Kerr-Tar RPO TCC and TAC Meeting Please feel free to ...€¦ · Kerr-Tar Regional Transportation Planning TAC. Meeting Minutes October 15,2015 . Kerr-Tar Regional Transportation

Kerr-Tar RPO TCC and TAC Meeting Kerr-Tar COG Offices Henderson

Thursday February 25, 2016– 3:00PM – 5:00PM 1724 Graham Avenue, Henderson, NC 27536

Pursuant to NCGS §138A-15 (e): ETHICS AWARENESS & CONFLICT OF INTEREST REMINDER

Does any member have any known conflict of interest with respect to any matters coming before the board today? If so, please identify the conflict and refrain from any participation in the particular matter involved.

Please feel free to attend meeting in person or via Conference Call. Conference Call Option: Phone #: 1-888-636-3807

Access Code: 7668349

Welcome Guests – 3:00pm TAC Vice Chair, Commissioner Sidney Dunston, TCC Chair, Mike Ciriello

TCC / TAC Action Item-Nominate new TAC Chair with nominations guided by TAC Vice Chair

TCC / TAC Action Item – Receive and approve minutes of last meetings on October 8, 2015 and October 15, 2015.- October meeting minutes enclosed as attachment.

TAC State Ethics Update-Ann Stroobant, Regional Planner KTRPO- TAC Members and TAC alternates please file your Statements of Economic Interest (SEIs) and RED forms no later than April

15th, 2016. Please include the KTRPO as a reason for filing on the SEI form. The filing period for the 2016 SEI and RED forms is from January 1, 2016- April 15, 2016. Forms received after the April 15, 2016 deadline are subject to penalties. If you have questions about SEI or RED forms, or the filing requirements please contact the State Ethics Commission at: (919) 814-3600 or email: [email protected]

- Link for TAC Members and alternates to file SEI Electronically or Manually: http://www.ethicscommission.nc.gov/sei/blankForm.aspx?type=MPO_RPO

TAC/TCC Updates –

- SPOT 4.0 Update – Ann Stroobant

- Kerr-Tar RPO Conditionally Approved Local Methodology for SPOT 4.0-Ann Stroobant

- Comprehensive Transportation Plan (CTP) Study Priority List-Ann Stroobant

- Draft Planning Work Program 2016-2017 Update-Ann Stroobant

- Draft 5 Year Work Plan 2016-2021 Update-Ann Stroobant

TAC/TCC Action Item-Approve Kerr-Tar RPO P4.0 Conditionally Approved Local Methodology- Discussion and approval of Kerr-Tar RPO P4.0 Conditionally Approved Local Methodology- Public comments on Methodology- TAC Chair to sign statement that Kerr-Tar P4.0 Conditionally Approved Local Methodology “will be done in accordance with

our normal procedures.”

NCDOT Reports –NCDOT Division 5 & NCDOT Transportation Planning Branch

Other Business- TAC/TCC Membership Updates- Consensus on whether or not it should be required for the TCC/TAC Chair to lead the meeting in person or whether it is

permissible for the TCC/TAC Chair to call in

Public Comment

Adjourn – Thank you for your participation!2016 KTRPO Meeting Schedule (3- 5PM) – Major Meeting Items

Thursday May 26, 2016 Thursday August 25, 2016

Thursday November 17, 2016 p.1

mailto:[email protected]

http://www.ethicscommission.nc.gov/sei/blankForm.aspx?type=MPO_RPO

p.2

Kerr-Tar Regional Transportation Planning TCC. Meeting Minutes

October 8,2015

Kerr-Tar Regional Transportation Planning TCC Draft Meeting Minutes

Thursday, October 8, 2015 (3:00PM - 5:00PM) Kerr-Tar Regional Council of Governments

1724 Graham Avenue / Henderson, NC

TAC Members TCC Members

-TAC did not have Quorum Michael Ciriello- TCC Chair; Person so only the TCC met. The TAC Stuart Litvin- Vance County EDC meeting will be rescheduled. Diane Cox

Justin Jorgensen Dan Brummitt Linda Worth Mayor Tom Lane Cheryl Hart Sidney Dunston Jessica Gladwin- Butner

Harry Mills Joey Hopkins- NCODT Div 5 Brandie Crawford- KTRPO Scott Walston- NCDOT TPB Barry Baker- Granville County Harry Mills Cheryl Hart Clark Thomas- Henderson B. Michael Ross

Guests Jason Rogers Will Brooks David Keilson- NCDOT Div 5

Welcome and the Review of Agenda – TCC Chair Mike Ciriello Mike Ciriello opens TCC meeting and welcomed members. The minutes were reviewed from the previous two meetings. Previous TAC/TCC meeting minutes are from the May 28, 2015 meeting and the Special Meeting on July 8, 2015.

