LGEP: Emerging Pension Issues SLGEP: Article on … Emerging Pension Issues ... they may help you, as an auditor, ... employing units are designated employee contributions,

LGEP: Emerging Pension Issues

SLGEP: Article on Emerging Pension Issues

aicpa.org/gaqc ⋆ [email protected] October 2015

Copyright © 2015 by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Inc., New York, New York. 1 of 9

Introduction and Purpose

With the implementation of Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 68,

Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions, the AICPA has received a number of inquiries. This article

was prepared by the AICPA State and Local Government Expert Panel (SLGEP) and includes a summary

of the more significant issues that have been raised and related discussion for plan auditors and employer

auditors to consider. Issues addressed in this article include:

Implementation issues for cost-sharing employers: Calculating a change in proportion and audit

evidence on beginning net pension liability;

Effect of employer-paid member contributions on plans and employers;

Additional illustrative schedule of pension amounts by employer for cost-sharing plans;

Employer’s presentation of net position;

Allocation of pension amounts to funds and departments; and

Audit evidence on intra-entity allocations.

The following sections reflect the related discussions of the SLGEP and are intended to build awareness

and assist auditors in recognizing and addressing these issues.

This article is an other auditing publication as defined in AU-C section 200, Overall Objectives of the Independent

Auditor and the Conduct of an Audit in Accordance With Generally Accepted Auditing Standards (AICPA,

Professional Standards). It also provides nonauthoritative accounting guidance.

Other auditing publications have no authoritative status; however, they may help you, as an auditor, understand

and apply certain auditing standards. Users of this article should consult the original material referenced in this

practice aid for a complete understanding of the standards, requirements, and guidance.

In applying the auditing guidance included in an other auditing publication, the auditor should, exercising

professional judgment, assess the relevance and appropriateness of such guidance to the circumstances of the

audit. The auditing guidance in this document has been reviewed by the American Institute of Certified Public

Accountants (AICPA) Audit and Attest Standards staff and published by the AICPA and is presumed to be

appropriate.

This document has not been approved, disapproved, or otherwise acted on by any senior technical committee of

the AICPA and does not represent an official position of the AICPA. It is distributed with the understanding that

neither the AICPA State and Local Government Expert Panel, nor the Governmental Audit Quality Center, is

rendering legal, accounting or other professional services in this publication. The application and impact of laws

can vary widely based on the specific facts involved. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the

services of a competent professional should be sought.

Copyright © 2015 by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Inc., New York, New York.

2 of 9

Implementation Issues for Cost-Sharing Employers: Calculating a Change in Proportion and Audit Evidence on Beginning Net Pension Liability1

Auditors of cost-sharing employers are reminded that in the initial year of implementing GASB Statement

No. 68:

Cost-sharing employers should report changes in the proportionate share of collective pension

amounts (changes in proportion); and

Sufficient appropriate evidence should be obtained by the employer auditor on the employer’s

proportionate share of the collective net pension liability as of the beginning of the measurement

period.

Calculating a Change in Proportion in the Implementation Year

There is no exclusion in the transition provisions of GASB Statement No. 68 for calculating a change in the

employer’s proportionate share of the collective net pension liability in the year of implementation. In

accordance with paragraph 54 of GASB Statement No. 68, the employer should report a change in

proportion for the initial measurement period (e.g., for the year ended June 30, 2014). Thus, the employer

requires its allocation percentage from the plan as of the end of the prior year (e.g., June 30, 2013) to

determine the net pension liability as of the beginning of the year (i.e., the opening balance).

Based on the inquiries received by the GAQC, it appears that some employers have confused the recording

of deferred outflows of resources or deferred inflows of resources resulting from the change in proportion

in the year of implementation with the transition provisions in paragraph 137 of GASB Statement No. 68.

The guidance in paragraph 137 acknowledges that it may not be practical to determine the amounts of all

deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to pensions, as applicable, at the

beginning of the period of implementation. However, the change in proportion represents activity during the

year and is not a transition adjustment affecting beginning balances. In some situations, it may be

appropriate for employers to use the same allocation percentages for the beginning and end of the year if

the employer determines (and the employer auditor concurs) that any changes in the allocation that

occurred during the year would be immaterial to the employer’s financial statements.

