38
Lean Six Sigma Tom Devane Nexus U 2008 -- A Deeper Dive --

Lean Six Sigma Tom Devane Nexus U 2008 -- A Deeper Dive --

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Lean Six Sigma Tom Devane Nexus U 2008 -- A Deeper Dive --

Lean Six Sigma

Tom DevaneNexus U

2008

-- A Deeper Dive --

Page 2: Lean Six Sigma Tom Devane Nexus U 2008 -- A Deeper Dive --

2

Session Objectives

In this session you will learn

• How to address organizational performance issues through Lean Six Sigma

• The fundamentals of Lean Six Sigma and some key tools

• What other organizations have learned through compiled lessons learned analyses

• How to get started, even if you’re not the CEO

• Some Lean Six Sigma considerations for your upcoming Sunday Design Experience.

Page 3: Lean Six Sigma Tom Devane Nexus U 2008 -- A Deeper Dive --

3

Agenda

Topics

1. Introduction

2. Lean Six Sigma Primer

3. Case Study 1

4. Case Study 2

5. Pre-thinking for Sunday’s Design Experience

6. Wrap-up

Page 4: Lean Six Sigma Tom Devane Nexus U 2008 -- A Deeper Dive --

4

1. Introduction

Page 5: Lean Six Sigma Tom Devane Nexus U 2008 -- A Deeper Dive --

5

Audience inputs to the agenda…

Page 6: Lean Six Sigma Tom Devane Nexus U 2008 -- A Deeper Dive --

6

Whaddaya Think?

1. The Toyota Production System -- a formidable competitive weapon by Toyota -- consists of both Lean and Six Sigma principles and tools.

2. Six Sigma tends to get faster business results than Lean.

3. General Electric, well-known for its Six Sigma program, does not do any Lean.

4. The “Just-In-Time” process improvement craze of the 1980s was actually a combination of Lean and Six Sigma.

5. Lean and Six Sigma are used best in a manufacturing environment, not in a service environment.

6. Lean and Six Sigma both share the common goal of improved operational performance, they merely go about it in different ways.

7. Jack Welch of General Electric fame first improved processes with Six Sigma, then modified the corporate culture to make Six Sigma results sustainable.

8. The average weight of a Lean practitioner is 22 pounds less then his Six Sigma counterpart.

9. Purist Lean and purist Six Sigma practitioners are often at odds with each other in companies that have been doing serious process improvement for 10 years or so.

10. The learning curve for Lean tends to be greater than the learning curve for Six Sigma.

At this point it’s not expected that you know anything about disciplines of Lean, Six Sigma, or their combined method. But you must have heard something, so get with a partner and take a shot at the T/F questions below, and then we’ll discuss in a learning environment.

T F

T F

T F

T F

T F

T F

T F

T F

T F

T F

Page 7: Lean Six Sigma Tom Devane Nexus U 2008 -- A Deeper Dive --

7

2. Lean Six Sigma Primer

Page 8: Lean Six Sigma Tom Devane Nexus U 2008 -- A Deeper Dive --

8

Discipline Overview

Lean

Lean Six Sigma

Six Sigma

Eliminate waste.Simple tools like VSM, 5s.

Quick results. Can be dramatic

Reduce variation.Advanced tools like FMEA,

DOE, control charts.Dramatic results.

Benefits of Leanand Six Sigma.

Page 9: Lean Six Sigma Tom Devane Nexus U 2008 -- A Deeper Dive --

9

Which steps are “waste” in a Lean environment?

1. Move required production materials to the work station.

2. Insert lenses into sunglasses frame.

3. Move filled frames to next work station.

4. Check lenses for proper alignment within frame.

5. Paint frames.

6. Scrape excess paint from lenses.

7. Move sunglasses to warehouse staging area.

8. When ready to ship, move sunglasses to packing area.

9. Pack sunglasses in box.

10. Perform final inspection on 1 of every 40 pairs of sunglasses.

11. Ship sunglasses.

12. Notify material planning personnel to order more frames and lenses.

Page 10: Lean Six Sigma Tom Devane Nexus U 2008 -- A Deeper Dive --

10

Value Stream Maps

• Visualize all actions required (both value added and non-value added) required to produce and distribute a product.

