King of Kuki (Kuki Raja)

8/3/2019 King of Kuki (Kuki Raja)

1/28

King of Kuki (KUKI RAJA)This blog is dedicated to (L)Pu Chengjapao Doungel, Chief of Aisan.

Monday, December 5, 2011BRIEF LIFE SKETCH OF SHRI CHENGJAPAO DOUNGEL

Chengjapao Doungel, son of Nguljam Doungel was born in the year 1868 in a remote village of

Aisan located in Sadar Hills in Manipur. They had come and settled down in this area about half a

century ago before his birth under the leadership of Helkhup Doungel who was then Chief of Aisan.

They came from Nanglembung village in "Aai-Saan" hills (where rituals are performed) in Chin

Hills coming along the Imphal River and reaching Imphal valley with Meitei guides. "Aisan" is a

shortened form. They were allotted Chingmeirong area for their settlement but they could not adaptto living in swampy and mosquito infected area. They chose to settle at Makeng Lokchao area 20

kms north of Saikul while a small branch settled in Kangchup area (Makhom and Kotjim).

Kukis maintained very good relationship with Meitei kings and were very close ally. Old

people still recall that Gambhir Singh personally surveyed the area with Helkhup going on elephant

back. He was respected by the neighbouring Chiefs. He also maintained good relationship with the

then Meitei kings i.e. Gambhir Singh and Chandrakirti Singh. Helkhup was a great Chief and died

at a ripe age. He was greatly mourned by all who knew him and his funeral was performed by his

near and dear ones together with the neighbouring villages. The funeral rites and the ceremony were

performed with honour according to Kuki custom befitting the great Chief and in the same manner

honours were shown to his ancestors. It is said that Chandrakirti Singh, the King of Manipur came

upto Aisan to pay tributes to the departed soul. He fluttered a black flag on the grave of Helkhup

Doungel. He was succeeded by his brother Manlhun who was a weak Chief. It was then that a

powerful lobby within the clan prevailed upon the others to bring a more competent person i.e.

Nguljam Doungel and his son Chengjapao Doungel who were living at Seitol village to assume

Chief-ship of Aisan. They are within the line of succession (ki gamnga). Helkhup was the grandson

of Neingul while Nguljam was the grandson of Haongul who were brothers. Chengjapao's father

died early but he began to attend to the affairs of Aisan village and creditably handled them. When

Manlhun died, he took over the Chief-ship which was the desire of the people of Aisan.

"In the beginning of the 19th Century, the Meitei kingdom of Kangleipak was in turmoil formany years. After assassination of King Garibniwas, the Burmese successively invaded Kangleipak.

King Chaurajit was not in a position to defend Kangleipak. He requested Kukis in 1810 to remain

as sentinels by settling in the ring of hills around the valley so as to prevent Burmese' invasions

which they did."- P.S. Haokip. The Kukis had moved northward from Chin Hills several decades

ago in three groups. The Kipgens, Sitlhous, Singsons, Hmars, Hangshings and Changsans etc. went

westward into Cachar, Tamenglong and Naga Hills. The Haokips, Touthangs, Milhems, Baites,

Lunkims etc. went eastward to Kabow valley, Chandel, Ukhrul and Hamolin area. Aisan people

were in the middle accompanied mostly by Chonglois. During their sojourn in Moirang for few

years, they found that their kinsmen Koms, Koirengs, Chirus etc had settled in the area long ago.

Kangleipak kingdom was beset with internal rivalries and intrigues leading to fratricidal war and

was in complete turmoil. Chaurajit was ultimately driven out by his brother Marjit in 1812 and fledto Cachar along with his brother Gambhir Singh. Marjit ascended the throne with Burmese' help

and ruled as a puppet till 1819.
http://kukiraja.blogspot.com/http://kukiraja.blogspot.com/


2/28

But in the same year, the Burmese overran and took actual control and ruled upto 1826. Marjit

also fled to Cachar to join the other kings in exile. The Burmese ruled for seven years and this

period is known as "Chahi taret khuntakpa" which marked the darkest period of Kangleipak

History. The hills, however, remained free because the Burmese could not conquer the hill people.

After Anglo-Burmese War in 1824, Gambhir Singh set out on a campaign to regain the Kangleipak

Kingdom. He requested Kukis for help which they did by providing more than 500 strong warriors

and other resources. It is during his sojourn at Cachar that he came in close contact with Kuki chiefs

of the Singson clan, notably Senvon, Lungthulen, Khongjang and Taithu etc. who formed the bulk

of hill warriors assisting him. Sokhojam (Sogaijam according to Meiteis) rose to be a general in the

Kangleipak army and became part of that establishment. Gambhir Singh drove out the Burmese

and recaptured Kangleipak in 1826. He was assisted by 1000 Kuki warriors when he subjugated

Angami Nagas in 1832. There used to be even a signboard called "Kuki Piquet" just before reaching

Kohima war cemetery while going from Imphal.

In 1851-52, Haotinkhup, powerful Suhte king invaded Manipur, defeated the Meiteis and king

Chandrakirti was taken captive and carried away to Chinland (Tiddim area). Kukis mobilized 1200strong troops, fought against the Suhtes (their own kinsmen), rescued king Chandrakirti and

restored him to the throne. The rise of British power caused a corresponding decline of the Meitei

kings which also affected their allies. The defeat of the Meitei king in the battle of Khongjom in

1891 and annexation of Manipur to British India dealt a death blow. Free people as they were, they

hated living under the British. They therefore migrated further north east to Vahong area in Chingai

sub-division and Somra tract areas in Burma far away from the reach of British authorities where

they again established themselves strongly. Tangkhuls Puchuries and other tribes in the area paid

annual tributes in acknowledgement of their suzerainty. It is recalled by many that King Gambhir

Singh presented an elephant which was tied at present Molkon Village, then named

"SAIHENJANG". Aisan people were a part of mainstream Thadou-Kuki group but how they came

northward was narrated by Pu Thanglhun Doungel, 80 years old of Molkon Village whose ancestors

were all in the group when they came to the present places of

settlement.

The Kukis have a tradition of taking their village name wherever they migrate and give the

same name to the villages they establish in most cases. Chengjapao Doungel was known for his

wisdom and generosity and justice prevailed during the period of his chieftainship. His territory

spread through Chingai sub-division of Ukhrul District to Somra Tract (Burma) and Pochuri region

of Nagaland. He ruled over his chiefdom up to the Kuki War of Independence, 1917-1919. The

people who lived within Chief Chengjapao's territory had to pay taxes (Si-le-Kai) in

acknowledgement of his suzerainty. The tributes is called "Samal and Changseo" which consists ofa "longkai" (long basket) of paddy annually per household and the hind leg of an animal (deer, stag,

wild boar etc.) killed in hunting.

During the reign of Chengjapao, Aisan's glory spread far and wide and it became the most

powerful village. The reason being that Chengjapao was not only the head of Doungel clan but also

of the entire Thadou-Kuki Clan (Mi-Upa). He was therefore looked upon as the ultimate authority

among the Kukis because of which he wielded great authority over the other chiefs. He could rise

much higher above the position he attained by virtue of his lineage because of his inborn courage

and wisdom and ability to organize. Aisan's paramouncy was acknowledged by the British and they

proclaimed Chengjapao Doungel as "King of Kukis" i.e Kuki Raja.

VAST TERRITORIAL OCCUPATION


3/28

The Kukis were and still are scattered over a vast region in India as well as in the neighbouring

countries. A sizeable number of Kukis are found in the Sylhet region of Bangladesh and along the

West Upper Chindwin Valley in Burma (Myanmar). Among the Indian States a large number of

Kukis are found in Manipur, South West region of Nagaland, North Cachar Hills, Karbi Anglong in

Assam and in the State of Tripura.

Before fighting with the British, Kukis were powerful. They knew the use of firearms andwere good marksmen and fighters. In the hills, they were rarely challenged seriously by anyone.

Rather, they came to live in Ukhrul area to keep peace among villages which were fighting against

one another. In Tamenglong (Laijang) area, Kukis were encouraged to live in order to protect

Zeliang Nagas from the Angamis who oppressed them. This is the reason why they lived wherever

they chose which has now made them scattered over many places. There are, however, certain areas

where they are well concentrated also. In Manipur, they form the second largest population with

more than

2,50,000 people living mostly in Sadar Hills, Churachandpur and Chandel Districts. This is without

counting other cognate tribes who prefer the nomenclature of Chin or Zomi. The other area of their

concentration is Sagaing Division of Burma where more than 1, 00,000 people are concentrated.They were crushed by the Britishers because of their rebellion against them. For this reason, their

being scattered is often wrongly alluded to their nomadic tendency by those who hardly know their

past history.

Mr. R. Brown, the then political agent at Imphal remarked, "If the Kukis settling in Manipur

are treated with justice and kindness, they will prove to be a source of strength to the country and

be among the most useful of its population. If on the contrary a selfish policy is adopted and this I

fear is most likely to be a case which may turn the Kuki towards the Maharaja side entirely

considering the present state of tumult." The Kukis lived in peace and tranquility both among

themselves and also maintained good relationship with neighbouring villages wherever they lived.