Audit Evidence on Beginning Net Pension Liability in the Implementation Year

The guidance in AU-C section 508, Opening Balances-Initial Audit Engagements, requires the auditor to

obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence about whether the opening balances contain misstatements

that materially affect the current period’s financial statements. GASB Statement No. 68 requires cost-

sharing employers, for the first time, to report net pension liability. To accommodate the employer auditor’s

need to obtain this evidence on the opening balance of the employer’s net pension liability in the year of

implementation, it is recommended that plans prepare an additional schedule of employer allocations and

a schedule of net pension liability as of the plan’s prior year end (e.g., June 30, 2013) for which the plan

1 References to a net pension liability in this section also apply to situations in which the fiduciary net position exceeds the total pension liability resulting in a net pension asset.


3 of 9

auditor is engaged to obtain reasonable assurance and report on the schedule of employer allocations and

on the total net pension liability. This would be in addition to similar schedules previously recommended by

the AICPA that the plan prepares as of its current year end (e.g., June 30, 2014) and that the plan auditor

is engaged to opine on. Said another way, the cost-sharing plan solutions communicated in Appendix B,

Governmental Employer Participation in Cost-Sharing Multiple-Employer Plans: Issues Related to

Information for Employer Reporting, in Chapter 13 of the 2015 AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide, State

and Local Governments (SLG Guide), would be applied for the year prior to implementation, as well as the

actual year of implementation.

Unlike the current year schedule of pension amounts described in Appendix B of the SLG Guide, the

recommended schedule of net pension liability as of the plan’s prior year-end does not need to include

deferred outflows of resources, deferred inflows of resources, and pension expense. This is because

paragraph 137 of GASB Statement No. 68 does not require employers to determine these amounts prior

to the year of implementation. In lieu of preparing a separate schedule of net pension liability for the prior

year, the plan may add an additional column to the current year schedule of pension amounts that includes

the net pension liability as of the end of the prior year for which the plan auditor is engaged to opine.

Without the plan addressing the opening balances as described above, it is unlikely that the employer

auditor could meet the requirements of AU-C section 508. Some have asserted that the recommended

approach is not necessary as the plan auditor has, in essence, substantiated the beginning net pension

liability because they have audited the current year schedule of pension amounts, which includes ending

net pension liability and the changes in net pension liability (NPL) for the year (i.e., Ending NPL + Decreases

in NPL – Increases in NPL = Beginning NPL). However, because the increases and decreases in net

pension liability are based on the measurement of net pension liability at the beginning and end of the year,

additional evidence that supports the beginning net pension liability and its allocation to the employers is

necessary.

Effect of Employer-Paid Member Contributions on Plans and Employers

Auditors of plans and participating employers should be aware that employer-paid member contributions

may have accounting and financial reporting implications for both the plan and participating employers

depending on how they are recognized by the employer. To understand the issues related to employer-

paid member contributions, it is important to understand the background and information on certain Internal

Revenue Service (IRS) guidance that is relevant to the issue.

Background

Employer-paid member contributions arise when payments are made by an employer to satisfy member

contribution requirements to a plan. They are also referred to as employer pick-ups. There are two employer

recognition alternatives for employer-paid member contributions:

The employer recognizes the employer-paid member contributions as salary expense. This is

appropriate when the employer increases the member’s salary by the amount of the member’s

required contribution.


4 of 9

The employer recognizes the employer-paid member contributions as other than salary expense.

This is appropriate when the employer elects to comply with Internal Revenue Code (IRC) section

414.h.2, Employer "Pick-Up" Contributions to Benefit Plans, as further described in the following

paragraphs.

IRC 414.h.2 Election

IRC section 414.h.2 provides that for any plan established by a government, where the contributions of

employing units are designated employee contributions, but the employer picks up the contributions, the

contributions are treated as employer contributions. For the employee contributions to be deemed picked

up by the employer and characterized as employer contributions, certain tests must be met. A series of

rulings by the IRS have established that only amounts that employers pay (including certain amounts

withheld or otherwise offset from the employee's salary) are considered employer contributions, and are

therefore excludable from the employee’s gross income.

