35
Local Coverage Determination (LCD): Lab:Controlled Substance Monitoring and Drugs of Abuse Testing (L36668) Links in PDF documents are not guaranteed to work. To follow a web link, please use the MCD Website. Contractor Information CONTRACTOR NAME CONTRACT TYPE CONTRACT NUMBER JURISDICTION STATE(S) Noridian Healthcare Solutions, LLC A and B MAC 01111 - MAC A J - E California - Entire State Noridian Healthcare Solutions, LLC A and B MAC 01112 - MAC B J - E California - Northern Noridian Healthcare Solutions, LLC A and B MAC 01182 - MAC B J - E California - Southern Noridian Healthcare Solutions, LLC A and B MAC 01211 - MAC A J - E American Samoa Guam Hawaii Northern Mariana Islands Noridian Healthcare Solutions, LLC A and B MAC 01212 - MAC B J - E American Samoa Guam Hawaii Northern Mariana Islands Noridian Healthcare Solutions, LLC A and B MAC 01311 - MAC A J - E Nevada Noridian Healthcare Solutions, LLC A and B MAC 01312 - MAC B J - E Nevada Noridian Healthcare Solutions, LLC A and B MAC 01911 - MAC A J - E American Samoa California - Entire State Guam Hawaii Nevada Northern Mariana Islands LCD Information Document Information Created on 01/17/2019. Page 1 of 35

Lab:Controlled Substance Monitoring and Drugs of Abuse ...(MDMA; “ecstasy”), and phencyclidine (PCP), they may not be optimal tests for many prescription drugs, such as: opiates,

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Lab:Controlled Substance Monitoring and Drugs of Abuse ...(MDMA; “ecstasy”), and phencyclidine (PCP), they may not be optimal tests for many prescription drugs, such as: opiates,

Local Coverage Determination (LCD): Lab:Controlled Substance Monitoring and Drugs of Abuse Testing (L36668)Links in PDF documents are not guaranteed to work. To follow a web link, please use the MCD Website.

Contractor InformationCONTRACTOR NAME CONTRACT TYPE CONTRACT

NUMBERJURISDICTION STATE(S)

Noridian Healthcare Solutions, LLC

A and B MAC 01111 - MAC A J - E California - Entire State

Noridian Healthcare Solutions, LLC

A and B MAC 01112 - MAC B J - E California - Northern

Noridian Healthcare Solutions, LLC

A and B MAC 01182 - MAC B J - E California - Southern

Noridian Healthcare Solutions, LLC

A and B MAC 01211 - MAC A J - E American Samoa Guam Hawaii Northern Mariana Islands

Noridian Healthcare Solutions, LLC

A and B MAC 01212 - MAC B J - E American Samoa Guam Hawaii Northern Mariana Islands

Noridian Healthcare Solutions, LLC

A and B MAC 01311 - MAC A J - E Nevada

Noridian Healthcare Solutions, LLC

A and B MAC 01312 - MAC B J - E Nevada

Noridian Healthcare Solutions, LLC

A and B MAC 01911 - MAC A J - E American Samoa California - Entire State Guam Hawaii Nevada Northern Mariana Islands

LCD Information

Document Information

Created on 01/17/2019. Page 1 of 35

Page 2: Lab:Controlled Substance Monitoring and Drugs of Abuse ...(MDMA; “ecstasy”), and phencyclidine (PCP), they may not be optimal tests for many prescription drugs, such as: opiates,

LCD IDL36668 LCD TitleLab:Controlled Substance Monitoring and Drugs of Abuse Testing Proposed LCD in Comment PeriodN/A Source Proposed LCDN/A AMA CPT / ADA CDT / AHA NUBC Copyright StatementCPT codes, descriptions and other data only are copyright 2018 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/HHSARS apply. Current Dental Terminology © 2018 American Dental Association. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2018, the American Hospital Association, Chicago, Illinois. Reproduced with permission. No portion of the AHA copyrighted materials contained within this publication may be copied without the express written consent of the AHA. AHA copyrighted materials including the UB-04 codes and descriptions may not be removed, copied, or utilized within any software, product, service, solution or derivative work without the written consent of the AHA. If an entity wishes to utilize any AHA materials, please contact the AHA at 312-893-6816. Making copies or utilizing the content of the UB-04 Manual, including the codes and/or descriptions, for internal purposes, resale and/or to be used in any product or publication; creating any modified or derivative work of the UB-04 Manual and/or codes and descriptions; and/or making any commercial use of UB-04 Manual or any portion thereof, including the codes and/or descriptions, is only authorized with an express license from the American Hospital Association. To license the electronic data file of UB-04 Data Specifications, contact Tim Carlson at (312) 893-6816 or Laryssa Marshall at (312) 893-6814. You may also contact us at [email protected].

Original Effective DateFor services performed on or after 06/28/2016 Revision Effective DateFor services performed on or after 12/27/2018 Revision Ending DateN/A Retirement DateN/A Notice Period Start Date05/12/2016 Notice Period End Date06/27/2016

CMS National Coverage PolicyCreated on 01/17/2019. Page 2 of 35

Page 3: Lab:Controlled Substance Monitoring and Drugs of Abuse ...(MDMA; “ecstasy”), and phencyclidine (PCP), they may not be optimal tests for many prescription drugs, such as: opiates,

CMS National Coverage Policy Title XVIII of the Social Security Act, §1862(a)(1)(A). Allows coverage and payment for only those services that are considered to be reasonable and necessary. Title XVIII of the Social Security Act, §1833(e). Prohibits Medicare payment for any claim which lacks the necessary information to process the claim. 42 CFR 410.32(a). Order diagnostic tests. 42 CFR 411.15(k)(1). Particular Services excluded from coverage. CMS On-Line Manual, Publication 100-02, Medicare Benefit Policy Manual, Chapter 15, §§80.0, 80.1.1, 80.2. Clinical Laboratory services.

Coverage Guidance

Coverage Indications, Limitations, and/or Medical Necessity

Purpose

Urine drug testing (UDT) provides objective information to assist clinicians in identifying the presence or absence of drugs or drug classes in the body and making treatment decisions. This policy details:

The appropriate indications and expected frequency of testing for safe medication management of prescribed substances in risk stratified pain management patients and/or in identifying and treating substance use disorders.

Designates documentation, by the clinician caring for the beneficiary in the beneficiary’s medical record, of medical necessity for, and testing ordered on an individual patient basis;

Provides an overview of presumptive urine drug testing (UDT) and definitive UDT testing by various methodologies.

This policy addresses UDT for Medicare patients only.

Definitions

As used in this document, the following terminology relates to the basic forms of UDT:

Presumptive/Qualitative Drug Testing (hereafter called "presumptive" UDT) - Used when medically necessary to determine the presence or absence of drugs or drug classes in a urine sample; results expressed as negative or positive or as a numerical result; includes competitive immunoassays (IA) and thin layer chromatography.

1.

Definitive/Quantitative/Confirmation (hereafter called “definitive” UDT) - Used when medically necessary to identify specific medications, illicit substances and metabolites; reports the results of analytes absent or present typically in concentrations such as ng/mL; definitive methods include, but are not limited to GC-MS and LC-MS/MS testing methods.

2.

Created on 01/17/2019. Page 3 of 35

Page 4: Lab:Controlled Substance Monitoring and Drugs of Abuse ...(MDMA; “ecstasy”), and phencyclidine (PCP), they may not be optimal tests for many prescription drugs, such as: opiates,

Specimen Validity Testing - Urine specimen testing to ensure that it is consistent with normal human urine and has not been adulterated or substituted, may include, but is not limited to pH, specific gravity, oxidants and creatinine.

3.

Immunoassay (IA) - Ordered by clinicians primarily to identify the presence or absence of drug classes and some specific drugs; biochemical tests that measure the presence above a cutoff level of a substance (drug) with the use of an antibody; read by photometric technology.

4.

Point of Care Testing (POCT) - Used when medically necessary by clinicians caring for the beneficiary for immediate test results for the immediate management of the beneficiary; available when the beneficiary and physician are in the same location; IA test method that primarily identifies drug classes and a few specific drugs; platform consists of cups, dipsticks, cassettes, or strips; read by the human eye, or read by instrument assisted direct optical observation.

5.

Standing Orders - Test request for a specific patient representing repetitive testing to monitor a condition or disease for a limited number of sequential visits; individualized orders for certain patients for pre-determined tests based on historical use, risk and community trend patient profiles; clinician can alter the standing order.Note: A “profile” differs from a “panel” in that a profile responds to the clinical risks of a particular patient, whereas a panel may encourage unnecessary or excessive testing when no clinical cause exists for many of the tests.

6.

Blanket Orders - Test request that is not for a specific patient; rather, it is an identical order for all patients in a clinician’s practice without individualized decision making at every visit.

7.

Reflex Testing - Laboratory testing that is performed "reflexively" after initial test results to identify further diagnostic information essential to patient care. This testing is not based on a specific physician's order. Testing performed as a step necessary to complete a physician’s order is not considered reflex testing.

8.

Drug Test Methods

The Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) regulates laboratory testing and requires clinical labs to be certified by their State as well as the CMS before they can accept human samples for diagnostic testing. Multiple types of CLIA certificates may be obtained based on the complexity of testing a lab conducts. CLIA levels of complexity (CLIA-waived, moderate complexity and high complexity) are addressed only as they relate to the HCPCS code description and the coding/billing guidance to be attached to this document. A. Presumptive Testing Methods:

Presumptive UDT:Presumptive UDT consist of various platforms including cards, dipsticks, cassettes and cups based on qualitative competitive immunoassay methodology with one or more analytes in the test. A presumptive IA test detects the presence of the amount of drug/substance present in urine above a predetermined “cut-off” value, and may be read by direct optical observation or by instrument assisted direct optical observation.A positive test result is reported when the concentration of drug is above the cutoff; a negative is reported when the concentration of drug is below the cut-off. Positive test results are presumptive but not necessarily definitive due to sensitivity and cross-reactivity limitations. Negative test results do not necessarily indicate the absence of a drug or substance in the urine specimen. The accuracy of the results of a presumptive UDT will depend on the testing environment, type of test, and training of the individual conducting the test.This type of test should only be used when results are needed immediately.

1.

Presumptive UDT by Instrumented Chemistry Analyzers: Chemistry analyzers with IA UDT technology can be used in an office or clinical laboratory setting. This test may be used when less immediate test results are required. At no time is IA technology by chemistry analyzer

2.

Created on 01/17/2019. Page 4 of 35

Page 5: Lab:Controlled Substance Monitoring and Drugs of Abuse ...(MDMA; “ecstasy”), and phencyclidine (PCP), they may not be optimal tests for many prescription drugs, such as: opiates,

analysis considered confirmatory (definitive) testing.A presumptive positive IA test detects the presence of a drug/substance in urine at or above the “cut-off” value. If the concentration of the drug is below the cut-off, the result will be negative. Presumptive positive tests are not always true positives due to sensitivity, specificity, and cross-reactivity limitations. Negative test results do not necessarily indicate the absence of a drug or substance in the urine specimen.FDA approved/cleared test platforms are available in the marketplace as well as, laboratory developed tests (LDTs) such as modified FDA approved/ cleared and non-FDA approved/cleared platforms and/or reagents. LDTs generally have been modified to test at a lower cutoff in order to detect substances that would have been missed at a higher cutoff. For example, a FDA labeled cutoff may be 300 ng/mL and the LDT cutoff for the same drug may be a 100 ng/mL.Presumptive UDT can be carried out at any validated cut-off concentration. Lowering of the cut-off concentration provides more stringent cutoffs for illicit drugs. LDTs may include non-FDA cleared tests not available in CLIA-waived or moderate complexity tests (e.g. tramadol, tapentadol, carisoprodol, fentanyl, zolpidem). Lowering the cutoff increases the possibility of detecting a drug when the test has been modified from the recipe of the manufacturer.