• Identify sources of “waste”.

• Entire process defined using a common language.

• Manage flow through the process.

• Show linkage between material and information flow.

Page 11: Lean Six Sigma Tom Devane Nexus U 2008 -- A Deeper Dive --

11

Company confidential

Company confidential

Company confidential

Company confidential

Company confidential

Orientation meeting Loan application Title search Ag econ eval/cons Account setup

HQ

Farmer

Loan Approval & SetupValue Stream Map -- Current State

I

I I I I I

Pyt processing

I

(Staggered Receipt ofRecords)

Manual Archiving

LOAN CUSTOMER

Branch Manager

KEYElectronic

Communication

ManualCommunication

Supplier orCustomer

Delivery /Shipment

I Inventory

Push

Pull

25 Batches

Company confidential

Operators 4Q03

Company confidential

Company confidential

Company confidential

Company confidential

Company confidential

Company confidential

Company confidential

Company confidential

Company confidential

Company confidential

Company confidential

Company confidential

Company confidential

Company confidential

Company confidential

Company confidential

Company confidential

Company confidential

Company confidential

Company confidential

Company confidential

Company confidential

Company confidential

Company confidential

Company confidential

Company confidential

Company confidential

Company confidential

Company confidential

Company confidential

Company confidential

Company confidential

Company confidential

Company confidential

Page 12: Lean Six Sigma Tom Devane Nexus U 2008 -- A Deeper Dive --

C/T = 7 days

C/O = 21 hours

L/T = 1 day (per lot)

AWT = 20 hours

# Op = 2 people

3 Sterile Batches

Step D

3 Sterile Batches

hold time = 1.5hrs (20 hrs max)

I C/T = 7 days

C/O = 6 hours

L/T = 3 day (per lot)

AWT = 2 hours

# Op = 2 people

3 Sterile Batches

Step E

Page 13: Lean Six Sigma Tom Devane Nexus U 2008 -- A Deeper Dive --

13

Which process is a “better” process in Six Sigma?

AverageCandy bar Production costs for chocolate bar

$5

$3

Process A

Process B

Page 14: Lean Six Sigma Tom Devane Nexus U 2008 -- A Deeper Dive --

14

Who is a better shot?

A B

Page 15: Lean Six Sigma Tom Devane Nexus U 2008 -- A Deeper Dive --

15

Key Six Sigma ToolControl Chart

Anatomy of a Control Chart

Page 16: Lean Six Sigma Tom Devane Nexus U 2008 -- A Deeper Dive --

16

Players

Player Roles & Responsibilities Typical Training Six Sigma Dedication

Black Belt Works with a team – usually of Green Belts and people with no LSS training -- assigned to a specific LSS improvement project. Black Belts help with both the technical aspects (e.g., statistical tools) and people issues (e.g., team dynamics and change management). Typically a Black Belt will deliver about $1 million to the bottom line annually.

4 weeks of training spread over 4 months

Full-time(18 to 24 mo)

Master Black Belt Acts as instructor, coach and mentor to several Black Belts. Frequently Master Black Belts (MBBs) become involved in large-scale organizational change efforts and promotion of LSS within the organization. In many organizations MBBs organize into a learning group in which they challenge, advise, and support each other and Black Belts. They also often formulate business strategies with top management. In addition they may also lead “super-projects” that are high impact staffed with multiple Black Belts.

Usually on the job Full-time

Green Belt Participates in LSS by collecting data, providing process expertise, completing improvement tasks, and communicating changes to colleagues.

3 sessions of 3-4 days Part-time, as project needs dictate

Champion (Executive) Provides business guidance to teams, assists in selecting projects, acts as an organizational “evangelist” for Six Sigma, allocates resources, questions the team, anticipates and prevents problems with the LSS before they occur, removes roadblocks if they do occur.

5 days Part-time, as active executive sponsorship

needs dictate

ExecutiveSponsor

Actively supports and encourages project teams, participates in LSS meetings, demonstrations, and celebrations.