Public Comments – None ACTION ITEM: Approve Previous Meeting Minutes

p.3


October 8,2015

The TCC members reviewed the previous meeting minutes from the May 28, 2015 and the July 8, 2015 meetings. There was a motion to approve the minutes. The motion was seconded. The motion passed. The minutes of both previous meetings were approved.

SPOT Update- Brandie Crawford, KTRPO

A SPOT update was provided to members noting that the Kerr-Tar RPO submitted the list of

modifications to existing projects and anticipated intersection/interchange projects from P3.0

for Prioritization 4.0 to NCDOT on September 1, 2015. The next step was noted to be

submitting new candidate projects for the KTRPO. It was pointed out that there are 12

available slots for new projects to submit for each mode of transportation in KTRPO including:

12 Highway Project Submittals, 12 Aviation Project Submittals, 12 Transit Project Submittals, 12

Rail Project Submittals, and 12 Bike Project Submittals.

South East High Speed Rail Update- Brandie Crawford, KTRPO

An update was provided to TCC members: The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT)’s

Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), the State of North Carolina and the Commonwealth of

Virginia announced that they have signed off on the Final Environmental Impact Statement

(FEIS) for the proposed Richmond to Raleigh (R2R) passenger rail line along the Southeast

Corridor. The completion of the FEIS is one of the final steps necessary before construction of

the project can move forward once funding is secured. To read the FEIS, visit

http://www.fra.dot.gov/eLib/Details/L17056

NC-56 Study Update- Brandie Crawford, KTRPO The NC 56 Corridor Study was recently completed and the draft report is now available: http://www.nc56corridorstudy. A possible presentation of the study will be made at the next KTRPO meeting by a core technical team member as well as an option to endorse the study by the RPO.

Planning Work Program Update- Brandie Crawford, KTRPO An update was provided that the KTRPO plans to submit a draft Planning Work Program (PWP)

for the next fiscal year to NCDOT by the December 31st deadline. RPO members were invited to

make any suggestions for additions to the draft PWP. A draft will be sent out to members

before the December deadline (the Draft PWP deadline has since been changed to February 29).

.

ACTION ITEM: Approve KTRPO Project Submittals for SPOT/Prioritization 4.0 The KTRPO draft list of project submittals was presented to members. The draft included 9 Highway projects for submittal, 7 aviation projects for submittal, and 3 new transit projects for

p.4


http://www.nc56corridorstudy/


October 8,2015

submittal. Members reviewed the draft list and were invited to make any additional project recommendations to add to the any of the lists. A request was made by Division 5 to consider submitting any or all 3 of their projects that they will otherwise be unable to submit. The three projects were included in the meeting packet. The three projects requested by Division 5 include: US 1 Capacity Improvements in Wake County, I-540 Auxiliary Lane in Wake County, and US 1 Operational Improvements in Wake County from I-440 to US1/US401 Split. The Division explained that the number of projects they can enter for P4.0 was 7 projects per transportation mode as opposed to 20 in the last round. A request was made to break project H111042 into two projects with the idea that it would score more competitively. A request was made to consider submitting two projects in Durham along I-85. A motion was made to break project H111042 into two projects, with one from NC 56 to the new road/26th Street overpass and the other then from that road down to Gate 2 road; as well as submitting 2 of the Division projects, the US 1 Capacity improvement project widening US 1 from Wake Union Church to Harris Road and the US 1 Capacity and Operational improvements from I-440 to US1/US401 split. The motion was seconded. The motion passed; with one vote against. A motion was made to update project H090152 to the original project description and project length. Prior to the meeting the project had been shortened, but there was interest in returning it to the original project. The motion was seconded. The motion passed. After some discussion, a motion was made to pass the aviation project list. The motion was seconded. The motion passed. After some discussion, a motion was made to pass the transit project list. The motion was seconded, and the motion passed with one against.