Limitations of Presumptive UDT:

Presumptive UDT testing is limited due to:

3.

Primarily screens for drug classes rather than specific drugs, and therefore, the practitioner may not be able to determine if a different drug within the same class is causing the positive result

Produces erroneous results due to cross-reactivity with other compounds or does not detect all drugs within a drug class

Given that not all prescription medications or synthetic/analog drugs are detectable and/or have assays available, it is unclear as to whether other drugs are present when some tests are reported as positive;

Cut-off may be too high to detect presence of a drug•

This information could cause a practitioner to make an erroneous assumption or clinical decision. An IA involves an antibody that reacts best with the stimulating drug, and reacts to a lesser extent (cross-reactive) or not at all with other drugs in the drug class. While presumptive tests vary in their ability to detect illicit drugs such as tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), cocaine, 3,4-methylenedioxy-N-methylamphetamine (MDMA; “ecstasy”), and phencyclidine (PCP), they may not be optimal tests for many prescription drugs, such as: opiates, barbiturates, benzodiazepines and opioids. For example, opiate reagents are formulated from morphine. Consequently, the cross-reactivity for other opioids and opiates varies based on the manufacturer and lot number. The semisynthetic opioids, hydromorphone and hydrocodone, may contribute to a positive presumptive result, while the semisynthetic opioids, oxycodone and oxymorphone, will not typically be detected even at 300 ng/mL cutoff. Synthetic opioids, such as fentanyl, meperidine and methadone, will not be detected by current opiate IA testing. Consequently, a positive opiate result by IA normally necessitates more specific identification of the substance(s) that account for the positive result, and a negative result does not rule out the presence of opiates or opioids. Presumptive UDT reagents for benzodiazepine are typically formulated for oxazepam, a metabolite of diazepam (Valium®) and chlordiazepoxide (Librium®), the main benzodiazepines prescribed twenty years ago. However, many of the more than 10 benzodiazepines that are currently available do not cross-react with IA benzodiazepine reagents. In particular, clonazepam and lorazepam give false negative results with presumptive IA tests and may necessitate more specific identification to account for the negative result. Similarly, a positive screening test result may require definitive UDT to identify the specific drug(s).

Created on 01/17/2019. Page 5 of 35

Page 6: Lab:Controlled Substance Monitoring and Drugs of Abuse ...(MDMA; “ecstasy”), and phencyclidine (PCP), they may not be optimal tests for many prescription drugs, such as: opiates,

Synthetic/analog or “designer” drugs manufactured to elude law enforcement require definitive testing for detection. Most commercially available IA reagents fail to detect designer drugs, such as psychedelic phenethylamines even at very high concentrations.

In summary, presumptive IA UDT is often unable to identify specific drugs within many drug classes, particularly within the amphetamine, barbiturate, benzodiazepine, tricyclic antidepressants, and opiate/opioid drug classes. Drugs such as buprenorphine, amphetamines, benzodiazepines, and cocaine/heroin yield false negative IA results due to low cross-reactivity or non-reactivity and drugs such as fentanyl, carisoprodol, tramadol, tapentadol and synthetic designer drugs cannot be detected by presumptive IA. Therefore, it may be medically necessary for clinicians to utilize definitive UDT when the presumptive tests for these drugs are negative.

B. Definitive UDT: Gas Chromatography coupled with Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) and Liquid Chromatography coupled with Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) are complex technologies that use the separation capabilities of gaseous or liquid chromatography with the analytical capabilities of mass spectrometry. These methodologies require the competency of on-site highly trained experts in this technology and interpretation of results. While these tests require different sample preparation and analytical runs, they identify specific drugs, metabolites, and most illicit substances and report the results as absent or present typically in concentrations of ng/mL. Quantification should not be used to determine adherence with a specific dosage or time of dose of a pain medication or illicit drug for clinical purposes. Rather, the use of quantitative drug data may be important for many reasons such as in a differential patient assessment. For example, when several opioids are present in the urine of a patient prescribed a single opioid, quantification may help the clinician decide whether the presence of the other opioids is consistent with metabolism of the prescribed opioid, opioid contamination during manufacturing, or if more than one drug within a class is being used. Quantification may also provide information in the setting of illicit drug use. Serial creatinine-corrected quantitative values may assist in the differential assessment of ongoing drug use or cessation of drug use with continued drug excretion.

GC-MSGC-MS can only be performed on molecules that are volatile. If the test drug is not volatile in its own right, it must be modified or derivatized to a volatile form. To derivatize, the test drug must be extracted from the urine, eluted from the extraction device, concentrated, and then reacted with a chemical reagent to make a volatile product. Each drug class may require a different derivatizing agent. For patients on multiple classes of medications, laboratories using GC procedures must make different volatile derivatives in order to perform comprehensive testing. Since a GC column may not be able to separate more than one class of compounds, multiple chromatographic runs on different column types may be required to monitor multiple drug classes. Newer GC-MS instruments often use tandem systems. GC-MS methodology allows for the testing of multiple substances but differs in ease of run.

1.

LC-MS/MS LC-MS/MS is roughly 100 times more sensitive and selective, involves less human steps, provides quicker turn-around time, uses less specimen volume and can test for a larger number of substances simultaneously when compared to GC-MS. After sample preparation, it is injected into the LC-MS/MS. The sample has to undergo hydrolysis to break the glucuronide bond that frees the drug and drug metabolites. Hydrolysis is followed by multiple additional steps including protein precipitation, centrifugation and purification. Deuterium-labeled isotopic internal standards are added to quantify the drugs and drug metabolites.The sample is injected when the mobile phase is flowing through the chromatographic column. Each drug

2.

Created on 01/17/2019. Page 6 of 35

Page 7: Lab:Controlled Substance Monitoring and Drugs of Abuse ...(MDMA; “ecstasy”), and phencyclidine (PCP), they may not be optimal tests for many prescription drugs, such as: opiates,

and drug metabolite interacts with the mobile phase and stationary phase differently and moves at different speeds depending on their chemical properties. In other words, each analyte elutes at different times. Specific drugs and metabolites are identified by their retention time and quantified against isotopic internal standards for each drug and metabolite. Each drug peak has to be compared to drug standards (calibrators) in order to ensure identification.

CLIA-Certified Laboratories

CLIA specifies quality standards for proficiency testing, facility administration, general laboratory systems, pre-analytic, analytic and post-analytic systems, onsite supervision requirements, personnel qualifications and responsibilities, quality control, and quality assessment. High complexity laboratories must ensure that testing is carried out by onsite qualified, trained personnel using validated reliable methods compliant with regulatory procedures (42 CFR Part 493). Both GC-MS and LC-MS/MS require a quality program to monitor the quality and audit the competency of the staff. LC-MS/MS instrument maintenance must be performed daily as well as the validation of instrument performance prior to patient specimens. Final review and approval of GC-MS and LC-MS/MS results must be performed by a qualified clinical laboratory scientist as defined in 42 CFR Part 493.1489 (Testing Personnel Qualifications). A GC-MS or LC-MS/MS laboratory must have a qualified laboratory director, qualified physician, or qualified clinical laboratory scientist, as provided in 42 CFR 493.1443 (Laboratory Director Qualifications). Assay validation must be consistent with FDA guidelines. Laboratories that use “application notes” from vendors to establish drug validation do not comply with federal standards, and put patients and providers at risk by potentially reporting inaccurate test results. Only FDA 510K cleared test methods may be distributed by vendors.

Purpose of UDT:

Presumptive UDT may be ordered by the clinician caring for a beneficiary when it is necessary to rapidly obtain and/or integrate results into clinical assessment and treatment decisions. Definitive UDT is reasonable and necessary for the following circumstances:

Identify a specific substance or metabolite that is inadequately detected by a presumptive UDT;•Definitively identify specific drugs in a large family of drugs;•Identify a specific substance or metabolite that is not detected by presumptive UDT such as fentanyl, meperidine, synthetic cannabinoids and other synthetic/analog drugs;

Identify drugs when a definitive concentration of a drug is needed to guide management (e.g., discontinuation of THC use according to a treatment plan);

Identify a negative, or confirm a positive, presumptive UDT result that is inconsistent with a patient’s self-report, presentation, medical history, or current prescribed pain medication plan;

Rule out an error as the cause of a presumptive UDT result;•Identify non-prescribed medication or illicit use for ongoing safe prescribing of controlled substances; and•Use in a differential assessment of medication efficacy, side effects, or drug-drug interactions.•

Created on 01/17/2019. Page 7 of 35

Page 8: Lab:Controlled Substance Monitoring and Drugs of Abuse ...(MDMA; “ecstasy”), and phencyclidine (PCP), they may not be optimal tests for many prescription drugs, such as: opiates,

Definitive UDT may be reasonable and necessary based on patient specific indications, including historical use, medication response, and clinical assessment, when accurate results are necessary to make clinical decisions. The clinician’s rationale for the definitive UDT and the tests ordered must be documented in the patient’s medical record.

Drug Testing Panels

Presumptive UDT PanelsPresumptive UDT testing typically involves testing for multiple analytes based on the beneficiary's clinical history and risk assessment, and must be documented in the medical record.

A.

Definitive UDT Panels Physician-directed definitive profile testing is reasonable and necessary when ordered for a particular patient based upon historical use and community trends. However, the same physician-defined profile is not reasonable and necessary for every patient in a physician’s practice. Definitive UDT orders should be individualized based on clinical history and risk assessment, and must be documented in the medical record.

B.

Specimen Type

Urine or oral fluid is the preferred biologic specimen for testing because of the ease of collection, storage, and cost-effectiveness. UDT cannot detect the dosage of drug ingested/used, the time of use, or the means of delivery (intravenous vs. oral vs. inhaled). Detection time of a substance in urine is typically 1-3 days depending on the drug, rate of metabolism, and rate of excretion. Lipid-soluble drugs, such as marijuana, may remain in body fat and be detected upwards of a week or more.

Parent Drugs and Metabolite

The following chart illustrates parent drugs and their metabolites but may not be totally inclusive of all drugs and metabolites. Note: Ethanol is a significant drug of abuse. Alcohol metabolites of ethyl glucuronide and ethyl sulfate are typically detected by definitive (GC-MS or LC-MS/MS) UDT, and should only be performed based on clinician’s documentation of medical necessity.

