LAMPIRAN I

Contoh Kuesioner

ITEM PERTANYAAN PENELITIAN

Pernyataan berikut ini berkaitan dengan kinerja Bapak/Ibu sebagai pimpinan

pembuat usulan Rencana Kegiatan Anggaran Satuan Kerja Perangkat Daerah

dalam Unit Kerja Bapak/Ibu. Kami sangat mengharapkan pendapat Bapak/Ibu

semua sesuai dengan kondisi di tempat kerja Bapak/Ibu dan berdasarkan

pengalaman nyata selama ini. Mohon Bapak/Ibu memilih jawaban dengan skala

yang paling tepat dengan menyilang atau melingkari nomor yang tersedia di

bawah ini dengan ketentuan sebagai berikut.

Keterangan : Sangat setuju = 5 Setuju = 4 Ragu-ragu = 3 Tidak setuju = 2 Sangat tidak setuju = 1

Partisipasi Penganggaran:

No. Urutan pertanyaan Jawaban

1.Pengaruh terhadap proses penyusunanrencana anggaran.

5 4 3 2 1

2.Saya aktif terlibat dalam prosesperencanaan “bottom up” 5 4 3 2 1

3.Penerimaan pendapat atas penetapanperencanaan anggaran

5 4 3 2 1

4. Kepuasan akan Rencana anggaran 5 4 3 2 1

5.Pertemuan dengan staf untuk rencanaanggaran

5 4 3 2 1

6.Kontribusi dan partisipasi aktif dalampenyusunan rencana anggaran

5 4 3 2 1

7.Pertimbangkan pendapat atas prosespenyusunan anggaran

5 4 3 2 1

8.Kendala waktu, menjadikan ketidaksesuaianangaran terhadap daftar Perencanaan

5 4 3 2 1

Kejelasan Tujuan Kerja:

No. Urutan pertanyaan Jawaban

1. Pemahaman atas Tujuan Rencana Kerja 5 4 3 2 1

2.Tujuan kerja RKA-SKPD adalah hal yangpenting dan perlu diprioritaskan

5 4 3 2 1

3. Ketidakjelasan tujuan kerja anggaran 5 4 3 2 1

4.Pemahaman sepenuhnya atas carapelaksanaan anggaran

5 4 3 2 1

5.Kesesuaian antara Tujuan RKA-SKPDdengan Rencana Anggaran Pendapatan danBelanja Daerah

5 4 3 2 1

Evaluasi Kinerja Anggaran:

No. Urutan pertanyaan Jawaban

1.Pimpinan menyebutkan RKA-SKPD ketikaberbicara mengenai efisiensi dan efektivitaskepada saya sebagai kepala unit

5 4 3 2 1

2.Pimpinan saya menganggap bahwa sayasendiri yang bertanggung jawab ataspenyimpangan anggaran dalam Unit saya

5 4 3 2 1

3.Pimpinan tidak puas dengan penjelasan sayaatas penyimpangan anggaran dalam unitsaya

5 4 3 2 1

4.Pimpinan membicarakan kepada sayamengenai peningkatan pekerjaan untukmemenuhi tujuan RKA-SKPD

5 4 3 2 1

5.Pimpinan akan menunjukkanketidakpuasannya mengenai anggaran unitsaya bila tidak tercapai

5 4 3 2 1

6.

Penyimpangan anggaran yang besar dalamunit saya telah mendapat komentar daripimpinan, karena mengakibatkan prestasisaya yang buruk

5 4 3 2 1

7.