IRS Revenue Ruling 2006-43, Government Pick-Up Plans; Employer Contributions; Income Tax;

Prospective Application, clarifies the requirements for employee contributions to be considered made, or

picked up, by the employer. The Ruling includes the following clarifications:

Employing units must take formal action (such as through the issuance of a resolution by the

governing body) to provide that the contributions on behalf of a specific class of employees,

although designated as employee contributions, will be paid by the employing unit in lieu of

employee contributions.

Participating employees, from the date of the pick-up and later, are not permitted to have a cash

right or deferred election right with respect to the designated employee contributions. Participating

employees must not be permitted to opt out of the pick-up, or to receive the contributed amounts

directly instead of having them paid by the employing unit to the plan.

Given the length of time that has elapsed since the IRS introduced the IRC section 414.h.2 election, plans

and employers may not be familiar with this particular section of the IRC. Therefore, auditors may want to

ask the question in a different manner. For example, are employee contributions made on pre-tax or post-

tax basis? If made on a pre-tax basis, the IRC section 414.h.2 election was likely made. It is also possible

that this election could have been made at the plan level (rather than at the individual employer level). Thus,

communication among the plan, employers, and their auditors is necessary to determine the proper

treatment of employer-paid member contributions.

Effect of Employer-Paid Member Contributions on Plan Financial Statement

Display of Contributions

Employer-paid member contributions may affect the classification of contributions by the plan in the

statement of changes in fiduciary net position. Based on the guidance in footnote 2 of GASB Statement No.

67, Financial Reporting for Pension Plans:

If the employer-paid member contribution is recognized by an employer as salary expense (i.e.,

there has been no IRC section 414.h.2 election made by that employer), the contributions relative

to that employer should be classified as member contributions.


5 of 9

If the employer-paid member contribution is recognized by an employer as other than salary

expense (i.e., the IRC section 414.h.2 election has been made by that employer), the contributions

relative to that employer should be classified as employer contributions.

If plans have not been aware of this nuance, it is possible that the employer pick-ups may have been

misclassified in the plan’s statement of changes in fiduciary net position. Plan auditors are advised to inquire

of plans about their knowledge of the nature of employer-paid member contributions and to determine the

appropriateness of the classification of any employer pick-ups in the statement of changes in fiduciary net

position. If applicable, plan auditors are also advised to consider verifying that a management resolution

was issued by the governing body of the employer in accordance with IRC section 414.h.2 to determine

that the expense classification made by the employer is appropriate.

This nuance is even more complex for multiple-employer plans because the IRC section 414.h.2 election

may be made on an employer-by-employer basis. Auditors of multiple-employer plans are advised to also

consider evaluating whether the plans have appropriate processes and controls to determine which

participating employers have made the IRC section 414.h.2 election and the effect of such elections on the

classification of contributions in the plan’s statement of changes in fiduciary net position.

Effect of Employer-Made Contributions on Employer Pension Expense and

Deferred Outflows of Resources

In situations in which employers have made payments to a plan to satisfy member contributions, the

employer should evaluate whether such payments affect pension expense. Based on the guidance in

footnote 2 of GASB Statement No. 68:

If the employer-paid member contribution is treated by the employer as salary expense (i.e., there

has been no IRC section 414.h.2 election made by the employer), the contributions would be

reported as salary expense and excluded from the employer’s pension expense.

If the employer-paid member contribution is treated by the employer as other than salary expense

(i.e., the IRC section 414.h.2 election has been made by the employer), the contributions would

be considered additional employer pension expense.

Some employers may not be aware of the complex nuances of the IRC section 414.h.2 election and its

effect on expense recognition and deferred outflows of resources. Auditors of employers are advised to

determine whether the employer has made any employer-paid member contributions and, if so, whether

the IRC section 414.h.2 election was made.

In situations in which the employer-paid member contributions meet the criteria to be classified as pension

expense (i.e., the IRC section 414.h.2 election was made by the employer):

Employer-paid member contributions made to the plan during the measurement period should

be reflected in pension expense.

Employer-paid member contributions made to the plan subsequent to the measurement date

and before the employer year end should be reported by the employer as deferred outflows of

resources in accordance with paragraphs 34 and 57 of GASB Statement No. 68.

In contrast, employers that did not make the IRC section 414.h.2 election should report employer-paid

member contributions made to the plan during the employer’s fiscal year as salary expense.