Parent Drugs and Metabolite Chart

Drugs Class/Drugs Common Names General Monitoring Possibilities Subject to Medical Necessity

Alcohol/Alcohol Metabolites Ethyl Glucuronide Ethyl Sulfate

AlcoholEthyl Glucuronide Ethyl Sulfate

Barbiturates

Amytal Sodium®

Alprazolam, Alpha-hydroxyalprazolam

Created on 01/17/2019. Page 8 of 35

Page 9: Lab:Controlled Substance Monitoring and Drugs of Abuse ...(MDMA; “ecstasy”), and phencyclidine (PCP), they may not be optimal tests for many prescription drugs, such as: opiates,

Amobarbital Butabarbital Butalbital Pentobarbital Phenobarbital Secobarbital

Butisol Sodium®, Butibel Fiorinal®, Fioricet® Nembutal® Belladona, Luminal® Seconal®

Nordiazepam, Oxazepam 7-Aminoclonazepam Nordiazepam, Oxazepam Diazepam, Nordiazepam, Temazepam, Oxazepam Lorazepam Oxazepam Temazepam, Oxazepam

Benzodiazepines Alprazolam Chlordiazepoxide Clonazepam Clorazepate Diazepam Lorazepam Oxazepam Temazepam

Xanax®, Niravam®, Xanor Librax®, Libritabs Klonopin® Tranxene® Valium® Ativan®, Lorax Adumbran, Alepam, Murelax, Serax, Serepax Restoril®, Tenox, Euhypnos

Alprazolam, Alpha-hydroxyalprazolam Nordiazepam, Oxazepam 7-Aminoclonazepam Nordiazepam, Oxazepam Diazepam, Nordiazepam, Temazepam, Oxazepam Lorazepam Oxazepam Temazepam, Oxazepam

Illicit Drugs Cocaine Heroin Marijuana MDA MDMA Methamphetamine Phencylclidine (PCP)

Blow, Coke, Crack, Snow Black Tar, Brown Sugar, Dragon, H, Horse, Tar Marinol, Pot, Reefer, Weed Ecstasy, X Ecstasy, X Crank, Crystal Meth, Didrex®, Eldepryl®, Ice Angel Dust

Benzoylecgonine 6-MAM, Morphine THC-COOH Methylenedioxyamphetamine Methylenedioxymethamphetamine, Methylenedioxyamphetamine Methamphetamine, Amphetamine Phencyclidine

Synthetic Cannabinoids "K2"/"Spice"

Cathinones"Bath Salts" Kratom

General Anesthetic Ketamine

Ketamine Norketamine

Created on 01/17/2019. Page 9 of 35

Page 10: Lab:Controlled Substance Monitoring and Drugs of Abuse ...(MDMA; “ecstasy”), and phencyclidine (PCP), they may not be optimal tests for many prescription drugs, such as: opiates,

Muscle Relaxants Carisoprodol Meprobamate

Soma®, Soprodoal Equinal, Miltown®, Meprospan

Carisoprodol, Meprobamate Meprobamate

Neuroleptics Gabapentin Pregabalin

Neurontin® Lyrica®

Opiates Codeine Hydrocodone Hydromorphone Morphine Oxycodone Oxymorphone

Tylenol® 3 Hycodan®, Lorcet®, Lortab®, Norco® Vicodin®, Vicoprofen® Dilaudid®, Exalgo®, Hymorphan Avinza®, Kadian®, MS Contin®, MSER, MSIR, Roxanol OxyContin®, OxyIR®, Percocet®, Percodan®, Roxicodone®, Tylox® Numorphan®, Opana® ER, Opana®

Codeine, Morphine Hydrocodone, Hydromorphone, Norhydrocodone Hydromorphone Morphine Oxycodone, Oxymorphone, Noroxycodone Oxymorphone

Opioids Buprenorphine Fentanyl Meperidine Methadone Propoxyphene Tapentadol Tramadol

Buprenex®, Butrans®, Suboxone®, Subutex® Actiq®, Duragesic®, Fentora®, Onsolis® Sublimaze Demerol®, Mepergan® Dolophine®, Methadose® Darvocet®, Darvon® Nucynta® Ryzolt®, Ultracet®, Ultram®, Tramadol

Buprenorphine, Norbuprenorphine Fentanyl, Norfentanyl Meperidine, Normeperidine Methadone, EDDP Propoxyphene, Norpropoxyphene Tapentadol, N-Desmethyltapentadol Tramadol, O-Desmethyltramadol

Stimulants Amphetamine Methylphenidate Nicotine

Adderall®, Benzedrine, Dexedrine®, Vyvanse® Concerta®, Focalin®, Methylin®, Ritalin® Nicoderm®, Nicorette®

Amphetamine Methylphenidate, Ritalinic Acid Cotinine

Covered Indications for UDT

Group A – Symptomatic patients, Multiple drug ingestion and/or Patients with unreliable history

A patient who presents in a variety of medical settings with signs or symptoms of substance use toxicity will be

Created on 01/17/2019. Page 10 of 35

Page 11: Lab:Controlled Substance Monitoring and Drugs of Abuse ...(MDMA; “ecstasy”), and phencyclidine (PCP), they may not be optimal tests for many prescription drugs, such as: opiates,

treated presumptively to stabilize the patient while awaiting rapid, then definitive testing to determine the cause(s) of the presentation. The need for definitive UDT is based upon rapid test findings, responses to medical interventions, and treatment plan. A presumptive UDT should be performed as part of the evaluation and management of a patient who presents in an urgent care setting with any one of the following:

Coma•Altered mental status in the absence of a clinically defined toxic syndrome or toxidrome•Severe or unexplained cardiovascular instability (cardiotoxicity)•Unexplained metabolic or respiratory acidosis in the absence of a clinically defined toxic syndrome or toxidrome

Seizures with an undetermined history•To provide antagonist to specific drug•

The presumptive findings, definitive drug tests ordered and reasons for the testing must be documented in the patient's medical record.

Group B - Diagnosis and treatment for substance abuse or dependence

A patient in active treatment for substance use disorder (SUD) or monitoring across different phases of recovery may undergo medical management for a variety of medical conditions. A physician who is writing prescriptions for medications to treat either the SUD or other conditions may need to know if the patient is taking substances which can interact with prescribed medications or taking prescribed medications as expected. The risk of drug-drug interactions is inherent to the patient, and may be compounded by prescribed medications.UDT is a medically necessary and useful component of chemical dependency diagnosis and treatment. The UDT result influences treatment and level of care decisions. Ordered tests and testing methods (presumptive and/or definitive) must match the stage of screening, treatment, or recovery; the documented history; and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM V) diagnosis.For patients with no known indicators of risk for SUDs, the clinician may screen for a broad range of commonly abused drugs using presumptive UDT. For patients with known indicators of risk for SUDs, the clinician may screen for a broad range of commonly abused drugs using definitive UDT. For patients with a diagnosed SUD, the clinician should perform random UDT, at random intervals in order to properly monitor the patient. Testing profiles must be determined by the clinician based on the following medical necessity guidance criteria:

Patient history, physical examination, and previous laboratory findings•Stage of treatment or recovery;•Suspected abused substance;•Substances that may present high risk for additive or synergistic interactions with prescribed medication (e.g., benzodiazepines, alcohol).

The patient’s medical record must include an appropriate testing frequency based on the stage of screening, treatment, or recovery; the rationale for the drugs/drug classes ordered; and the results must be documented in the medical record and used to direct care.

Frequency of Presumptive UDT for SUD: The testing frequency must meet medical necessity and be documented in the clinician’s medical record.

For patients with 0 to 30 consecutive days of abstinence, presumptive UDT is expected at a frequency of 1 to 3 presumptive UDT per week. More than 3 presumptive panels in one week is not reasonable and necessary and is not covered by Medicare.

a.

1.

Created on 01/17/2019. Page 11 of 35

Page 12: Lab:Controlled Substance Monitoring and Drugs of Abuse ...(MDMA; “ecstasy”), and phencyclidine (PCP), they may not be optimal tests for many prescription drugs, such as: opiates,

For patients with 31 to 90 consecutive days of abstinence, presumptive UDT is expected at a frequency of 1 to 3 UDT per week. More than 3 presumptive UDT in one week is not reasonable and necessary and is not be covered by Medicare.

b.

For patients with > 90 consecutive days of abstinence, presumptive UDT is expected at a frequency of 1 to 3 UDT in one month. More than 3 physician-directed UDT in one month is not reasonable and necessary and is not covered by Medicare.

c.

Frequency of Definitive UDT for SUD: Depending on the patient’s specific substance use history, definitive UDT to accurately determine the specific drugs in the patient’s system may be necessary. Definitive testing may be ordered when accurate and reliable results are necessary to integrate treatment decisions and clinical assessment. The frequency and the rational for definitive UDT must be documented in the patient’s medical record.

For patients with 0 to 30 consecutive days of abstinence, definitive UDT is expected at a frequency not to exceed 1 physician-directed testing profile in one week. More than 1 physician-directed testing profile in one week is not reasonable and necessary and is not covered by Medicare.

a.

For patients with 31 to 90 consecutive days of abstinence, definitive UDT is expected at a frequency of 1-3 physician-directed testing profiles in one month. More than 3 UDT in one month is not reasonable and necessary and is not covered by Medicare.

b.

For patients with > 90 day of consecutive abstinence, definitive UDT is expected at a frequency of 1-3 physician-directed testing profiles in three months. More than 3 definitive UDT in 3 months is not reasonable and necessary and is not covered by Medicare.

c.

2.

Group C - Treatment for patients on chronic opioid therapy (COT).

A physician who is writing prescriptions for medications to treat chronic pain can manage a patient better if the physician knows whether the patient is consuming another medication or substance, which could suggest the possibility of SUD or lead to drug-drug interactions. Additionally, UDT may help the physician monitor for medication adherence, diversion, efficacy, side effects, and patient safety in general.

COT UDT Testing Objectives:Identifies absence of prescribed medication and potential for abuse, misuse, and diversion;1. Identifies undisclosed substances, such as alcohol, unsanctioned prescription medication, or illicit substances;

2.

Identifies substances that contribute to adverse events or drug-drug interactions;3. Provides objectivity to the treatment plan;4. Reinforces therapeutic compliance with the patient;5. Provides additional documentation demonstrating compliance with patient evaluation and monitoring;

6.

Provide diagnostic information to help assess individual patient response to medications (e.g., metabolism, side effects, drug-drug interaction, etc.) over time for ongoing management of prescribed medications.

7.

1.

Medical Necessity Guidance:2.

Criteria to establish medical necessity for drug testing must be based on patient-specific elements identified during the clinical assessment, and documented by the clinician in the patient’s medical record and minimally include the following elements:

Patient history, physical examination and previous laboratory findings;•Current treatment plan•Prescribed medication(s)•Risk assessment plan•

Created on 01/17/2019. Page 12 of 35

Page 13: Lab:Controlled Substance Monitoring and Drugs of Abuse ...(MDMA; “ecstasy”), and phencyclidine (PCP), they may not be optimal tests for many prescription drugs, such as: opiates,

National pain organizations, physician societies, and the Federation of State Medical Boards recommend a practical approach to definitive UDT for COT. Frequency of testing beyond the baseline presumptive UDT must be based on individual patient needs substantiated by documentation in the patient’s medical record. Recommendations for the ordering of presumptive and definitive UDT for patients on COT are as follows:

COT Baseline Testing:Initial presumptive and/or definitive COT patient testing may include amphetamine/ methamphetamine, barbiturates, benzodiazepines, cocaine, methadone, oxycodone, tricyclic antidepressants, tetrahydrocannabinol, opioids, opiates, heroin, and synthetic/analog or “designer” drugs.

•a.

COT Monitoring Testing:Ongoing testing may be medically reasonable and necessary based on the patient history, clinical assessment, including medication side effects or inefficacy, suspicious behaviors, self-escalation of dose, doctor-shopping, indications/symptoms of illegal drug use, evidence of diversion, or other clinician documented change in affect or behavioral pattern. The frequency of testing must be based on a complete clinical assessment of the individual’s risk potential for abuse and diversion using a validated risk assessment interview or questionnaire and should include the patient’s response to prescribed medications and the side effects of medications.

The clinician should perform random UDT at random intervals, in order to properly monitor a patient. UDT testing does not have to be associated with an office visit.

Patients with specific symptoms of medication aberrant behavior or misuse may be tested in accordance with this document’s guidance for monitoring patient adherence and compliance during active treatment (<90 days) for substance use or dependence.

b.

3. UDT Frequency Based on Validated Risk Assessment and Stratification*:

Testing must be based on clinician’s documented medical necessity and reviewed by the clinician in the management of prescribing/renewing a controlled substance for every risk group outlined below.

Risk Group

Baseline Frequency of Testing

Low RiskPrior to Initiation of COT

Random testing 1-2 times every 12 months for prescribed medications, non-prescribed medications that may pose a safety risk if taken with prescribed medications, and illicit substances based on patient history, clinical presentation, and/or community usage.