Saya telah menjelaskan kepada pimpinanmengenai item-item anggaran yangmelampaui RKA-SKPD karena tidak dapatsaya kendalikan

5 4 3 2 1

Kinerja:

No. Urutan pertanyaan Jawaban

1.Target permulaan rencana anggaran selaluditetapkan serasional mungkin

5 4 3 2 1

2.Biasanya target yang ditetapkan mudahdicapai

5 4 3 2 1

3.Saya selalu merevisi target anggaran yangditetapkan setelah berjalan 6 bulan

5 4 3 2 1

4.Saya perlu mengetahui penyebabpenyimpangan anggaran untuk kelompokmaupun individu dalam unit saya

5 4 3 2 1

5.Saya harus kerja keras untuk mencapai targetsetelah direvisi

5 4 3 2 1

6.Atasan saya sering bersikap kritis terhadappenentuan target, karena itu anggaranditetapkan dengan baik

5 4 3 2 1

7.Proyek-proyek di unit kerja saya mengikutikebutuhan dan prioritas masyarakat setempat

5 4 3 2 1

8.

Kebutuhan dan prioritas masyarakat setempattidak dipertimbangkan pada saatmerencanakan dan melaksanakan proyek-proyek

5 4 3 2 1

9.Kinerja saya baik atau pada umumnya dinilaibaik jika anggaran yang ditetapkan dapatdicapai/dilaksanakan

5 4 3 2 1

10.Kinerja saya baik atau atau pada umumnyadinilai baik jika anggaran yang ditetapkandapat dikendalikan/diawasi

5 4 3 2 1

11.Kinerja saya baik atau pada umumnya dinilaibaik jika anggaran yang ditetapkan dapatdipertanggung jawabkan

5 4 3 2 1

12.

Untuk mengetahui perkembangan kinerjasaya baik atau pada umumnya baik jikarencana dan realisasi anggaran dari tahun ketahun dapat diperbandingkan

5 4 3 2 1

Terima kasih atas bantuan Bapak/Ibu dalam mengisi daftar pertanyaan ini.

Lampiran 2

Pengujian Validitas dan Reliabilitas Instrumen

1. Variabel Partisipasi

Correlations

item1 item2 item3 item4 item5 item6 item7 item8 SkorTotal

item1 Pearson Correlation 1 -.183 -.311* -.015 .095 .073 .172 .231 .343*

Sig. (2-tailed) .223 .035 .921 .529 .631 .254 .123 .020

N 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46item2 Pearson Correlation -.183 1 .112 .141 .259 .125 -.085 .203 .456**

Sig. (2-tailed) .223 .458 .349 .082 .409 .575 .175 .001

N 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46item3 Pearson Correlation -.311* .112 1 -.017 .379** .082 -.029 -.124 .294*

Sig. (2-tailed) .035 .458 .912 .009 .590 .846 .412 .047

N 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46item4 Pearson Correlation -.015 .141 -.017 1 -.029 .014 .025 -.238 .324*

Sig. (2-tailed) .921 .349 .912 .847 .924 .870 .111 .028

N 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46item5 Pearson Correlation .095 .259 .379** -.029 1 .375* -.030 .108 .664**

Sig. (2-tailed) .529 .082 .009 .847 .010 .842 .473 .000

N 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46item6 Pearson Correlation .073 .125 .082 .014 .375* 1 -.192 .455** .587**

Sig. (2-tailed) .631 .409 .590 .924 .010 .200 .001 .000

N 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46

item7 Pearson Correlation .172 -.085 -.029 .025 -.030 -.192 1 -.164 .192Sig. (2-tailed) .254 .575 .846 .870 .842 .200 .275 .201

N 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46item8 Pearson Correlation .231 .203 -.124 -.238 .108 .455** -.164 1 .423**

Sig. (2-tailed) .123 .175 .412 .111 .473 .001 .275 .003

N 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46SkorTotal Pearson Correlation .343* .456** .294* .324* .664** .587** .192 .423** 1

Sig. (2-tailed) .020 .001 .047 .028 .000 .000 .201 .003

N 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Correlations

item1 item2 item3 item4 item5 item6 item8 TotalSkor

item1 Pearson Correlation 1 -.183 -.311* -.015 .095 .073 .231 .300*

Sig. (2-tailed) .223 .035 .921 .529 .631 .123 .042

N 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46item2 Pearson Correlation -.183 1 .112 .141 .259 .125 .203 .486**

