37
Mapping Rigor Putting the Pieces Together April 23, 2013 Presented by Elin Reuben, New Hanover County Schools Karma Maples, New Hanover County Schools Shelley Hollingsworth, Wake County Schools

Mapping Rigor Putting the Pieces Together

  • Upload
    shaman

  • View
    32

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Mapping Rigor Putting the Pieces Together. April 23, 2013. Presented by Elin Reuben, New Hanover County Schools Karma Maples, New Hanover County Schools Shelley Hollingsworth, Wake County Schools. Agenda. 9:30 – 9:35 Welcome 9:35- 9:40 Introductions 9:40 – 10:00 Background - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Mapping Rigor Putting the Pieces Together

Mapping RigorPutting the Pieces Together

April 23, 2013

Presented by

Elin Reuben, New Hanover County Schools

Karma Maples, New Hanover County Schools

Shelley Hollingsworth, Wake County Schools

Page 2: Mapping Rigor Putting the Pieces Together

Agenda9:30 – 9:35 Welcome 9:35- 9:40 Introductions 9:40 – 10:00 Background 10:00 – 10:20 Introduction of DOK, RBT and rigor matrix10:20- 10:25 Defining Rigor 10:25- 10:35 Exercise – Little Red Riding Hood10:35- 10:50 What does Rigor look like?   10:50 – 11:20 Rigor Review 11:20- 11:30 Group discussion 11:30- 11:50 Rigorous Assessments 11:50- 12:15 Creating assessment 12:15 – 12:25 Group discussion and sharing 12:25- 12:30 Exit survey

Page 3: Mapping Rigor Putting the Pieces Together

Intended Outcomes:

•Define rigor

•Understand DOK and RBT

•Study and Use the Karen Hess’s Rigor Matrix

•Applying rigor tool to evaluate units/lessons

•Understand rigorous assessments

•Collaborate and Reflect

Page 4: Mapping Rigor Putting the Pieces Together

Review of Previous Year

• Evaluated where current units fit with the Common Core – participants brought units

• Looked at misconceptions in relation to the Common Core and gifted education

• Plugged units into Revised Bloom’s Matrix

Page 5: Mapping Rigor Putting the Pieces Together

Box of ChocolatesYou have been hired as a designer to market packages of chocolate candy for Valentine’s Day. The manufacturer would like rectangu1ar boxes that do not have a top. The candy will be covered with colorful plastic wrap so the consumer can see the actual product. Use your math skills to master this task.Directions:1. Use 1 inch graph paper (that was printed on card stock) to create a template for your box.2. Flip the paper over and decorate the package. (The printed squares should be inside the box.)3. Assemble the box with clear tape.Now it is time to do the math.Answer the foil owing questions.1. What are the dimensions of the box? (length, width, and height)2. What is the total surface area of the box?3. If the material used to construct the box costs 4 cents per square inch, how much did it cost the manufacturer to make the box?4. How many 1 inch cubes of chocolate fudge will the box hold? (volume)5. If it cost 20 cents to make each piece of candy, how much would it cost to fill the box with chocolates?6. What is the manufacture’s total cost of goods (box materials and candy)?7. If the consumer’s price is the manufacture’s total cost plus 20%, what will the actual price of the candy?8. How much profit will the manufacturer make on each box that is sold?

5.MD.5.C

5.NBT.7

5.MD.3 & 4 & 5

5.NBT.7

Page 6: Mapping Rigor Putting the Pieces Together

Blank Revised Bloom’s

Page 7: Mapping Rigor Putting the Pieces Together

Example Bloom’s Matrix

Page 8: Mapping Rigor Putting the Pieces Together

What is rigor?