STRENGTHENING THE BOND OF KINSHIP

Being a Mi-Upa, Chengjapao Doungel had many obligatory functions to perform in matters of

social and cultural integration of Kuki tribes. Such social intercourse by touring and visiting

important villages helped in strengthening the bond of kinship. His entourage used to consist of

some elderly persons to take part in discussion and discourse, young men to guard and protect and

slaves to serve. The villagers wherever he visited would come out some distance to welcome and

escort him. In this connection, he paid a visit to his kinfolks in Burma (Myanmar) village namely

Phailengjang. He also visited Molvailup, Phaisat etc. on Burma border. He visited Jampi, the

stronghold of Sitlhou clan in the western part of Manipur and Chahsat the principal village of

Haokip clan in the north eastern part of Manipur. He had also visited some villages in Naga Hills

(Present Nagaland) like Kangdung, Songsang, Sinjol, Chalkot etc. In North Cachar Hills also he

paid a visit to Diger Kuki area (Dimphai) and Haflong area (Aplonggam). The people whom he

visited warmly welcomed him by killing mithun, pigs and served him with jars of Ju (wine as per

the family record). In this way, ceremonious welcome befitting of a Mi-Upa was accorded to him

and grand feasts held in his honour.

KUKIS LIVED UNDER WELL

ORGANISED CHIEF

The Kukis lived under their powerful Chiefs who had a well organized system of administration.

They governed them according to their custom and tradition un-interfered by any external agents.

Every village was semi-independent ruled by the Chief whose position is akin to that of a tinymonarch and who is assisted by Semang(Minister),Pachong(Minister- internal security) and

Lhangsam (Tollaipao-information and publicity). These persons are elected by the village assembly.


4/28

As Kuki social structure was traditionally based on precedence of lineal descent, the placements of

each chief was determined by their seniority in their respective clans and over-all clan seniority in

the pluralistic sovereignty of the collective villages. This also places the ultimate authority on the

senior most head who is the Chief of Aisan. This was the position when villages were big, but with

the coming up of small ones, drastic transitional changes have overtaken. But when the British

brought the Kuki areas (Chiefdoms) under their direct imperialistic rule, various unfamiliar

problems cropped up for the subjugated Kukis. They could not adapt very easily to the alien ruleand the outcome of which culminated in Kukis Rebellion of 1917-1919 A.D.

The great Kuki Chiefs of Aisan Chengjapao Doungel, Lhukhomang Haokip alias Pache of Chahsat

the head of Haokip clan and Khotinthang Chief of Jampi, head of Sitlhou clan took upon

themselves the responsibility of organizing Kuki political meetings at regular intervals for the

freedom struggle of their motherland which they occupied from generation to generation. It is

surprising that Chengjapao Doungel even mentioned in one of his speeches that a man called

Gandhi is using a new weapon (his reference is to non-violence and non-cooperation), which would

soon render the Britishers helpless and grant freedom. Observations by Gen. D.K. Palit in Sentinels

of N.E., Prof. Borpujari in Problems of Hill tribes and Col. Shakespeare in History of Assam Rifles

- all support the fact that Bengali Nationalists sent emissaries urging Kukis to rise against the

British. This also reinforces the fact that it was not an isolated revolt but a part of Indian struggle for

freedom against the British rule.

CHENGJAPAO DOUNGEL AND

HIS ROLE IN KUKI REBELLION

OF 1917-1919 A.D.

The Anglo-Kuki war had many causes, longstanding as well as immediate causes:-

1. The Longstanding Causes: - The coming of the British in Manipur resulted in a number of

changes in the political sphere, social and economic life of the people in general and the Kuki tribes

in particular. In the hands of the British, the Kukis were forced to forfeit self-rule and self-

sufficiency by imposition of a political system in those days just contrary to what they expected

from the Britishers. Little did they knew that "they preferred their freedom to the beneficent Britishyoke, not having forgotten the times before British conquest of the Country"(Pioneer, 1918).It wasdue to this exploitation that the Kukis had to wage a costly war against the British in the year

between 1917 and 1919. The Kuki war, as a matter of fact, was a serious problem which shook the

whole of North Eastern Frontier of India.

2. The policy of the British was to control the Hill people totally. They imposed land revenue byintroducing hill house tax and forced labour which was something new and unbearable. It may be

added that the Raja of Manipur never ruled directly over the Kukis. He was contented with their

providing of fighting men as and when needed. In fact, Raja Gambhir Singh subjugated Angamis at

Kohima and advanced as far as the Brahmaputra Valley near Sibsagar with the help of Kuki

warriors.

3. The sending of expeditionary forces against those Kuki villages which were supposed to be

involved in head hunting curtailed their power in the hill areas of Manipur (mainly Ukhrul area)

though it earned salutation of some weaker minor tribes or small villages. The bigger and powerful

villages considered it as an absolute interference in their freedom and internal affairs. This has made

their hegemony over other tribes diminish so much so that the Kukis regarded the British as'oppressors' and greatly resented their laws.


5/28

4. Potthang (Forced Labour): - This hateful system of the British was abolished in the valley of

Manipur but was still continued in the hills. The people submitted a number of petitions to the

Government to exempt them fromPotthangbut they failed to evoke any response from the

Government. This burden ofPotthangwas to a great extent responsible for discontentment against

the British.

5. Confiscating guns: - The British Government had laid down a rule wherein it was stated that

only 1(one) gun was to be allowed for every 10(ten) houses and that extra possession of gun was to

be confiscated. The Kukis in those days were in possession of the largest number of guns because

they had acquired the art of manufacturing firearms and gunpowder in abundance. The system of

strict licensing of gun was seriously resented by the hill-men specially Kukis who had made the gun

their lifelong companion. This action of the Government more than anything hurt their pride and

greatly alienated the Kukis from the British.

6. Kukis Society: - In the Kuki Society, the Chiefs (Haosa) were hereditary and almost absolutely

despotic. "They could even kill or sell their subjects into slavery without any dissent". As the Kukis

were under self-rule and sovereign, the Chief (Haosa) also was the fountain of honour. The villagersutilized the land during their good relationship with the Chief; otherwise the common villager had

to migrate elsewhere. In Manipur before the coming of the British, the Maharaja never tried to

interfere in the internal affairs of the Kukis. Whatever they did for the Maharaja was voluntary and

not compulsion. But when the Britishers consolidated their position in the valley, they began to do

whatever the Raja did not dare and finally began to introduce their laws which the Kukis could not

accept.

7. Economy: - The economy of the Kukis was very poor in terms of money though they had their

own standard of living. They traded plantain leaves, cane, cotton and bamboo goods etc. with the

plains' people. The economy of the Kukis was mainly dependent on Jhum or shifting cultivation.

Their income from selling of these commodities were all spent for buying their day to dayrequirements such as salt, clothes etc. and as there was only a small circulation of currency in those

days in Manipur, the commercial transaction between the people of hills and plains were based

mainly on barter system. Thus, it was very difficult to save a large sum of money in cash. In this

miserable condition of livelihood, the Kukis had to pay a house tax of Rs. 3/- per house per year of

which they received no benefit at all. "The hill-men had to contribute thousands of rupees per yearin the form of house tax but had in return practically got no benefit". This economic drain was onemajor factor that led the Kukis to rise in rebellion against the British.

8. Lambus System: - Lambu system was one of the major factors leading to the rebellion of the

Kukis. The Kuki Chiefs lived and occupied the major Hill areas of Manipur. But after annexation of

Manipur in 1891 by the British, the administration of the Hill areas was taken over by the Political

Agent and the Vice-President of the Durbar was responsible for the administration of Hill areas.

Accordingly, they introduced the Lambu system in Manipur and Dobasi system in Assam. Lambus

acted as Hill peon interpreter and advisors to the British Officials. The Lambus took advantage of

their contact with the rulers who in turn became more dependent on them rather than the Chiefs for

administrative purposes. The Manipur Hills in particular covering 7000 sq. miles with a huge

population was administered through Lambus. The Kuki Chiefs who maintained equal status of

relationship with the Meitei King resented the interference by Lambus. The British administration

entrusted these Lambus to try petty cases. These at times led to the Lambus even overruling the

Chiefs. Because of this, they were given favourable treatment in each and every village. "These

Lambus are responsible in no small measures for the rebellions". Petty employees becoming anextension of the bureaucracy twisted many things and brought disrepute to the British rule which

even otherwise was resented enough by the Kukis. The Britishers realized belatedly that remote

control as above would not work. British officers should remain in close touch with them always


6/28

and if possible to be in their midst as far as possible; but that opportunity had gone and rebellion

had broken out.

IMMEDIATE CAUSE : Labour Corps: - When the World War I broke out in Europe, some Naga and Kuki men wererecruited much against their will and sent to France to help the British forces. They were engaged indigging trenches carrying loads and building base camps. The war in Europe grew from bad to

worse and the British in India wanted more men to be recruited to go to France. In this regard, the

Kuki Chiefs had a meeting with

Mr. Higgin I.C.S., Political Agent at Oktan village in Sept/Oct 1917 as earlier proposed by him. The

main discussion was recruitment for the Labour Corps in France. Mr. Higgins, the Political Agent

informed the Kuki Chiefs about the matter and he rode a horse and went all alone towards Oktan

village. He also took along a good amount of Jukha (Local alcoholic beverage) as gifts in the

meeting. Mr. Higgins tried to persuade the Kuki Chiefs to send some young men for the Labour

Corps. Mr. Higgins told the Kukis that if they agreed to the proposal, he would give a gun to every

Kuki Chief plus many other things.

However, the Kukis received a message from their Chief Chengjapao Doungel that the Kuki

sovereignty must be maintained at any cost. This led the Kukis to refuse. Mr. Higgins' offer of

drinks and his proposal were turned down. They informed Mr. Higgins that the Kukis were warriors

and not manual labourers. They therefore, would not join the Labour Corps. To end the meeting

amicably, the Kuki Chiefs offered gifts to

Mr. Higgins comprising of Dahpi (Gong) and Dangka (Silver) but the gifts were not accepted. So,

the Oktan Durbar ended without concrete results for either party i.e., the British rulers and the

Kukis. Mr. Higgins made a second attempt by meeting the Kuki Chiefs at Lonpi (Mombi) in Oct.