6 of 9

Effect of Employer-Paid Member Contributions on Schedule of Pension Amounts

for Cost-Sharing Employers

As noted above, the IRC Section 414.h.2 election and its effect may not have been appropriately addressed

by plans and employers. An additional implication is that the schedules prepared by cost-sharing plans to

assist participating employer reporting as recommended in Appendix B of the SLG Guide (e.g., the schedule

of pension amounts) could be affected. It should be noted that if the plan used the illustrative schedules

included in the SLG Guide, those illustrations did not take into consideration scenarios in which there are

employer-paid member contributions.

In addition to the considerations for plan auditors described in the section above “Effect of Employer-Paid

Member Contributions on Plan Financial Statement Display of Contributions,” auditors of cost-sharing plans

are advised to consider whether there is any effect on the plan’s schedule of pension amounts. If employers

have made the IRC section 414.h.2 election or if the plan is unsure as to whether the election has been

made by participating employers, the plan would be advised to revise the pension expense columnar

headings in the schedule of pension amounts to be more descriptive of what is included in the pension

expense column and the plan auditor would accordingly revise the opinion wording on the schedule to be

more descriptive of the revised columnar heading. See the related discussion later in this article, “Additional

Illustrative Schedule of Pension Amounts by Employer for Cost-Sharing Plans” that has been developed to

address this situation.

Effect of Employer-Paid Member Contributions on the Calculation of Employer’s

Proportionate Share of Collective Pension Amounts for Cost-Sharing Employers

GASB Statement No. 68 is silent as to whether employer-paid member contributions made by cost-sharing

employers would affect the calculation of the employer’s proportionate share of the collective pension

amounts (i.e., net pension liability, deferred outflows of resources, deferred inflows of resources, and

pension expense). However, GASB has recently deliberated this issue in a public meeting. As a result, the

SLGEP advises that employer-paid member contributions not be considered in the calculation of the

proportionate share of the collective pension amounts due to the potential for inappropriate cost-shifting

among participating employers. In other words, if the cost-sharing allocation calculation is made on a basis

of employer contributions, employer-paid member contributions would be excluded. This position is

consistent with the GASB’s tentative conclusions reached in initial discussions of the matter. Moreover, in

calculating the proportionate share of collective pension expense, the effect of all employer-paid member

contributions would have to be subtracted in determining the total allocable pension expense. Individual

employers that have made the IRC section 414.h.2 election would need to add the allocated pension

expense with their employer specific amount for employer-paid member contributions in determining total

pension expense reported by the employer.


7 of 9

Additional Illustrative Schedule of Pension Amounts by Employer for Cost-Sharing Plans

The illustrative schedule of pension amounts by employer, which appears in Appendix B of Chapter 13 of

the SLG Guide displays two parts of pension expense:

1. Proportionate share of pension expense.

2. Net recognition (amortization) of deferred amounts from change in proportion and differences

between employer contributions and proportionate share of contributions.

The SLGEP is providing an additional illustrative schedule titled,” Illustrative Schedule of Pension Amounts

by Employer: Revised for Employer-Specific Situations.” See Appendix A of this article. This example was

developed to illustrate how situations involving employer-paid member contributions (discussed above) and

pension expense related to specific liabilities of individual employers (described in paragraph 56 of GASB

Statement No. 68) would be handled as neither of these concepts were addressed in the original illustration.

Specific liabilities of individual employers result in pension expense specific to individual employers that are

not allocable to all employers. The new illustrative schedule includes:

A new column to reflect pension expense related to specific liabilities of individual employers.

Revisions to the titles of column headings to be clear as to whether the pension expense being

opined upon by the plan auditor includes or excludes the effect of employer-paid member

contributions as follows:

Changed column heading to, “Proportionate Share of Allocable Pension Expense,” to reflect

the pension expense to which the proportionate share applies.

Changed the pension expense heading to, “Pension Expense Excluding That Attributable to

Employer-Paid Member Contributions,” to clarify that employer-paid member contributions

that should be added to pension expense for the employer’s purpose are not included in the

schedule.

The SLGEP is also providing revised wording in Appendix A for the illustrative auditor’s report on the

schedule of pension amounts to reflect changes necessary for plan auditor’s to report on the new illustrative

schedule of pension amounts.

