LIMITED ASBESTOS and LEAD PAINT SURVEY. Cardinal Lifeguard Station acm lbp report[1].pdfLP-10 Beige Wood Door - Interior office of Building

LIMITED ASBESTOS and LEAD PAINT SURVEY

Lifeguard Station

301 Cardinal Avenue

Ormond Beach, Volusia County, Florida

December 19, 2011

Terracon Project No. H1117469

Prepared for:

Volusia County Engineering Department

123 West Indiana Avenue Deland, Florida 32720-4262

Prepared by:

Terracon Consultants, Inc. Winter Park, Florida

TABLE OF CONTENTS Page

1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 1

1.1 Scope of Services ............................................................................................ 1

1.2 Standard of Care ............................................................................................. 1

1.3 General Conditions and Limitations ................................................................. 2

1.4 Reliance ........................................................................................................... 2

2.0 BUILDING DESCRIPTION ......................................................................................... 2

3.0 PURPOSE ................................................................................................................... 3

3.1 Limited Suspect Asbestos-Containing Material Sampling ............................... 3

3.2 Lead Paint Sampling ....................................................................................... 4

4.0 REGULATORY OVERVIEW ....................................................................................... 5

4.1 Asbestos .......................................................................................................... 5

4.2 Lead Paint ....................................................................................................... 6

5.0 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................... 7

5.1 Asbestos .......................................................................................................... 7

5.2 Lead Paint ....................................................................................................... 7

6.0 GENERAL COMMENTS ............................................................................................. 8 APPENDIX A Photographs APPENDIX B Sample Location Diagram APPENDIX C Asbestos and Lead Paint Sampling Laboratory Data APPENDIX D Inspector Accreditations

Reliable ■ Resourceful ■ Responsive

LIMITED ASBESTOS AND LEAD PAINT SURVEY

Lifeguard Station 301 Cardinal Avenue

Ormond Beach, Volusia County, Florida Terracon Project No. H1117469

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Scope of Services Terracon Consultants, Inc. (Terracon) conducted a limited asbestos and lead paint survey at the Lifeguard Station located at 301 Cardinal Avenue in Ormond Beach, Florida. Terracon understands that these services were requested due to planned demolition of the facility. The building is a single-story structure constructed in the 1950s and contains approximately 2,500 square-feet of office, garage/storage, recreation and restroom space. The observation tower was not part of this scope of work and not scheduled for renovation/demolition. Therefore, sampling of this structure was not conducted. The survey was conducted on November 29, 2011, in accordance with our Master Services Agreement Task Order PH1110164, dated October 6, 2011. The scope of work consisted of performing a limited asbestos and lead paint (LP) survey of the structure to determine demolition options regarding regulated materials. Bulk samples of suspect ACM were submitted under chain of custody to EMSL of Orlando, Florida for analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) with dispersion staining techniques per EPA methodology (600/R-93/116). The percentage of asbestos, where applicable, was determined by microscopic visual estimation. EMSL is accredited under the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP Accreditation No. 200738-0). Paint samples were chosen from each unique combination of paint color and substrate. The paint chips were collected and submitted to EMSL Analytical, Inc. in Orlando, Florida for lead content analysis. The paint chips were analyzed by Flame Atomic Absorption according to National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) method 7420. 1.2 Standard of Care Terracon conducted this assessment in general accordance with our referenced proposal and the asbestos sampling activities were conducted by an Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA)-accredited building inspector in general accordance with the sampling protocols established in EPA 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 763.

Limited Asbestos and Lead Based Paint Survey Lifeguard Station ■ Ormond Beach, Florida December 19, 2011 ■ Terracon Project No. H1117469