1917 hoping that the influential Chief Ngulkhup Haokip might agree and sway the other Chiefs in

favour of the British. He did not succeed as Ngulkhup firmly stood by the decision earlier taken as

conveyed to him in the above. This was the last nail on the coffin that led to the inevitable punitive

measure of British Government and the outbreak of rebellion in retaliation by Kukis.

Mr. Higgins wanted to take punitive measures against them by using the Assam Rifles. But this did

not succeed because most of the force deployed in British-India and British-Burma had gone to

France. Therefore, a regular army the 2nd Gorkha Regiment comprising of three officers and

hundred armed personnel replaced the Assam Rifles in Kohima. They were sent to fight the Kukis.

"The Imperial force made up at 5400 British military Comprising 2400 from India and 3000 from

Burma Riflemen, in all under the command of Brigadier- General C.E.K. Macquoid fought stiff

battle against Kuki Warriors"

Initially the British did not believe that the Kukis would have many weapons because they had

already confiscated a large number of their guns before 1917. That the Imperial rulers under-

estimated the strength of the Kukis was apparent when the British were humiliated on all fronts in

the beginning of War. However, as the war continued, because of superior organization and

equipment, the imperial power began to gain the upper hand in the long run. And in the end, the

Kukis had to surrender to the Britishers.

CONCLAVE MEETING

Under the leadership of Chengjapao Doungel Chief of Aisan, Lhukhomang Haokip of Chassad,Khotinthang Sitlhou of Jampi and Tintong Haokip of Laijang had a lengthy discussion that took

place in preparation for the first Kuki War of Independence 1917-1919 at Chahsat Village on 7th

March, 1917.


7/28

Amongst others, the Kuki Chiefs who attended the Conclave were: -

1. Pu Chengjapao Doungel, Chief of Aisan.

2. Pu Lhukhomang Haokip alias Pache, Chief of Haokip Clan.

3. Pu Letjahao Chongloi, Chief of Khomunnom.

4. Pu Kondem Baite, Chief of Sadih/Sachih.

5. Pu Paokhohen Kipgen, Chief of Bongbal Kholen.

6. Pu Ngulbul Haokip, Chief of Longya.

7. Pu Haokhopao Kipgen, Chief of Molvailup.

8. Pu Tukih Nangjapao Lupheng, Chief of Tonglhang.

9. Pu Kamjahen Haokip, Chief of Phailengjang.

10. Pu Letkhothang Haokip, Chief of Khotuh.

11. Pu Semkholun Haokip, Chief of Phaisat.

12. Pu Tongkholun Haokip, Dy. Chief of Phailengjang.

13. Pu Sonkhopao Haokip, Chief of Twisomjang.

14. Pu Jalhun Haokip, Chief of Molvom.

15. Pu Thongkhomang Haokip, Chief of Phunchong.

16. Pu Doujapao Mate, Chief of Thomjang.

17. Pu Vumtong Haokip, Chief of Maokot.

18. Pu Laso Haokip, Chief of Selmei.

19. Pu Lenpu Hangsing, Chief of Vongjang.

20. Pu Ngulkhojam Chongloi, Chief of Maval.

21. Pu Amjapao Chongloi, Chief of Kholen.

22. Pu Nguljalhun Chongloi, Chief of Thingphai.23. Pu Palhun Hangshing, Chief of Tingpibung.

Besides these Chiefs, there were a number of Chiefs from Burma. In this Conclave Meeting, the

discussion included the making of united Kuki stand against the British, manufacture of weapons

and stocking of food-grain. On this occasion, a customary Mithun was killed by the Chassad Chief

Lhukhomang Haokip alias Pache on which the people feasted.

SAJAM (VOW TO FIGHT UNITEDLY)

Pu. Chengjapao Doungel, Chief of Aisan performed the customary rites 'Sajam' firstly at Aisan inthe 1st day of March, 1917. Some days later, Pu Lhukhomang Haokip alias Pache, Chief of Haokip

clan also performed the customary rite of Sajam on 7th March, 1917 at Chahsat. He invited the

eldest leader of Kuki Tribe Pu Chengjapao Doungel to grace the ceremony.

Likewise, 'Sajam Lhah' ceremony was also performed at the following places:

1. Jampi (Western Manipur)

2. Hanglep (Southern Manipur)

3. Mombi (Lonpi) South Eastern Manipur.

4. Joujang (Somra Area)5. Phailengjang (Upper Chindwin)

6. Haflong Area (North Cachar & Mikir Hills in Assam)


8/28

7. Mechangbung (Northern area i.e. present Nagaland)

SAJAM - A portion of meat was used for oath taking whereupon warriors of the respective villages

took a symbolic bite.

"They also killed one more Mithun and sent a piece of meat to each and every Kuki chief in the

entire length and breadth of their inhabited land. They also sent one bullet and an earring to their

Chin brothers in Chin Hills as sign to fight the British and to support to the call given by their Kuki

brothers."

COMMUNICATION

In absence of modern communication, the Kukis resorted to their traditional means. The indigenous

and traditional method is called THINGKHO le MALCHAPOM (Chilly tied to smouldering

firewood). Thingkho le Malchapom was relayed from one village to another and it covered the

entire area of Kuki inhabited land within a matter of two or three days. These Thingkho le

Malchapom signaled the declaration of war on the British in 1917.

At Chahsat Conclave, Chengjapao Doungel Chief of Aisan, by virtue of being the Piha or Pipa

(Head of the Kukis), was authorized to issue orders to each and every corner of their suzerain land.

The message was that no Kuki should respond to the call of the British to go to France, but rather

they should make all preparation to wage war against the British. Every Kuki followed the orders of

their Head Chief, the Aisan-Pa.

So, there started a mass preparation for the war and every Kuki contributed to the effort in every

way they could. Some manufactured guns, ammunitions while some prepared Pumpi (Cannon),

others prepared Songkhaithang(Stone-traps) and other indigenous traps, and others collected and

stored different kinds of material, arsenal and supplies in different places.JAMPI MEETING

It was necessary to have another meeting. Accordingly, the Kuki Chiefs had meeting at Jampi in the

Western area of Manipur on 17th March, 1917. The Chiefs who attended the meeting were: -

1. Pu. Khotinthang Sitlhou alias Kilkhong, Chief of Jampi.

2. Pu. Tintong Haokip, Chief of Laijang.

3. Pu. Sonchung Sitlhou, Chief of Sangnao.

4. Pu. Lunkholal Sitlhou, Chief of Chongjang.

5. Pu. Vumngul Kipgen, Chief of Tujang.

6. Pu. Lhunjangul Kipgen, S/o Vumngul.7. Pu. Enjakhup Kholhou, Chief of Thenjang.

8. Pu. Leothang Haokip, Chief of Gobah.

9. Pu. Mangkhoon Haokip, Chief of Tingkai.

10. Pu. Heljason Haokip, Chief of Laibol.

The 'Jampi Meeting' was attended by regional elders, intellectual and village volunteers and it was

concerning preparation for the coming war with the British for safeguarding of their motherland in

accordance with the order issued by the head of the Kukis, Chengjapao Doungel.

During discussion, Sonchung Sitlhou Chief of Sangnao stood up and said that an order was issuedby the head of the Kuki tribes.

Chengjapao Doungel, but he doubted whether they could fight the British since they were


9/28

subordinates and inferior to them in every field. If they annoyed the Government by rebelling

against them, they may face innumerable hardships. One after another, the gathered Chiefs

presented their views. Vumngul Kipgen, Chief of Tujang expressed doubt saying, "We do not have

sufficient guns and ammunitions to fight the British and their force". Instantly, an angry

Khotinthang Sitlhou, Chief of Jampi stood up and silenced them saying, "You are chicken-hearted".

Hearing the words of doubt and discouragement from some of the Chiefs, Pu Tintong Haokip Chief

of Laijang stood up, fired his gun and swore in the name of his forefathers and sang songs of valour(Kiminlah) proclaiming that "I would fight the British to the last of my bullet, winning or losing is

not the matter, but I would protect my sovereignty". That was the signal that war against the British

was the only way to live honourably and free. The determined Chiefs who gathered elected Chief

Tintong Haokip of Laijang as Commander-in-Chief and Enjakhup Kholhou of Thenjang as the 2nd

in Command of the Kuki forces. They invited Lenkhokam Chongloi from Haflong, Assam who was

an expert in designing and making guns. With Lenkhokam Chongloi's skills, the Kukis were able to

make a large number of guns in no time. Amongst others, the contribution of Enjakhup Kholhou is

great because as an ex-serviceman (Assam Rifles) he trained and built up the army.

THE BATTLES

Declaration of war on British on 17th March, 1917 started with war activities over all sectorsof land inhabited by the Kukis. All sectors according to their preparations and movement of the

enemy started attacking government establishment or fighting battles with advancing forces.

1. Upper Burma sector - Sagaing division, Somra tract in Burma (Myanmar).

2. Manipur Southern sector - Churachandpur District.

3. Manipur Western sector - Laijang and Jampi (Tamenglong).

4. Manipur Eastern Sector.

5. The Naga Hills Northern sector - Ahthibung, present Nagaland.6. The Assam sector - North Cachar Hills and Karbi-Anglong.

