Kumpulan Journal Kompartemen Sindrom

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/10/2019 Kumpulan Journal Kompartemen Sindrom

    1/6

    Kumpulan journal kompartemen

    sindromFebrian brahmana

  • 8/10/2019 Kumpulan Journal Kompartemen Sindrom

    2/6

  • 8/10/2019 Kumpulan Journal Kompartemen Sindrom

    3/6

    Am Surg. 2008 Mar;74(3):217-20. Dynamic wound closure for decompressive leg fasciotomy wounds. Singh N , Bluman E , Starnes B , Andersen C . Source Vascular Surgery Service, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, Washington 98431, USA.

    [email protected] Abstract Decompressive fasciotomy for preservation of lower extremity function and salvage is an essential

    technique in trauma. The wounds that result from the standard two incision four-compartment legfasciotomy are often accompanied by a wide soft tissue opening that in the face of truecompartment syndrome are often impossible to close in a delayed primary fashion. We describe atechnique using a device that allows for dissipation of the workload across the wound marginallowing for successful delayed primary closure. Consecutive patients who presented to the 28th

    Combat Support Hospital in Baghdad, Iraq with a diagnosis of compartment syndrome of the leg,impending compartment syndrome of the leg, or compartment syndrome of the leg recentlytreated with fasciotomies were followed. All patients underwent placement of the Canica dynamicwound closure device (Canica, Almonte, ON, Canada). Eleven consecutive patients treated at acombat support hospital in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom underwent four-compartmentfasciotomies for penetrating injuries. There were five patients that underwent a vascular repair[three superficial femoral artery (SFA) injuries and two below knee popliteal artery injuries] and sixpatients that had orthopedic injuries (three comminuted tibial fractures, two fibula fractures, andone closed pilon fracture). Patients returned to the operating room within 24 hours for washoutand wound inspection. Mean initial wound size was 8.1 cm; mean postplacement size was 2.7 cm;average time to closure was 2.6 days. All patients were able to undergo primary wound closure ofthe medial incision and placement of the Canica device over the lateral incision. Ten of the 11patients (91%) could be closed in delayed primary fashion after application of the device. In ourseries of patients with penetrating wartime injuries and compartment syndrome of the leg we havefound the use of this dynamic wound closure device to be extremely successful and expedient.

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18376685http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Singh%20N%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=18376685http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Bluman%20E%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=18376685http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Starnes%20B%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=18376685http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Andersen%20C%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=18376685http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Andersen%20C%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=18376685http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Andersen%20C%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=18376685http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Andersen%20C%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=18376685http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Starnes%20B%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=18376685http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Starnes%20B%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=18376685http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Starnes%20B%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=18376685http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Bluman%20E%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=18376685http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Bluman%20E%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=18376685http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Bluman%20E%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=18376685http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Singh%20N%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=18376685http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Singh%20N%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=18376685http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Singh%20N%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=18376685http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18376685http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18376685http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18376685http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18376685
  • 8/10/2019 Kumpulan Journal Kompartemen Sindrom

    4/6

    Publication Date: 5/16/2012 JBJS Acute compartment syndrome of the forearm . Andrew D Duckworth; Sarah E Mitchell; Samuel G Molyneux; Timothy O White; Charles M Court-

    Brown; Margaret M McQueen

    BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to document our experience with acute forearmcompartment syndrome and to determine the risk factors for the need for split-thickness skin-grafting and the development of complications after fasciotomy.

    METHODS: We identified from our trauma database all patients who underwent fasciotomy for anacute forearm compartment syndrome over a twenty-two-year period. Diagnosis was made withuse of clinical signs in all patients, with compartment pressure monitoring used as a diagnosticadjunct in some patients. Outcome measures were the use of split-thickness skin grafts and theidentification of complications following forearm fasciotomy.

    RESULTS: There were ninety patients in the study cohort, with a mean age of thirty-three years(range, thirteen to eighty-one years) and a significant male predominance (eighty-two patients; p