Reliable ■ Resourceful ■ Responsive 2

The Lead Paint (LP) sampling activities were conducted in general accordance with the EPA’s work practice standards for conducting lead paint activities (40 DFR 745.227, and State and local regulations). Lead is regulated by the EPA and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). 1.3 General Conditions and Limitations The above-described services were conducted at the site on November 29, 2011. The activities completed for this assessment were limited to the scope of services outlined in our Master Services Agreement Task Order PH1110164, dated October 6, 2011. Terracon did not attempt to identify every potential exposure or hazard present in the subject building. There may be conditions hidden from sight or inaccessible locations. Based on a request from the client, the asbestos and LP survey were limited to accessible areas of the structure. Access was provided by Volusia County Construction Manager Mr. Gary Morton. The results, findings, and recommendations expressed in this report are based exclusively on conditions observed during our site visit on November 29, 2011. The information contained in this report should not be relied upon to represent conditions that existed previously or at a later date. Terracon does not warrant the services of regulatory agencies, laboratories or other third parties supplying information, which may have been used in the preparation of this report. No warranty, express or implied is made. 1.4 Reliance This report is for the exclusive use of Volusia County for the project being discussed. No other individual or entity may rely on this report without written permission of Terracon and Volusia County. Reliance on this report by Volusia County and all authorized parties will be subject to the key understandings and limitations stated in our Task Order PH1110164 and this report.

2.0 BUILDING DESCRIPTION The building is a single-story structure, built in the 1950s and contains approximately 2,500 square feet of space. It is subdivided into three areas to include a garage area, recreation area and a restroom facility. It is constructed of concrete block and limited wood framed interior walls with wood paneling. The building is supported by a slab-on-grade concrete foundation. Exterior concrete block walls are predominantly finished with a brick facade. The roof system contains two different types of roofing materials; rolled roofing and a built-up roof system both supported by a concrete deck. Conventional windows and doors in aluminum frames were observed.



Interior walls consist predominantly of exposed concrete block and limited areas of wood paneling. The floor coverings consist of painted concrete and ceramic tile is present in the recreation area. The ceilings were open to the concrete roof deck with limited areas containing a suspended ceiling tile system. Conditioned air is provided by an electric HVAC system located in a closet with an exterior condensing unit (on grade) and two window mounted units are located in the recreation area and the break room. Duct work associated with the system is sealed with foil tape.

3.0 PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to perform an evaluation of the Lifeguard Station for the presence of ACM and LP that may impact planned demolition. The activities and procedures used to accomplish this task are as follows:

1. Review available information concerning the building including the dates of initial construction, significant renovations, types of construction, and information regarding the building's use.

2. Walk-around the interior and exterior of the building and observe accessible areas to

identify, locate, and assess suspect ACM and LP. 3. Bulk samples of suspect ACM will be collected and analyzed by Polarized Light

Microscopy (PLM) at an accredited laboratory under the National Institute of Standards and Technology's (NIST) certification program.

4. Collection and analysis of paint chip samples from component coatings and analysis

will be conducted by an AIHA/ELLAP accredited laboratory using Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (AAS) Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) method SW-846, 3rd edition, 7420 for the presence of lead.

5. Suspect asbestos bulk samples will be collected by an EPA accredited individual.

6. Prepare and submit a report of our findings.

Complete destructive observation and sampling procedures were not utilized during our evaluation of the building. The scope of our investigation is limited to accessible building materials suspected of containing ACM and/or LP. 3.1 Limited Suspect Asbestos-Containing Material Sampling The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) considers a (homogeneous) material to be asbestos containing if at least one sample of this material is greater than one percent (1%) asbestos. Conversely, EPA considers a homogeneous material to be non-asbestos containing if all the samples of that material contain 1% or less asbestos.



Terracon collected a total of fifteen (15) bulk samples from five (5) homogeneous areas of suspect ACM. The samples were placed into small plastic bags and shipped to EMSL Analytical, Inc. in Orlando, Florida with chain-of-custody for analysis by PLM. A summary of the asbestos sampling results obtained during this assessment are provided in Table 1 below.

TABLE 1 ASBESTOS SAMPLE SUMMARY

HA Sample

Nos. Description Sample Location Lab Results 1 A, B & C 2’x2’ Random Pattern

Ceiling Tile Garage Office Area ND

2 A, B & C 2’x4’ Random Pattern Ceiling Tile

Recreation Room ND

3 A, B & C Window Caulk Exterior Windows ND 4 A, B & C Built-up Roof System Exterior Roof ND 5 A, B & C Rolled Roof Material Exterior Roof ND

ND = none detected Based on the results of laboratory analysis, asbestos was not identified in samples collected and analyzed. The asbestos laboratory analytical report and chain of custody is included in Appendix C. 3.2 Lead Paint Sampling Terracon collected a total of ten (10) paint chip samples from unique combinations of paint color and substrate from areas representing the structure. The samples were placed into small plastic bags and shipped to EMSL Analytical, Inc. in Orlando, Florida with chain-of-custody for analysis by flame atomic absorption (FAA). A summary of the LP sampling results obtained during this assessment are provided in Table 2 below.