Burma Sector:

The Burma sector covered the present Sagaing Division upto Chin Hills. The commanders in this

sector were Captain Falkland and Captain Montiforece and they had fifty sepoys each under their

command. They were met with a stiff opposition from the Kuki Army. The Kukis in this region had

vowed to defend their motherland according to the resolution adopted in Chahsat meeting. And

Chengjapao Doungel, the Kuki Chief issued orders to all the Kuki Chiefs of Burma Sector to stand

firmly and unitedly.

A battle was fought in the Kabaw valley and the Jangmol Hills. From Tamu Capt. Coote and hismen headed towards Imphal HQ and pitched battles were fought at Naugkatoh, Khampet, Canan,

Tuivang, Tuidumjang, Khommunom, Jang Jouphai, Haipijang and Tuikhal. Many of the British

soldiers were killed and most of the Kuki villages were burnt down. The Kukis were not as well

equipped as the British army. Therefore, they finally left and hid themselves in deep jungles as told

by our aged elders and forefathers.

In Southern Chin Hills, Capt. Falkland and his troop were sent to fight. They fought in Yokwa and

Kapiator. In this battle, a number of British sepoys were killed and many more were injured. Capt.

Steadman and his army fought with the Kuki army at many other places also.

Southern Sector (Manipur):


10/28

This sector covered the whole of present Churachandpur and Chandel districts. The British in this

sector were commanded by Captain Goodal Fox, Lt. Carter and Lt. Hooper. At the counsel of the

Kuki Pipa Chengjapao Doungel Chief of Aisan, all the Chiefs within the sector assembled in March,

1917 at Joujang. The Chief of Joujang and the Chief of Henglep held a feast for their fellow Chiefs

which consisted of Mithun meat.

Sajam performed was followed by war message by Thingkho and Malchapom to proclaim to the

Chiefs and also appeal for their unflinching support to fight against the British. In the midst of all

these, raid on Ithai Forest toll station was carried out by Kukis of Ukha, Henglep area and others on

19th Dec. 1917 at the instance of one Manipuri of dubious character named Chinga Khamba. He

took advantage of the Kuki built-up for war against British government and thus precipitated the

first action.

In their bid to defend their motherland, the Kukis in this region attacked the Police, Thanas,damaged telegraph lines, destroyed Government properties and killed telegraph personnel. When

the news of the Kuki's offensive reached the authorities, Col. L.W. Shakespear, D.I.G. summoned

Capt. Goodall, Lt. Carter to March from Aizawl and they arrived at Bongmol village in March,

1918.The war in Manipur actually started in this sector. After the abortive Oktan meeting, J.C.

Higgins, PMSD made another attempt to raise Labour Corp by having meeting with Ngulkhup

Haokip, powerful Chief of Lonpi (Mombi) and others at his village. When persuasion failed, he

threatened them but that also failed. Further, Mrs. Cole, wife of the Political agent tried to

convince Ngulkhup in her personal capacity but that also failed. J.C. Higgins had to take punitive

measures as a last resort. In fact, he himself had to march against the rebellious Kukis with

Columns of Assam Rifles under his charge and Lonpi Village was burnt on 17th Oct. 1917. He later

sent troops to punish Ngulkhup and Ngulbul. This only made them more determined and Chief

Ngulkhup declared that Kuki territory was out of bound for the British. The son of Ngulkhup and

two sons of Ngulbul, Chief of Longja began organizing Kuki forces. A fierce battle was fought on

the bank of Kana River on 21st December, 1917 where Ngulbul and his valiant sons fell to the

bullet of British army. Many others including Ngulkhup's son were wounded while many British

army likewise suffered heavy casualties; yet they did not surrender and the war continued. Casualty

on the British side in this battle included one British Officer and six sepoys killed. This was

casualty on the first day. But the total number of Britishers and other soldiers killed in the one

already mentioned and in subsequent battles exceeded thirty.

Contrary to the earlier impression that opposition would collapse once there is realizationabout their inability to withstand columns of government forces, the Kukis did not submit but

fought on. Except for battles fought on well placed stockades, Kukis had well adapted themselves to

jungle warfare and resorted to sniping at advancing columns and then disappear. Being born

guerrilla fighters, they engaged government forces in hit and run war which made the Britishers

change their strategy. The government made preparations for large scale operations covering Kuki

inhabited areas of Manipur, Burma and Assam. They also built up resources to sustain a prolong

war. Fighting for a year and loss of one season's crop, no doubt, affected the Kuki warriors' food

supply to some extent; but when it stretched beyond two crop seasons, the telling effects were

discernible all over. Howsoever matchless their endurance might have been, to keep fighting for

days, months and years took their toll. They gradually capitulated before British government forceswho were better equipped and backed up by uninterrupted supplies of food, materials and

ammunition.


11/28

In Singngat area, the Zous and Haokips together fought the British. The Zous were led byChief of Behiang, Pu Langzaching. They stockaded their villages of Hengtam and Ihite. Fierce

fighting took place and exchange of fire lasted for a whole day in these two fortified villages. Sokel

of Zou lost his life on the banks of the river Gun. Another man Sokam Mate from Khajang village

died in this encounter. The Zou Kukis were gallant and patriotic.

In Henglep area, the Kuki Army stood in position awaiting the attack. When the British had topass through Khengjang village which was a steep climb from the river Leimatak, stone traps were

released. Ten soldiers went rolling down the cliff and many of them suffered broken limbs. Henglep

stockades were strongly built too which rifles failed to penetrate through the huge blocks of

climbers used for fortifications. A fierce battle took place. After a long-drawn battle, the exhaustion

of Kuki ammunitions paved the way for the British victory in Henglep area.

The Western Sector (Jampi and Laijang) Manipur:

This Western sector of Jampi and Laijang covered the whole of present Tamenglong District

and the Western Sadar Hills of present Manipur State. In this sector, the British forces werecommanded by Maj. Marshall, Capt. Montefiere, Lt. Water, Lt. Needham and Lt. Sanderson. This

region was the territory of Tintong Haokip, Commander-in-Chief and Deputy Commander-in-Chief,

Enjakhup Kholhou.

The Chiefs Summit had performed SAJAM ceremony at Jampi and Laijang areas organized inaccordance to the call of the head Chief (Pipa) Chengajpao Doungel. It was held on the 17th of

March, 1917 hosted at Jampi by Khotinthang Sitlhou alias Kilkhong, Chief of Jampi. After the

Summit came to close, Khotinthang slaughtered a Mithun as a symbol of solidarity and oath and

they feasted on the heart and the liver of the Mithun. Then, they prepared a share of the Sajam for

each of the Chiefs in the region and had them circulated with Thingkho-le-Malchapom. A share

each was also sent to Chengjapao Doungel and Pache Haokip to inform them of the success of the

Summit.

The British army marched toward Taloulong and overran the stockade. There was a heavy exchange

of fire and many Assam Rifles lost their lives. The British Army next marched to Buning and

torched thirty houses and they harassed the children and women folk. From Buning the British

Assam Rifles proceeded to Iting and made preparations to attack Kolkang. The way to Kolkang was

steep uphill and narrow straits and stone-traps were laid. The traps when released instantly killed

twenty sepoys. The riflemen again regrouped and made a fresh offensive from another point. Next,

the British forces marched towards Sangnao. The Chief offered terms of peace to the British and the

village was saved from destruction.

LENGSEI DOUNGEL:

He was a man from Khaochangbung village. The village folks in his honour killed a pig and

presented him with a shawl and set him off to face the challenge. He sat and waited under the

thickets of banyan tree. He ambushed an advancing British troop and killed a frontline soldier.

Before he could launch a second attack he was shot in the leg. Shifting himself to the nearby edge

cliff, he was pursued before reloading his gun, he was apprehended, beheaded and his portrait

dressed in his headgear and bead has been taken away by the British. He was one among those who

sacrificed their lives to defend Zalengam in the war against the British. The linking road to Manipur

with the rest of the world i.e. Silchar-Imphal road and Kohima-Imphal cart road were not yet

constructed into proper Highways. By these two roads, provision including foodstuffs andequipment for the British force were transported. Tintong Haokip and Enjakhup Kholhou terrorized

the British forces, burnt down the Government rest houses; communication lines including the


12/28

Telegraph lines were destroyed and totally cut off. The British forces were in complete chaos and

disarray in this sector. This area however being close to headquarters from Imphal and Kohima,

government forces also had the advantage of mobilizing and deploying their forces quickly in

operations against the rebels. Resistance, therefore, gradually crumbled paving the way for British

forces to control the area.

Eastern Sector:

This area lies between India and Burma and the axis of three powerful Chiefs i.e. Aisanpa,

Chahsatpa and Lonpipa gave the staunchest resistance in this area. The history of Anglo-Kuki war

will be incomplete if the roles of (1) Pache (Lhukhomang Haokip) Chief of Chahsat, (2) Nangjapao

Lupheng (Tukih) Chief of Tonglhang and (3) Vumkhokhai Haokip, Chief of Monglham are not

brought out. Pache was physically very strong and courageous person. His village Chahsat is so

located that it is not easily accessible either from British headquarters at Imphal or from Homalin-

Thungdut side of Burma. Further, he was a great Chief since he was the head of Haokip clan and

because of that many Kuki villages in Manipur and Burma side were under his rule with hardly any

interference. "Tangkhul Naga villages that live in dread of Kukis" awed allegiance and also paid

tributes to him. He was in constant touch with Chengjapao(Aisanpa)and Ngulkhup Haokip Chief of

Lonpi (Mombi) so that a common stand and synchronized approach was adopted. In fact, Chahsat

Chief and Lonpi Chief were the ones whose actions principally affected Burma side as well and

gave the greatest headache to British rulers.