Moderate Risk

Prior to Initiation of COT

Random testing 1-2 times every 6 months for prescription medications, non-prescribed medication that may pose a safety risk if taken with prescribed medications, and illicit substances, based on patient history, clinical presentation, and/or community usage.

High RiskPrior to Initiation of COT

Random testing performed 1-3 times every 3 months for prescribed medications, non-prescribed medications that may pose a safety risk if mixed with prescribed and illicit substances based on patient history, clinical presentation and/or community usage.

*Note: Any additional definitive UDT beyond recommendations above must be justified by the clinician in the medical record in situations in which changes in prescribed medications may be needed, such as:

Patient response to prescribed medication suddenly changes•

Created on 01/17/2019. Page 13 of 35

Page 14: Lab:Controlled Substance Monitoring and Drugs of Abuse ...(MDMA; “ecstasy”), and phencyclidine (PCP), they may not be optimal tests for many prescription drugs, such as: opiates,

Patient side effect profile changes•To assess for possible drug-drug interactions•Sudden change in patient’s medical condition•Patient admits to use of illicit or non-prescribed controlled substance.•

Other Covered Services

Reflex Testing by Reference Laboratories – since reference laboratories do not have access to patient-specific data, reflex testing under the following circumstances is reasonable and necessary:

To verify a presumptive positive UDT using definitive methods that include, but are not limited to GC-MS or LC-MS/MS before reporting the presumptive finding to the ordering clinician and without an additional order from the clinician; or

a.

To confirm the absence of prescribed medications when a negative result is obtained by presumptive UDT in the laboratory for a prescribed medication listed by the ordering clinician

b.

1.

Direct to definitive UDT without a presumptive UDT is reasonable and necessary, when individualized for a particular patient.

2.

Definitive testing to confirm a negative presumptive UDT result, upon the order of the clinician, is reasonable and necessary in the following circumstances:

The result is inconsistent with a patient’s self-report, presentation, medical history, or current prescribed medication plan (should be present in the sample);

a.

Following a review of clinical findings, the clinician suspects use of a substance that is inadequately detected or not detected by a presumptive UDT; or

b.

To rule out an error as the cause of a negative presumptive UDT result.c.

3.

Definitive testing to confirm a presumptive UDT positive result, upon the order of the clinician, is reasonable and necessary when the result is inconsistent with the expected result, a patient’s self-report, presentation, medical history, or current prescribed medication plan.

4.

Non-Covered Services

Blanket Orders1. Reflex definitive UDT is not reasonable and necessary when presumptive testing is performed at point of care because the clinician may have sufficient information to manage the patient. If the clinician is not satisfied, he/she must determine the clinical appropriateness of and order specific subsequent definitive testing (e.g., the patient admits to using a particular drug, or the IA cut-off is set at such a point that is sufficiently low that the physician is satisfied with the presumptive test result).

2.

Routine standing orders for all patients in a physician’s practice are not reasonable and necessary.3. It is not reasonable and necessary for a physician to perform presumptive POCT and order presumptive IA testing from a reference laboratory. In other words, Medicare will only pay for one presumptive test result per patient per date of service regardless of the number of billing providers.

4.

It is not reasonable and necessary for a physician to perform presumptive IA testing and order presumptive IA testing from a reference laboratory with or without reflex testing. Medicare will only pay for one presumptive test result per patient per date of service regardless of the number of billing providers.

5.

It is not reasonable and necessary for a reference laboratory to perform and bill IA presumptive UDT prior to definitive testing without a specific physician’s order for the presumptive testing.

6.

IA testing, regardless of whether it is qualitative or semi-quantitative (numerical), may not be used to “confirm” or definitively identify a presumptive test result obtained by cups, dipsticks, cards, cassettes or other IA testing methods. Definitive UDT provides specific identification and/or quantification typically by GC-MS or LC-MS/MS.

7.

Drug testing of two different specimen types from the same patient on the same date of service for the same drugs/metabolites/analytes.

8.

UDT for medico-legal and/or employment purposes or to protect a physician from drug diversion charges.9. Specimen validity testing including, but not limited to, pH, specific gravity, oxidants, creatinine.10.

Created on 01/17/2019. Page 14 of 35

Page 15: Lab:Controlled Substance Monitoring and Drugs of Abuse ...(MDMA; “ecstasy”), and phencyclidine (PCP), they may not be optimal tests for many prescription drugs, such as: opiates,

Summary of Evidence

N/A

Analysis of Evidence (Rationale for Determination)

N/A

Coding Information

Bill Type Codes:

Contractors may specify Bill Types to help providers identify those Bill Types typically used to report this service. Absence of a Bill Type does not guarantee that the policy does not apply to that Bill Type.Complete absence of all Bill Types indicates that coverage is not influenced by Bill Type and the policy should be assumed to apply equally to all claims.

N/A

Revenue Codes:

Contractors may specify Revenue Codes to help providers identify those Revenue Codes typically used to report this service. In most instances Revenue Codes are purely advisory. Unless specified in the policy, services reported under other Revenue Codes are equally subject to this coverage determination. Complete absence of all Revenue Codes indicates that coverage is not influenced by Revenue Code and the policy should be assumed to apply equally to all Revenue Codes.

N/A

CPT/HCPCS Codes

Group 1 Paragraph:

N/A

Group 1 Codes:

CODE DESCRIPTION

DRUG TEST(S), PRESUMPTIVE, ANY NUMBER OF DRUG CLASSES, ANY NUMBER OF 80305

Created on 01/17/2019. Page 15 of 35

Page 16: Lab:Controlled Substance Monitoring and Drugs of Abuse ...(MDMA; “ecstasy”), and phencyclidine (PCP), they may not be optimal tests for many prescription drugs, such as: opiates,

CODE DESCRIPTION

DEVICES OR PROCEDURES; CAPABLE OF BEING READ BY DIRECT OPTICAL OBSERVATION ONLY (EG, UTILIZING IMMUNOASSAY [EG, DIPSTICKS, CUPS, CARDS, OR CARTRIDGES]), INCLUDES SAMPLE VALIDATION WHEN PERFORMED, PER DATE OF SERVICE

80306 DRUG TEST(S), PRESUMPTIVE, ANY NUMBER OF DRUG CLASSES, ANY NUMBER OF DEVICES OR PROCEDURES; READ BY INSTRUMENT ASSISTED DIRECT OPTICAL OBSERVATION (EG, UTILIZING IMMUNOASSAY [EG, DIPSTICKS, CUPS, CARDS, OR CARTRIDGES]), INCLUDES SAMPLE VALIDATION WHEN PERFORMED, PER DATE OF SERVICE

80307 DRUG TEST(S), PRESUMPTIVE, ANY NUMBER OF DRUG CLASSES, ANY NUMBER OF DEVICES OR PROCEDURES; BY INSTRUMENT CHEMISTRY ANALYZERS (EG, UTILIZING IMMUNOASSAY [EG, EIA, ELISA, EMIT, FPIA, IA, KIMS, RIA]), CHROMATOGRAPHY (EG, GC, HPLC), AND MASS SPECTROMETRY EITHER WITH OR WITHOUT CHROMATOGRAPHY, (EG, DART, DESI, GC-MS, GC-MS/MS, LC-MS, LC-MS/MS, LDTD, MALDI, TOF) INCLUDES SAMPLE VALIDATION WHEN PERFORMED, PER DATE OF SERVICE

G0480 DRUG TEST(S), DEFINITIVE, UTILIZING (1) DRUG IDENTIFICATION METHODS ABLE TO IDENTIFY INDIVIDUAL DRUGS AND DISTINGUISH BETWEEN STRUCTURAL ISOMERS (BUT NOT NECESSARILY STEREOISOMERS), INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO GC/MS (ANY TYPE, SINGLE OR TANDEM) AND LC/MS (ANY TYPE, SINGLE OR TANDEM AND EXCLUDING IMMUNOASSAYS (E.G., IA, EIA, ELISA, EMIT, FPIA) AND ENZYMATIC METHODS (E.G., ALCOHOL DEHYDROGENASE)), (2) STABLE ISOTOPE OR OTHER UNIVERSALLY RECOGNIZED INTERNAL STANDARDS IN ALL SAMPLES (E.G., TO CONTROL FOR MATRIX EFFECTS, INTERFERENCES AND VARIATIONS IN SIGNAL STRENGTH), AND (3) METHOD OR DRUG-SPECIFIC CALIBRATION AND MATRIX-MATCHED QUALITY CONTROL MATERIAL (E.G., TO CONTROL FOR INSTRUMENT VARIATIONS AND MASS SPECTRAL DRIFT); QUALITATIVE OR QUANTITATIVE, ALL SOURCES, INCLUDES SPECIMEN VALIDITY TESTING, PER DAY; 1-7 DRUG CLASS(ES), INCLUDING METABOLITE(S) IF PERFORMED

DRUG TEST(S), DEFINITIVE, UTILIZING (1) DRUG IDENTIFICATION METHODS ABLE TO IDENTIFY INDIVIDUAL DRUGS AND DISTINGUISH BETWEEN STRUCTURAL ISOMERS (BUT NOT NECESSARILY STEREOISOMERS), INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO GC/MS (ANY TYPE, SINGLE OR TANDEM) AND LC/MS (ANY TYPE, SINGLE OR TANDEM AND EXCLUDING IMMUNOASSAYS (E.G., IA, EIA, ELISA, EMIT, FPIA) AND ENZYMATIC METHODS (E.G., ALCOHOL DEHYDROGENASE)), (2) STABLE ISOTOPE OR OTHER UNIVERSALLY RECOGNIZED INTERNAL STANDARDS IN ALL SAMPLES (E.G., TO CONTROL FOR MATRIX EFFECTS, INTERFERENCES AND VARIATIONS IN SIGNAL STRENGTH), AND (3) METHOD OR DRUG-SPECIFIC CALIBRATION AND MATRIX-MATCHED QUALITY CONTROL MATERIAL (E.G., TO CONTROL FOR INSTRUMENT VARIATIONS AND MASS SPECTRAL DRIFT); QUALITATIVE OR QUANTITATIVE, ALL SOURCES, INCLUDES SPECIMEN VALIDITY TESTING, PER DAY; 8-14 DRUG CLASS(ES), INCLUDING METABOLITE(S) IF

G0481

Created on 01/17/2019. Page 16 of 35

Page 17: Lab:Controlled Substance Monitoring and Drugs of Abuse ...(MDMA; “ecstasy”), and phencyclidine (PCP), they may not be optimal tests for many prescription drugs, such as: opiates,

CODE DESCRIPTION

PERFORMED

G0482 DRUG TEST(S), DEFINITIVE, UTILIZING (1) DRUG IDENTIFICATION METHODS ABLE TO IDENTIFY INDIVIDUAL DRUGS AND DISTINGUISH BETWEEN STRUCTURAL ISOMERS (BUT NOT NECESSARILY STEREOISOMERS), INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO GC/MS (ANY TYPE, SINGLE OR TANDEM) AND LC/MS (ANY TYPE, SINGLE OR TANDEM AND EXCLUDING IMMUNOASSAYS (E.G., IA, EIA, ELISA, EMIT, FPIA) AND ENZYMATIC METHODS (E.G., ALCOHOL DEHYDROGENASE)), (2) STABLE ISOTOPE OR OTHER UNIVERSALLY RECOGNIZED INTERNAL STANDARDS IN ALL SAMPLES (E.G., TO CONTROL FOR MATRIX EFFECTS, INTERFERENCES AND VARIATIONS IN SIGNAL STRENGTH), AND (3) METHOD OR DRUG-SPECIFIC CALIBRATION AND MATRIX-MATCHED QUALITY CONTROL MATERIAL (E.G., TO CONTROL FOR INSTRUMENT VARIATIONS AND MASS SPECTRAL DRIFT); QUALITATIVE OR QUANTITATIVE, ALL SOURCES, INCLUDES SPECIMEN VALIDITY TESTING, PER DAY; 15-21 DRUG CLASS(ES), INCLUDING METABOLITE(S) IF PERFORMED