TABLE 2

LEAD PAINT SAMPLE SUMMARY

Sample No. Color Substrate Component

Result (% by

weight) LP-1 Beige CMU Block Wall – Exterior east wall of Building <0.010 LP-2 Green Wood Soffit - Exterior west wall of Building <0.010 LP-3 Beige Wood Trim - Exterior SW wall of Building 0.025 LP-4 Beige Concrete Wall – Exterior east wall of Building <0.010 LP-5 Green Metal Handrail – Exterior east side of Building <0.010 LP-6 Beige Wood Fence – Exterior east side of Building <0.010



Sample No. Color Substrate Component

Result (% by

weight) LP-7 Beige CMU Block Wall – Interior east wall of Building <0.010 LP-8 White Concrete Roof Deck – Interior Garage <0.010 LP-9 Beige Wood Door frame – Interior office of Building <0.010 LP-10 Beige Wood Door - Interior office of Building <0.010

Based on the results of analytical results, lead was detected at a concentration greater than the analytical method’s reporting limit in one sample (Sample LBP-3). The laboratory analytical report and chain of custody is included in Appendix C. Photo documentation of the site at the time of the survey is provided in Appendix A.

4.0 REGULATORY OVERVIEW 4.1 Asbestos

The asbestos NESHAP (40 CFR Part 61, Subpart M) regulates asbestos fiber emissions and asbestos waste disposal practices. It also requires the identification and classification of existing building materials prior to demolition or renovation activity. Under NESHAP, asbestos-containing building materials are classified as either friable, Category I non-friable or Category II non-friable ACM. Friable materials are those that, when dry, may be crumbled, pulverized or reduced to powder by hand pressure. Category I non-friable ACM includes packings, gaskets, resilient floor coverings and asphalt roofing products containing more than 1% asbestos. Category II non-friable ACM are any materials other than Category I materials that contain more than 1% asbestos. Friable ACM, Category I and Category II non-friable ACM which is in poor condition and has become friable or which will be subjected to drilling, sanding, grinding, cutting or abrading and which could be crushed or pulverized during anticipated renovation or demolition activities are considered regulated ACM (RACM). In the State of Florida, asbestos activities are regulated by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). RACM must be removed prior to renovation or demolition activities which will disturb the materials. The owner or operator must provide the FDEP with written notification of planned removal activities at least 10 working days prior to the commencement of asbestos abatement activities. Removal of RACM must be conducted by a State of Florida-licensed asbestos abatement contractor.



The OSHA Asbestos standard for construction (29 CFR 1926.1101) regulates workplace exposure to asbestos. The OSHA standard requires that employee exposure to airborne asbestos fibers be maintained below 0.1 asbestos fibers per cubic centimeter of air (0.1 f/cc). The OSHA standard classifies construction and maintenance activities which could disturb ACM, and specifies work practices and precautions which employers must follow when engaging in each class of regulated work. 4.2 Lead Paint

LP activities are governed by various regulations and guidelines. The regulations and guidelines are focused on the protection of building occupants, protection of the environment, disposal procedures, and worker protection. The disturbance of LP coatings is regulated by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. The OSHA regulation does not define lead content of the coating, but instead, regulates the disturbance of the materials with any lead content. Those components/colors not tested, or in locations not inventoried in this report, should be tested for lead content prior to disturbance (repair, renovation, abatement, or demolition) that may cause airborne release of lead. Components/colors that may be identified to contain the presence of lead should not be disturbed in an uncontrolled manner, such as during repair, renovation or demolition. Disturbance of these materials should only be done by properly trained personnel in a controlled and documented manner. The disposal of waste materials containing lead from renovation, abatement, and/or demolition is regulated by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). RCRA requires a waste toxicity characteristic on the waste by using Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) (40 CFR 261.24). The TCLP extract is analyzed for lead (or other constituents) to determine if it is above or below the allowable TCLP regulatory threshold, which for lead is 5 parts per million (ppm) (milligrams/liter). It has been our past experience that the Florida Department of Environmental Protection and OSHA allows components with lead containing coatings to remain in-place during demolition provided that wet techniques and other engineering controls are employed during the process. However, the mixed demolition debris must be disposed of in a proper landfill according the results of the TCLP. Further, components that have lead containing coatings and debris mixed with lead containing coatings cannot be recycled and must be disposed in an appropriate landfill. With respect to lead related tasks such as manual demolition of structures, manual scraping, manual sanding, heat gun applications, and power tool cleaning with dust collection systems, OSHA requires employee protective measures until the employer