Let’s talk

Page 9: Mapping Rigor Putting the Pieces Together

How the Experts Define Cognitive Rigor…

Rigor is …

•Quality of thinking, not quantity, and can occur in any grade at any subject (Bogess, 2007)

•Deep immersion in a subject and should include real-world settings (Washor & Majkowki, 2006)

•Thoughtful analysis with sufficient attention to accuracy and detail (Beane, 2001)

•Helping students develop the capacity to understand content that is complex, ambiguous, provocative, and personally or emotionally challenging (Strong, Silver, & Perrini, 2001)

Page 10: Mapping Rigor Putting the Pieces Together

Developing a Cognitive Rigor Matrix

Currently, we use two different tools to describe cognitive rigor. Each addresses something different.

RBT (Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy) – What type of thinking (verbs) is needed to complete a task?

DOK (Webb’s Depth of Knowledge) – How deeply do you have to understand the content to successfully interact with it? How complex or abstract is the content?

Page 11: Mapping Rigor Putting the Pieces Together

Bloom’s Taxonomy (1956) & Bloom’s Cognitive Process Dimensions (2005)

Knowledge– Define, duplicate, label, list, name, order, recognize, relate, recall

Comprehension—Classify, describe, discuss, explain, express, identify, indicate, locate, recognize, report, review, select, translate

Application– Analyze, choose, demonstrate, dramatize, employ, illustrate, interpret, practice, write

Analysis– Analyze, appraise, explain, calculate, categorize, compare, criticize, discriminate, examine

Synthesis– Rearrange, assemble, collect, compose, create, design, develop, formulate, manage, write

Evaluation– Appraise, argue, assess, choose, compare, defend, estimate, explain, judge, predict, rate, core, select, support, value

Remember– Retrieve knowledge from long-term memory, recognize, recall, locate, identify

Understand – Construct meaning, clarify, paraphrase, represent, translate, illustrate, give examples, classify, categorize, summarize, generalize, predict

Apply – Carry out or use a procedure in a given situation; carry out or use/apply to an unfamiliar task

Analyze – Break into constituent parts, determine how parts relate

Evaluate – Make judgments based on criteria, check, detect inconsistencies/fallacies, critique

Create – Put elements together to form a coherent whole, reorganize elements into new patterns/structures.

Page 12: Mapping Rigor Putting the Pieces Together

What is DOK?

Webb’s Depth-of-Knowledge LevelsDOK-1 – Recall & Reproduction – Recall of a fact, term, principle, concept; perform a routine procedure; locate details

DOK-2 – Basic Application of Skills/Concepts – Use of information; conceptual knowledge; select appropriate procedures for a given task; two or more steps with decision points along the way; routine problems; organize/ display data; interpret/use simple graphs; summarize; identify main idea; explain relationships; make predictions

DOK-3 – Strategic Thinking – Requires reasoning, or developing a plan or sequence of steps to approach problem; requires decision making or justification; abstract, complex or non-routine; often more than one possible answer; support solutions or judgments with text evidence

DOK-4 – Extended Thinking – An investigation or application to real world; requires time to research, problem solve, and process multiple conditions of the problem or task; non-routine manipulations; synthesize information across disciplines/content areas/multiple sources.

Let’s watch a video

Page 13: Mapping Rigor Putting the Pieces Together
Page 14: Mapping Rigor Putting the Pieces Together

DOK is about depth & complexity –

Not difficulty!

The intended student learning outcome determines the DOK level. What mental process must occur?

While verbs may appear to point to a DOK level, it is what comes after the verb that is the best indicator of the rigor/DOK level.

Describe the process of photosynthesis

Describe how the two political parties are alike and different

Describe the most significant effect of WWII on the nations of Europe

Page 15: Mapping Rigor Putting the Pieces Together
Page 16: Mapping Rigor Putting the Pieces Together

Hess’s Cognitive Rigor Matrix:

Applies Webb’s DOK to RBT Cognitive Process Dimensions

Depth + Thinking

Level 1

Recall & Reproduction

Level 2

Basic Skills &

Concepts

Level 3

Strategic Thinking & Reasoning

Level 4

Extended

Thinking

RememberRecall, locate basic facts, details, events

UnderstandSelect appropriate words to use when intended meaning is clearly evident

Specify, explain relationships, summarize, identify main ideas

Explain, generalize, or connect ideas using supporting evidence

Explain how concepts or ideas specifically relate to other content domains or concepts

ApplyUse language structure or word relationships to determine meaning

Use contest to identify meaning of word, obtain and interpret information using text features

Use concepts to solve non-routine problems

Devise an approach among many alternatives to research a novel problem

Analyze

Identify whether information is contained in a graph, table, etc.

