Upload
o-r-therkildsen
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Low Pathogenic Avian Influenza (H7N1) TransmissionBetween Wild Ducks and Domestic DucksO. R. Therkildsen1, T. H. Jensen2*, K. J. Handberg2, K. Bragstad3 and P. H. Jørgensen2
1 National Environmental Research Institute, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark2 National Veterinary Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Aarhus, Denmark3 Department of Virology, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark
Impacts
• The paper describes a virological investigation in a mixed flock of domestic
ducks and geese and mallards reared for shooting following detection of
avian influenza virus antibodies subtype H5 in domestic geese.
• Low pathogenic avian influenza virus subtype H7N1 was found in both
domestic ducks and wild mallards, indicating that transmission of H7N1
virus was likely to have taken place between these.
• The importance of implementing and maintaining appropriate biosecurity
measures is re-emphasized.
Introduction
Wild waterbirds are considered the natural reservoir for
avian influenza viruses (AIV) (Olsen et al., 2006). North-
ern European outbreaks of highly pathogenic AI have
originated from low pathogenic avian influenza viruses
(LPAIV) previously found in waterbirds (Munster et al.,
2005). So far, only H5 and H7 AIV subtypes are known
to potentially become highly pathogenic after introduc-
tion to domestic birds (Webster et al., 1992; Banks et al.,
2001). Cross-species transmission of LPAIV seems to
occur regularly in wild bird populations (Ferro et al.,
2008; Siembieda et al., 2010) and LPAIV subtypes in
poultry partially reflects those found in wild birds (Olsen
et al., 2006). However, direct evidence of transmission of
LPAIV between wild and domestic birds has been difficult
to establish. Here, we present a case of concomitant isola-
tion of LPAIV H7N1 viruses in domestic ducks (Anas
platyrhynchos domesticus) and wild mallards (Anas platy-
rhynchos) indicating that disease transfer between these
had taken place.
In April 2008, the Danish national surveillance of AI
detected antibodies against AIV subtype H5 in a flock of
domestic geese (Anser anser domesticus). Accordingly, a
virological investigation was carried out on the premises,
which also held domestic ducks and mallards reared for
shooting. A flock of up to 200 wild mallards at a pond
about 50 m away from the sheds were included in the
Keywords:
Avian influenza; wild ducks; domestic ducks;
mallards; transmission
Correspondence:
O. R. Therkildsen. Department of Wildlife
Ecology & Biodiversity, National Environmental
Research Institute, Aarhus University, Kalø,
Grenavej 14, DK-8410 Rønde, Denmark.
Tel.: +45 89201700; Fax: +45 89201514;
E-mail: [email protected]
*First two authors contributed equally to this
work.
Received for publication January 23, 2010
doi: 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01375.x
Summary
This article describes a virological investigation in a mixed flock of ducks and
geese following detection of avian influenza virus antibodies in domestic geese.
Low pathogenic H7N1 was found in both domestic and wild birds, indicating
that transmission of virus was likely to have taken place between these. The
importance of implementing and maintaining appropriate biosecurity measures
is re-emphasized.
Zoonoses and Public Health
312 ª 2010 Blackwell Verlag GmbH • Zoonoses Public Health. 58 (2011) 312–317
investigation. The wild mallards were considered the most
plausible source of infection as they had access to spilled
food on the premises and were seen to mix with the
domestic geese. Subsequently, isolates of LPAIV H7N1,
but none of subtype H5, were obtained from both
domestic ducks and wild mallards at the pond on the
premises. The infected flocks, but not the wild mallards,
were stamped out immediately.
To investigate the extent to which AIV was present in
local wild birds, samples from wild mallards, a common
LPAIV host (Munster et al., 2005), and shelducks (Tadorna
tadorna) were subsequently collected at nearby sites.
Mallards and shelducks are abundant breeding species in
Danish farmland occupying smaller wetlands.
Materials and Methods
The flock consisted of 300 domestic geese, 250 domestic
ducks and 1500 mallards reared for shooting (Mellerg-
aard, 2008). The domestic geese and domestic ducks were
kept in the same shed in separate sections; only the geese
had access to outside areas. The mallards reared for
shooting were kept in outside pens covered with nets.