ACTION ITEM: Approve Resolution of Support for KTRPO CMAQ Project Submittals The TCC members were presented with the CMAQ prioritization process that KTRPO staff used

to prioritize the three applications received for CMAQ Funding for FFY 2017. The Prioritization

process was developed by a CMAQ committee to be used in the event that the RPO received

more application requests than available funding. From the prioritization process, there was a

top scoring project, the Roxboro, Person County Pedestrian & Bicycle Reconnect project, which

staff recommended to submit for CMAQ funding to NCDOT. Based on the cost of the project

and funding available, there was not enough remaining funding to fund a second project. A

resolution endorsing the candidate CMAQ project proposals was presented to TCC members. A

motion was made to submit and endorse the Roxboro, Person County Pedestrian & Bicycle

Reconnect project to NCDOT for CMAQ funding. The motion was seconded. The motion

passed.

NCDOT Reports- NCDOT Division 5 & NCDOT Transportation Planning Branch Division 5 provided updates on ongoing I-85 Rehab project, the East End Connector, and 501. He also spoke about the Budget Bill and additional revenue that will be available to NCDOT as a result. An update was provided that the General assembly didn’t buy into the transportation bond, but did increase revenues through HB 97.

p.5


October 8,2015

Transportation Planning Branch provided an update that they are hoping to hire a new TPB coordinator very soon. An update was also mentioned that they hope to begin the process for updating the Granville County Comprehensive Transportation Plan soon.

Other Business None

Adjournment

p.6

Kerr-Tar Regional Transportation Planning TAC. Meeting Minutes

October 15,2015

Kerr-Tar Regional Transportation Planning TAC Draft Meeting Minutes

Thursday, October 15, 2015 (10:00PM - 12:00PM) Kerr-Tar Regional Council of Governments

1724 Graham Avenue / Henderson, NC

TAC Members TCC Members

Mayor Tom Lane (TAC Chair) Will Brooks Tony King David Keilson- NCDOT Div 5 Mayor O’Geary Brandie Crawford- KTRPO Secretary Tare Davis Jim Crawford Tony Cozart Henry Daniel

Guests Eric Naisbitt- Senator Barefoot’s Office

Welcome and the Review of Agenda – TAC Chair, Mayor Tom Lane Mayor Tom Lane opens meeting and welcomed members. The minutes were reviewed from the previous two meetings. Previous TAC/TCC meeting minutes are from the May 28, 2015 meeting and the Special Meeting on July 8, 2015. The TAC meeting was originally scheduled for Thursday October 8, 2015, but was rescheduled to Thursday October 15, 2015 due to lack of quorum at the first meeting.

Public Comments – None ACTION ITEM: Approve Previous Meeting Minutes The TAC members reviewed the previous meeting minutes from the May 28, 2015 and the July 8, 2015 meetings. A motion was made by Mayor O’ Geary to approve the previous meetings minutes. The motion was seconded by Tony King. The motion passed. The minutes of both previous meetings were approved.

SPOT Update- Brandie Crawford, KTRPO

A SPOT update was provided to members noting that the Kerr-Tar RPO submitted the list of

modifications to existing projects and anticipated intersection/interchange projects from P3.0

for Prioritization 4.0 to NCDOT on September 1, 2015. The next step was noted to be

p.7


October 15,2015

submitting new candidate projects for the KTRPO. It was pointed out that there are 12

available slots for new projects to submit for each mode of transportation in KTRPO including:

12 Highway Project Submittals, 12 Aviation Project Submittals, 12 Transit Project Submittals, 12

Rail Project Submittals, and 12 Bike Project Submittals.

South East High Speed Rail Update- Brandie Crawford, KTRPO

An update was provided to TAC members: The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT)’s

Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), the State of North Carolina and the Commonwealth of

Virginia announced that they have signed off on the Final Environmental Impact Statement

(FEIS) for the proposed Richmond to Raleigh (R2R) passenger rail line along the Southeast

Corridor. The completion of the FEIS is one of the final steps necessary before construction of

the project can move forward once funding is secured. To read the FEIS, visit


NC-56 Study Update- Brandie Crawford, KTRPO The NC 56 Corridor Study was recently completed and the draft report is now available: http://www.nc56corridorstudy.com A possible presentation of the study will be made at the next KTRPO meeting by a core technical team member as well as an option to endorse the study by the RPO.