Employer’s Presentation of Net Position

Many governments are reporting a negative unrestricted net position based on the recognition of a relatively

large net pension liability. Given the related effect on many governments’ net position, there have been

questions raised about whether a government may display a separate pension component of unrestricted

net position (deficit) on the face of the financial statements. Because the unrestricted net position is a

residual balance that results from the cumulative inflows and outflows since the inception of the

organization, a deficit unrestricted net position cannot be attributed to any one individual liability or expense.

Therefore, auditors are reminded that unrestricted net position should be reported in the aggregate on the

face of the statement of net position. However, Q&A 7.23.10 of the GASB’s Comprehensive Implementation

Guide provides guidance that a government may disclose additional details of unrestricted net position in

the notes to the financial statements or in MD&A.


8 of 9

Allocation of Pension Amounts to Funds and Departments

Although net pension liabilities will not be recorded in governmental funds, employer auditors are reminded

that pension amounts should be allocated to proprietary and fiduciary funds based on the amounts that the

funds are expected to pay, either directly or indirectly (e.g., through a fringe rate reimbursement), in future

periods. The guidance on this issue resides in paragraph 42 of National Council on Governmental

Accounting (NCGA) Statement 1, Governmental Accounting and Financial Reporting Principles, as

amended, which requires that long-term liabilities that are “directly related to, and expected to be paid from”

those funds be reported in the statement of net position or statement of fiduciary net position, respectively.

Note that NCGA Statement 1 is considered in the GASB’s hierarchy of generally accepted accounting

principles (GAAP) as Category A level GAAP.

With regard to departments, paragraph 15.91 of the SLG Guide states, “although GASB standards do not

address the accounting and financial reporting for separately issued GAAP-based departmental financial

statements, in meeting their reporting obligations, auditors should consider long-established practice

dictating that those presentations should apply all relevant GAAP.” Therefore, NCGA Statement 1 would

be relevant to departments with separately issued financial statements as well.

In terms of how the allocations to funds or departments would be made, governments generally use the

allocation methodology for employers participating in cost-sharing plans as further discussed in chapter 13

of the SLG Guide (see Part III of the chapter titled, “Employer Accounting, Financial Reporting, and Auditing

Considerations: Cost-Sharing Employers”). This allocation will also likely result in the employer recognizing

additional deferred outflows of resources or deferred inflows of resources related to changes in proportion

from year to year.

Audit Evidence on Intra-Entity Allocations

In situations where a primary government allocates pension amounts to components (i.e., funds,

departments, or component units) that issue separate financial statements that are audited by other

auditors, component auditors are advised that additional audit evidence may be needed to support the

allocations. The following discussion addresses when component auditors may require additional audit

evidence from the primary government on the allocated amounts based on the type of plan involved.

Cost-Sharing Employers

As noted in Appendix B to the SLG Guide, cost-sharing employers receive an audited schedule of employer

allocations and schedule of pension amounts. These audited schedules, at the overall employer (primary

government) level, provide components receiving an intra-entity allocation with sufficient appropriate

evidence on the basis to apply relevant allocation percentages. However, an audited schedule of intra-

entity allocations may be needed for separately issued financial statements of components audited by other

auditors depending on whether the allocation basis used by the plan for the schedule of employer

allocations (e.g., actual contributions) is the same or different from that used for the intra-entity allocation.

If the allocation basis is the same, component auditors would likely not need additional

assurance from the auditor of the primary government on the intra-entity allocations. This is


9 of 9

because the allocation to the employer (primary government) provided in the plan’s schedule of

employer allocations becomes the denominator for the intra-entity calculation. Component auditors

could then test the numerator of the allocation based on the books and records of each component.

If the allocation basis is different, component auditors would likely need additional assurance

(i.e., an opinion) from the auditor of the primary government on the intra-entity allocations. In this

circumstance, it is recommended that the primary government prepare a schedule of intra-entity

allocations and engage its auditor to obtain reasonable assurance and report on the schedule of

intra-entity allocations for use by components and component auditors.

