1
Inpharma 1490 - 4 Jun 2005 Long-term insulin therapy does not improve survival after MI Among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, acutely- introduced, long-term insulin treatment does not improve survival following myocardial infarction (MI) when compared with standard treatment, according to results from the DIGAMI 2 * study. 1253 patients with diabetes who experienced MI were randomised to treatment with an IV insulin/ glucose infusion for 24 hours followed by SC insulin- based long-term glucose control (group 1; n = 474), IV insulin/glucose for 24 hours followed by standard insulin control (group 2; 473), or routine metabolic management (group 3). There were no significant between-group differences in the incidences of mortality, with estimated mortality rates of 23.4%, 21.2% and 17.9% in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Significantly fewer patients in group 3 than in groups 1 and 2 received an infusion of insulin/glucose. Although blood glucose levels were significantly lower in groups 1 and 2 than group 3 after 24 hours, there were no significant between-group differences in blood glucose and glycosylated haemoglobin levels when AUCs were compared. The incidences of stroke and myocardial infarction were lower in groups 2 and 3 than in group 1, but the differences between the groups were not significant. * Diabetes Insulin-Glucose in Acute Myocardial Infarction Malmberg K, et al. Intense metabolic control by means of insulin in patients with diabetes mellitus and acute myocardial infarction (DIGAMI 2): effects on mortality and morbidity. European Heart Journal 26: 650-661, No. 7, Apr 2005 800992227 1 Inpharma 4 Jun 2005 No. 1490 1173-8324/10/1490-0001/$14.95 Adis © 2010 Springer International Publishing AG. All rights reserved

Long-term insulin therapy does not improve survival after MI

  • View
    212

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Long-term insulin therapy does not improve survival after MI

Inpharma 1490 - 4 Jun 2005

Long-term insulin therapy does notimprove survival after MI

Among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, acutely-introduced, long-term insulin treatment does notimprove survival following myocardial infarction (MI)when compared with standard treatment, according toresults from the DIGAMI 2* study.

1253 patients with diabetes who experienced MIwere randomised to treatment with an IV insulin/glucose infusion for 24 hours followed by SC insulin-based long-term glucose control (group 1; n = 474), IVinsulin/glucose for 24 hours followed by standardinsulin control (group 2; 473), or routine metabolicmanagement (group 3).

There were no significant between-group differencesin the incidences of mortality, with estimated mortalityrates of 23.4%, 21.2% and 17.9% in groups 1, 2, and 3,respectively.

Significantly fewer patients in group 3 than ingroups 1 and 2 received an infusion of insulin/glucose.Although blood glucose levels were significantly lowerin groups 1 and 2 than group 3 after 24 hours, therewere no significant between-group differences in bloodglucose and glycosylated haemoglobin levels whenAUCs were compared.

The incidences of stroke and myocardial infarctionwere lower in groups 2 and 3 than in group 1, but thedifferences between the groups were not significant.* Diabetes Insulin-Glucose in Acute Myocardial Infarction

Malmberg K, et al. Intense metabolic control by means of insulin in patients withdiabetes mellitus and acute myocardial infarction (DIGAMI 2): effects on mortalityand morbidity. European Heart Journal 26: 650-661, No. 7, Apr 2005 800992227

1

Inpharma 4 Jun 2005 No. 14901173-8324/10/1490-0001/$14.95 Adis © 2010 Springer International Publishing AG. All rights reserved