Sig. (2-tailed) .223 .458 .349 .082 .409 .175 .001

N 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46item3 Pearson Correlation -.311* .112 1 -.017 .379** .082 -.124 .307*

Sig. (2-tailed) .035 .458 .912 .009 .590 .412 .038

N 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46item4 Pearson Correlation -.015 .141 -.017 1 -.029 .014 -.238 .322*

Sig. (2-tailed) .921 .349 .912 .847 .924 .111 .029

N 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46

item5 Pearson Correlation .095 .259 .379** -.029 1 .375* .108 .683**

Sig. (2-tailed) .529 .082 .009 .847 .010 .473 .000

N 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46item6 Pearson Correlation .073 .125 .082 .014 .375* 1 .455** .650**

Sig. (2-tailed) .631 .409 .590 .924 .010 .001 .000

N 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46item8 Pearson Correlation .231 .203 -.124 -.238 .108 .455** 1 .476**

Sig. (2-tailed) .123 .175 .412 .111 .473 .001 .001

N 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46TotalSkor Pearson Correlation .300* .486** .307* .322* .683** .650** .476** 1

Sig. (2-tailed) .042 .001 .038 .029 .000 .000 .001

N 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Reliability

Case Processing Summary

N %

Cases Valid 46 100.0

Excludeda 0 .0Total 46 100.0

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in theprocedure.

Reliability StatisticsCronbach's Alpha N of Items

.664 8

2. Variabel kejelasan tujuan kerja

Correlations

item1 item2 item3 item4 item5 TotalSkor

item1 Pearson Correlation 1 .105 -.210 -.017 -.067 .498**

Sig. (2-tailed) .487 .162 .909 .658 .000

N 46 46 46 46 46 46item2 Pearson Correlation .105 1 -.157 .050 -.232 .335*

Sig. (2-tailed) .487 .299 .743 .120 .023

N 46 46 46 46 46 46item3 Pearson Correlation -.210 -.157 1 .027 .137 .356*

Sig. (2-tailed) .162 .299 .859 .363 .015

N 46 46 46 46 46 46item4 Pearson Correlation -.017 .050 .027 1 .118 .475**

Sig. (2-tailed) .909 .743 .859 .436 .001

N 46 46 46 46 46 46item5 Pearson Correlation -.067 -.232 .137 .118 1 .437**

Sig. (2-tailed) .658 .120 .363 .436 .002

N 46 46 46 46 46 46TotalSkor Pearson Correlation .498** .335* .356* .475** .437** 1

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .023 .015 .001 .002

N 46 46 46 46 46 46**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Reliability

Case Processing Summary

N %

Cases Valid 46 100.0

Excludeda 0 .0Total 46 100.0

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in theprocedure.

Reliability StatisticsCronbach's Alpha N of Items

.559 6

3. Variabel Evaluasi Kinerja Anggaran

Correlations

item1 item2 item3 item4 item5 item6 item7 TotalSkor

item1 Pearson Correlation 1 -.008 .118 .048 -.209 .116 -.215 .303*

Sig. (2-tailed) .960 .433 .752 .163 .442 .152 .041

N 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46item2 Pearson Correlation -.008 1 -.021 .011 -.187 .094 -.033 .356*

Sig. (2-tailed) .960 .891 .943 .214 .535 .825 .015

N 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46item3 Pearson Correlation .118 -.021 1 .030 -.281 -.060 -.215 .166

Sig. (2-tailed) .433 .891 .842 .058 .690 .152 .269

N 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46item4 Pearson Correlation .048 .011 .030 1 -.199 -.118 .049 .348*

Sig. (2-tailed) .752 .943 .842 .184 .435 .748 .018

N 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46item5 Pearson Correlation -.209 -.187 -.281 -.199 1 .218 .080 .344*

Sig. (2-tailed) .163 .214 .058 .184 .145 .599 .019

N 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46item6 Pearson Correlation .116 .094 -.060 -.118 .218 1 .144 .489**

