46
LID Cost Considerations LID Cost Considerations “ALL Technologies” “ALL Technologies” Project Life Cycle Project Life Cycle Planning Design Construction Operation Maintenance Recapitalization Decommission

LID Cost Considerations “ALL Technologies” Project Life Cycle Planning Design Construction Operation Maintenance Recapitalization Decommission

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: LID Cost Considerations “ALL Technologies” Project Life Cycle Planning Design Construction Operation Maintenance Recapitalization Decommission

LID Cost ConsiderationsLID Cost Considerations“ALL Technologies”“ALL Technologies”

Project Life CycleProject Life Cycle

Planning Design

ConstructionOperation

MaintenanceRecapitalizationDecommission

Page 2: LID Cost Considerations “ALL Technologies” Project Life Cycle Planning Design Construction Operation Maintenance Recapitalization Decommission

Conventional 244 Lots

Cantura Coves: Cantura Coves: Mesquite, TexasMesquite, TexasD.R. Horton 241 Coved LotsD.R. Horton 241 Coved Lots

Cantura Coves: Cantura Coves: Mesquite, TexasMesquite, TexasD.R. Horton 241 Coved LotsD.R. Horton 241 Coved Lots

Coving:Coving:42% Less Street42% Less Street40% Larger Lots40% Larger LotsMeandering WalksMeandering Walks

Page 3: LID Cost Considerations “ALL Technologies” Project Life Cycle Planning Design Construction Operation Maintenance Recapitalization Decommission

3.7

Per A

c

3.7

Per A

c

3.7 Per A

c

3.7 Per A

c

3.7 Per Ac

3.7 Per Ac

Photo: Cantura Cove – Mesquite, Texas

Page 4: LID Cost Considerations “ALL Technologies” Project Life Cycle Planning Design Construction Operation Maintenance Recapitalization Decommission

Placitas de La Paz: Placitas de La Paz: Coachella, CaliforniaCoachella, CaliforniaCanaday & CompanyCanaday & Company271 Coved Lots271 Coved Lots

Coving:Coving:

42% Less Street42% Less Street

Same Avg. Lot Size.Same Avg. Lot Size.

Connective WalksConnective Walks

31 MORE Lots!31 MORE Lots!

Conventional Coved

City of Coachella, CaliforniaCity of Coachella, CaliforniaRESIDENTIAL PROJECT RESIDENTIAL PROJECT

OF THE YEAROF THE YEAR20022002

Awarded for Providing Awarded for Providing Beautiful, QualityBeautiful, Quality

Affordable HousingAffordable Housing

Page 5: LID Cost Considerations “ALL Technologies” Project Life Cycle Planning Design Construction Operation Maintenance Recapitalization Decommission
Page 6: LID Cost Considerations “ALL Technologies” Project Life Cycle Planning Design Construction Operation Maintenance Recapitalization Decommission

Construction Cost ComparisonConstruction Cost Comparison

Patuxent Riding

Conventional Low Impact

Grading /Roads 569,698$ 426,575$

StormDrains 225,721$ 132,558$

SWM Pond / Fees 260,858$ 10,530$

Bioretention / Micro -$ 175,000$

Total 1,086,277$ 744,663$

Unit Cost 14,679$ 9,193$

Page 7: LID Cost Considerations “ALL Technologies” Project Life Cycle Planning Design Construction Operation Maintenance Recapitalization Decommission

Green - LIDGreen - LID

Yellow - Conventional Yellow - Conventional

Page 8: LID Cost Considerations “ALL Technologies” Project Life Cycle Planning Design Construction Operation Maintenance Recapitalization Decommission

 A Comparison of Two Different Land Plans  

PROJECTED RESULTS FROM TOTAL DEVELOPMENT

Total SiteLot YieldLinear Feet - StreetLinear Feet - Collector StreetLinear Feet - Drainage PipeDrainage Sections(Inlets, Boxes, Headwalls)Estimated Total Cost

Conventional Plan35821,7707,36010,098103

$4.6 million

Revised Green Plan37521,12506,73379 $3.9 million

   

ACTUAL RESULTS FROM PHASE ONE

Total Site (engineer’s estimate)Lot YieldTotal Cost Cost Per Lot

Conventional Plan

63$1,028,544$16,326

Green Plan

 72828,523$11,507

   

ECONOMIC AND OTHER BENEFITS FROM LOW-IMPACT DEVELOPMENT

Higher Lot YieldHigher Lot ValueLower Cost per Lot Enhanced Marketability Added Amenities Recognition

17 additional lots$3,000 more per lot than competition$4,800 less per lot80 percent of lots sold in the first year23.5 acres of green space/parksNational, state, and professional groups

  

TOTAL ECONOMIC BENEFIT More than $2.2 million in savings.

