21
RIPE 47 – January, 2004 Amsterdam – The Netherlands LACNIC REPORT Hartmut Glaser Board Member [email protected]

LACNIC REPORT - RIPE Network Coordination Centremeetings.ripe.net/ripe-47/presentations/ripe47-plenary-lacnic.pdf · LACNIC REPORT Hartmut Glaser Board Member [email protected]. RIPE

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: LACNIC REPORT - RIPE Network Coordination Centremeetings.ripe.net/ripe-47/presentations/ripe47-plenary-lacnic.pdf · LACNIC REPORT Hartmut Glaser Board Member glaser@lacnic.net. RIPE

RIPE 47 – January, 2004 Amsterdam – The Netherlands

LACNIC REPORT

Hartmut Glaser Board Member

[email protected]

Page 2: LACNIC REPORT - RIPE Network Coordination Centremeetings.ripe.net/ripe-47/presentations/ripe47-plenary-lacnic.pdf · LACNIC REPORT Hartmut Glaser Board Member glaser@lacnic.net. RIPE

RIPE 47 – January, 2004 Amsterdam – The Netherlands

LACNIC SERVICE REGION

LACNIC serves 29 territories in Latin American and part of the CaribbeanARGENTINA GUYANAARUBA HAITIBELIZE HONDURASBOLIVIA MEXICOBRAZIL NETHERLANDS ANTILLESCHILE NICARAGUACOLOMBIA PANAMA COSTA RICA PARAGUAY CUBA PERU DOMICAN REPUBLIC ECUADOR SURINAME EL SALVADOR TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO URUGUAY FRENCH GUIANA VENEZUELAGUATEMALA FALKLAND ISLANDS (MALVINAS)SOUTH GEORGIA AND THE SOUTH SANDWICH ISLANDS

Page 3: LACNIC REPORT - RIPE Network Coordination Centremeetings.ripe.net/ripe-47/presentations/ripe47-plenary-lacnic.pdf · LACNIC REPORT Hartmut Glaser Board Member glaser@lacnic.net. RIPE

RIPE 47 – January, 2004 Amsterdam – The Netherlands

IPv4 DISTRIBUTION BY COUNTRY

AN0%

AR8%

BO1%

BR45%

BZ0%

CL9%

CO2%

CR0%

CU0%

DO0%

EC0%

GT0%

HN0%

HT0%

MX24%

NI0%

PA1%

PE2%

PY0%SR0% SV

0% TT0%

UY1%

VE4%

Otros5%

Total – 100,241 /24 until Dec 31, 2003

Page 4: LACNIC REPORT - RIPE Network Coordination Centremeetings.ripe.net/ripe-47/presentations/ripe47-plenary-lacnic.pdf · LACNIC REPORT Hartmut Glaser Board Member glaser@lacnic.net. RIPE

RIPE 47 – January, 2004 Amsterdam – The Netherlands

IPv4 /24 ALLOCATIONS PER QUARTER

288 448240

1572

1024

5153

1801

2304

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

1st Qtr2002

2nd Qtr2002

3rd Qtr2002

4th Qtr2002

1st Qtr2003

2nd Qtr2003

3rd Qtr2003

4rd Qtr2003

Total – 12,830 /24JAN 01, 2002 – DEC 31, 2003

Page 5: LACNIC REPORT - RIPE Network Coordination Centremeetings.ripe.net/ripe-47/presentations/ripe47-plenary-lacnic.pdf · LACNIC REPORT Hartmut Glaser Board Member glaser@lacnic.net. RIPE

RIPE 47 – January, 2004 Amsterdam – The Netherlands

IPv4 ALLOCATIONS PER QUARTER

9

1614

35

20

28

39

25

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

1st Qtr2002

2nd Qtr2002

3rd Qtr2002

4th Qtr2002

1st Qtr2003

2nd Qtr2003

3rd Qtr2003

4rd Qtr2003

Total - 186

JAN 01, 2002 – DEC 31, 2003

Page 6: LACNIC REPORT - RIPE Network Coordination Centremeetings.ripe.net/ripe-47/presentations/ripe47-plenary-lacnic.pdf · LACNIC REPORT Hartmut Glaser Board Member glaser@lacnic.net. RIPE