The first overt act of aggression of Kukis in Burma area took place on 21st December, 1917 which

was the same time battles were fought near and around Mombi. Mr Parker, ICS SDO Homalin, who

was sent with 50 riflemen to prevent Kukis of Burma from helping in the fight in Chahsat area

failed as he was attacked and forced to return. In fact, he narrowly escaped himself being

surrounded by Kukis. Another setback to the British had been the failure of Mr Molesworth

Supdt. of Police, 85 M.I. Burma Military Police to reach Chahsat as he was killed. Heavy casualtieson the British side were inflicted. However, Major T.H.D. Hacket was sent again and he reached

Phaisat on 31st January, 1918 and burnt down the villages in the area. After sometime, another

column proceeding to Chahsat theatre failed to reach as their British Commander was severely

wounded and the column also forced to return. Finally, Captain C.E. Montefiore's column

composed of Kabow Valley and South Manipur columns joined up with Captain R.M.F. Patrict

M.C's column at Kongal Thana on 21st March, 1918 and they marched and occupied the important

village of Chahsat some days later. The British forces were repulsed more than twice before they

could occupy Chahsat. Then also, they took nearly a month to subjugate and control the area during

which they suffered heavy casualties. Pache, however, had disappeared only to renew the fight

elsewhere. He continued to fight with undying spirit and was the last Chief to surrender before

General Keary in May 1919. However, occupation of Chahsat by British forces marked the fall ofone main bastion of Kuki rebellion which brought a demoralizing affect among them.

(Ref: Hon'ble C.M. Webb I.C.S. Chief Secy to Government of Burma's report to Foreign Secy to

G.O.I. Foreign and Pol Dept No. 901P-2C-2 of February 1919.)

In this theatre, the Generals planning battle strategies and physically leading were NangjapaoLupheng, Chief of Tonglhang and Vumkhokhai Haokip, Chief of Monglham who is next in

seniority to Chahsat Chief in the Doungul family of Haokip clan. Their friendship had started more

than two decades ago when they raided Chingjaroi Tangkhul Village in 1898 wiping out almost the

entire able bodied male population (258 in all) in an act of revenge for the most gruesome murder of

his 'jol' Kishing Tangkhul (jol denotes friendship with members of other tribesmen), otheraccumulated wrong doings and defiance of his dictat. Chingjaroi Village also worked as British

spies. Recently, much outcry had been made about the barbarity of this act. Unfortunate indeed it


13/28

was. What can be said about this is that it has to be viewed in the backdrop of headhunting which

was prevalent in those days and considered normal according to the standard of that age.

Nangjapao Lupheng was nicknamed 'Tukih' for backing out twice in planned attack of

Chingjaroi. He succeeded in the third attempt. He was a very well built man endowed with

extraordinary physical strength and prowess, with an air of natural command. He was a very skilled

hunter and an excellent marksman. Apart from killing tigers and elephants, his outstanding deeds ofvalour is the slaying of two Lhomis (Lion man) which terrorized Kolsung and Khelselbung Villages

in Burma. He was especially requested for the purpose as the people of the area felt that no one else

could do it. He became a legend like "Boewulf". He preserved the tails as trophy. He was the mosttrusted general of Chengjapao and Lhukhomang (Pache) who organized the Kuki army, planned

battle strategies and personally led in battles. He was present in the thick of battles in Thungdut and

Homalin area in Burma. He used to find time in covering areas between Aisan and Chahsat area. In

actions in Manipur side, he fought side by side with his friend and comrade Vumkhokhai Haokip,

Chief of Monglham. He was captured in Burma and after imprisonment in Homalin and Thungdut

jails; he was deported and detained in Cellular jail in Andamans. The saddest fact is that he never

returned home after his imprisonment in Andamans. Some say he was tortured and killed as the

Britishers still feared his return.

The Northern Sector (Ahthibung in present Nagaland):

"This sector falls in Naga Hills (present Nagaland). The British forces in the Northern sector were

commanded by Lt. Prior and Lt. Sanderson. The Kukis on the other side were led by Paohen

Lotjem. The battles were fought in Kandung, Songlhuh, Songsang, Mechangbung, Paona, Singjol,

Chalkot, Seleu River and several other places. In those days one of the best art of warfare for the

Kukis was Songkhai-Thang (suspended stone trap) laid on narrow paths edges of the cliffs. Many

British soldiers fell victim to those traps. The Kuki Army here also suffered severe limitation of

food and ammunition supplies. They could not carry on the fight for very long."

The Assam Sector (North Cachar Hills, Karbi Anglong and Cachar):

"The sector covering Kuki inhabited area in North Cachar Hills, Karbi-Anglong and Cachar of

Assam, Capt. Copeland was the British commander in this sector. The news of the Kuki offensive

reached the D.I.G., Col. Shakespeare at Kohima when he was on his way from Imphal to Shillong.

It was reported that six belligerent Kuki started attacking Government Institution and property, and

were harassing the British Government servants. They also brought down telegraph lines, attacked

Police Station and killed many policemen. As the post offices served as the main communication

medium between the British and their allies, the offices were attached and many personnel got

killed. The Kukis burnt down and damaged whatever they could lay their hands on. The labourhired by the Government for tea plantations were not spared. They were attacked and driven away

from the gardens, thus creating acute scarcity of labour. Within a short time, the Kukis spread terror

in North Cachar Hills. In dismay, railway volunteers also evacuated the town of Haflong. "The Kuki

Army in groups of 70-80 went about freely terrorizing people wherever they went. To counter this,the DIG detached one hundred rifles of the 2nd Assam Rifles under Captain Copeland at Haflong."

The heroism displayed by the Kukis in defence of N.C. Hills area of Assam was not prompted so

much by the decision of their own but more in response to the clarion call of Chengjapao Doungel,

Pipa of the Kukis. The Chiefs of the region assembled in the weekend in April, 1917. The Chief of

the area slaughtered Mithun for the occasion by partaking of the liver and heart of the Mithun in the

SAJAM ritual. It was agreed that all the Chiefs of the region should co-operate in defence of N.C.Hills. In the event of refusal, the village concerned would be burnt down and the existing chiefship

removed. Thus, the Kuki Army and the British force were engaged in many battles. The British


14/28

force of ten soldiers led by Capt. Copeland suffered loss of lives and a few were fatally wounded.

"To keep the Kukis in check, the British garrisons were stationed at Laikeh, Hangrum and

Baladhan on the Manipur borders which were kept out till November 1918, but nothing furthertranspired on this side".

THE SEARCH FOR CHENGJAPAO DOUNGEL

The British Government saw the rise of Chengjapao Doungel Chief of Aisan and the revolt of the

Kukis as a serious threat to their hegemony in the North eastern part of India. An arrest warrant was

immediately issued against the great Kuki Chief and the search was on to catch him dead or alive in

order to quell the historic Kuki rebellion that was masterminded and carried out under his

leadership. It was reported that he was taking shelter at Kanjang Camp near new Aisan village in

Naga Hills. So, the Assam Rifles under the command of the British officer marched to Kanjang

Camps. Having learnt the approach of the Assam Rifles, the Kuki Army under the command of

Haolun Lotjem ambushed the Assam Rifles on the way and one British officer died and the rest fled

away. After the death of the British officer, Haolun composed a song.

Kawlkeipa bang tonglamaChawi gong khawing

Veicham angpa lhang boning kasiellieGamsihtui bang ka lonsah ngawn ne.

Free translation : (Like a lion I hold a gun and block the path; as I lay down the glorious foreigner,

like flowing water his troops retreated).

After two weeks on a rainy day the Assam rifles under a J.C.O. resumed their attack on Kanjang

Camp where Chengjapao Doungel was stationed. But he was secretly sent through a hole on the

Southern Wall of the fort escorted by Sutmang Singson to Vahong Camp in Ukhrul District,

Manipur. When Assam Rifles captured Kanjang Camp, Chengjapao was no more there. The British

Commander, however, did not get the slightest information of the whereabouts of Chengjapao.

The commander announced a cash award to the villagers who would come forward and disclose the

whereabouts of Chengjapao, but there was no response from the villagers.

It was made known to the rebel Chiefs in July, 1918 that if they surrender within two months

bringing their house tax and a number of guns estimated by political agent to be in their possession,

no one would be punished without full and fair trial while the lives, property and members of their

tribes would be spared. They were told that if they surrender before 1st November, 1918 by

bringing their guns and house tax due from their villages, they would not be hanged or imprisoned

but would merely be detained.

The North-Eastern Sector (Aisan):

The North-Eastern sector was under the authority of Chengjapao Doungel. The territories

comprising Kanjang, Akhen and Meluri areas of present day Nagaland and Chinngai sub division of

Ukhrul District of present day Manipur were under the political sovereignty of the Chief of Aisan.

The people of this region fought bravely but were disunited. It was said that Pasut and Letkholal

Singson joined the side of the British scouts and in fact led them in storming the stockades built by

the Kuki Chief Chengjapao Doungel and Laljasong Haolai at Haijang who were commanders of the

war here. When, in time more Kukis crossed over to the side of the British, secret plans and moves

were revealed easily and it became immensely difficult for the Kukis to carry on fighting.

The Government of India under the British General moved throughout the country overcoming


15/28

opposition, disarming all hostile villages and capturing the leading rebels. The military operations

under Sir Henry Keary met with conspicuous success and were brought to an official close on the

20th May, 1919.

