Key Points Thinking Like an Economist

  • Upload
    disy109

  • View
    220

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/3/2019 Key Points Thinking Like an Economist

    1/6

    Key points Thinking Like an Economist

    Economists try to approach their subject with a scientists objectivity. Like all scientists, they make

    appropriate assumptions and build simplified models in order to understand the world around them.

    The field of economics is divided into two subfieldsmicroeconomics and macroeconomics.

    Microeconomists study decision making by households and firms and the interaction among households and

    firms in the marketplace. Macroeconomists study the forces and trends that affect the economy as a whole.

    A positive statement is an assertion about how the world is. A normative statement is an assertion about how

    the world ought to be. When economists make normative statements, they are acting more as policymakers

    than scientists.

    Economists who advise policymakers offer conflicting advice either because of differences in scientific

    judgments or because of differences in values. At other times, economists are united in the advice they offer,

    but policymakers may choose to ignore it.

    Production Possibility Frontier and efficiency

    Key points Supply and Demand

    Economists use the model of supply and demand to analyse competitive markets. In a competitive market,

    there are many buyers and sellers, each of whom has little or no influence on the market price.

    The demand curve shows how the quantity of a good demanded depends on the price. According to the law

    of demand, as the price of a good falls, the quantity demanded rises. Therefore, the demand curve slopes

    downwards.

    In addition to price, other determinants of the quantity demanded include income, tastes, expectations, and

    the prices of substitutes and complements. If one of these other determinants changes, the demand curve

    shifts.

    The supply curve shows how the quantity of a good supplied depends on the price. According to the law ofsupply, as the price of a good rises, the quantity supplied rises. Therefore, the supply curve slopes upwards.

    In addition to price, other determinants of the quantity supplied include input prices, technology, and

    expectations. If one of these other determinants changes, the supply curve shifts.

    The intersection of the supply and demand curves determines the market equilibrium. At the equilibrium

    price, the quantity demanded equals the quantity supplied.

    The behaviour of buyers and sellers naturally drives markets toward their equilibrium. When the market price

    is above the equilibrium price, there is excess supply, which causes the market price to fall. When the market

    price is below the equilibrium price, there is excess demand, which causes the market price to rise.

    To analyse how any event influences a market, we use the supply-and-demand diagram to examine how the

    event affects the equilibrium price and quantity. To do this we follow three steps. First, we decide whetherthe event shifts the supply curve or the demand curve. Second, we decide which direction the curve shifts.

    Third, we compare the new equilibrium with the old equilibrium.

    In market economies, prices are the signals that guide economic decisions and thereby allocate scarce

    resources. For every good in the economy, the price ensures that supply and demand are in balance. The

    equilibrium price then determines how much of the good buyers choose to purchase and how much sellers

    choose to produce.

    Key Points Elasticity

    The price elasticity of demand measures how much the quantity demanded responds to changes in the

    price. Demand tends to be more elastic if the good is a luxury rather than a necessity, if close substitutes are

    available, if the market is narrowly defined, or if buyers have substantial time to react to a price change.

  • 8/3/2019 Key Points Thinking Like an Economist

    2/6

    The price elasticity of demand is calculated as the percentage change in quantity demanded divided by the

    percentage change in price. If the elasticity is less than 1, so that quantity demanded moves proportionately

    less than the price, demand is said to be inelastic. If the elasticity is greater than 1, so that quantity demanded

    moves proportionately more than the price, demand is said to be elastic.

    Total revenue, the total amount paid for a good, equals the price of the good times the quantity sold. For

    inelastic demand curves, total revenue rises as price rises. For elastic demand curves, total revenue falls as

    price rises.

    The income elasticity of demand measures how much the quantity demanded responds to changes inconsumers income. The cross-price elasticity of demand measures how the quantity demanded of one good

    responds to the price of another good.

    The price elasticity of supply measures how much the quantity supplied responds to changes in the price.

    This elasticity often depends on the time horizon under consideration. In most markets, supply is more elastic

    in the long run than in the short run.

    The price elasticity of supply is calculated as the percentage change in quantity supplied divided by the

    percentage change in price. If the elasticity is less than 1, so that quantity supplied moves proportionately less

    than the price, supply is said to be inelastic. If the elasticity is greater than 1, so that quantity supplied moves

    proportionately more than the price, supply is said to be elastic.