G0483 DRUG TEST(S), DEFINITIVE, UTILIZING (1) DRUG IDENTIFICATION METHODS ABLE TO IDENTIFY INDIVIDUAL DRUGS AND DISTINGUISH BETWEEN STRUCTURAL ISOMERS (BUT NOT NECESSARILY STEREOISOMERS), INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO GC/MS (ANY TYPE, SINGLE OR TANDEM) AND LC/MS (ANY TYPE, SINGLE OR TANDEM AND EXCLUDING IMMUNOASSAYS (E.G., IA, EIA, ELISA, EMIT, FPIA) AND ENZYMATIC METHODS (E.G., ALCOHOL DEHYDROGENASE)), (2) STABLE ISOTOPE OR OTHER UNIVERSALLY RECOGNIZED INTERNAL STANDARDS IN ALL SAMPLES (E.G., TO CONTROL FOR MATRIX EFFECTS, INTERFERENCES AND VARIATIONS IN SIGNAL STRENGTH), AND (3) METHOD OR DRUG-SPECIFIC CALIBRATION AND MATRIX-MATCHED QUALITY CONTROL MATERIAL (E.G., TO CONTROL FOR INSTRUMENT VARIATIONS AND MASS SPECTRAL DRIFT); QUALITATIVE OR QUANTITATIVE, ALL SOURCES, INCLUDES SPECIMEN VALIDITY TESTING, PER DAY; 22 OR MORE DRUG CLASS(ES), INCLUDING METABOLITE(S) IF PERFORMED

G0659 DRUG TEST(S), DEFINITIVE, UTILIZING DRUG IDENTIFICATION METHODS ABLE TO IDENTIFY INDIVIDUAL DRUGS AND DISTINGUISH BETWEEN STRUCTURAL ISOMERS (BUT NOT NECESSARILY STEREOISOMERS), INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO GC/MS (ANY TYPE, SINGLE OR TANDEM) AND LC/MS (ANY TYPE, SINGLE OR TANDEM), EXCLUDING IMMUNOASSAYS (E.G., IA, EIA, ELISA, EMIT, FPIA) AND ENZYMATIC METHODS (E.G., ALCOHOL DEHYDROGENASE), PERFORMED WITHOUT METHOD OR DRUG-SPECIFIC CALIBRATION, WITHOUT MATRIX-MATCHED QUALITY CONTROL MATERIAL, OR WITHOUT USE OF STABLE ISOTOPE OR OTHER UNIVERSALLY RECOGNIZED INTERNAL STANDARD(S) FOR EACH DRUG, DRUG METABOLITE OR DRUG CLASS PER SPECIMEN; QUALITATIVE OR QUANTITATIVE, ALL SOURCES, INCLUDES SPECIMEN VALIDITY TESTING, PER DAY, ANY NUMBER OF DRUG CLASSES

Created on 01/17/2019. Page 17 of 35

Page 18: Lab:Controlled Substance Monitoring and Drugs of Abuse ...(MDMA; “ecstasy”), and phencyclidine (PCP), they may not be optimal tests for many prescription drugs, such as: opiates,

ICD-10 Codes that Support Medical Necessity

Group 1 Paragraph:

N/A

Group 1 Codes:

ICD-10 CODE DESCRIPTION

E87.2 Acidosis

F10.11 Alcohol abuse, in remission

F10.20 Alcohol dependence, uncomplicated

F11.11 Opioid abuse, in remission

F11.20 Opioid dependence, uncomplicated

F11.220 Opioid dependence with intoxication, uncomplicated

F11.221 Opioid dependence with intoxication delirium

F11.222 Opioid dependence with intoxication with perceptual disturbance

F11.229 Opioid dependence with intoxication, unspecified

F11.23 Opioid dependence with withdrawal

F11.24 Opioid dependence with opioid-induced mood disorder

F11.250 Opioid dependence with opioid-induced psychotic disorder with delusions

F11.251 Opioid dependence with opioid-induced psychotic disorder with hallucinations

F11.259 Opioid dependence with opioid-induced psychotic disorder, unspecified

F11.281 Opioid dependence with opioid-induced sexual dysfunction

F11.282 Opioid dependence with opioid-induced sleep disorder

F11.288 Opioid dependence with other opioid-induced disorder

F11.29 Opioid dependence with unspecified opioid-induced disorder

F12.11 Cannabis abuse, in remission

F12.23 Cannabis dependence with withdrawal

F12.93 Cannabis use, unspecified with withdrawal

F13.11 Sedative, hypnotic or anxiolytic abuse, in remission

F14.11 Cocaine abuse, in remission

F15.11 Other stimulant abuse, in remission

F16.11 Hallucinogen abuse, in remission

F18.10 Inhalant abuse, uncomplicated

F18.11 Inhalant abuse, in remission

F18.120 Inhalant abuse with intoxication, uncomplicated

Created on 01/17/2019. Page 18 of 35

Page 19: Lab:Controlled Substance Monitoring and Drugs of Abuse ...(MDMA; “ecstasy”), and phencyclidine (PCP), they may not be optimal tests for many prescription drugs, such as: opiates,

ICD-10 CODE DESCRIPTION

F18.90 Inhalant use, unspecified, uncomplicated

F19.11 Other psychoactive substance abuse, in remission

F19.20 Other psychoactive substance dependence, uncomplicated

F20.0 Paranoid schizophrenia

F20.1 Disorganized schizophrenia

F20.2 Catatonic schizophrenia

F20.89 Other schizophrenia

F55.0 Abuse of antacids

F55.1 Abuse of herbal or folk remedies

F55.2 Abuse of laxatives

F55.3 Abuse of steroids or hormones

F55.4 Abuse of vitamins

F55.8 Abuse of other non-psychoactive substances

G40.301 Generalized idiopathic epilepsy and epileptic syndromes, not intractable, with status epilepticus

G40.309 Generalized idiopathic epilepsy and epileptic syndromes, not intractable, without status epilepticus

G40.311 Generalized idiopathic epilepsy and epileptic syndromes, intractable, with status epilepticus

G40.319 Generalized idiopathic epilepsy and epileptic syndromes, intractable, without status epilepticus

G40.401 Other generalized epilepsy and epileptic syndromes, not intractable, with status epilepticus

G40.409 Other generalized epilepsy and epileptic syndromes, not intractable, without status epilepticus

G40.411 Other generalized epilepsy and epileptic syndromes, intractable, with status epilepticus

G40.419 Other generalized epilepsy and epileptic syndromes, intractable, without status epilepticus

G40.901 Epilepsy, unspecified, not intractable, with status epilepticus

G40.909 Epilepsy, unspecified, not intractable, without status epilepticus

G40.911 Epilepsy, unspecified, intractable, with status epilepticus

G40.919 Epilepsy, unspecified, intractable, without status epilepticus

G89.29 Other chronic pain

Created on 01/17/2019. Page 19 of 35

Page 20: Lab:Controlled Substance Monitoring and Drugs of Abuse ...(MDMA; “ecstasy”), and phencyclidine (PCP), they may not be optimal tests for many prescription drugs, such as: opiates,

ICD-10 CODE DESCRIPTION

G89.4 Chronic pain syndrome

I44.0 Atrioventricular block, first degree

I44.1 Atrioventricular block, second degree

I44.30 Unspecified atrioventricular block

I45.81 Long QT syndrome

I47.0 Re-entry ventricular arrhythmia

I47.1 Supraventricular tachycardia

I47.2 Ventricular tachycardia

I49.2 Junctional premature depolarization

M25.50 Pain in unspecified joint

M25.511 Pain in right shoulder

M25.512 Pain in left shoulder

M47.21 Other spondylosis with radiculopathy, occipito-atlanto-axial region

M47.22 Other spondylosis with radiculopathy, cervical region

M47.23 Other spondylosis with radiculopathy, cervicothoracic region

M47.26 Other spondylosis with radiculopathy, lumbar region

M47.27 Other spondylosis with radiculopathy, lumbosacral region

M47.28 Other spondylosis with radiculopathy, sacral and sacrococcygeal region

M47.811 Spondylosis without myelopathy or radiculopathy, occipito-atlanto-axial region

M47.812 Spondylosis without myelopathy or radiculopathy, cervical region

M47.813 Spondylosis without myelopathy or radiculopathy, cervicothoracic region

M47.816 Spondylosis without myelopathy or radiculopathy, lumbar region

M47.817 Spondylosis without myelopathy or radiculopathy, lumbosacral region

M47.818 Spondylosis without myelopathy or radiculopathy, sacral and sacrococcygeal region

M47.891 Other spondylosis, occipito-atlanto-axial region

M47.892 Other spondylosis, cervical region

M47.893 Other spondylosis, cervicothoracic region

M47.896 Other spondylosis, lumbar region

M47.897 Other spondylosis, lumbosacral region

M47.898 Other spondylosis, sacral and sacrococcygeal region

M51.14 Intervertebral disc disorders with radiculopathy, thoracic region

M51.15 Intervertebral disc disorders with radiculopathy, thoracolumbar region

Created on 01/17/2019. Page 20 of 35

Page 21: Lab:Controlled Substance Monitoring and Drugs of Abuse ...(MDMA; “ecstasy”), and phencyclidine (PCP), they may not be optimal tests for many prescription drugs, such as: opiates,

ICD-10 CODE DESCRIPTION

M51.16 Intervertebral disc disorders with radiculopathy, lumbar region

M51.17 Intervertebral disc disorders with radiculopathy, lumbosacral region

M51.36 Other intervertebral disc degeneration, lumbar region

M51.37 Other intervertebral disc degeneration, lumbosacral region

M54.10 Radiculopathy, site unspecified

M54.12 Radiculopathy, cervical region

M54.14 Radiculopathy, thoracic region

M54.15 Radiculopathy, thoracolumbar region

M54.16 Radiculopathy, lumbar region

M54.17 Radiculopathy, lumbosacral region

M54.18 Radiculopathy, sacral and sacrococcygeal region

M54.2 Cervicalgia

M54.5 Low back pain

M60.811 Other myositis, right shoulder

M60.812 Other myositis, left shoulder

ICD-10 CODE DESCRIPTION

M60.821 Other myositis, right upper arm

M60.822 Other myositis, left upper arm

M60.831 Other myositis, right forearm

M60.832 Other myositis, left forearm

M60.841 Other myositis, right hand

M60.842 Other myositis, left hand

M60.851 Other myositis, right thigh

M60.852 Other myositis, left thigh

M60.861 Other myositis, right lower leg

M60.862 Other myositis, left lower leg

M60.871 Other myositis, right ankle and foot

M60.872 Other myositis, left ankle and foot

M60.88 Other myositis, other site

M60.89 Other myositis, multiple sites

M60.9 Myositis, unspecified

M79.2 Neuralgia and neuritis, unspecified

Created on 01/17/2019. Page 21 of 35

Page 22: Lab:Controlled Substance Monitoring and Drugs of Abuse ...(MDMA; “ecstasy”), and phencyclidine (PCP), they may not be optimal tests for many prescription drugs, such as: opiates,

ICD-10 CODE DESCRIPTION

M79.7 Fibromyalgia

R40.0 Somnolence

R40.1 Stupor

R40.20 Unspecified coma

R40.2110 Coma scale, eyes open, never, unspecified time

R40.2111 Coma scale, eyes open, never, in the field [EMT or ambulance]