SURRENDER OFCHENGJAPAO DOUNGEL AND

THE END OF THE REBELLION

When some of the Kukis Chiefs surrendered and still more were apparently to follow suit, itbecame all the more difficult for Chengjapao Doungel to continue the war. As the head of Kuki

Chiefs, Chengjapao Doungel decided to come to terms with the British. In the anticipation of more

lenient terms for himself and his subordinate Chiefs, he purchased a huge elephant tusk from a

Kipgen village in Burma for Rs.300/-. In a meeting that was solemn in mid spring 1917, he had the

ivory presented to Mr. Higgins in Imphal Headquarters as a token of surrender. He requested to the

Political agent Mr. Higgins, "As head among the Kuki Chiefs, I request you to pardon me and my

brothers from the penalty of waging war, in defence of our motherland". The political officer Mr.

Higgins replied that it was not within his authority to pardon them. But Higgins assured ChiefChengjapao Kuki that he was pleased by his actions and would reduce the punishment which was

due to him and the others to a certain extent.

"The Commander-in-Chiefs Mr. Tintong Haokip and Enjakhup Kholhou were finally captured withMangkhoon in the village of Tingkai. With their capture, the war in the western front came to an

end. It was already mid-May, 1919 but the capture of Pache was yet to be accomplished. Chief

Pache being the head of the Haokip Chiefs, readily found shelter with one of them. A man ofstrength, courage and skill, he kept on the British force on a wild goose chase for a long time in a

hit and run warfare. But when all of his fellow Chiefs and brothers had been captured, he preferredto finally surrender and joined them to meet the same fate of their suffering. He surrendered to Gen.

Keary. With Pache's surrender, Gen. Keary declared the end of the first Kuki war of Independenceon May 20, 1919 vide his report to Chief of Gen. Staff, Army Headquarters Simla No. 1762 K.P.M.

June 1919."

TRIAL AND CHARGE SHEET OF CHENGJAPAO DOUNGEL

Chengjapao Doungel, Chief of Aisan - This man is "Piha" or "Pipa" head of all Kukis. Thecharges against him are as follow: -

1. That Chengjapao Doungel began to organize opposition to recruiting for the labour corps

even before coolies were actually sent for, holding a meeting at which he killed buffalo anddistributed its flesh calling on other Chiefs to resist recruiting and to make war upon

government.

2. That Chengjapao Doungel came to Imphal after the arrest of his uncle by Mr. Higgins.

Being detained for a day or two, was released in order that he might call in other recalcitrant

Chiefs which he said he was able and willing to do so, but failed to induce the Chiefs.

3. That Chengjapao Doungel kept up communi-cation with other rebels for joint action against

government.

4. That at Haijang, he maintained himself by looting neighbouring villages and a post wasestablished at Lapvomi. He went out of his way to attack it and obtained the co-operation of

Sri Toljakhup and Laljasong.


16/28

5. That he stockaded himself at Haijang and when ejected from there by the Lapvomi

shilloi columns in March-April 1918, he migrated to Vahong in a "Cross hatch area"

where he fortified himself and continued raiding for supplies in the neighbouring villages.

6. That when his village at Vahong was burnt and destroyed by Lapvomi guards, he

surrendered to Lieutenant Parry at Tusom village.

7. His defence was that he merely objected to sending labourers to France.

8. The advisory Committee found that Chengjapao Doungel was the first Chief to organize

opposition for recruitment of labour corps. He sent around the fiery cross among the Kukis

and seemed to have attempted to get the Angami Nagas to join.

Eventually, he surrendered and the Committee recommended that the minimum period for which

Chengjapao Doungel should be detained away from his country should be 15 years. They

considered that the first year of his confinement should be spent in either the Tezpur or the

Dibrugarh Jail and that thereafter, unless unforeseen complication arise, he might be kept underrestrictions at Sodiya or some other places in the North - East Frontier Tracts. (Extract of Hon'ble

Websters' Chief Secy to Chief Commissioner Assam's report to Govt. of India, Foreign and Political

department of 27/06/1919.)

SENTENCES OF KUKI CHIEFS IN INDIA

The Kuki Chiefs along with Tintong Haokip C-in-C and Enjakhup Kholhou Deputy C-in-Cwere all first tried as war criminals and sentences for imprisonment were passed accordingly. Some

common charges were organization of opposition to recruiting labour corps, taking part in the

armed rebellion against the Government and preventing the Chiefs willing to surrender. Tintong

Haokip and Enjakhup Kholhou were charged for arming and giving training to group of people inthe art of warfare. Accordingly, they were tortured and sentenced to imprisonment for a number of

years as given below :

Sl. No. Name of Prisoner Period of detention

1. Pu. Chengjapao Doungel,

Chief of Aisan 15 years

2. Pu. Lhukhomang Haokip,

Chief of Chahsat 20 years

3. Pu. Tintong Haokip,

Chief of Laijang 20 years4. Pu. Khotinthang Sitlhou,

Chief of Jampi 15 years

5. Pu. Pakang Haokip,

Chief of Henglep 15 years

6. Pu. Enjakhup Kholhou,

Chief of Thenjol 15 year

7. Pu. Ngulkhup Haokip,

Chief of Mombi (Lonpi) 15 years

8. Pu. Heljason Haokip,

Chief of Loibol 15 years9. Pu. Mangkho-on Haokip,

Chief of Tingkai 15 years


17/28

10. Pu. Leothang Haokip,

Chief of Goboh 15 years

11. Pu. Lunkholal Sitlhou,

Chief of Chonjang 15 years

12. Pu. Semchung Haokip,

Chief of Ukha 15 years

SENTENCE OF KUKI CHIEFS in BURMA (MYANMAR)

The war of Anglo-Kuki of 1917-19 in Burma side also came to close. The Kuki

Chiefs and leaders were detained in Homalin Jail and tortured. As leaders of the war, they were

sentenced to fifteen years imprisonment at Taungyi Jail as follow:


1. Pu Kamjahen Haokip,

Chief of Phailengjang 15 years

2. Pu Letkhothang Haokip,Chief of Khotuh 15 year

3. Pu Semkholun Haokip,

Chief of Phaisat 15 years

4. Pu Vumngul Kipgen,

Chief of Tujang 15 years

5. Pu Haokhopao Haokip,

Chief of Molvailup 15 years

6. Pu Tongkholun Haokip,

Deputy Chief of 15 years

Phailengjang7. Pu Tukih Lupheng,Chief Tonglhang 15 years

8. Pu Sonkhopao Haokip,

Chief of Twison 15 years

9. Pu Letjahao Chongloi,

Chief of Khomunnom 15 years

10. Pu Kondem Baite,

Chief of Sadih (Sachih) 15 years

11. Pu Jalhun Haokip,

Chief of Molvom 15 years.

WHO WAS THE HEAD THAT LED THE WAR

There were some ambitious Chiefs of Sitlhou clan who earlier claimed that they are the head ofthe Thadou-Kuki clan. They falsely stated that the Doungel line has become extinct "ingam" and

claimed that being next in lineage; the Chief of Jampi of Sitlhou clan should be recognized and

declared as head of Thadou-Kuki clan. The Britishers made enquiries from all sources but did not

find any evidence. They interrogated the captured and surrendered Chiefs asking them who the head

and leader of the rebellion was. Every one of them stated that Chengjapao who was thePipa ofThadou-Kuki clan was the supreme leader.

However, to set the matter at rest beyond any doubt, the Britishers adopted a method whereby the

issue is settled once for all publicly. Therefore, while they were still detained in Imphal Jail, to


18/28

ascertain whether the Kuki Raja, Chengjapao Doungel of Aisan wasPipa (Head of the Kukis), the

British paraded him enchained in the streets of Imphal town three times a day for three consecutive

days. As he was paraded, he was made to announce these words aloud, "He who among the Kukis is

elder, let him come and take my place, take these chains off me, suffer in my stead and be bestowed

with the honour that is mine". As no response to such an announcement came from any quarter, the

political agent Mr. J.C. Higgins confirmed Chengjapao Doungel as the Head of Thadou-Kuki clan

and leader among the Kukis. The charge sheet on him began with the above. In case ofKhotinthang, Chief of Jampi, it is indicated in the charge sheet that he is the head of the Thadou

clan and second in seniority.

As observed by Maculloch, this emanated from the tradition "that Thadou-Kukis pay much

attention to their genealogy and profess to know the names of their Chiefs in succession."The

social structure is based on the order of precedence of lineal descents. They claim their pedigree

right from the legendary ancestor called "Songthu" (some use Chongthu). According to the

genealogical tree from Songthu, he begets Sattong and Shongja his younger brother. Sattong begets

Thangpi (his two younger brothers are unknown). Thangpi begets Shingmeng and Hangmeng.

Shingmeng begets Titou and Touhin. Titou is the progenitor of Doungels. There are ten generationsfrom Titou to Doungel whose younger brothers are Haolai, Tuboi, Bolsom (Dimngel), Touthang,

Kilong, Saum etc. Touhin is the progenitor of Thadou (Sitlhou) whose brothers and kin are Haokip,

Kipgen, Singson, Chongloi, Hangshing etc. Titou begets Javong and his brother, Javong begets

Mangtol, Mangtol begets Lhunthang, Lhunthang begets Thithang and his brother, Thithang begets

Chonmang and his brother, Chonmang begets Thilhun, Thilhun begets Chalmang and his brother,

Chalmang begets Sechang and his brother, and Sechang begets Doungel and his three brothers.