None of these had access to the nearby pond, but the
wild mallards present at the pond were seen to mix with
the geese in the outside areas and occasionally entered the
shed to feed.
On 21 April, sera from domestic ducks (n = 23),
domestic geese (n = 22) and mallards reared for shooting
(n = 45) were collected as part of the national surveil-
lance programme. On 24 April, following the detection of
antibodies against AIV subtype H5 in the domestic geese,
swabs were collected from the domestic geese (n = 10)
and domestic ducks (n = 10) to confirm the serological
analysis. On 29 April, tracheal and cloacal swabs from
domestic ducks (n = 20) in sheds and wild mallards at a
pond in the premises (n = 24) and sera from domestic
ducks (n = 50) in sheds were collected for further diag-
nostic investigation. For animal welfare reasons, tracheal
swabs were taken only from dead birds.
The survey was extended to include 33 ponds and
flooded fields up to approximately 10 km from the farm
(Table 1, Fig. 1); here, samples of fresh droppings from
wild mallards (n = 46) and shelducks (n = 10) were col-
lected from 8 to 18 May.
Antibody titres were determined by haemagglutination
inhibition test (HI) as described by Commission of the
European Communities, Council Directive (CEC 2006).
A/Ostrich/Denmark/72420/96 (H5N2) and A/Duck/Den-
mark/64650/03 (H5N7) were used as antigens for detec-
tion of antibodies against AIV H5 in domestic geese,
domestic ducks and mallards reared for shooting (21
April). A/Turkey/England/647/77 (H7N7) and A/African
Starling/983/79 (H7N1) were used for detection of anti-
Table 1. Samples from domestic geese, domestic ducks, mallards reared for shooting, wild mallards and shelducks tested for avian influenza
Sampling
date
No. samples
(n · pools of) Species Origin of birds
Type of
sample
Results RT-PCR*Virus
isolation
Sequence
analysis
Serology
(HI)
M H5 H7 H5 H7
21 April 23 D. duck Premises (shed) Serum – – – – – 0/23 0/23
21 April 22 D. goose Premises (shed) Serum – – – – – 3/22 0/22
21 April 45 Mallard r.s. Premises (shed) Serum – – – – – 0/45 0/45
24 April 10 (2 · 5) D. goose Premises (shed) Oropharyngeal 0/2 0/2 0/2 Nd Nd – –
24 April 10 (2 · 5) D. goose Premises (shed) Cloacal 0/2 0/2 0/2 Nd Nd – –
24 April 10 (2 · 5) D. duck Premises (shed) Oropharyngeal 0/2 0/2 0/2 Nd Nd – –
24 April 10 (2 · 5) D. duck Premises (shed) Cloacal 2/2 0/2 2/2 2/2 (H7N1) LP H7 – –
29 April 20 (not pooled) D. duck Premises (shed) Tracheal 0/20 0/20 0/20 Nd Nd – –
29 April 20 (not pooled) D. duck Premises (shed) Cloacal 1/20 0/20 1/20 Nd� LP H7 – –
29 April 50 D. duck Premises (shed) Serum – – – – – 0/50 5/50
29 April 24 (4 · 5, 1 · 4) W. mallard Premises (pond) Tracheal 0/5 0/5 0/5 Nd Nd – –
29 April 24 (4 · 5, 1 · 4) W. mallard Premises (pond) Cloacal 3/5 0/5 2/5 2/5 (H7N1)� LP H7 – –
8–18 May 46 (16 · 1, 8 · 2,
2 · 3, 2 · 4)§W. mallard Nearby sites Faeces 0/28 0/28 0/28 Nd Nd – –
8–18 May 10 (1 · 1, 3 · 2, 1 · 3)§ Shelduck Nearby sites Faeces 0/5 0/5 0/5 Nd Nd – –
HI, haemagglutination inhibition test; D, domestic; W, wild; r.s.: reared for shooting; Nd, not done.
*Number of positive samples or pools of the total number of samples or pools tested. The H7 sequence analyses were performed on these sam-
ples.�The sample became unavailable for virus isolation.�One of the sample positive for the M gene by RT-PCR did not yield a virus isolate.§Pools represent different sampling sites.