1-2 days Part-time, as executive support needs

dictate

Process Owner Ensures high quality design and peak performance of business processes. Helps triage problems as those addressable by simple process improvement methods or problems requiring use of complex, lesser-known statistical tools.

1 week Half-time to full-time, depending on process size

Page 17: Lean Six Sigma Tom Devane Nexus U 2008 -- A Deeper Dive --

17

Who you gonna call?

1. The Purchasing analyst cannot spend as much time on the cross-departmental New Product Launch process because her functional manager has put her on a “crunch project” in Purchasing. This will likely cause a 4-week slip in the launch of the next product.

2. Data needs to be collected on the number of failures of your company’s new electric razor once it gets into a customer’s hands.

3. The process improvement project will now be delayed 5 months because the engineer on the project has been sent on an overseas assignment.

4. Some heavy statistical analysis and design of experiments need to be done for the new bioreactor in the South building because its yields are erratic, and averaging only 35%.

5. Several Black Belts are working on similar problems in different parts of the company, but they are not benefiting from each others’ experience like they could.

6. Decide that it would be great if the CEO could mention Lean Six Sigma in each of her company-wide addresses over the next two months.

Black Belt

Master Black Belt

Green Belt

Champion

Executive Sponsor

Process owner

Draw a line to connect the issue with the person you would most likely call to address it.

Page 18: Lean Six Sigma Tom Devane Nexus U 2008 -- A Deeper Dive --

18

A peek into the practical world of Black BeltsCommon BB Challenges by Category

BB stretched too thinly

Team members stretched too thinly

Assigned project will not support strategy well

Assigned project will have little return

Entire targeted population for the improvements not on improvement

team, and resist

Motivating team to perform and

improve

Middle manager seeks to block project in his/her

area

General poor support from Champion

Pressure for quick results from top

management

Black Belts in different parts of the organization make the same mistakes

Team wants to jump ahead to fixes w/o data

Team won’t assume ownership quickly enough backsliding,

etc.Poor team dynamics

hinder progress

Powerful execs in other areas block implementation and

Champion wimps out

Powerful functional manager attempts to

influence solution

Middle manager wants pet project funded

Change management

Post-launch discoveries

Politics

Team problems

Team interfaces with others

Resourcing issues

Page 19: Lean Six Sigma Tom Devane Nexus U 2008 -- A Deeper Dive --

19

Sigma level

Percentage of time customers’

requirements were met

Defects per million

opportunities

1 68.27 690,000

2 95.45 308,537

3 99.73 66,807

4 99.9937 6,210

5 99.999943 233

6 99.9999998 3.4

What’s the “Sigma Thing” anyway?

Page 20: Lean Six Sigma Tom Devane Nexus U 2008 -- A Deeper Dive --

20

• The voice of the customer and “CTQ”

• Operational definition

• DMAIC

• DOE

• FMEA

• Value Stream Mapping

• 5s

• Tampering

Key terms and concepts

Page 21: Lean Six Sigma Tom Devane Nexus U 2008 -- A Deeper Dive --

21

What it’s not

In helping to define what Lean Six Sigma is, it is also helpful to consider what it is not:

• It is not just a collection of tools that people can be trained in and shortly thereafter deliver outstanding results. Successful LSS efforts require strong management support, training, and formal ties to the organization’s management system.

• It is not just a statistics program. It is a results program.

• It is not a recycled Total Quality Management program from the 1970s. While many tools and some methods from the quality movement are present in LSS, it distinguishes itself by having formal links to the compensation system, financial screening of potential projects, and a fanatical emphasis on the needs of the external customer.

• It is not a training program, as many Total Quality Management programs became. It is a system of tools, principles, and management practices that are applied to a improve processes.

Page 22: Lean Six Sigma Tom Devane Nexus U 2008 -- A Deeper Dive --

22

3. Case Study 1

Biopharmaceutical division of a global pharma company

Page 23: Lean Six Sigma Tom Devane Nexus U 2008 -- A Deeper Dive --

23

Strategy

Process

Information& LearningCulture

Structure &Relationships

Energizing Core

Want Know to how

Payfor

HRPractices

Performance Framework

© 2003. Jossey-Bass and Tom Devane from Integrating Lean Six Sigma and High-Performance Organizations. All rights reserved.