performs an employee exposure assessment and documents that the employee performing any of the lead related tasks is not exposed above the Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) of 50 micrograms of lead per cubic meter of air (µg/m3) averaged over an 8-hour period. Terracon recommends employee exposure monitoring during lead related tasks. Resource Conservation & Recovery Act (RCRA) - Deals with the waste and disposal requirements associated with Lead Paint materials. The OSHA regulations are as follows: 29 CFR 1926.62, Lead Exposure in Construction: Interim Final Rule - Deals with the potential exposure to Lead Paint materials to which construction workers may be subjected. 29 CFR 1910.134: Use of Respirators - The OSHA Respiratory Protection Rule defines the program and requirements as to when personnel are allowed to wear respirators, maintenance of respirators, etc. In general, OSHA coverage extends to all private sector employer and employees. Those not covered under the standard typically include self-employed persons and federal, state and local municipal employees. The State of Florida regulations is as follows:

F.S. 442 - Right-to-Know Law - The document addresses the requirements to advise personnel of hazardous materials that may be in the workplace.

5.0 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5.1 Asbestos

Laboratory analysis did not identify the presence of asbestos in samples of the homogeneous materials sampled from the Lifeguard Station. It should be noted that suspect materials, other than those identified during the November 29, 2011 survey may exist within the building. Should suspect materials other than those which were identified during this survey be uncovered prior to or during the demolishing process, those materials should be assumed asbestos-containing until sampling and analysis can confirm or deny their asbestos content. A summary of the laboratory analysis is presented in Table 1 of Section 3.1 and complete laboratory analysis report is presented in Appendix C. 5.2 Lead Paint

Paint chip samples were collected from component coatings. One sample collected from the wood trim associated with the southwest roll-up garage doors was determined to have lead in



concentrations of the analytical detection limit when analyzed by an AIHA/ELLAP laboratory. Disturbance of this paint would be subject to the requirements of 29 CFR 1926.62. A summary of the paint chip laboratory analysis is presented in Table 2 of Section 3.2 and complete laboratory analysis report is presented in Appendix C.

6.0 GENERAL COMMENTS This asbestos and LP survey was conducted in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in the same locale. The results, findings, conclusions and recommendations expressed in this report are based on conditions observed during our survey of the building. The information contained in this report is relevant to the date on which this survey was performed, and should not be relied upon to represent conditions at a later date. This report has been prepared on behalf of and exclusively for use by Volusia County for specific application to their project as discussed. This report is not a bidding document. Contractors or consultants reviewing this report must draw their own conclusions regarding further investigation or remediation deemed necessary. Terracon does not warrant the work of regulatory agencies, laboratories or other third parties supplying information which may have been used in the preparation of this report. No warranty, express or implied is made.

APPENDIX A Photographs

APPENDIX B Sample Location Diagram

APPENDIX C Asbestos and Lead Paint Laboratory Data

Client Sample Description ConcentrationLab ID AnalyzedLead

Collected

EMSL Analytical, Inc.5125 Adanson Street, Suite 900, Orlando, FL 32804Phone: (407) 599-5887 Fax: (407) 599-9063 Email: [email protected]

341109432

Attn: Charles SabasTerracon Consultants, Inc.1675 Lee Road

Winter Park, FL 32789

Customer PO:Received: 11/30/11 1:22 PM

H1117469

Customer ID: TERC62

Fax: (407) 740-6112 Phone: (407) 740-6110Project:

EMSL Order:

EMSL Proj:

Test Report: Lead in Paint Chips by Flame AAS (SW 846 3050B*/7000B)