Maculloch attempted to establish the genealogical tree of the Thadou-Kukis from Songthu to

Doungels/Thadou in 1857 which broadly agreed with the accepted ones. The Doungels are

descended from Thadou's elder brother and therefore, are considered superior to the others. We areconfining to the descendent of Shingmeng and not discussing about others here. J.H. Hutton found

the theory of extinction of male lineage of Doungels audacious and claim of seniority absolutely

untenable as the same does not stand any logical scrutiny and appeared cooked up. The confusion

arose because when Helkhup died, there was no worthy successor. A powerful lobby of the clan

convinced the others that a more competent person has to take over as Chief of Aisan. So they

brought Nguljam and his son Chengjapao who are the next in line, from Seitol village where they

were living. Helkhup and his younger brother Manlhun are descended from Neingul and Nguljam

from Haongul who were brothers. Their father was Songjakhai. Nguljam's son Chengjapao assumed

Chiefship of Aisan after the death of his uncle Manlhun. Some people with vested intersest, wanting

to slander the family alleged that he had usurped the Chiefship. Series of blackmail ultimately led to

the allegation that they were slaves. This, though meant to be sarcastic observation resulted in

creating confusion and that was how some ambitious people tried to take advantage of ignoring the

factual position. That seniority of one clan cannot simply be replaced by the next clan even

assuming that the single male line is 'ingam'. The others in the Doungel clan are still senior. That is

why he recorded in footnote to Notes on Thadou-Kukis that even if the 'ingam theory' is assumed to

be true, the younger brother of Doungel, that is Haolai clan would still be senior, not to speak of

other surviving Doungels. Even more absurd contention is about a crude story that one entire

Doungel village i.e. Tolthang (Lotjem) had been wiped out by rolling boulders with no survivors to

slander them. This argument has no locus-standi and no takers but it somehow reached the British

authorities. In order to put the matter beyond any doubt, Britishers made exercises which proved the

claim false. Otherwise, it is a matter about which no one would have taken any notice of.

The report of Hon'ble J.E. Webster, Chief Secretary to the Chief Commissioner, Assam to Secretary


19/28

Govt of India, Foreign and Political Dept of 27/06/1919 clearly indicated that "Chengjapao, Chief

of Aisan who is Pipa or head of all Thadou-Kukis had sent orders to all Kuki Chiefs to resist

recruiting of labour with force, if necessary." Having established that he was the supreme leader in

the war of rebellion against the British government which was due to the immense influence he

wielded as well as his lineage, they appeared to have decided that it is in the fitness of things to call

him King or Rajah. It is to be taken that this is the respect British conquerors have shown to the

vanquished foe i.e. Kukis as a whole by raising their status as also theirs.

British Government Recorded as Below:

1. Chengjapao Doungel Chief of Aisan, Head of Doungel Clan.

2. Chengjapao Doungel Chief of Aisan, Head of Kukis.

3. Chnegjapao Doungel Chief of Aisan, PIHA (PIPA).

4. The bust of Chengjapao with inscription "King of Kukis" is on display in Calcutta

Museum and Victoria Hall, Kolkata.

THE SECOND TRIAL OF KUKI CHIEFS AND WAR COMMANDERS

The Kuki rebellion was put down and World War I also ended. There was sympathy among British

people and officers who felt that the Kukis were more sinned against than sinning. Their hegemony

in Manipur Hills and elsewhere was completely taken away and most of their villages ravaged.

There were reports in the national press in India expressing sympathy for Kukis. To cite few

examples, "New India wrote on 28th February 1918 and quotingPioneersaid that the British

justified the action of their men under the Union Jack in Chin Hills (and Kuki Hills) by saying that

they were carrying the work of pacification satisfactorily. But whether they realize the horror of

burning villages and their terrified women and children flying from their flaming houses, such is

the work of Christian civilization." They strongly condemned ill treatment of French people by

German conquerors and their liberated colonies in Africa. This is absolutely contrary to loftystatement, held out by prominent statesmen like Lyod George or President Wilson. They went to the

extent that those colonies will even be allowed to choose their own form of government. But they

are in no way better than the Germans by any standard.New India on 5th March, 1918 again wrote,

"But certainly that is no excuse for treating them in such a cruel fashion. To destroy villages on

such a systematic scale and to harass people until finding no other alternative before them, they

surrender to any conditions of life that may be imposed upon them - are these practices to be

tolerated by a civilized nation like England? We are confident that if the story should be revealed in

all its tragic inhumanity to the British nation, the real nature of the Bureaucracy will be known in a

single day." The Britishers perhaps feared that atrocities committed by burning of Kuki villages

and herding them in concentration camps where they were engaged in forced labour etc. would

leak out to outside world. They have seen that the backbone of the Kukis had been broken and their

spirit crushed. They thought it wiser to take political and administrative steps to contain them. It

was therefore decided that the Chiefs and leaders should be retried for political offences with

leniency. Government of India letter 457-EB (Foreign and Political) of 02/09/1919 to Chief

Secretary to Chief Commissioner, Assam.

The Kuki Chiefs in Burma were shifted from Homalin Jail to Taungyji Jail and those in India werealso imprisoned in Sodiya Jail in Assam. Later they were all shifted to cellular jail in the Andamans.

After commutation of sentences of Kuki Chiefs in Sodiya, the terms were as follow :



20/28

1. Pu. Chengjapao Doungel,

Chief of Aisan 4 years

2. Pu. Lhukhomang Haokip

alias Pache, Chief of Chahsat 3 years

3. Pu. Tintong Haokip,

Chief of Laijang 3 years

4. Pu. Enjakhup Kholhou,

Chief of Thenjang 3 years

5. Pu. Khotinthang Sitlhou

alias Kilkhong, Chief of Jampi 3 years

6. Pu. Pakang Haokip,

Chief of Henglep 3 years

7. Pu. Heljason Haokip,

Chief of Loibol 3 years

8. Pu. Mangkho-on Haokip,

Chief of Tingkai 3 years

9. Pu. Ngulkhup Haokip,

Chief of Mombi (Lonpi) 3 years

10. Pu. Leothang Haokip,

Chief of Goboh 3 years

11. Pu. Lunkholal Sitlhou,Chief of Chonjang 3 years

THE TERMS OF IMPRISONMENT FOR THE CHIEFS IN TAUNGYJI JAIL IN BURMA

(MYANMAR) AFTER REVIEW WERE ALSO AS FOLLOW:

Sl. No. Name of Prisoners Period of detention

1. Pu Kamjahen Haokip,

Chief of Phailengjang 3 years

2. Pu Letkhothang Haokip,

Chief of Khotuh 3 years

3. Pu Semkholun Haokip,Chief of Phaisat 3 years

4. Pu Vumngul Kipgen,

Chief of Tujang 3 years

5. Pu Nangjapao Lupheng,

Chief of Tonglhang 3 years

6. Pu Sonkhopao Haokip,

Chief of Twison 3 years

7. Pu Haokhopao Haokip,

Chief of Molvailup 3 years

8. Pu Letjahao Chongloi,

Chief of Khomunnom 3 years

9. Pu Kondem Baite,


21/28

Chief of Sadih (Sachih) 3 years10. Pu Jalhun Haokip,

Chief of Molvom 3 years

11. Pu Tongkholun Haokip,

Deputy Chief of Phailengjang 3 years

The punishment and torture meted out to the Kuki Chiefs and leaders in different jails in the firstKuki war of Independence remained evergreen in the memories of the Kukis.

TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF POLITICAL EXILE OF THE KUKI CHIEFS

The condition as laid down under regulation 111 of 1818 was signed by R.E. Hilland,Secretary to the Government of India Foreign Political Department dated December, 1919.

The conditions under which the Kuki Chiefs were exiled were:

1. That they could not be detained in Jail and that their place of residence and movements be under

close supervision of the Government at suitable localities that movements be limited within theprescribed radius without confinement, that their place of exile was selected at Sodiya being far

away from Kuki country and that the climatic condition was cool and healthy at Sodiya on the

North Bank of the Brahmaputra river which suited the Chiefs.

2. That they were entitled to acquire land as wished for cultivator in Sodiya and that their choice of

land for habitation must in no case be beyond two miles from the political office of Sodiya.

3. That the British Imperial Government in England was convinced that it was possible to hold that

the Kuki Chiefs were, "more sinned against than sinning" and therefore that a policy of clemency

was both called for and justified.

These are the background under which the Kuki Chiefs were exiled in Sodiya as politicalvictims. They were later shifted to Andaman.

KUKI REBELLION OF 1917-19 WAS TAKEN AS A PART OF WORLD WAR- I

The Kukis had to wage an unequal war against the British between1917-1919. In the resolution

regarding late Kuki rising, extract from the proceedings of the discussion with Chief Commissioner

Assam, in the Political Dept No. 8856P of 27.09.1920 recorded that the Kuki war as a matter of fact

was a serious problem, which shook the whole of North Eastern Frontier of India. The British

officials themselves admitted that the war was the most serious problem to the authority in Assam.

It is in the fitness of thing that expedition against the Kukis in 1917 - 19 was taken as a part of

World War I.

The British Government according to Col. Shakespeare in History of Assam Rifles also put thefollowing on record.

1. 86 rebel villages were destroyed.

2. 112 rebel villages submitted.

3. 15 rebel villages were destroyed by the people.

4. 970 muskets were confiscated in Manipur rebel area and 600 in the South Chin Hills

(Burma). The rebels also lost heavily not only in killed and wounded, but also in grainand cattle destroyed and confiscated. The official figures of guns confiscated do not show at

least about 1000 guns destroyed by burning and these burnt together with houses.


22/28

Gallantry awards:

The following British gallantry awards were instituted at the end of the war. 1. C.I.E. 1 2. O.B.E. 1 3. A.I.D.S.M.S. 14 4. King's Police Medal 1Of the British Assam Rifles the casualties were: 1. 1 Indian Officer killed in action. 2. 34 Riflemen killed in action. 3. 1 Indian officer wounded in action. 4. Of the transport followers, 7 were

killed, 393 died of disease.

