LEADERSHIP TEAM MEETINGOctober 30, 2013

Bell Ringer Choose four formative assessment practices that research reviews suggest lead to improved student achievement.

Clear Learning

Goal• Use formative assessment to differentiate teaching and learning

• Develop deeper knowledge of questioning and engagement

Clear Learning

Goals• Demonstrate the fundamentals of free throw shooting to successfully hit a shot

Free Throw Shooting

Directions•Write down the fundamental steps needed to successfully hit free throws

Free Throw Shooting

Steps• Feet shoulder width apart• Determine your ritual• Reach for the rim, inside the

rim or back of the rim• Balance the ball on your

fingertips• Arms in L shape• Follow the motion through the

body• Follow through

With a shoulder partner physically practice steps to fundamentally shoot free throws correctly

Formative Assessment• Feet shoulder width apart

• Determine your ritual• Reach for the rim, inside the

rim or back of the rim• Balance the ball on your

fingertips• Arms in L shape• Follow the motion through the

body• Follow through

GO TO THE GYM

Assessment Results• ___________ out of

___________ made their first free throw attempt

• ___________ out of ___________ made their second free throw attempt

• ___________ out of ___________ made their summative free throw attempt

Next Steps• Do we move on?• What about students that have mastered the skill or the ones who need much remediation?

• Did our formative assessment align with our Clear Learning Goal & what we taught?

• Did we put you in the game situation?

Next Steps cont’• Did we have mastery of

the formative before we did the summative?

• Did we get the problem fixed so could have growth?

• Did we individualize or regroup?

•How did you organize the cards?

•Reflecting on this list, which skills are not applicable in science education?

Do Categories Matter?English Language

ArtsScience and Engineering

Mathematics

Cite textual evidence to support analysisDetermine the meaning of symbols and domain specific wordsFollow precisely a multi-step procedureDistinguish among facts, reasoned judgment in research, and speculationAnalyze the structure used for organization and to enhance understandingIntegrate information expressed in words with visual representations Compare/Contrast experimental results with informational text

Ask Questions and Define ProblemsDevelop and Use ModelsPlan and Carry Out InvestigationsAnalyze and Interpret DataUse Math, Information Technology, Computer Technology, and Computational ThinkingConstruct Explanations and Design SolutionsEngage in Argument from EvidenceObtain, Evaluate, and Communicate Information

Make sense of problems and persevere in solving themReason abstractly and quantitativelyConstruct viable arguments & critique reasoning of othersModel with mathematicsUse appropriate tools strategicallyAttend to precisionLook for and make use of structureLook for and express regularity in repeated reasoning

Program Review (PR) Scoring Guide

Program Review CalculationsEach of the 3 Program Review areas (Arts & Humanities, Writing, and Practical Living) is comprised of 4 standards (Curriculum/Instruction, Formative/Summative Assessment, Professional Development, and Administrative Support).

Step 1: Average the characteristic scores for a score for each standard.– Scores range from 0-3 for each standard– 0 – No Implementation, 1– Needs Improvement, 2 –Proficient, and 3

DistinguishedStep 2: Add the 4 standard scores to get a single number for each Program Review area.

– Scores range 0-12 for each Program Review area– The cut score 8 is Proficient and 10.8 is Distinguished

Step 3: Add the three Program Review area scores for a total Program Review score.

– Scores range between 0-36Step 4: Divide the total number by 24 (proficient (8) x 3 areas = 24).

– This number yields the percent of the 23 points earned (number of points possible in Unbridled Learning accountability model for PR when Learners and PR are combined).

Program Review

Data Release

    AVERAGE CHARACTER-

ISTIC SCORES

PROGRAM REVIEW TOTAL

CATEGORY

ARTS & HUMANITIES

Curriculum/ Instruction 1.0    

Formative/ Summative Assessment 1.0    

Professional Development 1.0    

Administrative Support 1.0    

ARTS & HUMANITIES TOTAL 4 Needs Improvement

PRACTICAL LIVING/CAREERSTUDIES

Curriculum/Instruction 2.0

Formative/Summative Assessment 2.0

Professional Development 1.9

Administrative Support 2.1

PRACTICAL LIVING TOTAL 8 ProficientWRITING Curriculum/Instruction 1.4

Formative/Summative Assessment

1.4

Professional Development 1.8

Administrative Support 1.4

WRITING TOTAL 6 NeedsImprovement

TOTAL POINTS 18  

PERCENTAGE OF POINTS (divide by 24) 75%  

ACCOUNTABILITY POINTS (out of 23 points possible) 17.25  

CalculationExample

Accountability Formula for Combining Next Generation Learners and Program Reviews

Component OverallWeighted Percent

Weighted Score

Next Gen Learners Overall Score 57.9 X 77% = 44.6

Program Reviews 75.0 X 23% = 17.3

Combined Overall Score* 61.9

*Combined Overall Score used to calculate new 70th and 90th percentile cut for summer 2014 targets

Program Review Data Release Combining Next-Generation Learners and Program

Reviews

Exit Slip Reflect on conversations around formative and summative assessments. What adjustments do you need to implement to develop enduring skills in students?