Upload
christopher-quentin-lawson
View
232
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Ankita Prabhakar, Asst.Prof.
MANAGEMENT THEORIES
Ankita Prabhakar, Asst.Prof.
Figure 2.1 Chronological Development of Management Perspectives
Ankita Prabhakar, Asst.Prof.
Figure 2.2 Subfields of the Classical Perspective on Management
Focuses on the individual worker’s
productivityFocuses on the overall
organizational systemFocuses on
the functions of
management
Ankita Prabhakar, Asst.Prof.
A) Scientific Management
1) Frederick W. Taylor (1856-1915)• Father of “Scientific Management.
1. Attempted to define “the one best way” to perform every task through systematic study and other scientific methods.
2. Believed that improved management practices lead to improved productivity.
• Three areas of focus:
1. Task Performance
2. Supervision
3. Motivation
Ankita Prabhakar, Asst.Prof.
1. Task Performance
• Scientific management incorporates basic expectations of management, including:
1. Development of work standards
2. Selection of workers
3. Training of workers
4. Support of workers
Ankita Prabhakar, Asst.Prof.
2. Supervision
• Taylor felt that a single supervisor could not be an expert at all tasks.
• As a result, each first-level supervisor should be responsible only workers who perform a common function familiar to the supervisor.
Ankita Prabhakar, Asst.Prof.
3. Motivation
• Taylor believed money was the way to motivate workers to their fullest capabilities.
• He advocated a piecework system in which worker’s pay was tied to their output.
• Workers who met a standard level of production were paid a standard wage rate.
• Workers whose production exceeded the standard were paid at a higher rate for all of their production output.
Ankita Prabhakar, Asst.Prof.
A) Scientific Management (contd.)
2) Lillian Gilbreth1. A strong proponent of better working conditions as a
means of improving efficiency and productivity.2. Favored standard days with scheduled lunch breaks
and rest periods for workers.3. Strived for removal of unsafe working conditions and
the abolition of child labor.
Ankita Prabhakar, Asst.Prof.
B) Administrative Management
1) Henri Fayol (1841–1925)
1. First recognized that successful managers had to
understand the basic managerial functions.
2. Developed a set of 14 general principles of
management.
3. Fayol’s managerial functions of planning, leading,
organizing and controlling are routinely used in modern
organizations.
Ankita Prabhakar, Asst.Prof.
Ankita Prabhakar, Asst.Prof.
3. Bureaucratic Management
• Focuses on the overall organizational system.
• Bureaucratic management is based upon:
1. Firm rules
2. Policies and procedures
3. A fixed hierarchy
4. A clear division of labor
Ankita Prabhakar, Asst.Prof.
3. Bureaucratic Management (contd.)
Max Weber (1864–1920)
A German sociologist and historian who envisioned a
system of management that would be based upon
impersonal and rational behavior—the approach to
management now referred to as “bureaucracy.”
1. Division of labor
2. Hierarchy of authority
3. Rules and procedures
4. Impersonality
5. Employee selection and promotion
Ankita Prabhakar, Asst.Prof.
Weber’s Forms of Authority
• Traditional authority
Subordinate obedience based upon custom or tradition
(e.g., kings, queens, chiefs).
• Charismatic authority
Subordinates voluntarily comply with a leader because of
his or her special personal qualities or abilities (e.g.,
Martin Luther King, Gandhi).
• Rational-legal authority
Subordinate obedience based upon the position held by
superiors within the organization (e.g., police officers,
executives, supervisors).
© 2–14
Figure 2.3 Bureaucratic Hierarchical Power Structure
Ankita Prabhakar, Asst.Prof.
Theory 2: Neo Classical/ Behavioral
• Acknowledged the importance of human
behavior in shaping management style
• Is associated with:
1. Mary Parker Follett
2. Elton Mayo
3. Douglas McGregor
Ankita Prabhakar, Asst.Prof.
1. Mary Parker Follett
• An approach to solve the problems of power, authority,
conflict and control.
• Constructive Conflict
• Leader Vs. Boss
• Delegation of Authority
• Coordination needed at all the levels
Ankita Prabhakar, Asst.Prof.
Four principles of coordination to promote effective work
groups:
1. Coordination requires that people be in direct contact
with one another.
2. Coordination is essential during the initial stages of
any endeavor.
3. Coordination must address all factors and phases of
any endeavor.