Page 9: LID Cost Considerations “ALL Technologies” Project Life Cycle Planning Design Construction Operation Maintenance Recapitalization Decommission

No Cost Stuff No Cost Stuff

1.1. Site Design to Conserve Terrestrial FunctionsSite Design to Conserve Terrestrial Functions

2.2. Disconnection Disconnection

3.3. Grading TechniquesGrading Techniques

4.4. Distributed Controls Distributed Controls

5.5. Multifunctional Use of SpaceMultifunctional Use of Space

6.6. Less Grading and Clearing Less Grading and Clearing

““Optimize the use of these smart design techniques” Optimize the use of these smart design techniques”

Page 10: LID Cost Considerations “ALL Technologies” Project Life Cycle Planning Design Construction Operation Maintenance Recapitalization Decommission

Rain Garden Treatment Train Approach

Bioretention CellStorm Drain System

Bioretention Cell

Flow Path

Grass Swale Grass Filter Strip

Page 11: LID Cost Considerations “ALL Technologies” Project Life Cycle Planning Design Construction Operation Maintenance Recapitalization Decommission

Rain Gardens

Page 12: LID Cost Considerations “ALL Technologies” Project Life Cycle Planning Design Construction Operation Maintenance Recapitalization Decommission

Conventional Conventional DevelopmentDevelopment

Page 13: LID Cost Considerations “ALL Technologies” Project Life Cycle Planning Design Construction Operation Maintenance Recapitalization Decommission

Stormwater Pond Problems

• High Design / Construction Costs

• Moderate Maintenance– Functional / Aesthetics

• Consumes Land / Resources

• Limited Effectiveness

• Disease

• Public Safety

Page 14: LID Cost Considerations “ALL Technologies” Project Life Cycle Planning Design Construction Operation Maintenance Recapitalization Decommission

LID Development

Conservation Conservation Minimization Minimization Soil Soil Management Management Open Drainage Open Drainage Rain Gardens Rain Gardens Rain Rain Barrels Barrels Pollution Pollution Prevention Prevention

Conservation Conservation Minimization Minimization Soil Soil Management Management Open Drainage Open Drainage Rain Gardens Rain Gardens Rain Rain Barrels Barrels Pollution Pollution Prevention Prevention

Disconnected Disconnected Decentralized Decentralized Distributed Distributed Multi-functional Multi-functional

Disconnected Disconnected Decentralized Decentralized Distributed Distributed Multi-functional Multi-functional

Multiple SystemsMultiple Systems

Page 15: LID Cost Considerations “ALL Technologies” Project Life Cycle Planning Design Construction Operation Maintenance Recapitalization Decommission

No Cost Stuff No Cost Stuff

1.1. Site Design to Conserve Terrestrial FunctionsSite Design to Conserve Terrestrial Functions

2.2. Disconnection Disconnection

3.3. Grading TechniquesGrading Techniques

4.4. Distributed Controls Distributed Controls

5.5. Multifunctional Use of SpaceMultifunctional Use of Space

6.6. Less Grading and Clearing Less Grading and Clearing

““Optimize the use of these smart design techniques” Optimize the use of these smart design techniques”

Page 16: LID Cost Considerations “ALL Technologies” Project Life Cycle Planning Design Construction Operation Maintenance Recapitalization Decommission

Construction Cost ComparisonConstruction Cost Comparison

Patuxent Riding

Conventional Low Impact

Grading /Roads 569,698$ 426,575$

StormDrains 225,721$ 132,558$

SWM Pond / Fees 260,858$ 10,530$

Bioretention / Micro -$ 175,000$

Total 1,086,277$ 744,663$

Unit Cost 14,679$ 9,193$

Page 17: LID Cost Considerations “ALL Technologies” Project Life Cycle Planning Design Construction Operation Maintenance Recapitalization Decommission