Planning Work Program Update- Brandie Crawford, KTRPO An update was provided that the KTRPO plans to submit a draft Planning Work Program (PWP)

for the next fiscal year to NCDOT by the December 31st deadline. RPO members were invited to

make any suggestions for additions to the draft PWP. A draft will be sent out to members

before the December deadline (the Draft PWP deadline has since been changed to February 29).

ACTION ITEM: Approve KTRPO Project Submittals for SPOT/Prioritization 4.0 The KTRPO draft list of Highway projects to submit for P4.0 was presented to TAC members. The approved motions made by the TCC were presented to TAC members. After discussion, a motion was made by Tony King to approve the TCC’s recommendation for the highway projects list. The motion was seconded by Jim Crawford. The motion passed.

The draft list of aviation projects to submit for P4.0 was presented to TAC members. The approved motions made by the TCC were presented to TAC members. After discussion, a motion was made by Jim Crawford to approve the TCC’s recommendation for the aviation projects list. The motion was seconded by Tony Cozart. The motion passed.

The draft list of Transit projects to submit for P4.0 was presented to TAC members. The approved motions made by the TCC were presented to TAC members. After discussion, a

p.8


http://www.nc56corridorstudy.com/


October 15,2015

motion was made by Mayor O’Geary to approve the TCC’s recommendation for transit projects. The motion was seconded by Tony King. The motion passed.

A request by the Town of Butner was presented to TAC members. Butner requested that the TAC consider updating two Butner projects’ descriptions on the P4.0 Highway Submittal list. The two projects are new projects that would construct a new roadway on a new location in the town of Butner. The current description is what was submitted in previous rounds of prioritization. Since the time the original project was submitted, the Town of Butner has completed a study that has more specific recommendations for the project and would like to update the two projects descriptions to read as described below:

“My only request would be to change the description from this:

This project is a segment of former project H111042. Construct Service Road Parallel to I-85 to Serve Commercial and Residential Developments.

This project is a segment of former project H111042. Construct Service Road Parallel to I-85 to Serve Commercial and Residential Developments.

To this: This project is a segment of former project H111042. Construct a new road adjacent to I-85 in accordance with the Butner Gateway Small Area Plan.

If that is not possible at this time, I would like to keep it to be changed at the next opportunity to update the project, or possibly if the TAC could adopt this description. The alignment is just not exactly parallel to I-85 in order to avoid some wetlands and due to the funded overpass that will be the dividing line, splitting this project into 2.”

After discussion, Tony King made a motion to approve the update for the description of the two Butner projects. The motion was seconded by Tony Cozart. The motion passed.

ACTION ITEM: Approve Resolution of Support for KTRPO CMAQ Project Submittals The TAC members were presented with the CMAQ prioritization process that KTRPO staff used

to prioritize the three applications received for CMAQ Funding for FFY 2017. The Prioritization

process was developed by a CMAQ committee to be used in the event that the RPO received

more application requests than available funding. From the prioritization process, there was a

top scoring project, the Roxboro, Person County Pedestrian & Bicycle Reconnect project, which

staff recommended to submit for CMAQ funding to NCDOT. Based on the cost of the project

and funding available, there was not enough remaining funding to fund a second project. The

TAC was presented with the TCC motion endorsing the resolution in support of the Roxboro

p.9


October 15,2015

Person County Pedestrian & Bicycle Reconnect project. After discussion, a motion was made by

Mayor O’Geary to approve the TCC’s recommendation. The motion was seconded by Tony

King. The motion passed.

NCDOT Reports- NCDOT Division 5 & NCDOT Transportation Planning Branch There were no NCDOT reports provided.

Other Business Mayor Lane and Mayor O’Geary both mentioned that this meeting would be their last meeting as TAC members. Brandie Crawford, KTRPO Secretary also stated that this would be her last meeting as well.

Adjournment A motion was made to adjourn by Mayor O’ Geary. The motion was seconded. The motion passed.

p.10

STATE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT

The State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) is the North Carolina Department of Transportation’s (NCDOT) 10-year construction schedule for projects. The schedule is updated every two years based on a data-driven process called Prioritization, as well as the latest state and federal financial situation and the status of preconstruction activities. Schedule development must adhere to the Strategic Transportation Investments (STI) law which mandates ongoing evaluation and improvement to ensure the process continues to be responsive to North Carolina’s diverse needs. Developing a STIP is accomplished though ongoing collaboration with our regional planning partners—metropolitan and rural planning organizations—and public input is a key component.