Site: exterior beige paint on CMU block0001LBP-1 <0.010 % wt12/1/201111/29/2011

Site: exterior green paint on wood soffit0002LBP-2 <0.010 % wt12/1/201111/29/2011

Site: exterior beige paint on wood trim0003LBP-3 0.025 % wt12/1/201111/29/2011

Site: exterior beige paint on concrete0004LBP-4 <0.010 % wt12/1/201111/29/2011

Site: exterior green paint on metal handrail0005LBP-5 <0.010 % wt12/1/201111/29/2011

Site: exterior beige paint on wood fence0006LBP-6 <0.010 % wt12/1/201111/29/2011

Site: interior beige paint on CMU block0007LBP-7 <0.010 % wt12/1/201111/29/2011

Site: interior white paint on concrete roof deck0008LBP-8 <0.010 % wt12/1/201111/29/2011

Site: interior beige paint on wood door frame0009LBP-9 <0.010 % wt12/1/201111/29/2011

Site: interior beige paint on door0010LBP-10 <0.010 % wt12/1/201111/29/2011

Page 1 of 1

Blanca Cortes, Ph.D., Laboratory Manageror other approved signatory

Test Report ChmSnglePrm/nQC-7.21.0 Printed:

Reporting limit is 0.01 % wt. The QC data associated with these results included in this report meet the method QC requirements, unless specifically indicated otherwise. Unless noted, results in this report are not blank corrected. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. * slight modifications to methods applied.Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Orlando, FL AIHA-LAP, LLC ELLAP 163563

Initial report from

mailto:[email protected]

Sample Description Appearance % Type

AsbestosNon-Asbestos

% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy

341109434




H1117469 lifeguard station

Customer ID: TERC62


EMSL Order:

EMSL Proj:12/1/2011Analysis Date:


LS-1A341109434-0001

garage office A - 2x2 random pattern ceiling tile

Tan None Detected

FibrousHeterogeneous

Cellulose60%Glass10%

Non-fibrous (other)15%Perlite15%

LS-1B341109434-0002


Tan None Detected




LS-1C341109434-0003


Tan None Detected




LS-2A341109434-0004

rec room B - 2x4 drywall ceiling tiles

White None Detected


Cellulose20% Non-fibrous (other)40%Gypsum40%

LS-2B341109434-0005


White None Detected



LS-2C341109434-0006


White None Detected



1

Jonathan Teda, Asbestos Lab Manageror other approved signatory

Analyst(s)

Test Report PLM-7.23.0 Printed: 12/1/2011 12:00:15 PM

EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request.Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Orlando, FL NVLAP Lab Code 101151-0

Adelmarie Bones (18)

Initial report from 12/01/2011 12:00:15






341109434





Customer ID: TERC62


EMSL Order:



LS-3A341109434-0007

exterior windows - window caulk

Gray None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)90%Ca Carbonate10%

LS-3B341109434-0008


Gray None Detected


Non-fibrous (other)90%Ca Carbonate10%

LS-3C341109434-0009


White None Detected


Non-fibrous (other)100%

LS-4A-Roofing341109434-0010

exterior roof - roofing BUR

Black None Detected


Cellulose10% Non-fibrous (other)90%

LS-4A-Roofing341109434-0010A


Gray None Detected



LS-4B-Roofing341109434-0011


Black None Detected



2


Analyst(s)

Test Report PLM-7.23.0 Printed: 12/1/2011 12:00:15 PM









341109434





Customer ID: TERC62


EMSL Order:



LS-4B-Roofing341109434-0011A


Gray None Detected



LS-4C-Roofing341109434-0012


Black None Detected



LS-4C-Roofing341109434-0012A


Gray None Detected



LS-5A341109434-0013

exterior roof - rolled roofing

Black None Detected



LS-5B341109434-0014


Black None Detected



LS-5C341109434-0015


Black None Detected



3


Analyst(s)

THIS IS THE LAST PAGE OF THE REPORT.Test Report PLM-7.23.0 Printed: 12/1/2011 12:00:15 PM





APPENDIX D Inspector Accreditations

Documents

LIMITED ASBESTOS and LEAD PAINT SURVEY. Cardinal Lifeguard Station acm lbp report[1].pdfLP-10 Beige Wood Door - Interior office of Building