    The tools of supply and demand can be applied in many different kinds of markets. This chapter uses them toanalyse the market for wheat, the market for oil, and the market for illegal drugs.

    Key points Supply and demand Government Policies

    A price ceiling is a legal maximum on the price of a good or service. An example is rent control. If the price

    ceiling is below the equilibrium price, the quantity demanded exceeds the quantity supplied. Because of the

    resulting shortage, sellers must in some way ration the good or service among buyers.

    A price floor is a legal minimum on the price of a good or service. An example is a minimum or award wage.

    If the price floor is above the equilibrium price, the quantity supplied exceeds the quantity demanded.

    Because of the resulting surplus, buyers demands for the good or service must in some way be rationed

    among sellers.

    When the government levies a tax on a good, the equilibrium quantity of the good falls. That is, a tax on a

    market shrinks the size of the market.

    A tax on a good places a wedge between the price paid by buyers and the price received by sellers. When the

    market moves to the new equilibrium, buyers pay more for the good and sellers receive less for it. In this

    sense, buyers and sellers share the tax burden. The incidence of a tax (that is, the division of the tax burden)

    does not depend on whether the tax is levied on buyers or sellers.

    The incidence of a tax depends on the price elasticities of supply and demand. The burden tends to fall on the

    side of the market that is less elastic because that side of the market can respond less easily to the tax by

    changing the quantity bought or sold.

    Consumers Producers and Efficiency Key points

    Consumer surplus equals buyers willingness to pay for a good minus the amount they actually pay for it, and

    it measures the benefit buyers get from participating in a market. Consumer surplus can be calculated by

    finding the area below the demand curve and above the price.

    Producer surplus equals the amount sellers receive for their goods minus their costs of production, and it

    measures the benefit sellers get from participating in a market. Producer surplus can be calculated by finding

    the area below the price and above the supply curve.

    An allocation of resources that maximises the sum of consumer and producer surplus is said to be efficient.

    Policymakers are often concerned with the efficiency, as well as the equity, of economic outcomes.

    The equilibrium of supply and demand maximises the sum of consumer and producer surplus. That is, the

    invisible hand of the marketplace leads buyers and sellers to allocate resources efficiently.

  • 8/3/2019 Key Points Thinking Like an Economist

    3/6

    Markets do not allocate resources efficiently in the presence of market failures such as market power or

    externalities.

    The costs of production

    Key points

    1 The goal of firms is to maximise profit, which equals total revenue minus total cost.2 When analysing a firms behaviour, it is important to include all the opportunity costs of production. Some of

    the opportunity costs, such as the wages a firm pays its workers, are explicit. Other opportunity costs, such as

    the wages the firm owner gives up by working in the firm rather than taking another job, are implicit.

    3 A firms costs reflect its production process. A typical firms production function gets flatter as the quantity

    of an input increases, displaying the property of diminishing marginal product. As a result, a firms total-cost

    curve gets steeper as the quantity produced rises.

    4 A firms total costs can be divided between fixed costs and variable costs. Fixed costs are costs that do not

    change when the firm alters the quantity of output produced. Variable costs are costs that do change when the

    firm alters the quantity of output produced.

    5 From a firms total cost, two related measures of cost are derived. Average total cost is total cost divided bythe quantity of output. Marginal cost is the amount by which total cost would rise if output were increased by

    one unit.

    6 When analysing firm behaviour, it is often useful to graph average total cost and marginal cost. For a typical

    firm, marginal cost rises with the quantity of output. Average total cost first falls as output increases and then

    rises as output increases further. The marginal-cost curve always crosses the average-total-cost curve at the

    minimum of average total cost.

    7 A firms costs often depend on the time horizon being considered. In particular, many costs are fixed in the

    short run but variable in the long run. As a result, when the firm changes its level of production, average total

    cost may rise more in the short run than in the long run.

    Firms in competitive markets

    Learning objectives

    n this chapter, students will:

    learn what characteristics make a market competitive

    examine how competitive firms decide how much output to produce

    examine how competitive firms decide when to shut down production temporarily

    examine how competitive firms decide whether to exit or enter a market

    see how firm behaviour determines a markets short-run and long-run supply curves.

    Key points

    1 Because a competitive firm is a price taker, its revenue is proportional to the amount of output it produces.

    The price of the good equals both the firms average revenue and its marginal revenue.