Sig. (2-tailed) .442 .535 .690 .435 .145 .339 .001

N 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46item7 Pearson Correlation -.215 -.033 -.215 .049 .080 .144 1 .326*

Sig. (2-tailed) .152 .825 .152 .748 .599 .339 .027

N 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46

TotalSkor Pearson Correlation .303* .356* .166 .348* .344* .489** .326* 1Sig. (2-tailed) .041 .015 .269 .018 .019 .001 .027

N 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Correlations

Correlations

item1 item2 item4 item5 item6 item7 TotalSkor

item1 Pearson Correlation 1 -.008 .048 -.209 .116 -.215 .303*

Sig. (2-tailed) .960 .752 .163 .442 .152 .041

N 46 46 46 46 46 46 46item2 Pearson Correlation -.008 1 .011 -.187 .094 -.033 .356*

Sig. (2-tailed) .960 .943 .214 .535 .825 .015

N 46 46 46 46 46 46 46item4 Pearson Correlation .048 .011 1 -.199 -.118 .049 .348*

Sig. (2-tailed) .752 .943 .184 .435 .748 .018

N 46 46 46 46 46 46 46item5 Pearson Correlation -.209 -.187 -.199 1 .218 .080 .344*

Sig. (2-tailed) .163 .214 .184 .145 .599 .019

N 46 46 46 46 46 46 46item6 Pearson Correlation .116 .094 -.118 .218 1 .144 .489**

Sig. (2-tailed) .442 .535 .435 .145 .339 .001

N 46 46 46 46 46 46 46

item7 Pearson Correlation -.215 -.033 .049 .080 .144 1 .326*

Sig. (2-tailed) .152 .825 .748 .599 .339 .027

N 46 46 46 46 46 46 46TotalSkor Pearson Correlation .303* .356* .348* .344* .489** .326* 1

Sig. (2-tailed) .041 .015 .018 .019 .001 .027

N 46 46 46 46 46 46 46*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Reliability

Case Processing Summary

N %

Cases Valid 46 100.0

Excludeda 0 .0

Total 46 100.0a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in theprocedure.

Reliability StatisticsCronbach's Alpha N of Items

.511 7

4. Variabel Kinerja

Correlations

item1 item2 item3 item4 item5 item6 item7 item8 item9 item10 item11 item12 TotalSkor

item1 Pearson Correlation 1 .036 .179 .003 .169 -.149 .197 -.082 .085 .064 -.127 .052 .389**

Sig. (2-tailed) .814 .235 .983 .262 .322 .189 .588 .576 .672 .402 .730 .008

N 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46item2 Pearson Correlation .036 1 -.074 -.219 -.256 .034 .013 -.201 .241 .040 -.134 .033 .191

Sig. (2-tailed) .814 .623 .143 .086 .823 .933 .181 .107 .792 .374 .829 .202

N 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46item3 Pearson Correlation .179 -.074 1 -.228 .188 .000 .264 -.021 .055 .151 .039 .030 .440**

Sig. (2-tailed) .235 .623 .128 .211 1.000 .076 .888 .716 .317 .796 .842 .002

N 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46item4 Pearson Correlation .003 -.219 -.228 1 -.058 .036 .265 .046 -.201 -.124 -.052 -.077 .065

Sig. (2-tailed) .983 .143 .128 .703 .810 .075 .759 .181 .412 .734 .613 .666

N 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46item5 Pearson Correlation .169 -.256 .188 -.058 1 -.116 -.051 -.154 .019 .015 -.051 -.091 .154

Sig. (2-tailed) .262 .086 .211 .703 .444 .737 .307 .901 .920 .737 .547 .307

N 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46item6 Pearson Correlation -.149 .034 .000 .036 -.116 1 .080 -.037 -.052 .030 .080 .149 .274

Sig. (2-tailed) .322 .823 1.000 .810 .444 .596 .805 .731 .841 .596 .322 .066

N 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46item7 Pearson Correlation .197 .013 .264 .265 -.051 .080 1 -.219 .049 -.175 .216 -.035 .401**