Pub

lic In

put

Pub

lic Input

Pub

lic Input

Public Input

Process BeginsFall 2015

Winter 2016

Summer 2017

TIP Unit programs Statewide Mobility

projects for the draft STIP

SPOT reviews and calculates Quantitative Scores for projects (new and existing) under the latest Prioritization criteria,

formulas and weights. Includes review of all data, costs and input from MPOs, RPOs,

NCDOT divisions and NCDOT sta�.

MPOs, RPOS, NCDOT divisions

submit new projects for scoring

MPOs, RPOs, divisions rank projects on the Regional Impact level

(which can include projects that were not funded at the Statewide

Mobility level)

TIP Unit identifies Regional Impact projects for the draft STIP

SPOT finalizesRegional Impact project scores

SPOT finalizesDivision Needs project scores

MPOs, RPOs, divisions rank projects at the Division Needs level

(which can include projects that were not funded at the Statewide or

Regional level)

TIP Unit identifies Division Needs projects for the draft STIP

NCDOT releases draft STIP

Cycle Starts Again

NC Board of Transportation approves Final

2018–2027 STIP

Abbreviations

MPOs—Metropolitan Planning Organizations

RPOs—Rural Planning Organizations

SPOT—NCDOT Strategic Prioritization O�ce of Transportation

STIP—Statewide Transportation Improvement Program

Public

Local Planning Organizations

Local NCDOT Divisions

NCDOT Headquarters

TIP—NCDOT Transportation Improvement Program

NC Board of Transportation

Color Codes

Win

ter

2015

/20

16

Late Winter/Early Spring 2016

Spring 2016

Summer 2016 Summer 2016

Fall 2016

For more information, visit www.ncdot.gov/strategictransportation investments.com

p.11

STATE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT

STRATEGIC TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENTS LAWPassed in 2013, the Strategic Transportation Investments Law (STI) allows NCDOT to use its funding more efficiently and effectively to enhance the state’s infrastructure, while supporting economic growth, job creation and a higher quality of life. This process encourages thinking from a statewide and regional perspective, while also providing flexibility to address local needs.

STI established the Strategic Mobility Formula, which allocates available revenues based on data-driven scoring and local input. It was used for the first time to develop NCDOT’s the 2016–2025 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), which schedules the projects that will be funded during a 10-year period. While federal law requires it to be updated at least every four years, NCDOT updates the STIP every two years.

PRIORITIZATIONNCDOT uses a transparent, data-driven method for prioritizing transportation investment decisions. Through the process, called Prioritization, potential transportation improvement projects are submitted to NCDOT to be scored and ranked through the Strategic Mobility Formula at the statewide, regional and division levels, based on approved criteria such as safety, congestion, benefit-cost and local priorities. These scores and other factors are used to determine whether a project receives funding. Project prioritization occurs every two years. The current round of Prioritization is referred to as P4.0, because it is the fourth iteration of this process.

HOW THE STRATEGIC MOBILITY FORMULA WORKSThe Strategic Mobility Formula funds projects in three categories:

• Division Needs• Regional Impact• Statewide Mobility

Division NeedsProjects in this category receive 30 percent of the available revenue, shared equally over NCDOT’s 14 transportation divisions, which are groupings of local counties. Project scores are based 50 percent on data and 50 percent on rankings by local planning organizations and the NCDOT transportation divisions.

Highway projects in this category are analyzed according to five criteria:

• Congestion (15 percent)• Benefit/cost (15 percent)• Safety (10 percent)• Freight and military) (5 percent)• Accessibility/Connectivity (5 percent)

Regional ImpactProjects in this category receive 30 percent of available revenue. Projects on this level compete within regions made up of two NCDOT transportation divisions, with funding divided among the regions based on population. Data makes up 70 percent of the project scores in this category. Local rankings account for the remaining 30 percent.

Regional Impact projects are analyzed according to five criteria:

• Congestion (20 percent)• Benefit/cost (20 percent)• Safety (10 percent)• Accessibility/connectivity (10 percent)• Freight and military (10 percent)

Statewide MobilityProjects in this category receive 40 percent of available revenue. The project selection process is based 100 percent on data.