RIPE 47 – January, 2004 Amsterdam – The Netherlands

ASN DISTRIBUTION BY COUNTRY

AN2%

AR17%

AW0%

BO1%

BR27%

BZ0%

CL9%

CO7%

CR1%

CU0%

DO0%

EC1%

GT1%

GY0%

HN1%

HT0%

MX18%

NI1%

PA3% PE

2%PY0% SV

1%

TT0%

UY1%

VE5%

Otros12%

Total – 836 until Dec 31, 2003

Page 7: LACNIC REPORT - RIPE Network Coordination Centremeetings.ripe.net/ripe-47/presentations/ripe47-plenary-lacnic.pdf · LACNIC REPORT Hartmut Glaser Board Member glaser@lacnic.net. RIPE

RIPE 47 – January, 2004 Amsterdam – The Netherlands

23

15

31

17

13

26

18

12

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

1st Qtr 2002 2nd Qtr 2002 3rd Qtr 2002 4th Qtr 2002 1st Qtr 2003 2nd Qtr 2003 3rd Qtr 2003 4rd Qtr 2003

Total - 155

ASN ASSIGNMENT PER QUARTER

JAN 01, 2002 – DEC 31, 2003

Page 8: LACNIC REPORT - RIPE Network Coordination Centremeetings.ripe.net/ripe-47/presentations/ripe47-plenary-lacnic.pdf · LACNIC REPORT Hartmut Glaser Board Member glaser@lacnic.net. RIPE

RIPE 47 – January, 2004 Amsterdam – The Netherlands

IPv6 DISTRIBUTION BY COUNTRY

12 IPv6 allocations until Dec 31, 2003

MX-ARIN, 4

MX, 2

BR-ARIN, 1

BR, 2 DO, 1

CL, 1

AR, 1

MX-ARINMXBR-ARINBRDOCLAR

Page 9: LACNIC REPORT - RIPE Network Coordination Centremeetings.ripe.net/ripe-47/presentations/ripe47-plenary-lacnic.pdf · LACNIC REPORT Hartmut Glaser Board Member glaser@lacnic.net. RIPE

RIPE 47 – January, 2004 Amsterdam – The Netherlands

LACNIC MEMBERSHIP

11%1%

3%

47%

28%

7% 3%

End UsersAssoc.FoundersISP-smallISP-medISP-LgeISP-XL

Dec 31, 2003

End Users - 18ISP Small - 75ISP Medium - 44ISP Large - 11ISP XLarge - 4

Subtotal 152

Founder Members - 4Associated Members - 2

Total = 158

Page 10: LACNIC REPORT - RIPE Network Coordination Centremeetings.ripe.net/ripe-47/presentations/ripe47-plenary-lacnic.pdf · LACNIC REPORT Hartmut Glaser Board Member glaser@lacnic.net. RIPE

RIPE 47 – January, 2004 Amsterdam – The Netherlands

MEMBERSHIP DISTRIBUTION BY COUNTRY

AN1%

AR26%

BO4%

BR1%BZ

1%

CL16%

CO14%

CR1%

CU1%

DO1%

EC4%

GT2%

HT1%

MX2%

NI1%

PA4%

PE6%

PY1%

SV2%

TT1%

UY3%

VE6%

Otros16%

Total – 158 until Dec 31, 2003

Page 11: LACNIC REPORT - RIPE Network Coordination Centremeetings.ripe.net/ripe-47/presentations/ripe47-plenary-lacnic.pdf · LACNIC REPORT Hartmut Glaser Board Member glaser@lacnic.net. RIPE