Sig. (2-tailed) .189 .933 .076 .075 .737 .596 .144 .745 .244 .150 .816 .006

N 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46

item8 Pearson Correlation -.082 -.201 -.021 .046 -.154 -.037 -.219 1 -.009 -.023 -.138 .007 .044Sig. (2-tailed) .588 .181 .888 .759 .307 .805 .144 .952 .881 .362 .966 .773

N 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46item9 Pearson Correlation .085 .241 .055 -.201 .019 -.052 .049 -.009 1 .133 .106 -.085 .475**

Sig. (2-tailed) .576 .107 .716 .181 .901 .731 .745 .952 .380 .484 .576 .001

N 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46item10 Pearson Correlation .064 .040 .151 -.124 .015 .030 -.175 -.023 .133 1 .023 .059 .393**

Sig. (2-tailed) .672 .792 .317 .412 .920 .841 .244 .881 .380 .879 .698 .007

N 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46item11 Pearson Correlation -.127 -.134 .039 -.052 -.051 .080 .216 -.138 .106 .023 1 .369* .338*

Sig. (2-tailed) .402 .374 .796 .734 .737 .596 .150 .362 .484 .879 .012 .022

N 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46item12 Pearson Correlation .052 .033 .030 -.077 -.091 .149 -.035 .007 -.085 .059 .369* 1 .360*

Sig. (2-tailed) .730 .829 .842 .613 .547 .322 .816 .966 .576 .698 .012 .014

N 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46TotalSkor

Pearson Correlation .389** .191 .440** .065 .154 .274 .401** .044 .475** .393** .338* .360* 1Sig. (2-tailed) .008 .202 .002 .666 .307 .066 .006 .773 .001 .007 .022 .014

N 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Correlations

item1 item3 item7 item9 item10 item11 item12 TotalSkor

item1 Pearson Correlation 1 .179 .197 .085 .064 -.127 .052 .389**

Sig. (2-tailed) .235 .189 .576 .672 .402 .730 .008

N 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46item3 Pearson Correlation .179 1 .264 .055 .151 .039 .030 .440**

Sig. (2-tailed) .235 .076 .716 .317 .796 .842 .002

N 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46item7 Pearson Correlation .197 .264 1 .049 -.175 .216 -.035 .401**

Sig. (2-tailed) .189 .076 .745 .244 .150 .816 .006

N 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46item9 Pearson Correlation .085 .055 .049 1 .133 .106 -.085 .475**

Sig. (2-tailed) .576 .716 .745 .380 .484 .576 .001

N 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46item10 Pearson Correlation .064 .151 -.175 .133 1 .023 .059 .393**

Sig. (2-tailed) .672 .317 .244 .380 .879 .698 .007

N 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46item11 Pearson Correlation -.127 .039 .216 .106 .023 1 .369* .338*

Sig. (2-tailed) .402 .796 .150 .484 .879 .012 .022

N 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46item12 Pearson Correlation .052 .030 -.035 -.085 .059 .369* 1 .360*

Sig. (2-tailed) .730 .842 .816 .576 .698 .012 .014

N 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46TotalSkor Pearson Correlation .389** .440** .401** .475** .393** .338* .360* 1

Sig. (2-tailed) .008 .002 .006 .001 .007 .022 .014

N 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Reliability

Case Processing Summary

N %

Cases Valid 46 100.0

Excludeda 0 .0Total 46 100.0

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in theprocedure.