    2 To maximise profit, a firm chooses a quantity of output such that marginal revenue equals marginal cost.

    Because marginal revenue for a competitive firm equals the market price, the firm chooses quantity so that

    price equals marginal cost. Thus, the firms marginal-cost curve is its supply curve.

    3 In the short run when a firm cannot recover its fixed costs, the firm will choose to shut down temporarily if

    the price of the good is less than average variable cost. In the long run when the firm can recover both fixed

    and variable costs, it will choose to exit if the price is less than average total cost.

    4 In a market with free entry and exit, profits are driven to zero in the long run. In this long-run equilibrium, all

    firms produce at the efficient scale, price equals the minimum of average total cost, and the number of firms

    adjusts to satisfy the quantity demanded at this price.

  • 8/3/2019 Key Points Thinking Like an Economist

    4/6

    5 Changes in demand have different effects over different time horizons. In the short run, an increase in

    demand raises prices and leads to profits, and a decrease in demand lowers prices and leads to losses. But if

    firms can freely enter and exit the market, then in the long run the number of firms adjusts to drive the market

    back to the zero-profit equilibrium.

    Monopoly

    Learning objectives

    n this chapter, students will:

    learn why some markets have only one seller

    analyse how a monopoly determines the quantity to produce and the price to charge

    see how the monopolys decisions affect economic wellbeing

    see why monopolies try to charge different prices to different customers.

    Key points1 A monopoly is a firm that is the sole seller in its market. A monopoly arises when a single firm owns a key

    resource, when the government gives a firm the exclusive right to produce a good, or when a single firm can

    supply the entire market at a smaller cost than many firms could.

    2 Because a monopoly is the sole producer in its market, it faces a downward-sloping demand curve for its

    product. When a monopoly increases production by one unit, it causes the price of its good to fall, which

    reduces the amount of revenue earned on all units produced. As a result, a monopolys marginal revenue is

    always below the price of its good.

    3 Like a competitive firm, a monopoly firm maximises profit by producing the quantity at which marginal

    revenue equals marginal cost. The monopoly then chooses the price at which that quantity is demanded.

    Unlike a competitive firm, a monopoly firms price exceeds its marginal revenue, so its price exceedsmarginal cost.

    4 A monopolists profit-maximising level of output is below the level that maximises the sum of consumer and

    producer surplus. That is, when the monopoly charges a price above marginal cost, some consumers who

    value the good more than its cost of production do not buy it. As a result, monopoly causes deadweight losses

    similar to the deadweight losses caused by taxes.

    5 Monopolists often can raise their profits by charging different prices for the same good based on a buyers

    willingness to pay. This practice of price discrimination can raise economic welfare by getting the good to

    some consumers who otherwise would not buy it. In the extreme case of perfect price discrimination, the

    deadweight losses of monopoly are completely eliminated. More generally, when price discrimination is

    imperfect, it can either raise or lower welfare compared with the outcome with a single monopoly price.

    Monopolistic competition

    Learning objectives

    n this chapter, students will:

    analyse competition among firms that sell differentiated products

    compare the outcome under monopolistic competition and under perfect competition

    consider the desirability of outcomes in monopolistically competitive markets

    examine the debate over the effects of advertising

    examine the debate over the role of brand names.

  • 8/3/2019 Key Points Thinking Like an Economist

    5/6

    Key points

    1 A monopolistically competitive market is characterised by three attributes: many firms, differentiated

    products and free entry (or exit).

    2 The equilibrium in a monopolistically competitive market differs from that in a perfectly competitive market

    in two related ways. First, each firm has higher average costs; that is, it operates on the downward-sloping

    portion of the average-total-cost curve. Second, each firm charges a price above marginal cost.

    3 Monopolistic competition does not have all the desirable properties of perfect competition. There is the

    standard deadweight loss of monopoly caused by the mark-up of price over marginal cost. In addition, thenumber of firms (and thus the variety of products) can be too large or too small. In practice, the ability of

    policymakers to correct these inefficiencies is limited.

    4 The product differentiation inherent in monopolistic competition leads to the use of advertising and brand

    names. Critics of advertising and brand names argue that firms use them to take advantage of consumer

    irrationality and to reduce competition. Defenders of advertising and brand names argue that firms use them

    to inform consumers and to compete more vigorously on price and product quality.

