be saved; he will come in and go

    out and find pasture. 10 The thief comes only in order to steal, kill

    and destroy.




    In a couple of short paragraphs you have read about religion, starting

    with a lie, a truth withheld, a man attempting to show the discrepancy,

    sheep scattered by religion, a different meaning of truth, a snake called

    that name by religion who scatter sheep, steel their loot after battlesagainst their co citizens, instigated by religion, a Lord who promise

    mans extinction multiple times throughout scripture but have yet to


    Remember I asked the question; how long is truth, and what does it

    take to convince someone about an idea?

    Maybe we should look from another angle!



    According to science life first appeared on this place we call earth in the

    form of microscopic one celled organisms plus minus 3.5 billion years

    ago. Up to plus minus 6 thousand years ago according to the Bible no

    interference or outside influences took place, from that perspective

    human kind has only been here for the past plus minus 6 thousand


    Very soon after that the sons of God mated with earth woman, a

    slightly different looking human specie were born from those affairs,

    (Genesis chapter 6). Then in the time of Lot (Genesis chapter 19) the

    Lord decided to destroy the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah, another

    outside influence!

    These outside influences kept happening until plus minus 400 B.C,

    religion prefers to call these influences God influences.




    Some religions also tend to call the offspring of the mating with the sons

    of God unintended, or the children of Satan, and those offspring which

    is basically all people on earth not resembling a specific profile

    according to that specific religion should hand over whatever they ownto the originally intended and report as the slaves of that specific human

    specie, should they not that God will at the end of time come back and

    kill all other unintended human beings, the only ones who will be saved

    will be those who hand over their gold and play slave.

    There is however other versions regarding outside influences, more

    scientifically based.

    Many reading this have heard about the Sumerian tablets, according to

    those who have knowledge regarding the language the human specie

    were first created successfully some two hundred thousand years ago by

    a specie known as the Annunaki or people who came from a place or

    planet called Nibiru or the planet of the crossing. A man called Zecharia

    Sitchin, apparently spent some fifty odd years researching these tablets,

    and the conclusions he came to is stated in numerous books written by

    him on this subject. His findings were however heavily criticized byother scientists and the church. Today science have taken a different

    approach to this mans work and some are of the opinion that his

    interpretation might not be totally correct, but there might be some very

    real facts in his work.

    According to Sitchin we Homo Sapiens, were created through

    experimenting with Homo Erectus or Homo Heidelbergenesis and the

    Annunaki themselves. Apparently they used a fertilization processwhere sperm from Homo Erectus and egg cells from themselves were

    used and after some 150 thousand years finally successfully cloned

    Homo Sapiens. At first they were only successful in cloning male

    specimens, but after changing the sperm and egg cells around using

    their male sperm and the female egg cells of Homo Erectus they

    succeeded in cloning a female.

    These males and females were then allowed to mate and the offspringbecame us, the first successful offspring had a brown colour and dark




    curly hair, another feature was a smooth somewhat oily complexion and

    hair. These features is that of the original intended huma...