Reliability StatisticsCronbach's

Alpha N of Items.559 13

Lampiran 3Nomor

RespondenKinerja Total

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 121 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 572 4 4 5 4 3 5 5 4 4 4 5 4 513 5 4 4 5 4 4 5 4 4 4 5 4 524 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 5 5 4 5 4 505 4 4 5 4 4 5 4 4 2 4 5 4 496 4 3 4 5 5 4 4 4 5 4 5 4 517 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 518 5 3 4 4 4 4 4 5 3 5 4 5 509 4 4 4 4 4 5 4 5 3 4 4 5 50

10 4 5 4 4 3 5 4 5 4 4 4 5 5111 5 4 4 5 4 4 5 4 2 3 4 5 4912 5 4 5 3 4 4 5 4 5 4 5 5 5313 5 3 5 4 5 4 5 5 4 4 5 5 5414 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 4 4 4 3 4815 5 4 4 5 4 5 5 3 4 4 4 4 5116 4 4 4 4 4 5 4 5 5 5 4 4 5217 4 4 5 4 4 4 5 4 4 3 5 5 5118 4 5 4 5 4 5 5 4 4 4 5 5 5419 4 5 4 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5020 5 4 5 3 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 5121 4 5 5 4 4 4 5 4 5 5 4 4 5322 5 5 5 4 4 4 5 4 5 4 5 5 5523 5 5 5 4 4 3 4 5 3 5 4 4 5124 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5025 5 4 5 4 4 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 5226 5 4 4 5 5 4 5 4 4 3 5 4 5227 4 4 5 5 4 5 5 4 3 5 5 5 5428 5 4 5 4 5 5 4 4 4 5 4 5 5429 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 5 5130 4 5 4 4 4 4 5 4 5 4 4 4 5131 4 5 3 4 4 5 4 4 4 3 4 4 4832 5 4 5 4 4 4 4 5 5 4 5 5 5433 5 4 5 4 5 4 4 4 5 4 4 4 5234 5 4 5 5 4 4 5 4 5 5 4 4 5435 5 5 5 4 4 5 5 4 5 3 4 4 5336 5 5 4 3 4 4 5 3 4 5 5 4 5137 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 4 4 4 5 5 52

38 3 4 5 4 4 5 4 4 4 4 5 5 5139 5 5 5 4 4 5 5 4 4 5 5 5 5640 5 4 5 5 4 5 5 5 3 3 4 4 5241 4 4 5 4 5 5 5 4 4 5 5 4 5442 5 4 5 4 4 5 5 4 4 4 5 4 5343 5 4 3 5 4 5 4 4 4 5 5 5 5344 5 5 5 3 5 5 4 4 5 5 5 5 5645 5 5 4 4 3 5 4 4 5 5 5 5 5446 5 5 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 3 5 5 55

NomorResponden

Partisipasi Penganggaran Total1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 402 5 4 4 5 4 4 5 4 353 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 5 354 5 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 345 4 4 5 4 4 3 4 4 326 4 5 5 3 5 5 4 5 367 4 4 4 3 4 5 4 5 338 5 4 4 3 4 4 5 4 339 5 3 4 3 3 4 5 4 31

10 3 4 5 3 4 4 4 4 3111 4 4 5 3 4 5 3 5 3312 5 4 4 4 5 5 4 5 3613 3 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 3414 4 4 5 5 3 4 5 4 3415 5 5 4 5 4 4 5 4 3616 5 4 4 3 4 4 5 5 3417 4 4 4 4 3 3 4 4 3018 5 5 5 4 5 5 4 5 3819 4 4 4 5 4 4 4 4 3320 4 4 4 4 3 4 5 4 3221 5 4 4 4 3 4 4 5 3322 5 4 5 4 5 5 4 4 3623 4 4 5 4 4 5 4 4 3424 4 5 5 4 5 4 5 4 3625 4 4 4 5 4 5 4 5 3526 4 5 4 5 3 4 4 3 3227 4 4 4 5 4 5 4 4 3428 5 4 5 4 5 4 4 4 3529 4 4 5 4 5 4 4 4 3430 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 3531 5 5 4 4 4 5 4 5 3632 4 4 5 3 4 5 5 4 3433 4 4 5 5 5 5 4 3 3534 5 3 5 5 3 4 5 4 3435 4 4 5 5 5 4 5 4 3636 4 5 5 4 4 4 5 4 3537 4 4 5 5 4 5 4 5 3638 5 4 4 5 4 5 4 4 35