R40.2112 Coma scale, eyes open, never, at arrival to emergency department

R40.2113 Coma scale, eyes open, never, at hospital admission

R40.2114 Coma scale, eyes open, never, 24 hours or more after hospital admission

R40.2120 Coma scale, eyes open, to pain, unspecified time

R40.2121 Coma scale, eyes open, to pain, in the field [EMT or ambulance]

R40.2122 Coma scale, eyes open, to pain, at arrival to emergency department

R40.2123 Coma scale, eyes open, to pain, at hospital admission

R40.2124 Coma scale, eyes open, to pain, 24 hours or more after hospital admission

R40.2210 Coma scale, best verbal response, none, unspecified time

R40.2211 Coma scale, best verbal response, none, in the field [EMT or ambulance]

R40.2212 Coma scale, best verbal response, none, at arrival to emergency department

R40.2213 Coma scale, best verbal response, none, at hospital admission

R40.2214 Coma scale, best verbal response, none, 24 hours or more after hospital admission

R40.2220 Coma scale, best verbal response, incomprehensible words, unspecified time

R40.2221 Coma scale, best verbal response, incomprehensible words, in the field [EMT or ambulance]

R40.2222 Coma scale, best verbal response, incomprehensible words, at arrival to emergency department

R40.2223 Coma scale, best verbal response, incomprehensible words, at hospital admission

R40.2224 Coma scale, best verbal response, incomprehensible words, 24 hours or more after hospital admission

R40.2310 Coma scale, best motor response, none, unspecified time

R40.2311 Coma scale, best motor response, none, in the field [EMT or ambulance]

R40.2312 Coma scale, best motor response, none, at arrival to emergency department

R40.2313 Coma scale, best motor response, none, at hospital admission

R40.2314 Coma scale, best motor response, none, 24 hours or more after hospital admission

R40.2320 Coma scale, best motor response, extension, unspecified time

Created on 01/17/2019. Page 22 of 35

Page 23: Lab:Controlled Substance Monitoring and Drugs of Abuse ...(MDMA; “ecstasy”), and phencyclidine (PCP), they may not be optimal tests for many prescription drugs, such as: opiates,

ICD-10 CODE DESCRIPTION

R40.2321 Coma scale, best motor response, extension, in the field [EMT or ambulance]

R40.2322 Coma scale, best motor response, extension, at arrival to emergency department

R40.2323 Coma scale, best motor response, extension, at hospital admission

R40.2324 Coma scale, best motor response, extension, 24 hours or more after hospital admission

R40.2340 Coma scale, best motor response, flexion withdrawal, unspecified time

R40.2341 Coma scale, best motor response, flexion withdrawal, in the field [EMT or ambulance]

R40.2342 Coma scale, best motor response, flexion withdrawal, at arrival to emergency department

R40.2343 Coma scale, best motor response, flexion withdrawal, at hospital admission

R40.2344 Coma scale, best motor response, flexion withdrawal, 24 hours or more after hospital admission

R41.82 Altered mental status, unspecified

R44.0 Auditory hallucinations

R44.2 Other hallucinations

R44.3 Hallucinations, unspecified

R45.850 Homicidal ideations

R45.851 Suicidal ideations

R56.9 Unspecified convulsions

T39.011A Poisoning by aspirin, accidental (unintentional), initial encounter

T39.012A Poisoning by aspirin, intentional self-harm, initial encounter

T39.013A Poisoning by aspirin, assault, initial encounter

T39.014A Poisoning by aspirin, undetermined, initial encounter

T39.091A Poisoning by salicylates, accidental (unintentional), initial encounter

T39.092A Poisoning by salicylates, intentional self-harm, initial encounter

T39.093A Poisoning by salicylates, assault, initial encounter

T39.094A Poisoning by salicylates, undetermined, initial encounter

T39.1X1A Poisoning by 4-Aminophenol derivatives, accidental (unintentional), initial encounter

T39.1X2A Poisoning by 4-Aminophenol derivatives, intentional self-harm, initial encounter

T39.1X3A Poisoning by 4-Aminophenol derivatives, assault, initial encounter

T39.1X4A Poisoning by 4-Aminophenol derivatives, undetermined, initial encounter

T39.2X1A Poisoning by pyrazolone derivatives, accidental (unintentional), initial encounter

Created on 01/17/2019. Page 23 of 35

Page 24: Lab:Controlled Substance Monitoring and Drugs of Abuse ...(MDMA; “ecstasy”), and phencyclidine (PCP), they may not be optimal tests for many prescription drugs, such as: opiates,

ICD-10 CODE DESCRIPTION

T39.2X2A Poisoning by pyrazolone derivatives, intentional self-harm, initial encounter

T39.2X3A Poisoning by pyrazolone derivatives, assault, initial encounter

T39.2X4A Poisoning by pyrazolone derivatives, undetermined, initial encounter

T39.311A Poisoning by propionic acid derivatives, accidental (unintentional), initial encounter

T39.312A Poisoning by propionic acid derivatives, intentional self-harm, initial encounter

T39.313A Poisoning by propionic acid derivatives, assault, initial encounter

T39.314A Poisoning by propionic acid derivatives, undetermined, initial encounter

T39.391A Poisoning by other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAID], accidental (unintentional), initial encounter

T39.392A Poisoning by other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAID], intentional self-harm, initial encounter

T39.393A Poisoning by other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAID], assault, initial encounter

T39.394A Poisoning by other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAID], undetermined, initial encounter

T40.0X1A Poisoning by opium, accidental (unintentional), initial encounter

T40.0X2A Poisoning by opium, intentional self-harm, initial encounter

T40.0X3A Poisoning by opium, assault, initial encounter

T40.0X4A Poisoning by opium, undetermined, initial encounter

T40.1X1A Poisoning by heroin, accidental (unintentional), initial encounter

T40.1X2A Poisoning by heroin, intentional self-harm, initial encounter

T40.1X3A Poisoning by heroin, assault, initial encounter

T40.1X4A Poisoning by heroin, undetermined, initial encounter

T40.2X1A Poisoning by other opioids, accidental (unintentional), initial encounter

T40.2X2A Poisoning by other opioids, intentional self-harm, initial encounter

T40.2X3A Poisoning by other opioids, assault, initial encounter

T40.2X4A Poisoning by other opioids, undetermined, initial encounter

T40.3X1A Poisoning by methadone, accidental (unintentional), initial encounter

T40.3X2A Poisoning by methadone, intentional self-harm, initial encounter

ICD-10 CODE DESCRIPTION

T40.3X3A Poisoning by methadone, assault, initial encounter

T40.3X4A Poisoning by methadone, undetermined, initial encounter

T40.4X1A Poisoning by other synthetic narcotics, accidental (unintentional), initial encounter

Created on 01/17/2019. Page 24 of 35

Page 25: Lab:Controlled Substance Monitoring and Drugs of Abuse ...(MDMA; “ecstasy”), and phencyclidine (PCP), they may not be optimal tests for many prescription drugs, such as: opiates,

ICD-10 CODE DESCRIPTION

T40.4X2A Poisoning by other synthetic narcotics, intentional self-harm, initial encounter

T40.4X3A Poisoning by other synthetic narcotics, assault, initial encounter

T40.4X4A Poisoning by other synthetic narcotics, undetermined, initial encounter

T40.601A Poisoning by unspecified narcotics, accidental (unintentional), initial encounter

T40.602A Poisoning by unspecified narcotics, intentional self-harm, initial encounter

T40.603A Poisoning by unspecified narcotics, assault, initial encounter

T40.604A Poisoning by unspecified narcotics, undetermined, initial encounter

T40.691A Poisoning by other narcotics, accidental (unintentional), initial encounter

T40.692A Poisoning by other narcotics, intentional self-harm, initial encounter

T40.693A Poisoning by other narcotics, assault, initial encounter

T40.694A Poisoning by other narcotics, undetermined, initial encounter

T40.7X1A Poisoning by cannabis (derivatives), accidental (unintentional), initial encounter

T40.7X2A Poisoning by cannabis (derivatives), intentional self-harm, initial encounter

T40.7X3A Poisoning by cannabis (derivatives), assault, initial encounter

T40.7X4A Poisoning by cannabis (derivatives), undetermined, initial encounter

T40.8X1A Poisoning by lysergide [LSD], accidental (unintentional), initial encounter

T40.8X2A Poisoning by lysergide [LSD], intentional self-harm, initial encounter

T40.8X3A Poisoning by lysergide [LSD], assault, initial encounter

T40.8X4A Poisoning by lysergide [LSD], undetermined, initial encounter

T40.901A Poisoning by unspecified psychodysleptics [hallucinogens], accidental (unintentional), initial encounter

T40.902A Poisoning by unspecified psychodysleptics [hallucinogens], intentional self-harm, initial encounter

T40.903A Poisoning by unspecified psychodysleptics [hallucinogens], assault, initial encounter

T40.904A Poisoning by unspecified psychodysleptics [hallucinogens], undetermined, initial encounter

T40.991A Poisoning by other psychodysleptics [hallucinogens], accidental (unintentional), initial encounter

T40.992A Poisoning by other psychodysleptics [hallucinogens], intentional self-harm, initial encounter

T40.993A Poisoning by other psychodysleptics [hallucinogens], assault, initial encounter

T40.994A Poisoning by other psychodysleptics [hallucinogens], undetermined, initial encounter

T42.0X1A Poisoning by hydantoin derivatives, accidental (unintentional), initial encounter

Created on 01/17/2019. Page 25 of 35

Page 26: Lab:Controlled Substance Monitoring and Drugs of Abuse ...(MDMA; “ecstasy”), and phencyclidine (PCP), they may not be optimal tests for many prescription drugs, such as: opiates,

ICD-10 CODE DESCRIPTION

T42.0X2A Poisoning by hydantoin derivatives, intentional self-harm, initial encounter

T42.0X3A Poisoning by hydantoin derivatives, assault, initial encounter

T42.0X4A Poisoning by hydantoin derivatives, undetermined, initial encounter

T42.3X1A Poisoning by barbiturates, accidental (unintentional), initial encounter

T42.3X2A Poisoning by barbiturates, intentional self-harm, initial encounter

T42.3X3A Poisoning by barbiturates, assault, initial encounter

T42.3X4A Poisoning by barbiturates, undetermined, initial encounter

T42.4X1A Poisoning by benzodiazepines, accidental (unintentional), initial encounter

T42.4X2A Poisoning by benzodiazepines, intentional self-harm, initial encounter

T42.4X3A Poisoning by benzodiazepines, assault, initial encounter

T42.4X4A Poisoning by benzodiazepines, undetermined, initial encounter

T42.6X1A Poisoning by other antiepileptic and sedative-hypnotic drugs, accidental (unintentional), initial encounter

T42.6X2A Poisoning by other antiepileptic and sedative-hypnotic drugs, intentional self-harm, initial encounter

T42.6X3A Poisoning by other antiepileptic and sedative-hypnotic drugs, assault, initial encounter

T42.6X4A Poisoning by other antiepileptic and sedative-hypnotic drugs, undetermined, initial encounter

T42.71XA Poisoning by unspecified antiepileptic and sedative-hypnotic drugs, accidental (unintentional), initial encounter

T42.72XA Poisoning by unspecified antiepileptic and sedative-hypnotic drugs, intentional self-harm, initial encounter

T42.73XA Poisoning by unspecified antiepileptic and sedative-hypnotic drugs, assault, initial encounter

T42.74XA Poisoning by unspecified antiepileptic and sedative-hypnotic drugs, undetermined, initial encounter

T43.011A Poisoning by tricyclic antidepressants, accidental (unintentional), initial encounter

T43.012A Poisoning by tricyclic antidepressants, intentional self-harm, initial encounter