O. R. Therkildsen et al. Transmission of LPAIV H7N1
ª 2010 Blackwell Verlag GmbH • Zoonoses Public Health. 58 (2011) 312–317 313
bodies against AIV H7 as recommended by CEC (2007).
Two AIV subtype antigens were used to elucidate
potential cross reactivity with the N protein (CEC, 2007).
The sera collected from the ducks on 29 April were
tested against A/Ostrich/Denmark/72420/96 (H5N2) and
A/African Starling/983/79 (H7N1) antigens.
Swab samples (Table 1) were transported in phosphate
buffered saline with antibiotics and tested by reverse
transcriptase (RT)-PCR and virus isolation (CEC, 2006).
Total RNA was extracted from swabs using the RNeasy
Mini kit (Qiagen, Sollentuna, Sweden) following the
manufacturer’s protocol. RT-PCR was performed using
the FB-AI-M52C and -M253 primers for M-gene detec-
tion (Fouchier et al., 2000); GK7-3 and -4 primers for
H7 detection and H5-KHA-1 and -3 primers for H5
identification (Slomka et al., 2007). RT-PCR amplicons
were sequenced by DNA Technology (Aarhus, Denmark)
using FB-AI-M52C and -M253 primers for M gene and
GK7-3 and -4 primers for H7 identification.
Virus isolation was achieved by inoculating swab super-
natant in the allantoic cavity of 8- to 10-day-old specific
pathogen free chicken embryos (Lohmann Tierzucht,
Cuxhaven, Germany). The allantoic fluid from eggs with
dead embryos and eggs harvested after 6 days of incuba-
tion were examined for haemagglutinating activity (CEC,
2006). Neuraminidase inhibition assay for N typing of the
isolates was performed according to Alexander (1974).
RT-PCR and sequencing of the internal segments PB2,
PB1, PA, NP, M and NS of the two isolates from the wild
mallards were performed as described by Brown et al.
(1998). Partial sequence analyses were performed as
described by Handberg et al. (2009).
Full length sequencing was performed on the virus iso-
late from the domestic ducks. Viral RNA was extracted
from the allantoic fluid by an automated MagNA Pure
LC Instrument applying the MagNa Pure LC Total
Nucleic Acid Isolation Kit (Roche Diagnostics, Basel,
Switzerland). The different gene segments were amplified
by OneStep RT-PCR Kit (Qiagen) as previously described
(Bragstad et al., 2007) including a 2-min elongation step
for all genes. The primers for RT-PCR were subtype uni-
versal targeting the highly conserved non-coding RNA
regions at the 5¢- and 3¢-end of each segment (Hoffmann
et al., 2001). PCR products were purified using the
GFX� PCR DNA and Gel Band Purification Kit (Amer-
sham Biosciences, Freiburg, Germany) prior to sequenc-
ing. Purified PCR products were sequenced directly. The
sequencing reaction was performed by ABI PRISM Big-
Dye Terminators v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Bio-
systems, Foster City, CA, USA) as described previously
(Bragstad et al., 2005). The development of the sequences
was performed on an automatic ABI PRISM 3130 genetic
analyzer (Applied Biosystems) with 50 cm capillaries.
Consensus sequences were generated in seqscape Soft-
Fig. 1. Map illustrating the location of the premises, where LP H7N1 was isolated from wild mallards and domestic ducks, and nearby sites,
where samples from wild mallards and shelducks were collected.
Transmission of LPAIV H7N1 O. R. Therkildsen et al.
314 ª 2010 Blackwell Verlag GmbH • Zoonoses Public Health. 58 (2011) 312–317
ware v2.5 (Applied Biosystems). Sequence assembly, mul-
tiple alignment and alignment trimming were performed
using the bioedit software v.7.0.5 (Hall, 1999).
Genbank accession numbers
Full-genome sequences of A/duck/Denmark/53-147-8/08
are available in GenBank with the following accession
numbers: HA GQ401157, NA GQ401158, NP GQ401159,
M GQ401160, NS GQ401161, PB2 GQ401162, PB1
GQ401163 and PA GQ401164.
