21
Linking Behavior Support and Literacy Support Rob Horner and George Sugai University of Oregon and University of Connecticut OSEP TA Center on Positive Behavior Support www.pbis.org www.swis.org

Linking Behavior Support and Literacy Support

  • Upload
    kineta

  • View
    34

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Linking Behavior Support and Literacy Support. Rob Horner and George Sugai University of Oregon and University of Connecticut OSEP TA Center on Positive Behavior Support www.pbis.org www.swis.org. Goals. Define logic that links behavior support and academic supports. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Linking Behavior Support and Literacy Support

Linking Behavior Support and Literacy Support

Rob Horner and George SugaiUniversity of Oregon and University of Connecticut

OSEP TA Center on Positive Behavior Supportwww.pbis.orgwww.swis.org

Page 2: Linking Behavior Support and Literacy Support

Goals Define logic that links behavior support and

academic supports.

Provide summary of recent research

Page 3: Linking Behavior Support and Literacy Support
Page 4: Linking Behavior Support and Literacy Support

Logic Children who engage in problem behavior

typically do so for one of two MAIN reasons: Get access to attention (adult/ peer) Avoid/escape work or demands

Good instruction improves behavior Good behavior support improves academic

engagement… and academic gains.

Page 5: Linking Behavior Support and Literacy Support

Linking Academic and Behavior Supports Behavior and Academic supports are

connected Kent McIntosh Amanda Sanford Jorge Preciado Moira McKenna

Page 6: Linking Behavior Support and Literacy Support

Steps for Successful Readers (Roland Good)

Phonemic Awareness

(Spring, Kdg)

Fluency with Connected Text

(Spring, 1st)

Alphabetic Principle

(Winter, 1st)

Probability: On-Track .64 (n=348)

Probability: On-Track .86 (n=138)

Probability: Catch-Up .17 (n=183)

Probability: Catch-Up .22 (n=180)

Probability of remaining an average reader in fourth grade when an average reader in first grade is .87Probability of remaining a poor reader at the end of fourth grade when a poor reader at the end of first grade is .88 (Juel, 1988)

Fluency with Connected Text

(Spring, 2nd)

Fluency with Connected Text

(Spring, 3rd)

Probability: Catch-Up .03 (n=114)

Probability: Catch-Up .06 (n=213)

Probability: On-Track .83 (n=246)

Probability: On-Track .81 (n=196)

We need to have the odds with us!

Page 7: Linking Behavior Support and Literacy Support

Changing the Odds: Kindergarten Students at Benchmark On PSF Across Two Years

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Schools

Perc

en

t o

f S

tud

en

ts

Year 1

Year 2

Page 8: Linking Behavior Support and Literacy Support

Changing the Odds: First Grade Students at Benchmark On ORF Across Two Years

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Schools

Perc

en

t at

Ben

ch

mark

2004-2005

2005-2006

Page 9: Linking Behavior Support and Literacy Support

Big Ideas to Improve ReadingBig Ideas to Improve ReadingClear goals/objectives Research-based

instructional practicesInstructional timeInstructional leadershipResponsive intervention

programsAssessmentProfessional development

Page 10: Linking Behavior Support and Literacy Support

Guiding Questions In Reading Do you know what percent of Kindergartners are on

track for becoming a reader by the end of first grade? How much time is allocated and protected for

reading instruction daily? Does your school use a valid and reliable schoolwide

screening tool? Does your school use a research based basal

curriculum

Page 11: Linking Behavior Support and Literacy Support

School-Wide Support Systems for School-Wide Support Systems for Student SuccessStudent Success

ReadingBehavior

Universal InterventionCore Instruction, all studentsPreventive

Targeted InterventionSupplemental, somestudents, reduce risk

Intensive Intervention Individualized, functional assessment, highly specific

80%

7-15%

1-5%

Page 12: Linking Behavior Support and Literacy Support

Why Behavior and Reading Support? Both involve similar processes to achieve

desired outcomes and both are necessary for academic success

As disruptive student behavior decreases, teaching time increases, allowing all children to learn more.

As major discipline referrals decrease, school staff are free to address other school needs like supporting instruction.

Page 13: Linking Behavior Support and Literacy Support

Major Discipline Referrals per 100 Students by Cohort

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

Cohort 1 Cohort 2

Maj

or D

isci

plin

e Re

ferr

als

per

100

Stud

ents

04-05 05-06

n = 18

n = 8

Page 14: Linking Behavior Support and Literacy Support

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Year

Perc

ent

of

stud

en

ts

School District

Participating School Example: Fourth Grade Reading MEAP Results

Began Implementation

Page 15: Linking Behavior Support and Literacy Support

Percent of Students at DIBELS Benchmark level: Schoolwide

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Cohort 1 Cohort 2 Cohort 3

Perc

en

t

Spr '04 Spr '05 Spr '06

n = 20n = 29 n = 14

“Control group”

Page 16: Linking Behavior Support and Literacy Support

Additional Developmentsin SWPBS

Page 17: Linking Behavior Support and Literacy Support

SW-PBS and Teacher Stress/Efficacy Schools that create a predictable, consistent,

positive, and safe social culture are better places for TEACHERS.

Scott Ross

Page 18: Linking Behavior Support and Literacy Support

Braiding Bully Proofing into SWPBS Scott Ross

Page 19: Linking Behavior Support and Literacy Support

Extending SWPBS to the Bus Louise Bronaugh

Page 20: Linking Behavior Support and Literacy Support

Sustaining SWPBS Jennifer Doolittle

Page 21: Linking Behavior Support and Literacy Support

Summary Effective educational environments meet both

the academic and social needs of students.

Effective behavior support enhances academic outcomes.

Effective instruction enhances social behavior.