T43.013A Poisoning by tricyclic antidepressants, assault, initial encounter

T43.014A Poisoning by tricyclic antidepressants, undetermined, initial encounter

T43.021A Poisoning by tetracyclic antidepressants, accidental (unintentional), initial encounter

T43.022A Poisoning by tetracyclic antidepressants, intentional self-harm, initial encounter

T43.023A Poisoning by tetracyclic antidepressants, assault, initial encounter

Created on 01/17/2019. Page 26 of 35

Page 27: Lab:Controlled Substance Monitoring and Drugs of Abuse ...(MDMA; “ecstasy”), and phencyclidine (PCP), they may not be optimal tests for many prescription drugs, such as: opiates,

ICD-10 CODE DESCRIPTION

T43.024A Poisoning by tetracyclic antidepressants, undetermined, initial encounter

T43.1X1A Poisoning by monoamine-oxidase-inhibitor antidepressants, accidental (unintentional), initial encounter

T43.1X2A Poisoning by monoamine-oxidase-inhibitor antidepressants, intentional self-harm, initial encounter

T43.1X3A Poisoning by monoamine-oxidase-inhibitor antidepressants, assault, initial encounter

T43.1X4A Poisoning by monoamine-oxidase-inhibitor antidepressants, undetermined, initial encounter

T43.201A Poisoning by unspecified antidepressants, accidental (unintentional), initial encounter

T43.202A Poisoning by unspecified antidepressants, intentional self-harm, initial encounter

T43.203A Poisoning by unspecified antidepressants, assault, initial encounter

T43.204A Poisoning by unspecified antidepressants, undetermined, initial encounter

T43.211A Poisoning by selective serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, accidental (unintentional), initial encounter

T43.212A Poisoning by selective serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, intentional self-harm, initial encounter

T43.213A Poisoning by selective serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, assault, initial encounter

T43.214A Poisoning by selective serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, undetermined, initial encounter

T43.221A Poisoning by selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, accidental (unintentional), initial encounter

T43.222A Poisoning by selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, intentional self-harm, initial encounter

T43.223A Poisoning by selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, assault, initial encounter

T43.224A Poisoning by selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, undetermined, initial encounter

T43.291A Poisoning by other antidepressants, accidental (unintentional), initial encounter

T43.292A Poisoning by other antidepressants, intentional self-harm, initial encounter

T43.293A Poisoning by other antidepressants, assault, initial encounter

T43.294A Poisoning by other antidepressants, undetermined, initial encounter

T43.3X1A Poisoning by phenothiazine antipsychotics and neuroleptics, accidental (unintentional), initial encounter

Poisoning by phenothiazine antipsychotics and neuroleptics, intentional self-harm, T43.3X2A

Created on 01/17/2019. Page 27 of 35

Page 28: Lab:Controlled Substance Monitoring and Drugs of Abuse ...(MDMA; “ecstasy”), and phencyclidine (PCP), they may not be optimal tests for many prescription drugs, such as: opiates,

ICD-10 CODE DESCRIPTION

initial encounter

T43.3X3A Poisoning by phenothiazine antipsychotics and neuroleptics, assault, initial encounter

T43.3X4A Poisoning by phenothiazine antipsychotics and neuroleptics, undetermined, initial encounter

T43.4X1A Poisoning by butyrophenone and thiothixene neuroleptics, accidental (unintentional), initial encounter

T43.4X2A Poisoning by butyrophenone and thiothixene neuroleptics, intentional self-harm, initial encounter

T43.4X3A Poisoning by butyrophenone and thiothixene neuroleptics, assault, initial encounter

T43.4X4A Poisoning by butyrophenone and thiothixene neuroleptics, undetermined, initial encounter

T43.501A Poisoning by unspecified antipsychotics and neuroleptics, accidental (unintentional), initial encounter

T43.502A Poisoning by unspecified antipsychotics and neuroleptics, intentional self-harm, initial encounter

T43.503A Poisoning by unspecified antipsychotics and neuroleptics, assault, initial encounter

T43.504A Poisoning by unspecified antipsychotics and neuroleptics, undetermined, initial encounter

T43.591A Poisoning by other antipsychotics and neuroleptics, accidental (unintentional), initial encounter

T43.592A Poisoning by other antipsychotics and neuroleptics, intentional self-harm, initial encounter

T43.593A Poisoning by other antipsychotics and neuroleptics, assault, initial encounter

T43.594A Poisoning by other antipsychotics and neuroleptics, undetermined, initial encounter

T43.601A Poisoning by unspecified psychostimulants, accidental (unintentional), initial encounter

T43.602A Poisoning by unspecified psychostimulants, intentional self-harm, initial encounter

T43.603A Poisoning by unspecified psychostimulants, assault, initial encounter

T43.604A Poisoning by unspecified psychostimulants, undetermined, initial encounter

T43.611A Poisoning by caffeine, accidental (unintentional), initial encounter

T43.612A Poisoning by caffeine, intentional self-harm, initial encounter

ICD-10 CODE DESCRIPTION

T43.613A Poisoning by caffeine, assault, initial encounter

T43.614A Poisoning by caffeine, undetermined, initial encounter

Created on 01/17/2019. Page 28 of 35

Page 29: Lab:Controlled Substance Monitoring and Drugs of Abuse ...(MDMA; “ecstasy”), and phencyclidine (PCP), they may not be optimal tests for many prescription drugs, such as: opiates,

ICD-10 CODE DESCRIPTION

T43.621A Poisoning by amphetamines, accidental (unintentional), initial encounter

T43.622A Poisoning by amphetamines, intentional self-harm, initial encounter

T43.623A Poisoning by amphetamines, assault, initial encounter

T43.624A Poisoning by amphetamines, undetermined, initial encounter

T43.631A Poisoning by methylphenidate, accidental (unintentional), initial encounter

T43.632A Poisoning by methylphenidate, intentional self-harm, initial encounter

T43.633A Poisoning by methylphenidate, assault, initial encounter

T43.634A Poisoning by methylphenidate, undetermined, initial encounter

T43.641A Poisoning by ecstasy, accidental (unintentional), initial encounter

T43.641D Poisoning by ecstasy, accidental (unintentional), subsequent encounter

T43.641S Poisoning by ecstasy, accidental (unintentional), sequela

T43.642A Poisoning by ecstasy, intentional self-harm, initial encounter

T43.642D Poisoning by ecstasy, intentional self-harm, subsequent encounter

T43.642S Poisoning by ecstasy, intentional self-harm, sequela

T43.643A Poisoning by ecstasy, assault, initial encounter

T43.643D Poisoning by ecstasy, assault, subsequent encounter

T43.643S Poisoning by ecstasy, assault, sequela

T43.644A Poisoning by ecstasy, undetermined, initial encounter

T43.644D Poisoning by ecstasy, undetermined, subsequent encounter

T43.644S Poisoning by ecstasy, undetermined, sequela

T43.691A Poisoning by other psychostimulants, accidental (unintentional), initial encounter

T43.692A Poisoning by other psychostimulants, intentional self-harm, initial encounter

T43.693A Poisoning by other psychostimulants, assault, initial encounter

T43.694A Poisoning by other psychostimulants, undetermined, initial encounter

T43.8X1A Poisoning by other psychotropic drugs, accidental (unintentional), initial encounter

T43.8X2A Poisoning by other psychotropic drugs, intentional self-harm, initial encounter

T43.8X3A Poisoning by other psychotropic drugs, assault, initial encounter

T43.8X4A Poisoning by other psychotropic drugs, undetermined, initial encounter

T43.91XA Poisoning by unspecified psychotropic drug, accidental (unintentional), initial encounter

T43.92XA Poisoning by unspecified psychotropic drug, intentional self-harm, initial encounter

T43.93XA Poisoning by unspecified psychotropic drug, assault, initial encounter

Created on 01/17/2019. Page 29 of 35

Page 30: Lab:Controlled Substance Monitoring and Drugs of Abuse ...(MDMA; “ecstasy”), and phencyclidine (PCP), they may not be optimal tests for many prescription drugs, such as: opiates,

ICD-10 CODE DESCRIPTION

T43.94XA Poisoning by unspecified psychotropic drug, undetermined, initial encounter

T45.0X1A Poisoning by antiallergic and antiemetic drugs, accidental (unintentional), initial encounter

T45.0X2A Poisoning by antiallergic and antiemetic drugs, intentional self-harm, initial encounter

T45.0X3A Poisoning by antiallergic and antiemetic drugs, assault, initial encounter

T45.0X4A Poisoning by antiallergic and antiemetic drugs, undetermined, initial encounter

T46.0X1A Poisoning by cardiac-stimulant glycosides and drugs of similar action, accidental (unintentional), initial encounter

T46.0X2A Poisoning by cardiac-stimulant glycosides and drugs of similar action, intentional self-harm, initial encounter

T46.0X3A Poisoning by cardiac-stimulant glycosides and drugs of similar action, assault, initial encounter

T46.0X4A Poisoning by cardiac-stimulant glycosides and drugs of similar action, undetermined, initial encounter

T50.901A Poisoning by unspecified drugs, medicaments and biological substances, accidental (unintentional), initial encounter

T50.902A Poisoning by unspecified drugs, medicaments and biological substances, intentional self-harm, initial encounter

T50.903A Poisoning by unspecified drugs, medicaments and biological substances, assault, initial encounter

T50.904A Poisoning by unspecified drugs, medicaments and biological substances, undetermined, initial encounter

Z03.89 Encounter for observation for other suspected diseases and conditions ruled out

Z51.81 Encounter for therapeutic drug level monitoring

Z79.3 Long term (current) use of hormonal contraceptives

Z79.891 Long term (current) use of opiate analgesic

Z79.899 Other long term (current) drug therapy

Z91.19 Patient's noncompliance with other medical treatment and regimen

ICD-10 Codes that DO NOT Support Medical Necessity

N/A

Additional ICD-10 Information

N/A

Created on 01/17/2019. Page 30 of 35

Page 31: Lab:Controlled Substance Monitoring and Drugs of Abuse ...(MDMA; “ecstasy”), and phencyclidine (PCP), they may not be optimal tests for many prescription drugs, such as: opiates,

General InformationAssociated Information

N/a

Sources of Information

This LCD is based on the similar LCD by Palmetto GBA, Controlled Substance and Drugs of Abuse Testing, L35724.

American Academy of Pain Medicine, Guideline Statement, Use of Opioids for the Treatment of Chronic Pain, March 2013, available online at http://www.painmed.org/files/use-of-opioids-for-the-treatment-of-chronic-pain.pdf.

1.

AMA Report 2 of the Council on Science and Public Health (I-08): Improving Medical Practice and Patient/Family Education to Reverse the Epidemic of Nonmedical Prescription Drug Use and Addiction.http://www.ama-assn.org/resources/doc/csaph/csaph2i08.pdf

2.

Barthwell, A. Principles for Urine Drug Testing in Addiction Medicine. CLAAD June 23, 2014. http://claad.org/principles-for-urine-drug-testing-in-addiction-medicine/

3.

Centers for Disease Control: Policy Impact: Prescription Painkiller Overdose Deaths. July 2013. Available online at http://www.cdc.gov/HomeandRecreationalSafety/pdf/PolicyImpact-PrescriptionPainkillerOD.pdf.

4.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Unintentional Drug Poisoning in the United States. July 2010.http://www.cdc.gov/HomeandRecreationalSafety/pdf/poison-issue-brief.pdf

5.

Chou R, Fanciullo GJ. Opioid Treatment Guidelines; Clinical Guidelines for the Use of Chronic Opioid Therapy in Chronic Noncancer Pain. J Pain. 2009; 10(2): 113-130.

6.

Department of Health and Human Services. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. Overdose deaths involving prescription opioids among enrollees. Washington, 2004-2007. http://www/cdc/gov/mmwr.