Statewide Mobility projects are analyzed according to six criteria:

• Congestion (30 percent)• Benefit/cost (25 percent)• Economic competitiveness (10 percent)• Safety (15 percent)• Multimodal and military (5 percent)• Freight and mobility (15 percent)

Alternate CriteriaTo provide more flexibility, STI allows regions and divisions to develop alternate criteria tailored to their individual needs. To do so, the metropolitan and rural planning organizations and the NCDOT divisions within the region must unanimously agree on the criteria.

REVENUE DISTRIBUTION

p.12

KTRPO Prioritization P4.0 Submittals-Highway Projects ( Page 1 of 1)

The two Division 5 Projects on US 1(From Wake Union Church Road to Harris Road & I-440 to US 1/401 Split were submitted by CAMPO as requested by Divison 5 and the SPOT Office. Kerr-Tar allowed this as there were no comments back from our 11/6/15 E-mail to TCC/TAC Members.

The NC-56 & West Lyon Station Project was a double entry. Instead of being New Project H150774, it is H140487-C an existing Division 5 project.

p.13

Prioritization 4.0 Existing Highway Projects (Page 1 of 2)

p.14

Prioritization 4.0 Existing Highway Projects (Page 2 of 2)

p.15

Prioritization 4.0 Existing and Submitted-Division 5 and Kerr-Tar (1 of 3 )

*

Note: This project was originally assumed to be a New Project and was entered as H150774, but was later discovered to be a double entry and was assigned its original project number.This is why it does not show up on our KTRPO P4 Highway Project Submittals Table.

* p.16


p.17


p.18

2

98

99

230

231

232

A C D E F G M N O P

SpotID P4.0 Submittal TypeExisting or Submittal

TIP Project Category Submitter RouteFacilityName ProjectTitle ProjectDescription SpecificImprovementType

A130310 Holding Tank Submittal Division Needs Kerr-Tar RPO HNZ - Oxford-Henderson CORPORATE HANGARConstruct a new 100' X 120' corporate hangar and associated apron. (includes Project Request Numbers: 2896 )

1900 - Hangars

A130311 Holding Tank Submittal Division Needs Kerr-Tar RPO HNZ - Oxford-Henderson CORPORATE HANGAR - 50' X 60'Construct a new 50' x 60' corporate hangar, as well as apron, taxilane, and access road. (includes Project Request Numbers: 3067 )

1900 - Hangars

A150872 New Submittal Division Needs Kerr-Tar RPO HNZ - Oxford-Henderson h Terminal Area Development

Construct a New Parallel Taxiway (Project Request Number 3462); Construct a new terminal area apron(Project Request Number 3463); Construct a new terminal building (Project Request Number 3464);Access Road and Parking for new terminal (Project Request Number 3465). Project includes Project Request Numbers: 3462,3463,3464,3465

1305 - General Aviation Terminal Building: New Construction

A150869 New Submittal Division Needs Kerr-Tar RPO TDF - Person County Executive Runway Extension to 6,500 ft

Extend runway 500' to 6,500 ft total length(takeoff length); includes former projects 2432 Environmental Assessment/Preliminary Engineering; 2429 Land acquisition Rwy 24; and 2433/2434 Runway 24 Safety Area Extension, Relocate SR 1131 & Relocate Localizer, 200' extension on Rwy 6 and 300' extension

0500 - Runway Length/Width

A150871 New Submittal Division Needs Kerr-Tar RPO TDF - Person County ExecutiveStrengthen Pavement Runway, Taxiways and Aprons

Strengthen Runway, Taxiway, and Apron Pavements to 90,000# for Critical Air Freight Aircraft. The runway, apron & majority of the taxiways were last overlaid in 2003; Taxiway A West and Taxiway H were constructed in 2007. The design strength for these pavements was 30,000# SWG, 68.000# DWG. The pavement PCI's range from 67 (Fair) on the runway, 74 (Satisfactory) on the taxiways, & 67 (Fair) on the apron. The airport currently has operations by aircraft in excess of the pavement design strength.