Results and Discussion
Initially, the serological surveillance programme revealed
AIV subtype H5 antibodies in three domestic geese
(Table 1). This finding triggered further investigations. By
this, LPAIV H7 was subsequently identified by PCR and
A/duck/Denmark/ 53-147-8/08 (H7N1) was isolated from
domestic ducks housed in sheds adjacent to the domestic
geese (Fig. 2). On the basis of the partial sequence analy-
ses of the H7 gene and the internal fragments PB2, PB1,
PA, NP, M and NS, we conclude that this isolate was
A/turkey/Italy/8535/2002 (H7N3)
A/turkey/Italy/214845/02 (H7N3)
A/turkey/Italy/220158/2002 (H7N3)
A/turkey/Italy/214845/2002 (H7N3)
A/chicken/Italy/270638/02 (H7N3)
A/chicken/England/4054/2006 (H7N3)
A/chicken/England/4266/2006 (H7N3)
A/mallard/Sweden/S90597/2005 (H7N7)
A/mallard/Netherlands/33/2006 (H7N8)
A/duck/Denmark/53-147-8/08 (H7N1)
A/mallard/Netherlands/29/2006 (H7N2)
A/mallard/Netherlands/22/2007 (H7N1)
A/mallard/Netherlands/12/2000 (H7N3)
A/mallard/Netherlands/12/00 (H7N3)
A/chicken/Italy/322/2001 (H7N1)
A/turkey/Italy/3489/1999 (H7N1)
A/turkey/Italy/4603/99 (H7N1)
A/turkey/Italy/1084/2000 (H7N1)
A/duck/Nanchang/1904/1992 (H7N1)
A/Pekin robin/California/30412/1994 (H7N1)
A/parakeet/Netherlands/267497/94 (H7N1)
A/duck/Hongkong/301/72 (H7N1)
A/chicken/Germany/1934 (H7N1)
A/FPV/Rostock/1934 (H7N1)
A/mallard/Alberta/34/2001 (H7N1)
A/rhea/North Carolina/39482/1993 (H7N1)
0.02
100
100
100100
10099
72
77
93100
100
100
97
97
7389
9997
98
79
95
100
100
A/guinea fowl/Italy/155/2000 (H7N1)
A/mallard/Italy/43/01 (H7N3)
A/mallard/Italy/33/01 (H7N3)
A/mallard/Italy/199/01 (H7N3)
A/mallard/Italy/250/02 (H7N1)
A/mute swan/Hungary/5973/2007 (H7N7)
Fig. 2. Evolutionary relationship of the HA nucleotide sequence (1685 bp) of A/duck/Denmark/53-147-8/08(H7N1) compared to the twenty most
closely related H7 viruses and other representative H7N1 viruses public available. The Danish isolate is indicated in bold typeface in the mid-point
rooted neighbour joining tree. Bootstrap values of 1000 resamplings in percent (>70%) are indicated.
O. R. Therkildsen et al. Transmission of LPAIV H7N1
ª 2010 Blackwell Verlag GmbH • Zoonoses Public Health. 58 (2011) 312–317 315
identical to the LPAIV H7N1 isolates obtained a few days
later from wild mallards at a pond in the premises. The
sequence analysis also showed that this virus has high
similarity with other European virus sequences (Fig. 2).
One sample from the domestic ducks was positive by
PCR, but unfortunately, the sample was not available for
virus isolation.
The detection of both antibodies against AIV H5 and
LPAIV H7N1 showed that at least two strains of AIV had
been introduced to the flock. Most likely, the domestic
geese had experienced AIV H5 earlier and cleared the
virus, as no AIV subtype H5 could be detected by viro-
logical examination. Transmission of AIV between the
domestic geese and domestic ducks was not evident since
the geese had H5 antibodies and no detectable virus,
whereas LPAIV H7N1 and H7 antibodies were found in
the domestic ducks (Table 1). The initial failure to detect
antibodies against AIV subtype H7 during routine surveil-
lance could reflect a recent introduction of this subtype
into the flock as only five of 50 domestic ducks had anti-
bodies against AIV subtype H7 1 week later (Table 1).
Remarkably, although the results of the serological sur-
veillance suggested an infection with AIV of subtype H5,
only subtype H7N1 was detected in swabs collected
3 days after the sera had been collected.