RIPE 47 – January, 2004 Amsterdam – The Netherlands

MEMBERSHIP EVOLUTION

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Other

End User

Large

Small

Medium

Extra Large

119

89

49

145

JAN 01, 1998 – DEC 31, 2003 158

Page 12: LACNIC REPORT - RIPE Network Coordination Centremeetings.ripe.net/ripe-47/presentations/ripe47-plenary-lacnic.pdf · LACNIC REPORT Hartmut Glaser Board Member glaser@lacnic.net. RIPE

RIPE 47 – January, 2004 Amsterdam – The Netherlands

LACNIC POLICY’S UPDATE 2003

• LACNIC IV in Santiago/Chile, in April (ASO General Assembly)

New Policies

• Bulk Whois Copy Distribution• IPv6 Microallocation• Multihomed end user microallocation

• LACNIC V in La Havana/Cuba, last November.

• New Policies approved in LACNIC V - Last call for comments finished January 23. Theseproposals and comments will be analyzed by the Board in its next meeting in February.

• Experimental Allocations• IPv6 Policy• Multihomed end user microallocation (modification)

Page 13: LACNIC REPORT - RIPE Network Coordination Centremeetings.ripe.net/ripe-47/presentations/ripe47-plenary-lacnic.pdf · LACNIC REPORT Hartmut Glaser Board Member glaser@lacnic.net. RIPE

RIPE 47 – January, 2004 Amsterdam – The Netherlands

LACNIC POLICY’S UPDATE 2003

• The Policy Development Process is under revision. The discussion will continue during LACNIC VI .

• The resolution in the proposal for a new policy in Lame Delegation was postponedfor LACNIC VI.

• The proposal for Global Policy “IANA to RIR Allocation of IPv4 Address Space”was approved and has been already ratified by LACNIC’s Board of Directors.

• Follow up Policy Development Process in http://lacnic.net/en/des-pol.html

Page 14: LACNIC REPORT - RIPE Network Coordination Centremeetings.ripe.net/ripe-47/presentations/ripe47-plenary-lacnic.pdf · LACNIC REPORT Hartmut Glaser Board Member glaser@lacnic.net. RIPE

RIPE 47 – January, 2004 Amsterdam – The Netherlands

LACNIC POLICY’S UPDATE 2003

1. New Policy in “Internet Resources Experimental Allocation”.

2. Changes in the “IPv6 Policy for LACNIC Region”.- 3 New Requirements for initial allocations:c. Document a detailed plan for the services and IPv6 connectivity to be offered to other

organizations (clients).d. Announce a single block in the Internet inter-domain routing system, aggregating the

total IPv6 address allocation received, within a period not longer than 12 months.e. Offer IPv6 services to clients physically located within the region covered by LACNIC

within a period not longer than 24 months.- 2 of the previous requirements were deleted:c. Plan to provide IPv6 connectivity to organizations to which it will assign /48s, by

advertising that connectivity through its single aggregated address allocation; and d. Have a plan for making at least 200 /48 assignments to other organizations within two

years.

3. Changes in the policy “Microallocation for Multihomed End Users”. A new requirement was added.

Require an allocation equivalent to a /25 previously allocated by the applicant's Internet Service Provider in order to qualify for the microallocation of IPv4 address space to Multihomed End Users.

Page 15: LACNIC REPORT - RIPE Network Coordination Centremeetings.ripe.net/ripe-47/presentations/ripe47-plenary-lacnic.pdf · LACNIC REPORT Hartmut Glaser Board Member glaser@lacnic.net. RIPE

RIPE 47 – January, 2004 Amsterdam – The Netherlands

ENGINEERING PROJECTS FOR 2004

•Priorities– To work together with the other RIRs in a common solution of Global Whois. – Accounting tracking system for LACNIC.

•Other projects– Authentication in LACNIC’s systems.– Web based templates.– Some add-ons to the Voting software (originally developed by ARIN).– Improvements to the Membership software.– LACNIC’s meetings Webcasting.– Common projects with the other RIR (ERX, …..).