    Business strategy

    Learning objectives

    n this chapter, students will:

    see what market structures lie between monopoly and competition

    examine what outcomes are possible when a market is an oligopoly

    learn about the prisoners dilemma and how it applies to oligopoly and other issues.

    Key points

    1 Oligopolists maximise their total profits by forming a cartel and acting like a monopolist. Yet, if oligopolists

    make decisions about production levels individually, the result is a greater quantity and a lower price than

    under the monopoly outcome. The larger the number of firms in the oligopoly, the closer the quantity andprice will be to the levels that would prevail under competition.

    2 The prisoners dilemma shows that self-interest can prevent people from maintaining cooperation, even when

    cooperation is in their mutual interest. The logic of the prisoners dilemma applies in many situations,

    including arms races, advertising, common-resource problems and oligopolies.

    Externalities

    Learning objectives

    n this chapter, students will: learn what an externality is

    see why externalities can make market outcomes inefficient

    examine how people can sometimes solve the problem of externalities on their own

    consider why private solutions to externalities sometimes do not work

    examine the various government policies aimed at solving the problem of externalities

    Key points

    When a transaction between a buyer and seller directly affects a third party, that effect is called an

    externality. Negative externalities, such as pollution, cause the socially desirable quantity in a market to beless than the equilibrium quantity. Positive externalities, such as technology spillovers, cause the socially

    desirable quantity to be greater than the equilibrium quantity.

    Those affected by externalities can sometimes solve the problem privately. For instance, when one business

    confers an externality on another business, the two businesses can internalise the externality by merging.

    Alternatively, the interested parties can solve the problem by signing a contract. According to the Coase

  • 8/3/2019 Key Points Thinking Like an Economist

    6/6

    theorem, if people can bargain without cost, then they can always reach an agreement in which resources are

    allocated efficiently. In many cases, however, reaching a bargain among the many interested parties is

    difficult, so the Coase theorem does not apply.

    When private parties cannot adequately deal with external effects, such as pollution, the government

    often steps in. Sometimes the government prevents socially inefficient activity by regulating behaviour. Other

    imes it internalises an externality using Pigovian taxes. Another way to protect the environment is for the

    government to issue a limited number of pollution permits. The end result of this policy is largely the same as

    mposing Pigovian taxes on polluters

    Public goods and common resources

    Learning objectives

    n this chapter, students will:

    learn the defining characteristics of public goods and common resources

    examine why private markets fail to provide public goods

    consider some of the important public goods in our economy

    see why the costbenefit analysis of public goods is both necessary and difficult

    examine why people tend to use common resources too much

    consider some of the important common resources in our economy.

    Key points

    1 Goods differ in whether they are excludable and whether they are rival. A good is excludable if it is possible

    to prevent someone from using it. A good is rival if one persons enjoyment of the good prevents other

    people from enjoying the same good. Markets work best for private goods, which are both excludable and

    rival. Markets do not work as well for other types of goods.2 Public goods are neither rival nor excludable. Examples of public goods include fireworks displays, defence,

    and the creation of fundamental knowledge. Because people are not charged for their use of the public good,

    they have an incentive to free ride when the good is provided privately. Therefore, governments provide

    public goods, making their decision about the quantity based on costbenefit analysis.

    3 Common resources are rival but not excludable. Some examples are common grazing land, clean air and

    congested roads. Because people are not charged for their use of common resources, they tend to use them

    excessively. Therefore, governments try to limit the use of common resources

    Common resources

    The Tragedy of the Commons Definition: Tragedy of the Commonsa parable that illustrates why common resources get used more than is

    desirable from the standpoint of society as a whole.

    Example: small, medieval town where sheep graze on common land.

    Over time, as the population grows, so does the number of sheep.

    Given the fixed amount of land, the grass will begin to disappear as the land loses its ability to replenish

    itself.

    The townspeople will no longer be able to raise sheep because the private incentives (using the land for

    free) outweigh the social incentives (using the land carefully).

    When one familys flock grazes on the common land, it reduces the quality of the land available for

    others. Because people ignore this negative externality the result is an excessive number of sheep. This problem could have been prevented if the town had regulated the number of sheep in each familys

    flock, internalised the externality by taxing sheep or auctioned off a limited number of sheep-grazing

    permits. Alternatively, the town could have divided the common property between its citizens, thus

    making the land excludable and turning it into a private good.