On the Burma side the casualties were:

1. 1 British officer killed in action. 2. 38 sepoys killed in action. 3. 4 British officers wounded. 4. 319 sepoys wounded.A large number of followers also succumbed to disease.

RELEASE OF THE CHIEFS FROM POLITICAL JAIL AND DETENTION OF

CHENGJAPAO DOUNGEL

After a long three years, all the Kuki leaders except the Kuki Chief (Pipa) ChengjapaoDoungel was set free from Sodiya Jail. Chengajpao Doungel being the leader and (Mi-Upa), he was

detained for another 1 (one) year of imprisonment.

The great Kuki warriors and Chiefs finally went back home to their beloved people and villages

where they were welcomed back with tears of joy.

Chengjapao composed the following song :

"Henkol Kaipin thimthu tamlel tauvinte

Keija henkol jangkhen thih hija ham?Keija henkol jang khen thih hiponte.

Lengtui cham chang cheng khao balou

Lhanga Manglung kihei loulai hinte."

Free translation:

My fellow prisoners whose hands were shackled

would now be free to talk as they in their village.

My hand-cuff, is it made of strong steel?

No, it is not.

The rope - way for me to cross the river is not yet laidThe British Lord is not yet done with me.


23/28

RELEASE OF CHENGJAPAO DOUNGEL AFTER 4 YEARS OF DETENTION

Finally, Chengjapao Doungel was set free on completion of additional 1 (one) year term. The good

news spread all over the land and the people turned out in a great number at Kohima District HQ of

Naga Hills and Imphal HQ of Manipur.

THE HERO'S HOME COMING

In 1923, the British Government of India informed that Chengjapao Doungel, the Head of theChiefs (PIPA) be released and accordingly information was sent to all concerned.

Chengjapao was brought to Kohima first where many Chiefs and leaders came and met him there.

On behalf of the Kukis, Pu Haojakhup Chongloi, Chief of Jangnoi welcomed and capped him with

SATELDEL cloth as a sign of respect and love. He said to him, "We are thankful for your good

health and return to your native land safe and sound". Chengjapao then replied, "Dear Pakhup

(Haojakhup), I am delighted to come once again victoriously. May God bless and multiply your

descendents and may your village continue to prosper in the days to come".

From Kohima town Chengjapao Doungel was escorted by Government scouts along with manyKuki Chiefs to Imphal town. There he was welcomed by thousands of people who clothed him with

Saipikhup and capped him with Tuhpah and out of joy he composed the following song.

"Kache langin Jang huivan ka maovin Ka hung langin pigo nun nelkaiji, Tonglam eidot namtin pibang kimna Laija bulve ge bang in kaneme".Free Translation:

When I was leaving my village,

I was overwhelmed with sadness.

On my return to my village waving

All my people awaited me like bamboos in the grove.

All the people there to welcome me.

In my joy I felt as light as the fluttering feathers of

Vakul (a type of bird).

Chengjapao Doungel, Chief of Aisan was overwhelmed with joy and managed to forget all the

hardship and lonely years during his political exile. He was taken on a palanquin by his people

accompanied by the Heads of other clan members. He reached Aisan village to a resounding

welcome by his beloved people. On arrival at his village, Pu Chengjapao Doungel composed asong.

"Namtin Khelin Kumkho sot hen kalkai jing

Lalna gamlei muna Thonglhung kitne.

Pupa jilsa kalen chom solang nguisa, Solna gamleo gamva jing thou kit hen."Free translation:

I was imprisoned unlike the other for a long time

I have now come back to my own land.

The drums made by my forefathers

remained silent so long.

May the joy of life return to land again,


24/28

And may the birds sing once again.

THE REASONS FOR DEFEAT OF THE KUKIS IN KUKI REBELLION

1. The mighty combined forces of the British India and the British Burma were too strong for

the countable Kuki Tribals who settled in villages in the hilly regions.

2. The Kuki villages in comparison to their British counterparts were not well equipped with

weapons for war, which was also another main cause of their defeat.

3. The war was fought in Kuki soil.

4. Another unfortunate reason was that some of the Kukis who had been converted to

Christianity sided with the Britishers against their own fellow Kukis, thus reducing the

strength of the Kuki forces in a major way.

5. There were also cases of some self seeking Kuki traitors who acted as secret informers for

the British forces, thus, revealing important secret of war plans etc. of the Kukis.

The major advantage for the British was that they received uninterrupted supply of rations during

the war whereas the Kukis had to depend solely on the produce of their yearly agricultural land.

When the war extended beyond two cropping seasons, the Kukis ran short of food grains which

affected them to a major extent.

The defeat of the Kukis in the hands of the mighty Britishers mainly terminated their superiority

among the Hill tribes. After the war, the economic position of the Kukis reached the lowest

watermark. Thus, the above reasons are responsible for the defeat of the Kukis.

THE EFFECT OF ANGLO-KUKI WAR

1. The war by the Kukis against the British continued for three consecutive years whichwas stated to have started from the month of March, 1917 and ended on 20th of May, 1919. The

aftermath of the war was too severe that it affected different parts in major degrees. This war

claimed many lives and left many homeless. Most of the villages were burnt to ashes; living

livestock were killed, crop fields were destroyed and everything which was needed for a normal

livelihood was just not the same again.

2. The land dominated by the Kukis was mainly divided into two parts the Northern and Southern

part. The Northern part was under the rule of the British India whereas the Southern part was underthe rule of the British Burma. The Western part which is now under the Manipur state was divided

into three sub-divisions. Those sub-divisions came to be later known as Ukhrul instead of Chasad,

Tamenglong instead of Laijang and Churachandpur instead of Lamka. The Eastern dominated area

of Kuki came to be known as Tamu and Homalin under the Sagaing division of Burma. According

to Dr. T. Gangte, the Britishers intended to contain any further rebellion of Kukis and also create

situation for Naga domination of Tamenglong and Ukhrul.

3. The Gun which was a symbol of pride for a Kuki man and whoever owned one was regarded

very high in the Kuki society. During the war, whatever gun found available were confiscated which

had deep effect on the pride and moral of the Kukis.

4. Due to three continuous years of the war that led to the disruption of the Jhum cultivation which


25/28

was their means of livelihood, people faced multiple problems. There occurred famine in the areas,

which were once lush green fields. Even after the war, there were continuous raids on the villages

by British forces searching for guns. People lived in fear and could not cultivate in fields which led

to total scarcity of food. As a result, people had to subsist on whatever edible things found in the

forest like raw tapioca, leaves and fruits for their survival.

5. The concentration camps in which the Kukis were held captive were in an unhygienic conditionand due to that it led to the epidemic outbreak of diseases like malaria, cholera, small pox etc.

resulting in the death of many Kuki inmates of the camp.

6. The British soldiers raided the big and main villages of the Kukis in successive manner. This

finally resulted in the disintegration of all the big settlements into smaller, weaker and scattered

villages. The policy adopted by British India is still continued till today by encouraging small

settlements. Chengjapao himself and his brother Thongngam were hunted and constantly harassed

that they could not properly look after the affairs of their village resulting in sharp decline of their

powers.

7. The British policy of "Divide and Rule" led to the division of the main Kuki dominant areas

between the two sovereign countries of India and Burma. Further, as there was no recognized

independent state of the Kukis those days, their territory was divided into different administrative

units. As they lost control of most of their territories, they have been reduced to weak people

without much political organization.

Many innocent Kukis including the womenfolk and children who were captured and put in various

concentration camps were subjected to inhuman treatments. They were mostly used as labour force.

The road of Manipur connecting Imphal to Tamu, Ukhrul, Tamenglong and Churachandpur

measuring about 5000 kms or so in total was constructed by innocent Kuki inmates of the

concentration camps who worked like slaves and were not paid any wages for their hard labour.

So, the plight of the Kukis in those days was very bad as told by old aged people. The inhuman

treatment meted out to them remains unforgettable. Defeat in war shattered their society and

economy which brought demoralization in every way. New equations came up within the society.

Those considered betrayers and ought to have been charged with treason emerged as powerful

persons and having the upper hand in shaping things. Self seeking leaders devoid of any vision

came to abound. Even Kuki identity was at stake because there was no more pride in being a Kuki

and the society was sickeningly mired in stagnation. The government authorities as well as

neighboring tribes ignored and belittled them. Many of those under their umbrella looked for new

political moorings while others asserted themselves with hostile attitudes. Many Nagas of Manipurnot only distorted historical facts but also maligned them in every way. An identity crisis made

unity at stake. They find adaptation to transition to democracy from feudal chieftainship more

difficult. Even Indian leaders, seeing them in the present miserable conditions cannot visualize that

once they were proud people who sacrificed so much towards India's freedom. They have greater

inclination to patronize the Nagas. There no longer exists a cohesive agency in the vacuum as the

released Chiefs were rendered powerless and the others who sided with the British could not rise to

be social leaders.

THE DEATH OF CHENGJAPAO DOUNGEL

Pu Chengjapao Doungel was born on 4th March, 1868 and died on 28th August, 1928. He


26/28

spent his life in governing and working for the welfare of his people (Kukis).

He fought the mighty British Government on whose empire it was said the sun never set for almost

three years 1917-19. After his surrender, which also brought the war to an end, he was sent on a

long political exile in Sodiya, Tinsukia district of Assam for long 4 (four) years during the prime

period of his life.

While returning home after completion of his term from political exile, everything was changed in

his Chiefdom, such as the names of districts, sub-divisions and the name of the headquarters. The

morale of the

Documents

King of Kuki (Kuki Raja)