Upload
phallon-caddell
View
31
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Magnetic Vibration Damper for Space Applications. P11566 20101 / 20102. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Magnetic Vibration Damper for Space Applications
PlanningConcept Develop
mentDesign Fabricati
on
Test & Verificati
on
Background Principle: When a conductor moves through a magnetic field, an eddy current is generated (like a paddle through water) which dissipates mechanical energy as electrical current through the conductor. The motion of the damper will behave according to the equation of motion for a spring-damper system, shown below. The zeta calculation referenced in customer needs backs out of the ‘c’ damping coefficient.
Concept Generation: • Magnets fixed, conductor mobile• Conductor fixed, magnets mobile
Design Selection: The first method was chosen to minimize magnetic leakage. The magnet array is mounted on a cast iron bridge to amplify the magnetic field strength and allows a copper vane to move between to dissipate the energy in the system. The motion is constrained by a set of laser cut flexures. The design sought to maximize use of off the shelf parts.
The magnets used are rare earth, neodymium magnets, rated at 14,800 Gauss with a pull force of ~40 lbs. Very strong.
Mission: To develop a prototype of a solid state eddy current damper for use in satellite and aerospace applications and to deliver it with an accurate analytical model of system performance and test fixture in 25 weeks.
Team (left to right):Jake Norris (ME)- Fabrication EngineerTom Sciotto (IE)- Lead EngineerTiffany Heyd (ME)- Simulation EngineerBen Hensel (ME)- Test EngineerDr. Alan Raisanen- Faculty Guide
Special Thanks to:Phil Vallone of ITTRob Kraynik and the entire ME shop staffDr. Linda BartonDr. Marca LamDr. Mark KempskiDr. P. Venkataraman
P1156620101 / 20102
Customer Need Parameter SpecificationCritical to deliver prototype that matches analytical model.10-25% Damping Constant Zeta appropriate stiffness of system
Damping Coefficient Zeta 10% to 25%
½" range of motion mandatory, desired 1" Amplitude ±0.25" to ±0.50"
Component for space applications
Operating Temperature -40° C to 80° COperating Pressure Envelope 0 Pa
Has to last 10 years Lifecycle 158,000 cyclesWeight must be less than 10kg Mass <1 kgPayload to be damped is approx. 60 kg (system of 6 dampers) Load 10 kgSystem must not be affected by magnetic field beyond 6"
Magnetic Field Strength @ 6" from <20 mG @ 6"
Need to damp 1 Hz vibration in motion and 100 Hz vibration while
stationary
Frequency (maneuver) 1 HzFrequency (stationary) 100 Hz
No tin, zinc, or organic volatiles
Not suitable for space applications due to "whisker" formation and off
gassing.No Rubbing of Components
Very difficult to model "stick slip" occurrences.
Factor of safety of 2
Copper vane is free to move through magnet array.
Flexure constrains motion
Layers promote easy modification
Cast iron bridges magnetic field, amplifies power greatly
Known issues: • During testing it was difficult to find a consistent method to vibrate
the damper.• While exploring different options and trying different techniques, a
shift in the magnetic array caused rubbing.• It is unknown whether the model matches the prototype, or what
level the prototype was performing at before the array shift happened.
• Unit is very heavy, assumptions were made that the actual unit would contain aero grade materials.
• Unable to test at temperature extremes or in vacuum.
Proposed Work:• Use non-conductive magnetic bridge to make simpler magnetic
field.• Attempt to design to last for proposed life cycle.• Make continuous strides to reduce weight of the unit.• Consider designs that would reduce possibility of rubbing.• Consider trade off of swapping copper for aluminum conductor
(conductivity vs. weight).• Effect on damping coefficient from increasing magnet layers.
Test fixture with unit attached to shaker table …before the test caused the shaker to overheat.
Damping Force (lbf)
Damping Coefficient, c (lbf-s/in)
Spring Constant, k (lbf/in)
Zeta (%)
Experimental 0.65 1.31 82.87 7.25%
Theoretical 1.81 3.62 20.87 13.83%
Difference 64% 64% 297% 48%
Theoretical eddy current produced from conductor moving through a pair of magnets at 0.5 in./sec (from COMSOL).