Compare literacy elements, terms, facts, events, analyze format, organization, & text structures

Analyze or interpret author’s craft to critique a text

Analyze multiple sources or texts

Analyze complex/ abstract themes

EvaluateCite evidence and develop a logical argument for conjectures

Evaluate relevancy, accuracy, & completeness of information

CreateBrainstorm ideas about a topic

Generate conjectures based on observations or prior knowledge

Synthesis information within one source of text

Synthesize information across multiple sources or texts

Page 17: Mapping Rigor Putting the Pieces Together

Story: Little Red Riding Hood

Where do these questions fit into the matrix?

1. Retell or summarize the story in your own words.2. What was the story’s setting?3. What is your opinion about the intelligence of the wolf? Justify using

details/evidence from the story.4. What color was Red’s cape?5. Identify transitional words and phrases that helped you know the

sequence of events in the story.6. Write a telephone conversation between Little Red Riding Hood and her

mother that explains the wolf incident.7. What did the wolf do to trick Little Red Riding Hood?8. What is the same and different about your grandmother’s house and the house in the story?9. Who was the main character?10. Are all wolves (in literature) like the wolf in this story? Support your response using evidence from other texts.11. How did the story end?12. Where was Little Red Riding Hood going?13. What are some of the examples of personification used in the story?

Page 18: Mapping Rigor Putting the Pieces Together

Hess CR MatrixWrite the number for each set of questions in the correct cell in the CR Matrix

Depth + Thinking Level 1

Recall & Reproduction

Level 2

Basic Skills &

Concepts

Level 3

Strategic Thinking & Reasoning

Level 4

Extended

Thinking

Remember

Understand

Apply

Analyze

Evaluate

Create

Page 19: Mapping Rigor Putting the Pieces Together

Depth + Thinking Level 1Recall & Reproduction

Level 2Basic Skills &Concepts

Level 3 Strategic Thinking & Reasoning

Level 4 Extended Thinking

Remember

(4) What color was Red’s cape?(12) Where was little red riding hood going?(7) What did the wolf do to trick Little Red Riding Hood? (11)How did the story end?

Understand(9) Who was the main character? (2) What was the story’s setting?

(1) Retell or summarize the story in your own words.

Apply(5) Identify transitional words and phrases to help you know the sequence of events in the story.

Analyze

(13) What are some examples of personification in the story? (8)What is the same and different about your grandmother’s house and the house in the story?

(10) Are all wolfs (in literature) like the wolf in this story? Support your response using evidence from other texts.

Evaluate

(3) What is your opinion about the intelligence of the wolf? Justify using details/evidence from the story.

Create

(6) Write a telephone conversation between Little Red Riding Hood and her mother that explains the wolf incident.

Page 20: Mapping Rigor Putting the Pieces Together

• What happens when you

RIGOR

Page 21: Mapping Rigor Putting the Pieces Together
Page 22: Mapping Rigor Putting the Pieces Together

• Kindergarten Antiques Road Show

• Math Games

Page 23: Mapping Rigor Putting the Pieces Together

Is it rigor?

Page 24: Mapping Rigor Putting the Pieces Together

Resources

Google Site

https://sites.google.com/a/nhcs.net/rigor-depth-and-complexity/

Page 25: Mapping Rigor Putting the Pieces Together

Rigor in Curriculum

• WCPSS has a tool called CMAPP which serves as an instructional guide

• Tiered activities to include all levels of students

• Efforts to align CMAPP with Common Core Standards started this year

Page 26: Mapping Rigor Putting the Pieces Together

Using DOK on a Daily Basis

• DOK charts in student notebooks– Students take ownership and understand their

own learning process– Natural differentiation

• Assignments directly using DOK– Creating study guides – Make an assessment & answer it

Page 27: Mapping Rigor Putting the Pieces Together

Revised Bloom’s in the Classroom

• WCPSS provides posters for all classrooms– Reminder to students and teachers– Consistency of language

• Encouraged to reference frequently to students– Increased self-efficacy in students– Helps to see growth in individuals &

curriculum

Page 28: Mapping Rigor Putting the Pieces Together

Is DOK different from Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy?