4. Coordination is a continuous, ongoing process.
Follett Principles of Coordination
2. Elton Mayo
Ankita Prabhakar, Asst.Prof.
• Conducted the famous Hawthorne Experiments.
• “Hawthorne Effect”
1. Job satisfaction increases as workers were given
more freedom to -
a) determine condition of their working
environment.
b) set their own standards of output
2. Job satisfaction depend more on cooperation than
on physical working conditions.
• Criticized for lack of vigorous research, the experiments
were too narrow and small to generalization.
Ankita Prabhakar, Asst.Prof.
3. Douglas McGregor
• Proposed the Theory X and Theory Y styles of
management.
1. Theory X managers perceive that their subordinates
have an inherent dislike of work and will avoid it if at all
possible.
2. Theory Y managers perceive that their subordinates
enjoy work and that they will gain satisfaction from
performing their jobs.
Ankita Prabhakar, Asst.Prof.
Table 2.3 Comparison of Theory X and Theory Y Assumptions
Factor Theory X Assumptions Theory Y Assumptions
Employee attitude Employees dislike work and. Employees enjoy work and toward work will avoid it if at all possible. will actively seek it.
Management view Employees must be directed, Employees are self-motivatedof direction coerced, controlled, or threatened and self-directed toward achieving
to get them to put forth adequate effort. organizational goals. Employee view Employees wish to avoid responsibility; Employees seek responsibility; of direction they prefer to be directed and told what they wish to use their creativity, to do and how to do it. imagination, and ingenuity in performing their jobs.
Management style Authoritarian style of management Participatory style of management
Ankita Prabhakar, Asst.Prof.
Theory 3:The Quantitative Perspective
• Characterized by its use of mathematics, statistics, and
other quantitative techniques for management decision
making and problem solving.
• This approach has four basic characteristics:
1. A decision-making focus
2. Development of measurable criteria
3. Formulation of a quantitative model
4. The use of computers
Ankita Prabhakar, Asst.Prof.
The Quantitative Perspective (cont’d)
1. Decision-Making Focus
The primary focus of the quantitative approach is on problems or
situations that require direct action, or a decision, on the part of
management.
2. Measurable Criteria
The decision-making process requires that the decision maker select
some alternative course of action. The alternatives must be compared
on the basis of measurable criteria.
3. Quantitative Model
To assess the likely impact of each alternative on the stated criteria, a
quantitative model of the decision situation must be formulated.
4. Computers
Computers are quite useful in the problem-solving process.
Ankita Prabhakar, Asst.Prof.
Theory 4: Systems Perspective
An approach to problem solving based on an understanding of the basic structure of systems
Ankita Prabhakar, Asst.Prof.
Theory 4: Systems Perspective (contd.)
• Environmental interaction
1. Open systems must interact with the external
environment to survive.
2. Closed systems do not interact with the environment.
• Synergy: when all subsystems work together making the whole
greater than the sum of its parts.
• Entropy: the tendency for systems to decay over time.
Ankita Prabhakar, Asst.Prof.
Theory 5:The Contingency Perspective
• A view that proposes that there is no one best approach to
management for all situations.
1. Asserts that managers are responsible for determining
which managerial approach is likely to be most effective in
a given situation.
2. This requires managers to identify the key contingencies in
a given situation.
Ankita Prabhakar, Asst.Prof.
Blending Components into a Contingency Perspective
Ankita Prabhakar, Asst.Prof.
An Example of the Contingency Perspective
• Joan Woodward’s Research
• Discovered that a particular management style is
affected by the organization’s technology.
• Identified and described three different types of
technology:
1. Small-batch technology
2. Mass-production technology
3. Continuous-process technology
Ankita Prabhakar, Asst.Prof.
Production TechnologyExamples
Small-batch Custom fabrication machine shop,technology manufacturer of neon advertising signs,
print shop specializing in personal business
cards, trophy-engraving shop
Mass-production Manufacturer of automobiles, manufacturertechnology of refrigerators, manufacturer of hair dryers,
manufacturer of pencils
Continuous-process Oil refinery, flour mill, soft drink bottler,technology chemical processor
Ankita Prabhakar, Asst.Prof.
Management in the 21st Century
• William Ouchi’s Theory Z
• Japanese-style approach to management developed by
William Ouchi
1. Advocates trusting employees and making them feel
like an integral part of the organization.
2. Based on the assumption that once a trusting
relationship with workers is established, production
will increase.