Page 16: LACNIC REPORT - RIPE Network Coordination Centremeetings.ripe.net/ripe-47/presentations/ripe47-plenary-lacnic.pdf · LACNIC REPORT Hartmut Glaser Board Member glaser@lacnic.net. RIPE

RIPE 47 – January, 2004 Amsterdam – The Netherlands

LACNIC VI

Montevideo

Uruguay

29th March – 1st April 2004

http://lacnic.net/en/lacnicVI.html

Page 17: LACNIC REPORT - RIPE Network Coordination Centremeetings.ripe.net/ripe-47/presentations/ripe47-plenary-lacnic.pdf · LACNIC REPORT Hartmut Glaser Board Member glaser@lacnic.net. RIPE

RIPE 47 – January, 2004 Amsterdam – The Netherlands

SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS OF LACNIC VI

- Joint meeting:- LACTLD (Association of Latin-American and Caribbean ccTLDs).- ECOMLAC (Latin American and Caribbean Federation for Internet andElectronic Commerce ).

- LACNIC (RIR for LA&C).

- Some of the joint activities:- First Latin-American Forum of IPv6 => FLIP-6.- Round Table in Internet Governance with participation of the most importantstakeholders (LACNIC, LACTLD, ECOMLAC, Civil Society, Governments).

- Strategic Vision Workshop in Internet Number Resources.

Page 18: LACNIC REPORT - RIPE Network Coordination Centremeetings.ripe.net/ripe-47/presentations/ripe47-plenary-lacnic.pdf · LACNIC REPORT Hartmut Glaser Board Member glaser@lacnic.net. RIPE

RIPE 47 – January, 2004 Amsterdam – The Netherlands

FRIDA PROJECT

- Competitive Funds to support researches, through SmallGrants, in areas of interest for LACNIC’s community.

- Participants:-LACNIC, Institute for Connectivity of the Americas – ICA (Canada),IDRC (Canada), ISOC (Internet Society)

- Initially: U$S 500.000 for 2004 and 2005.- Call for proposals: next March.- Important initiative to promote the Internet Development inour region.

Page 19: LACNIC REPORT - RIPE Network Coordination Centremeetings.ripe.net/ripe-47/presentations/ripe47-plenary-lacnic.pdf · LACNIC REPORT Hartmut Glaser Board Member glaser@lacnic.net. RIPE

RIPE 47 – January, 2004 Amsterdam – The Netherlands

GENERAL INFORMATION

- 2 New Board Members elected last November.Oscar Robles from México and Jesús Martínez from Cuba.

- Raimundo Beca re-elected for 3 years to the AC.

- Fiscal Year 2003 closed with very good results.- The incomes were higher as projected and outcomes less (~ 92 % of the budget); reserves now are equivalent to 40 % of the budget for 2004.

- The External Auditors finished the Audit with favorable opinion.- The Internal Control Organ issued also its favorable opinion in relation to

the financial statements and the management/administration of LACNIC.- Annual Report 2003 will be issued before the end of February/04.- Next Annual Members meeting will be held during LACNIC VI in Montevideo.

Page 20: LACNIC REPORT - RIPE Network Coordination Centremeetings.ripe.net/ripe-47/presentations/ripe47-plenary-lacnic.pdf · LACNIC REPORT Hartmut Glaser Board Member glaser@lacnic.net. RIPE

RIPE 47 – January, 2004 Amsterdam – The Netherlands

Thank you !

Gracias !

Obrigado !

Page 21: LACNIC REPORT - RIPE Network Coordination Centremeetings.ripe.net/ripe-47/presentations/ripe47-plenary-lacnic.pdf · LACNIC REPORT Hartmut Glaser Board Member glaser@lacnic.net. RIPE

RIPE 47 – January, 2004 Amsterdam – The Netherlands

Questions ?

Comments ?