Depth of Knowledge (DOK) is a scale of cognitive demand. The Depth of Knowledge is NOT determined by the verb, but the context in which the verb is used and the depth of thinking required. See example below:

DOK 3-Describe a model that you might use to represent the relationships that exist within the rock cycle. (Requires deep understanding of rock cycle and a determination of how best to represent it)DOK 2-Describe the difference between metamorphic and igneous rocks. (Requires cognitive processing to determine the differences in the two rock types)DOK 1-Describe three characteristics of metamorphic rocks. (Simple recall)

Same verb—used at all three DOK levels

Focus of DOK

DOK requires looking at the assessment item/standard in order to determine the level.DOK is about the item/standard and not the students’ ability. The context of the assessment item/standard must be considered to determine the DOK-not just a look at what verb was chosen

Page 29: Mapping Rigor Putting the Pieces Together

Rigorous Assessments• Days of definition tests and T/F are OVER!

• Use DOK/RB to create questions: classroom and standardized

• Better matches differentiation & rigor in curriculum

• MSL/EOG Training – Major Shift in Thinking!

• Are all my “Good Questions” Garbage??!!

• Question Makeovers

Page 30: Mapping Rigor Putting the Pieces Together

Short List of Do’s & Don’ts for Stems

• Stems should:– Be reasonably short and contain no extra info– Ask about only one objective– Not contain the word “not”– Avoid “of the following”– Avoid biased topics, slang words, etc.

Page 31: Mapping Rigor Putting the Pieces Together

Short List of Do’s & Don’ts for Foils

• Foils should:– Avoid “none/all of the above”

• “a & c only” • etc.

– Have four plausible answers– Have answers nearly the same length– Avoid “crazy” answers or distracters

Page 32: Mapping Rigor Putting the Pieces Together

Sample EOG Question How would smoking tobacco most likely

have a negative impact on the ability of an individual to succeed at physical activities?

A. It interferes with balance & coordination

B. It decreases the ability to make decisions rapidly

C. It decreases stamina and cardiovascular efficiency

D. It decreases the speed & power of muscle contractions.

Page 33: Mapping Rigor Putting the Pieces Together

Old Question

What is a physical change?

A.A change that produces a new substance

B.A change that does not produce a new substance

C.A change where atoms are rearranged

D.None of the above

Page 34: Mapping Rigor Putting the Pieces Together

Better? More rigorous? Or not? A teacher does a demonstration for her class with a piece of

notebook paper. Using a balance, she discovers that the mass of the paper is 20 g. She then takes the piece of paper and cuts it into several small pieces. The cumulative mass of the small pieces is 20 g. What have the students observed?

A. a chemical change involving change of shape and size of

matter

B. a chemical change involving change of mass

C. a physical change involving change of shape and size of

matter D. a physical change involving change of mass

Page 35: Mapping Rigor Putting the Pieces Together

Is this a rigorous question?A paleontologist is giving a presentation about her research that theropod dinosaurs like Tyrannosaurus Rex walked more upright than bent over. She has a photo from her recent field research of a theropod track. How do you think she plans to use the photograph and diagram with Theropod A and Theropod B to support her theory?

Page 36: Mapping Rigor Putting the Pieces Together

Questions

Page 37: Mapping Rigor Putting the Pieces Together

Contact InformationShelley HollingsworthHeritage Middle School

[email protected]

Karma MaplesCodington Elementary School

910-790-2236 ext. [email protected]

Elin ReubenRoland-Grise Middle School

910.350.2136 ext. 718 [email protected]