Rain Garden Treatment Train Approach

Bioretention CellStorm Drain System

Bioretention Cell

Flow Path

Grass Swale Grass Filter Strip

Page 18: LID Cost Considerations “ALL Technologies” Project Life Cycle Planning Design Construction Operation Maintenance Recapitalization Decommission

Rain Gardens

Page 19: LID Cost Considerations “ALL Technologies” Project Life Cycle Planning Design Construction Operation Maintenance Recapitalization Decommission

Somerset Cost Savings

• $780,000 Total Cost Savings – Eliminated

• Curb / Gutter $350,000• 4 stormwater ponds $650,000• Pipes / Structures $150,000

– Added • $370,000 for Rain Gardens

Page 20: LID Cost Considerations “ALL Technologies” Project Life Cycle Planning Design Construction Operation Maintenance Recapitalization Decommission

Bioretention Bioretention • Shallow Ponding - 4” to 6”

• Soil Depth 2’ - 2.5’

• Sandy Top Soil

• 50% Sand

• 20% Sandy Loam

• 30% Compost

• Under Drain System

• Plant Selection

Aesthetic Value / Habitat Value

Property Value / Low Cost

Low Maintenance

X 2’

Under Drain

Page 21: LID Cost Considerations “ALL Technologies” Project Life Cycle Planning Design Construction Operation Maintenance Recapitalization Decommission

Proprietary Devices

2” Mulch

Sandy Filter Media

Drain Pipe

Storm Drain

Roadway

A Grow ing Idea in Stormwater Filt ration.

Optional Infiltration Storage

Volatilization

BioretentionClean-out

Rip-Rap

Biodegradation

Root Uptake

Drains to infiltration storage

Tree Grate

Page 22: LID Cost Considerations “ALL Technologies” Project Life Cycle Planning Design Construction Operation Maintenance Recapitalization Decommission
Page 23: LID Cost Considerations “ALL Technologies” Project Life Cycle Planning Design Construction Operation Maintenance Recapitalization Decommission
Page 24: LID Cost Considerations “ALL Technologies” Project Life Cycle Planning Design Construction Operation Maintenance Recapitalization Decommission
Page 25: LID Cost Considerations “ALL Technologies” Project Life Cycle Planning Design Construction Operation Maintenance Recapitalization Decommission
Page 26: LID Cost Considerations “ALL Technologies” Project Life Cycle Planning Design Construction Operation Maintenance Recapitalization Decommission
Page 27: LID Cost Considerations “ALL Technologies” Project Life Cycle Planning Design Construction Operation Maintenance Recapitalization Decommission
Page 28: LID Cost Considerations “ALL Technologies” Project Life Cycle Planning Design Construction Operation Maintenance Recapitalization Decommission

Rain Garden on a commercial project with turf grass near I-395 and Edsall Road.

Page 29: LID Cost Considerations “ALL Technologies” Project Life Cycle Planning Design Construction Operation Maintenance Recapitalization Decommission

Rain Garden longitudinal view showing overflow device.

Page 30: LID Cost Considerations “ALL Technologies” Project Life Cycle Planning Design Construction Operation Maintenance Recapitalization Decommission

Cost Comparison Proprietory BMP's

Device Type Unit Cost Main.Cost Annual

Storm Solutions Absrobant 5,500$ 455$ Ab Tech Absrobant 5,000$ 1,600$ Bay Saver Hydrodynamic 6,700$ 2,000$ Vortechnics Hydrodynamic 12,000$ 2,000$ CDS Hydrodynamic 15,000$ 2,000$ Fossil Filter Filter Inlet Insert 5,400$ 6,300$ Stormceptor Hydrodynamic 34,570$ 2,000$ Stormtreat Filter Wetland 33,000$ 4,500$ Stormfilter Filter Cartrages 40,000$ 5,000$ Filterra Bioretention 6,000$ 100$