Single Employers and Agent Employers

There are different considerations for employers participating in single-employer and agent multiple-

employer defined benefit pension plans. The need for an audited schedule of intra-entity allocations in these

situations hinges on whether any of the components receiving an allocation of pension amounts are audited

by other auditors.

If other auditors are not involved in component audits, additional assurance from the auditor

of the primary government on the intra-entity allocations would not be necessary as the auditor of

the primary government is the auditor of the financial reporting entity and would have access to the

books and records of the components suitable for testing the various allocations.

If other auditors are involved in component audits, component auditors would likely need

additional assurance (i.e., an opinion) from the auditor of the primary government on the intra-entity

allocations and on the pension amounts to which the allocation is applied. Thus, it is recommended

the primary government prepare a schedule of intra-entity allocations and engage its auditor to

obtain reasonable assurance and report on the schedule of intra-entity allocations. It is also

recommended that either the primary government or plan prepare a schedule of pension amounts

and engage the respective auditor (i.e., the auditor of the primary government or plan) to obtain

reasonable assurance and report on total net pension liability, total deferred outflows of resources,

total deferred inflows of resources, and total pension expense for the sum of all participating

components included in this schedule. Without such audit evidence, it is unlikely that component

auditors will be able to accumulate sufficient appropriate audit evidence necessary to provide an

unmodified opinion on the separately issued financial statements of components that have material

allocated pension amounts.

SLGEP: Article on Emerging Pension Issues

Appendix A

aicpa.org/gaqc ⋆ [email protected] October 2015

Copyright © 2015 by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Inc., New York, New York. Appendix: Page 1 of 3

Illustrative Schedule of Pension Amounts by Employer: Revised for Employer-Specific Situations

EXAMPLE COST SHARING PENSION PLAN

Schedule of Pension Amounts by Employer

As of and for the year ended 6/30/20X5

Net Amortization of

Deferred Amounts Total

Changes in Changes in from Changes in Pension

Net Difference Proportion Proportion Proportion Expense

Between and Differences and Differences Pension and Differences Excluding

Projected Between Between Proportionate Expense Between That

Differences and Actual Employer Total Differences Employer Total Share of Related to Employer Attributable

Between Investment Contributions and Deferred Between Contributions Deferred Allocable Specific Contributions and to

Expected Earnings on Proportionate Outflows Expected and Proportionate Inflows Plan Liabilities Proportionate Employer-Paid

Net Pension and Actual Pension Plan Changes of Share of of and Actual Changes of Share of of Pension of Individual Share of Member

Entity Liability Experience Investments Assumptions Contributions Resources Experience Assumptions Contributions Resources Expense fn1

Employers fn2

Contributions Contributions

Employer 1 $ 45,224,620 438,859 1,569,847 1,404,206 695,426 4,108,338 355,917 – 726,425 1,082,342 1,907,283 – 12,375 1,919,658

Employer 2 5,661,780 54,942 196,533 175,796 84,231 511,502 44,558 – 74,326 118,884 238,777 – (1,793) 236,984

Employer 3 6,795,628 65,945 235,892 211,001 117,354 630,192 53,481 – 98,465 151,946 286,596 – (8,088) 278,508

Employer 4 10,193,442 98,917 353,838 316,502 161,215 930,472 80,222 – 165,453 245,675 429,894 – 3,021 432,915

Employer 5 13,355,038 129,597 463,584 414,668 199,845 1,207,694 105,103 – 197,645 302,748 563,229 – (9,900) 553,329

Employer 6 3,043,487 29,534 105,646 94,499 53,453 283,132 23,952 – 48,453 72,405 128,355 – 599 128,954

Employer 7 2,011,585 19,520 69,827 62,459 33,458 185,264 15,831 – 35,345 51,176 84,836 – 625 85,461

Employer 8 1,987,964 19,291 69,007 61,725 35,425 185,448 15,645 – 16,453 32,098 83,839 – (5,712) 78,127

Employer 9 16,777,717 162,811 582,393 520,941 248,356 1,514,501 132,040 – 284,543 416,583 707,576 – 8,405 715,981

Employer 10 5,641,888 54,749 195,843 175,178 95,465 521,235 44,401 – 44,356 88,757 237,938 – (1,188) 236,750

Employer 11 8,512,562 82,606 295,490 264,312 136,453 778,861 66,993 – 148,543 215,536 359,005 – 1,254 360,259