The concomitant isolation of LPAIV H7N1 viruses in
the wild mallards at the pond next to the premises and
domestic ducks indicates a viral transmission between
these. However, it is not possible to determine whether
wild mallards had been the source of infection or if this
disease transfer had occurred from domestic ducks to the
wild mallards. The origin of the wild mallards at the
pond on the premises remains unknown, but they were
probably non-breeders attracted to the farm by spilled
food, since the spring migration had finished at the time
of the investigation. Unfortunately, no information about
turn-over in the flock during spring migration or local
movements between the premises and neighbouring areas
could be obtained. We are therefore unable to assess the
potential for transmission between infected wild mallards
at the nearby pond and the local wild bird reservoir.
Whilst the wild mallards may have introduced LPAIV
H7N1, the possibility of virus introduction by other feral
birds, virus-contaminated material or infected domestic
birds cannot be excluded. Previous studies indicate that
most introductions of highly pathogenic H5N1 in Europe
have been through migrating birds (Kilpatrick et al.,
2006). Likewise, wild mallards were reported to be the
source of an H7N3 outbreak in turkeys in Italy (Campi-
telli et al., 2004), although it should be noted that indi-
rect transmission from environmental virus reservoirs
may be an underestimated source of infection (Rohani
et al., 2009).
As AIV was not detected in our sampling of wild mal-
lards and shelducks at nearby sites outside the premises
(Table 1, Fig. 1), we suggest that until the flocks were
stamped out, the spread of LP H7N1 from the infected
population at the premises either had not taken place or
had been limited. This suggests little or no movement of
individuals between the pond and nearby sites or low
rates of disease transmission between individuals.
Real-time PCR was not performed on the samples and
therefore data on relative virus loads are not available.
This case re-emphasizes the importance of implementing
and maintaining appropriate biosecurity measures at all
times, to minimize wild bird contact with domestic birds
at existing and new production facilities, especially through
the removal of food, and avoidance of waterbodies and
ponds, which may attract wild birds. This case also con-
firms that inappropriate biosecurity measures may facili-
tate direct transfer of AIV from infected poultry to the
avian reservoir of wild birds, which potentially could fur-
ther spread disease agents. During highly pathogenic avian
influenza outbreaks in poultry, this may even severely
threaten wild bird populations of conservation concern.
Acknowledgements
The collection of samples from wild birds was funded by
the Danish Food and Veterinary Agency. We wish to
thank Lars Hansen for collecting the samples. Tony Fox
kindly commented on the manuscript.
References
Alexander, D. J., 1974: Comparison of the neuraminidases of
three avian paramyxoviruses. Arch. Gesamte Virusforsch. 44,
28–34.
Banks, J., E. S. Speidel, E. Moore, L. Plowright, A. Piccirillo, I.
Capua, P. Cordioli, A. Fioretti, and D. J. Alexander, 2001:
Changes in the haemagglutinin and the neuraminidase genes
prior to the emergence of highly pathogenic H7N1 avian
influenza viruses in Italy. Arch. Virol. 146, 963–973.
Bragstad, K., P. H. Jørgensen, K. J. Handberg, S. Mellergaard,
S. Corbet, and A. Fomsgaard, 2005: New avian influenza A
virus subtype combination H5N7 identified in Danish mal-
lard ducks. Virus Res. 109, 181–190.
Bragstad, K., P. H. Jørgensen, K. J. Handberg, and A. Fomsg-
aard, 2007: Genome characterisation of the newly discovered
avian influenza A H5N7 virus subtype combination. Arch.
Virol. 152, 585–593.
Brown, I. H., P. A. Harris, J. W. McCauley, and D. J. Alexan-
der, 1998: Multiple genetic reassortment of avian and
human influenza A viruses in European pigs, resulting in
the emergence of an H1N2 virus of novel genotype. J. Gen.
Virol. 79, 2947–2955.
Transmission of LPAIV H7N1 O. R. Therkildsen et al.
316 ª 2010 Blackwell Verlag GmbH • Zoonoses Public Health. 58 (2011) 312–317
Campitelli, L., E. Mogavero, M. A. De Marco, M. Delogu, S.
Puzelli, F. Frezza, M. Facchini, C. Chiapponi, E. Foni, P.
Cordioli, R. Webby, G. Barigazzi, R. G. Webster, and I.
Donatelli, 2004: Interspecies transmission of an H7N3 influ-
enza virus from wild birds to intensively reared domestic
poultry in Italy. Virology 323, 24–36.