Page 31: LID Cost Considerations “ALL Technologies” Project Life Cycle Planning Design Construction Operation Maintenance Recapitalization Decommission

High Flow Rate Filter and Infiltration

Treats 90% of Total Annual Volume

Page 32: LID Cost Considerations “ALL Technologies” Project Life Cycle Planning Design Construction Operation Maintenance Recapitalization Decommission

Maintenance Cost - $200 / Year

Page 33: LID Cost Considerations “ALL Technologies” Project Life Cycle Planning Design Construction Operation Maintenance Recapitalization Decommission
Page 34: LID Cost Considerations “ALL Technologies” Project Life Cycle Planning Design Construction Operation Maintenance Recapitalization Decommission

Perspectives on Perspectives on Implementing Implementing Low-Impact Low-Impact

Developments since 1998Developments since 1998

Waukesha, WisconsinWaukesha, Wisconsin

Page 35: LID Cost Considerations “ALL Technologies” Project Life Cycle Planning Design Construction Operation Maintenance Recapitalization Decommission

Use native species in restoring open spaces and in lot bioretetnion landscapingUse native species in restoring open spaces and in lot bioretetnion landscaping

Page 36: LID Cost Considerations “ALL Technologies” Project Life Cycle Planning Design Construction Operation Maintenance Recapitalization Decommission

© Applied Ecological Services, Inc.

Page 37: LID Cost Considerations “ALL Technologies” Project Life Cycle Planning Design Construction Operation Maintenance Recapitalization Decommission

Home and Lot SalesHome and Lot Sales

Conventional Conventional Village of Jackson

Lot Size: 7,000 – 8,000 ft2

Price: low-mid $40,000$40,000

Low ImpactLow ImpactPrairie Meadows

Lot Size: 7,000 – 8,000 ft2

Price: mid-high $50,000$50,000

Page 38: LID Cost Considerations “ALL Technologies” Project Life Cycle Planning Design Construction Operation Maintenance Recapitalization Decommission

Advantages of LID Over Advantages of LID Over Conventional DesignConventional Design

Advantages of LID Over Advantages of LID Over Conventional DesignConventional Design

Added Value of LID Results in:Added Value of LID Results in:

• Lot PremiumsLot Premiums

• Increased Sales VelocityIncreased Sales Velocity

• Increased Sales Volume Increased Sales Volume

• Reduced Debt Service Reduced Debt Service

• Reduced Infrastructure CostsReduced Infrastructure Costs

Page 39: LID Cost Considerations “ALL Technologies” Project Life Cycle Planning Design Construction Operation Maintenance Recapitalization Decommission

Lessons Learned Nature Sells!Lessons Learned Nature Sells!Lessons Learned Nature Sells!Lessons Learned Nature Sells!

Page 40: LID Cost Considerations “ALL Technologies” Project Life Cycle Planning Design Construction Operation Maintenance Recapitalization Decommission

Biggest Obstacles to LIDBiggest Obstacles to LID

Local Ordinances Local Ordinances and and

Knowledge / Experience Knowledge / Experience of of

Local Building Officials Local Building Officials & &

Consultants!Consultants!

Biggest Obstacles to LIDBiggest Obstacles to LID

Local Ordinances Local Ordinances and and

Knowledge / Experience Knowledge / Experience of of

Local Building Officials Local Building Officials & &

Consultants!Consultants!

Page 41: LID Cost Considerations “ALL Technologies” Project Life Cycle Planning Design Construction Operation Maintenance Recapitalization Decommission
Page 42: LID Cost Considerations “ALL Technologies” Project Life Cycle Planning Design Construction Operation Maintenance Recapitalization Decommission
Page 43: LID Cost Considerations “ALL Technologies” Project Life Cycle Planning Design Construction Operation Maintenance Recapitalization Decommission
Page 44: LID Cost Considerations “ALL Technologies” Project Life Cycle Planning Design Construction Operation Maintenance Recapitalization Decommission
Page 45: LID Cost Considerations “ALL Technologies” Project Life Cycle Planning Design Construction Operation Maintenance Recapitalization Decommission
Page 46: LID Cost Considerations “ALL Technologies” Project Life Cycle Planning Design Construction Operation Maintenance Recapitalization Decommission