Page 24: Lean Six Sigma Tom Devane Nexus U 2008 -- A Deeper Dive --

24

Hit performance issues on multiple fronts

• Lean training for all managers and supervisors

• Basic Six Sigma training for all managers and supervisors

• Center of Excellence leaders – located in all departments -- trained in advanced Six Sigma methods and philosophy

• Leadership development occurred simultaneously to address critical change management issues within, and among departments

Page 25: Lean Six Sigma Tom Devane Nexus U 2008 -- A Deeper Dive --

25

Operating Results

• Representative issues addressed

– Batch review cycle time reduced by 60%

– Operational metrics track 12 parameters, improvements in 9 so far

– Yields improved by 20% in one production area by using statistical tools

• Approach to addressing the issues and results

– All work was done via chartered, cross-functional teams

– DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control)

Page 26: Lean Six Sigma Tom Devane Nexus U 2008 -- A Deeper Dive --

26

The 10 Big “pay attention to” elements for LSS leaders

1. The use of data and facts – not just opinions -- to make decisions.

2. Managing variation in processes, instead of just managing reject levels for a product.

3. An awareness of, and management of business processes and value streams that cut across functional department boundaries.

4. Opportunities to pull work through operations rather than push them.

5. An emphasis on prevention, not reaction.

6. Processes and culture that foster the continual search for ways to streamline and eliminate waste.

7. Impacts of activities and solutions on customer requirements.

8. Checks and balances to ensure that LSS experts do not become overloaded and leave.

9. Workplace orderliness and cleanliness.

10. Links between LSS improvement efforts and the organization’s reward and recognition system.

Page 27: Lean Six Sigma Tom Devane Nexus U 2008 -- A Deeper Dive --

27

4. Case Study 2

High-Tech Electronics Assembly

Page 28: Lean Six Sigma Tom Devane Nexus U 2008 -- A Deeper Dive --

28

Background

• Key challenges– High rate of field failures needed to be addressed in order to compete and be profitable– Lack of consistency within our products as a whole based on different services– Different processes created unnecessary confusion and significant difficulties when it was time to transfer

products into large volume production– Absence of motivation for continuous improvement outside the internal total quality group– Goals among different departments were not aligned and people were working on redundant, and in some cases

counter-productive projects– Many of the employees had come up through the scientific ranks and were accustomed to working alone, not on

teams.• Results

– Successfully integrated Lean, Six Sigma, and High Performance Organization disciplines– Operating results:

• $400,000 repeating annual savings within 2 months• Productivity increase of 2x within 7 months• Established a culture that drove for execution and continual improvement• Identified key areas for upstream new product development that later saved the company over $1 million

annually• Value-Added Process Time/Total Process Time went from 8% to 60% for two key processes within the

first 2 months– Executives played a key role in the initial success– Hard/soft integration principles deployed.

Page 29: Lean Six Sigma Tom Devane Nexus U 2008 -- A Deeper Dive --

29

Discipline Overview

Lean

Lean Six Sigma

Six Sigma

Eliminate waste.Simple tools like VSM, 5s.

Quick results.

Reduce variation.Advanced tools like FMEA,

DOE, control charts.Dramatic results.

Benefits of Leanand Six Sigma.

High-PerformanceOrganizations

LSS/HPO

Culture of execution & improvement.Restructure into HPTs.

Intrinsic motivation for short- and long-term sustainable gains.

Benefits of Lean,Six Sigma, and

High-Performance Organizations.