7.

DuPont RL, Shea CL, Barthwell AG, et al. Drug Testing: A White Paper of the American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM). American Society of Addiction Medicine. White Paper. 2013.

8.

Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB), Model Policy for the Use of Opioid Analgesics for the Treatment of Chronic Pain, July 2013, available online at http://www.fsmb.org/pdf/pain_policy_july2013.pdf.

9.

Gourlay DL, Caplan YH. Urine Drug testing in Clinical Practice. http://www.familydocs.org/files/UDTMonograph_for_web.pdf.

10.

Interagency Guideline on Opioid Dosing for Chronic Non-cancer Pain: An educational aid to improve care and safety with opioid therapy 2010 Update; http://www.agencymeddirectors.wa.gov/Files/OpioidGdline.pdf.

11.

Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI). Guideline for the assessment and management of chronic pain. November 2011.http://www.icsi.org/pain chronic assessment_and_management_of_14399/pain chronic assessment_and_management_of guideline_.html

12.

Jackman RP, Purvis JM. Chronic Nonmalignant Pain in Primary Care. American Family Physician. 2008; 78(10):1155-1162.

13.

Jamison RN, Ross EL, Michna E, Chen LQ, Holcomb C, Wasan AD. Substance misuse treatment for high-risk chronic pain patients on opioid therapy: a randomized trial. Pain. 2010; 150(3):390-400.

14.

Jones T, McCoy D, Moore TM, Browder, JH, and Daffron S (2010). “Urine Drug Testing as an Evaluation of Risk Management Strategies,” Practical Pain Management. Vol. 10, Issue 5, pages 26-30

15.

Jones T, Moore T, et al. A comparison of various risk screening methods in predicting discharge from opioid treatment. Clin J Pain. 2012;28(2):93-100.

16.

Jones T and Moore TM (2013) Preliminary Data on a New Risk Assessment Tool: The Brief Risk Interview. Journal of Opioid Management. Vol. 9, No 1, pages 19-27.

17.

Jones T, Moore TM, Levy J, Browder JH, Daffron S, and Passik SD (2012). “A Comparison of Various Risk Screening Methods for Patients Receiving Opioids for Chronic Pain Management.” Clinical Journal of Pain. Vol. 28, Issue 2, pages 93-100.

18.

Created on 01/17/2019. Page 31 of 35

Page 32: Lab:Controlled Substance Monitoring and Drugs of Abuse ...(MDMA; “ecstasy”), and phencyclidine (PCP), they may not be optimal tests for many prescription drugs, such as: opiates,

Jones T and Passik SD (2011). “A Comparison of Methods of Administering the Opioid Risk Tool.” Journal of Opioid Management. Vol. 7, No 5, pages 347-352.

19.

Mallya A., Purnell AL, Svrakic DM, et al. Witnesses versus unwitnessed random urine tests in the treatment of opioid dependence. Am J Addict. 2013; 22(2):175-177.

20.

Melanson Stacy EF, Baskin LB. Interpretation and utility of drug of abuse immunoassays: lessons from laboratory drug testing surveys. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2010;134:736-739.

21.

Michna, E. et al. Urine toxicology screening among chronic pain patients of opioid therapy: frequency and predictability of abnormal findings. Clin J Pain 2007;23(2):173-179

22.

Moore TM, Jones T, et al. A comparison of common screening methods for predicting aberrant drug-related behavior among patients receiving opioids for chronic pain management. Pain Med. 2009;10:1426-1433.

23.

Moore TM, Jones T, Browder JH, Daffron S, and Passik SD (2009). A Comparison of Common Screening Methods for Predicting Aberrant Drug-Related Behavior Among Patients Receiving Opioids of Chronic Pain Management. Pain Medicine. Vol. 10, Issue 8, pages 1426-1433.

24.

Nafziger AN, Bertino JS. Utility and application of urine drug testing in chronic pain management with opioids. Clin J Pain 2009;25(1)73-79.

25.

Nicholson B, Passik S. Management of chronic non-cancer pain in the primary care setting. SMJ 2007;100(10):1028-1034.

26.

Passik S and Jones T (2013). “Risk Assessment 2.0.” PainWeek Journal.No. 1, Q 3, pages 5-9

27.

Passik SD. Issues in long-term opioid therapy: unmet needs, risks, and solutions. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2009;84(7):593-601.

28.

Passik SD, Kirsh KL, Casper D. Addiction-related assessment tools and pain management: instruments for screening, treatment planning and monitoring compliance. Pain Med 2008;9:S145-S166.

29.

Reisfield GM, Wasan AD, Jamison RN. The prevalence and significance of cannabis uses in patients prescribed chronic opioid therapy: a review of the extant literature. Pain Med. 2009; 10(8):1434-1441.

30.

SAMHSA, Clinical Drug Testing in Primary Care, Rockville, MD: SAMHSA; 2012. Technical Assistance Publication (TAP) 32, HHS publication (SMA) 12-4668, available online at http://store.samhsa.gov/product/TAP-32-Clinical-Drug-Testing-in-Primary-Care/SMA12-4668.

31.

Schneider J, Miller A. Urine drug tests in a private chronic pain practice. PPM. January/February 2008. http://www.tuft.edu/data/41/528854.pdf.

32.

Standridge JB, Adams SM. Urine drug screening: a valuable office procedure. American Family Physician. 2010;81(5):635-640.

33.

Starrels JL, Becker WC, Alford DP, Kapoor A, Williams AR, Turner BJ. Systematic review: treatment agreements and urine drug testing to reduce opioid misuse in patients with chronic pain. Ann Intern Med. 2010; 152(11):712-720.

34.

Trescot AM, Standiford H. Opioids in the management of chronic non-cancer pain: an update on American Society of the Interventional Pain Physicians' (ASIPP) guidelines. AFP2008;11:S5-S61.

35.

University of Washington, Division of Pain Medicine, Urine Drug Testing Interpretive Algorithm for Monitoring Opioid Treatment (adapted from the Washington Agency Medical Directors Group Opioid Treatment Guidelines 2010), available online at http://depts.washington.edu/anesth/education/forms/pain/UW-UDTinterpretationAlgorithm.pdf

36.

US Food & Drug Administration, Goal of Labeling Changes: Better Prescribing, Safer Use of Opioids, Sept. 2013, available online at http://www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/ConsumerUpdates/ucm367660.htm.

37.

Bibliography

N/A

Created on 01/17/2019. Page 32 of 35

Page 33: Lab:Controlled Substance Monitoring and Drugs of Abuse ...(MDMA; “ecstasy”), and phencyclidine (PCP), they may not be optimal tests for many prescription drugs, such as: opiates,

Revision History InformationREVISION HISTORY DATE

REVISION HISTORY NUMBER

REVISION HISTORY EXPLANATION REASON(S) FOR CHANGE

12/27/2018 R701/07/2018: At this time 21st Century Cures Act will apply to new and revised LCDs that restrict coverage which requires comment and notice. This revision is not a restriction to the coverage determination; and, therefore not all the fields included on the LCD are applicable as noted in this policy. Effective Date of 12/27/2018 entered to be consistent with Palmetto GBA.

Removed reference #4: Bolen J. Survey of Drug Testing Policy in the Management of Chronic Pain. Added "Lab" to title.

Creation of Uniform LCDs With Other MAC Jurisdiction

10/01/2018 R609.05.18: At this time 21st Century Cures Act will apply to new and revised LCDs that restrict coverage which requires comment and notice. This revision is not a restriction to the coverage determination; and, therefore not all the fields included on the LCD are applicable as noted in this policy.

The following ICD-10 code was deleted from the ICD-10 Codes that Support Medical Necessity field: M79.1 was deleted from Group 1. The following ICD-10 Codes were added to the ICD-10 Codes that Support Medical Necessity field: F12.23, F12.93, T43.641A, T43.641D, T43.641S, T43.642A, T43.642D, T43.642S, T43.643A, T43.643D, T43.643S, T43.644A, T43.644D, T43.644S. This revision is due to the Annual ICD-10 Code Update and becomes effective October 1, 2018.

Revisions Due To ICD-10-CM Code Changes

10/01/2017 R505/14/2018: At this time 21st Century Cures Act will apply to new and revised LCDs that restrict coverage which requires comment and notice. This revision is not a restriction to the coverage determination; and, therefore not all the fields included on the LCD are applicable as noted in this policy.

Addition of ICD -10- Codes to Group I codes: M54.12; M25.511; M25.512

Creation of Uniform LCDs With Other MAC Jurisdiction

10/01/2017 R4LCD revised to correct the table under the heading "Parent Drugs and Metabolite"

Typographical Error

08/31/2017: At this time 21st Century Cures Act will apply to new and revised LCDs that restrict coverage which requires

Creation of Uniform LCDs

•10/01/2017 R3

Created on 01/17/2019. Page 33 of 35

Page 34: Lab:Controlled Substance Monitoring and Drugs of Abuse ...(MDMA; “ecstasy”), and phencyclidine (PCP), they may not be optimal tests for many prescription drugs, such as: opiates,

REVISION HISTORY DATE

REVISION HISTORY NUMBER

REVISION HISTORY EXPLANATION REASON(S) FOR CHANGE

comment and notice. This revision is not a restriction to the coverage determination; and, therefore not all the fields included on the LCD are applicable as noted in this policy.

Effective 10/1/2017, LCD is revised per the annual ICD-10-CM code update to: Add ICD-10-CM codes: F10.11; F11.11; F12.11; F13.11; F14.11; F15.11; F16.11; F18.11; F19.11

With Other MAC JurisdictionRevisions Due To ICD-10-CM Code Changes

10/01/2017 R2DATE (08/29/2017): At this time 21st Century Cures Act will apply to new and revised LCDs that restrict coverage which requires comment and notice. This revision is not a restriction to the coverage determination; and, therefore not all the fields included on the LCD are applicable as noted in this policy. Effective 10/1/2017, LCD is revised per the annual ICD-10-CM code update to: Add ICD-10-CM codes: R41.82; R45.850; R45.851

Creation of Uniform LCDs With Other MAC Jurisdiction

Revisions Due To ICD-10-CM Code Changes

01/01/2017 R1 Revised for 2017 CPT code changes: Codes Deleted and invalid:G0477, G0478 and G0479; Added G0659, 80305, 80306 and 80307.

Revisions Due To CPT/HCPCS Code Changes

Associated DocumentsAttachments

N/A

Related Local Coverage Documents

Article(s) A55001 - 2018 Controlled Substance Monitoring and Drugs of Abuse Coding and Billing Guidelines A54998 - Response to Comments: Controlled Substance Monitoring and Drugs of Abuse Testing Comment Period Ending 05/02/2014.

Related National Coverage Documents

N/A

Public Version(s)

Updated on 01/12/2019 with effective dates 12/27/2018 - N/A Updated on 09/05/2018 with effective dates 10/01/2018 - 12/26/2018 Updated on 05/16/2018 with effective dates 10/01/2017 - 09/30/2018 Updated on 09/11/2017 with effective dates 10/01/2017 - N/A Updated on 08/31/2017 with effective dates 10/01/2017 - N/A Updated on 08/30/2017 with effective dates 10/01/2017 - N/A

Created on 01/17/2019. Page 34 of 35

Page 35: Lab:Controlled Substance Monitoring and Drugs of Abuse ...(MDMA; “ecstasy”), and phencyclidine (PCP), they may not be optimal tests for many prescription drugs, such as: opiates,

Some older versions have been archived. Please visit the MCD Archive Site to retrieve them.

KeywordsG0659•G0480•G0481•G0482•G0483•80305•80306•80307•Drugs of Abuse Testing•Controlled Substance•

Created on 01/17/2019. Page 35 of 35