Employer 12 3,499,761 33,962 121,485 108,666 52,145 316,258 27,543 – 64,354 91,897 147,597 – 453 148,050

Employer 13 1,443,418 14,007 50,104 44,818 23,156 132,085 11,360 – 33,453 44,813 60,874 – (205) 60,669

Employer 14 131,785 1,279 4,575 4,092 1,968 11,914 1,037 – 894 1,931 5,558 – 147 5,705

Employer 15 44,757 434 1,554 1,390 1,456 4,834 352 – 698 1,050 1,888 – 7 1,895

Total for All

Entities $ 124,325,432 1,206,453 4,315,618 3,860,253 1,939,406 11,321,730 978,435 – 1,939,406 2,917,841 5,243,245 – – 5,243,245

fn 1Allocable pension expense is meant to reflect the pension expense to which the proportionate share applies.

fn 2Pension expense related to specific liabilities of individual employers is discussed in paragraph 56 of GASB Statement No. 68, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions.

If these types of liabilities do not exist in a plan, the column may be eliminated and the report would not cite such expense.

Deferred Outflows of Resources Deferred Inflows of Resources

Pension Expense Excluding That Attributable to Employer-Paid

Member Contributions

Note that the original Schedule of Pension Amounts can be found in the whitepaper, “Governmental Employer Participation in Cost-Sharing Multiple-Employer Plans:

Issues Related to Information for Employer Reporting” and the 2015 edition of the AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide, State and Local Governments.

ix A

Copyright © 2015 by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Inc., New York, New York. Appendix: Page 2 of 3

Illustration of Pension Expense Columns

Given the amount of detail on the Schedule of Pension Amounts on the previous page, the columns with

changes have been expanded here for reference and changes from the original schedule are in bolded

red:

Net Amortization of

Deferred Amounts Total

from Changes in Pension

Proportion Expense

Pension and Differences Excluding

Proportionate Expense Between That

Share of Related to Employer Attributable

Allocable Specific Contributions and to

Plan Liabilities Proportionate Employer-Paid

Pension of Individual Share of Member

Expense fn1

Employers fn2

Contributions Contributions

fn 1 Allocable pension expense is meant to reflect the pension expense to which

the proportionate share applies.

fn 2 Pension expense related to specific liabilities of individual employers is discussed

in paragraph 56 of GASB Statement No. 68, Accounting and Financial Reporting

for Pensions. If these types of liabilities do not exist in a plan, the column may be

eliminated and the report would not cite such expense.

Pension Expense Excluding That Attributable to Employer-Paid

Member Contributions

SLGEP


Appendix: Page 3 of 3

Report Wording Modifications

If revisions to the Schedule of Pension Amounts are made to reflect employer-specific amounts using the

format in the above illustrative schedule above, the illustrative report that was previously issued also needs

to be revised to reflect the changes. The paragraphs below would be replace the Introductory and Opinion

paragraphs is Auditing Interpretation 1 of AU-C section 9805, Special Consideration-Audits of Single

Financial Statement and Specific Elements, Accounts, or Items of a Financial Statement. Changes from

the illustration that appears in the Auditing Interpretation are noted in red bolded underlined text.

Modifications for the Illustrative Report in Appendix A of this Article

First Paragraph of Report

We have audited the accompanying schedule of employer allocations of ABC Pension Plan as of and for

the year ended June 30, 20X5, and the related notes. We have also audited the total for all entities of the

columns titled net pension liability, total deferred outflows of resources, total deferred inflows of resources,

and total pension expense excluding that attributable to employer-paid member contributions

(specified column totals) included in the accompanying schedule of pension amounts by employer of ABC

Pension Plan as of and for the year ended June 30, 20X5, and the related notes.

Opinions

In our opinion, the schedules referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the employer

allocations and net pension liability, total deferred outflows of resources, total deferred inflows of resources,

and total pension expense excluding that attributable to employer-paid member contributions for the

total of all participating entities for ABC Pension Plan as of and for the year ended June 30, 20X5, in

accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Documents

LGEP: Emerging Pension Issues SLGEP: Article on … Emerging Pension Issues ... they may help you, as an auditor, ... employing units are designated employee contributions,