Page 30: Lean Six Sigma Tom Devane Nexus U 2008 -- A Deeper Dive --

30

JourneyChallenges articulated

Study group convenes

Develop direction

Research results

New leadership training

Announcements

Customer requirements

Process mapping

Teamstructuring workshop

Projects Remedial coaching

Continuousimprovement

Page 31: Lean Six Sigma Tom Devane Nexus U 2008 -- A Deeper Dive --

31

Hallmarks of the discipline

1. Statistical methods

2. Attention to workplace and tool organization

3. Fanatical focus on the external customer

4. Attention to process

5. Pre-screening, and ongoing screening of improvement projects to ensure fit with strategy and financial return

6. People strive for perfection, but noble mistakes are tolerated

7. An analysis-rich and measurement-rich environment

8. A classification and sorting process to determine the type of tools to apply

9. Coordination and control of the work occurs at the lowest level possible

10. Collective accountability

Page 32: Lean Six Sigma Tom Devane Nexus U 2008 -- A Deeper Dive --

32

5. Pre-Thinking for your Sunday Design Experience

Page 33: Lean Six Sigma Tom Devane Nexus U 2008 -- A Deeper Dive --

33

Sunday pre-thought

• What would a Lean Six Sigma “foundation building block” look like? How would it be described?

• What other methods might enhance Lean Six Sigma?

• What other methods might Lean Six Sigma enhance?

Page 34: Lean Six Sigma Tom Devane Nexus U 2008 -- A Deeper Dive --

34

6. Wrap-up

Page 35: Lean Six Sigma Tom Devane Nexus U 2008 -- A Deeper Dive --

35

Lessons Learned

Planning

• Being realistic is quite helpful

• Ensuring wide participation in the planning processes

• Missing the customer perspective early on will kill you

• Need to document planning phase well

• Assign responsibilities clearly

• Integration of hard and soft aspects is key – each covers inherent weaknesses of the other

• No organization-wide roll-outs of Six Sigma without training senior managers how to support it – top management dialogue can’t stop after the approval and initial re-organization into teams.

• Resist the temptation to use good -- not great -- performers as driving change agents, such as Black Belts.

• Go for lean manufacturing techniques before Six Sigma to demonstrate quick wins unless data for analysis already exists (as it did for a field service warranty process)

• Strive to “over-communicate” and request feedback on the content and quality of communication.

Page 36: Lean Six Sigma Tom Devane Nexus U 2008 -- A Deeper Dive --

36

Lessons Learned

Implementation

• Maintain flexibility in the planning that other options can be considered as you move forward.

• You can generally do more than most people think.

• Ensure responsibilities are clearly assigned.

• Ensure leaders of change are optimistic and will push project through to completion.

• Groom the subsequent leaders

• The restructuring into teams -- this can not be a pilot.

• Executives need to agree on their individual and collective areas of responsibility for business processes.

• Design structures and processes that ensure control.

• Training for new leaders needs to mandatory, not optional

• Bring Finance and HR into the process soon.

• Executive efforts can decrease as the transformation progresses if the soft elements of HPO are successfully anchored.

• It is extremely important to provide frequent status reports for the improvement projects.

Page 37: Lean Six Sigma Tom Devane Nexus U 2008 -- A Deeper Dive --

37

Sounds great. But how do I get something going with Lean Six Sigma if I’m not the CEO?

Page 38: Lean Six Sigma Tom Devane Nexus U 2008 -- A Deeper Dive --

38

For Future Reference

Breyfogle, Forrest. Implementing Six Sigma: Smarter Solutions Using Statistical Methods. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1999.

Devane, T. Integrating Lean Six Sigma and High Performance Organizations: Leading the Charge Toward Rapid, Radical, Sustainable Improvement.. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer, (current working title, forthcoming in November, 2003).

Holman, P., Devane, T., & Cady, S., The Change Handbook. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler, 2007.

Macy, B.A., and Izumi, H.A. “Organizational Change, Design and Work Innovation: A Meta-Analysis of 131 North American Field Studies – 1961-1991,” in Research in Organizational Change and Development. R. Woodman and W. Pasmore (eds). New York: JAI Press Inc, Vol 7.

Nauman, E. & Hoisington S. Customer Centered Six Sigma: Linking Customers, Process Improvement, and Financial Results. Houston: American Society for Quality, 2001.

Pande, Peter, et al. The Six Sigma Way. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2000.

Rother, M., and Shook, J. Learning to See: Value Stream Mapping to Create Value and Eliminate Muda. Brookline, MA: Lean Enterprise Institute, 1989.

Womack, J. and Jones, T. (1996). Lean thinking: Banish waste and create wealth in your corporation. New York: Simon & Schuster.

-----Web resource: www.isixsigma.com