CEC, 2006: Council Directive 2006/437/EF. Virological tests
and evaluation of results. The Commission of the European
Communities. In: Official Journal of the European Union –
Approving a Diagnostic Manual for Avian Influenza as Pro-
vided for in Council Directive 2005/94/EC, pp. 16–17.
CEC, 2007: Council Decision 2007/268/EF. Surveillance pro-
grams in the member states concerning avian influenza in
poultry and wild birds. In: Official Journal of the European
Union May 3, 2007. L 115/3.
Ferro, P. J., J. El-Attrache, X. Fang, S. N. Rollo, A. Jester, T.
Merendino, M. J. Peterson, and B. Lupiani, 2008: Avian
Influenza Surveillance in Hunter-harvested Waterfowl from
the Gulf Coast of Texas (November 2005–January 2006).
J. Wildl. Dis. 44, 434–439.
Fouchier, R. A., T. M. Bestebroer, S. Herfst, L. Van Der Kemp,
G. F. Rimmelzwaan, and A. D. Osterhaus, 2000: Detection
of influenza A viruses from different species by PCR ampli-
fication of conserved sequences in the matrix gene. J. Clin.
Microbiol. 38, 4096–4101.
Hall, T. A., 1999: BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence
alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/
NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 41, 95–98.
Handberg, K. J., O. R. Therkildsen, and P. H. Jørgensen, 2009:
Genetic analysis of avian influenza virus form wild birds
and mallards reared for shooting in Denmark. Avian Dis.
54(Suppl. 1), 420–425.
Hoffmann, E., J. Stech, Y. Guan, R. G. Webster, and D. R.
Perez, 2001: Universal primer set for the full-length
amplification of all influenza A viruses. Arch. Virol. 146,
2275–2289.
Kilpatrick, A. M., A. A. Chmura, D. W. Gibbons, R. C.
Fleischer, P. P. Marra, and P. Daszak, 2006: Predicting the
global spread of H5N1 avian influenza. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
U.S.A. 103, 19368–19373.
Mellergaard, S., 2008: Alvorligt smitsomme husdyrsygdomme i
Europa. DVT 20, 18–19 In Danish.
Munster, V. J., A. Wallensten, C. Baas, G. F. Rimmelzwaan, M.
Schutten, B. Olsen, A. D. Osterhaus, and R. A. Fouchier, 2005:
Mallards and highly pathogenic avian influenza ancestral
viruses, northern Europe. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 11, 1545–1551.
Olsen, B., V. J. Munster, A. Wallensten, J. Waldenstrom, A. D.
Osterhaus, and R. A. Fouchier, 2006: Global patterns of
influenza a virus in wild birds. Science 312, 384–388.
Rohani, P., R. Breban, D. E. Stallknecht, and J. M. Drake,
2009: Environmental transmission of low pathogenicity
avian influenza viruses and its implications for pathogen
invasion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 10365–10369.
Siembieda, J. L., C. K. Johnson, C. Cardona, N. Anchell, N.
Dao, W. Reisen, and W. Boyce, 2010: Influenza A Viruses in
Wild Birds of the Pacific Flyway, 2005–2008. Vector Borne
Zoonotic Dis. 10. doi: 10.1089=vbz.2009.0095.
Slomka, M. J., V. J. Coward, J. Banks, B. Z. Londt, I. H.
Brown, J. Voermans, G. Koch, K. J. Handberg, P. H. Jørgen-
sen, M. Cherbonnel-Pansart, V. Jestin, G. Cattoli, I. Capua,
A. Ejdersund, P. Thoren, and G. Czifra, 2007: Identification
of sensitive and specific avian influenza polymerase chain
reaction methods through blind ring trials organized in the
European Union. Avian Dis. 51, 227–234.
Webster, R. G., W. J. Bean, O. T. Gorman, T. M. Chambers,
and Y. Kawaoka, 1992: Evolution and ecology of influenza
A viruses. Microbiol. Rev. 56, 152–179.
O. R. Therkildsen et al. Transmission of LPAIV H7N1
ª 2010 Blackwell Verlag GmbH • Zoonoses Public Health. 58 (2011) 312–317 317