39 3 5 5 4 4 4 5 4 3440 4 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 3341 4 5 5 4 4 5 4 5 3642 4 4 5 4 5 5 5 4 3643 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 3644 4 4 5 4 3 4 4 4 3245 5 4 5 4 4 5 5 5 3746 4 5 5 5 4 5 4 5 37

NomorResponden

Kejelasan Tujuan Kerja Total1 2 3 4 5

1 5 4 3 5 5 222 3 5 2 5 4 193 4 4 2 5 5 204 4 4 2 4 4 185 3 4 1 4 4 166 5 5 1 4 5 207 4 4 2 5 4 198 2 4 1 5 5 179 4 3 1 5 4 17

10 4 5 2 5 4 2011 3 5 1 5 5 1912 5 3 1 4 5 1813 4 4 1 5 4 1814 4 4 1 4 3 1615 4 5 1 4 4 1816 4 4 1 4 4 1717 3 4 1 4 5 1718 5 4 3 4 5 2119 4 4 1 5 4 1820 5 5 1 4 4 1921 4 4 1 4 5 1822 4 4 1 5 3 1723 3 3 3 4 5 1824 5 5 1 4 4 1925 4 5 2 5 4 2026 5 4 2 4 4 1927 4 4 1 5 5 1928 3 5 2 4 4 1829 5 4 1 3 3 1630 5 5 1 4 4 1931 5 4 1 5 4 1932 5 5 1 5 4 2033 5 4 1 5 5 2034 3 3 2 4 5 1735 4 5 1 4 4 1836 4 4 3 5 4 2037 4 4 2 4 5 1938 4 4 1 4 5 18

39 5 5 1 4 5 2040 5 4 1 5 5 2041 5 5 1 5 3 1942 3 4 2 4 4 1743 5 4 1 5 5 2044 5 4 1 5 5 2045 5 4 1 5 5 2046 3 5 2 5 5 20

NomorResponden

Evaluasi Kinerja Anggaran Total1 2 3 4 5 6 7

1 5 1 1 5 4 4 5 252 5 3 2 5 1 4 4 243 4 1 1 4 5 5 4 244 5 1 1 5 4 4 4 245 4 2 1 4 4 5 5 256 4 1 2 5 4 4 5 257 5 1 1 5 5 4 4 258 4 1 3 5 4 4 4 259 4 1 1 5 4 4 4 23

10 4 2 1 4 4 4 4 2311 5 2 1 5 2 4 4 2312 4 1 1 4 4 4 4 2213 5 2 2 3 5 5 3 2514 5 1 1 4 4 4 4 2315 5 1 1 4 5 4 4 2416 5 1 1 4 4 4 5 2417 5 1 1 4 4 4 5 2418 5 1 1 4 4 5 5 2519 5 1 3 4 2 4 4 2320 5 2 1 3 5 4 4 2421 4 3 1 5 4 4 4 2522 5 1 1 4 4 4 4 2323 4 1 1 4 4 4 4 2224 5 1 1 5 4 5 5 2625 5 1 1 4 3 4 3 2126 5 2 1 5 4 4 4 2527 5 1 1 5 4 4 4 2428 5 1 1 3 4 4 5 2329 5 3 1 4 5 5 5 2830 4 2 1 4 4 4 5 2431 4 1 1 4 4 4 5 2332 4 3 1 4 5 4 4 2533 4 1 1 5 5 4 4 2434 5 1 3 4 5 4 4 2635 3 2 1 4 4 4 5 2336 4 1 1 5 4 4 5 2437 4 1 1 4 5 5 5 2538 4 1 1 4 5 4 5 24

39 3 1 1 4 5 4 5 2340 4 1 1 4 5 4 4 2341 4 1 1 3 4 4 4 2142 4 1 1 5 5 4 4 2443 5 2 1 5 5 4 5 2744 5 1 1 5 5 5 4 2645 4 1 1 4 5 4 4 2346 5 1 1 4 5 4 4 24