0605 - Pavement Strength - Runway

KTRPO Prioritization 4.0 Submittals-Aviation Projects

A130316 & A130318 were submitted by Division 5. The bottom line is that it makes no difference to KTRPO. The projects are in our area and Local Input Points can be asssigned to these projects.

p.19

2

32

33

98

99

100

101

102

230

231

232

A C D E F G M N O P

SpotID P4.0 Submittal TypeExisting or Submittal

TIP Project Category Submitter RouteFacilityName ProjectTitle ProjectDescription SpecificImprovementType

A130113 Existing Existing Division Needs Division 5 LHZ - Triangle North Executive INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT - PHASE IDevelopment of new industrial site, in phases, including site preparation for industrial hangar sites and construction of pavement for aprons, connector taxiway, access road, and parking. (includes Project Request Numbers: 2799 )

1900 - Hangars

A130115 Existing Existing Division Needs Division 5 LHZ - Triangle North Executive RUNWAY EXTENSION

Includes the following:1. Environmental Assessment2. Land Acquisition3. Sam Horton Road (SR 1704) Relocation4. Site Preparation- Phase I5. Site Preparation - Phase II6. Paving and Lighting7. Install HIRL8. NAVAID Relocation9. Airport Entrance Road Relocation - Preliminary Design & Environmental Overview10. Airport Entrance Road Relocation - Land Acquisition11.AirportEntrance Road Relocation12. Powerline Relocation (includes Project Request Numbers: 3219 )


A130310 Holding Tank Submittal Division Needs Kerr-Tar RPO HNZ - Oxford-Henderson CORPORATE HANGARConstruct a new 100' X 120' corporate hangar and associated apron. (includes Project Request Numbers: 2896 )

1900 - Hangars

A130311 Holding Tank Submittal Division Needs Kerr-Tar RPO HNZ - Oxford-Henderson CORPORATE HANGAR - 50' X 60'Construct a new 50' x 60' corporate hangar, as well as apron, taxilane, and access road. (includes Project Request Numbers: 3067 )

1900 - Hangars

A130316 Existing Existing Division Needs Division 5 TDF - Person County ExecutiveTERMINAL EXPANSION, AREA APRON EXPANSION, TERM AREA AND PARKING EXPANSION

Expand existing 2,000 terminal building to +/-5,000 sq ft. Building was constructed in mid-1980s. Passenger levels are projected to increase ~40% over next 20 years and terminal needs to be expanded to accommodate increased activity at TDF. Expand terminal auto parking in conjunction with Project 2439 to expand terminal building. Expand 6in waterline from SR 1131 to terminal area. Associated with project 2439. Current terminal is served by well.(includes PRN: 2440/2439/2444 )

1315 - General Aviation Terminal Building: Construct Addition to Existing

A130318 Existing Existing Division Needs Division 5 TDF - Person County ExecutiveT-HANGAR, EXECUTIVE HANGAR, & TAXIWAY MULTIPLE PHASES

Construct T-Hangar and Executive Hangar. All existing hangars at TDF are occupied. The Airport needs new hangars to support economic development.(includes Project Request Number: 3139)

1900 - Hangars

A130319 Existing Existing Division Needs Division 5 TDF - Person County Executive EXTEND RUNWAY TO 7000'Extend runway to 7,000 ft. (Takeoff Length) (includes Project Request Numbers: 3140 )


A150872 New Submittal Division Needs Kerr-Tar RPO HNZ - Oxford-Henderson h Terminal Area Development

Construct a New Parallel Taxiway (Project Request Number 3462); Construct a new terminal area apron(Project Request Number 3463); Construct a new terminal building (Project Request Number 3464);Access Road and Parking for new terminal (Project Request Number 3465). Project includes Project Request Numbers: 3462,3463,3464,3465

1305 - General Aviation Terminal Building: New Construction

A150869 New Submittal Division Needs Kerr-Tar RPO TDF - Person County Executive Runway Extension to 6,500 ft

Extend runway 500' to 6,500 ft total length(takeoff length); includes former projects 2432 Environmental Assessment/Preliminary Engineering; 2429 Land acquisition Rwy 24; and 2433/2434 Runway 24 Safety Area Extension, Relocate SR 1131 & Relocate Localizer, 200' extension on Rwy 6 and 300' extension


A150871 New Submittal Division Needs Kerr-Tar RPO TDF - Person County ExecutiveStrengthen Pavement Runway, Taxiways and Aprons

Strengthen Runway, Taxiway, and Apron Pavements to 90,000# for Critical Air Freight Aircraft. The runway, apron & majority of the taxiways were last overlaid in 2003; Taxiway A West and Taxiway H were constructed in 2007. The design strength for these pavements was 30,000# SWG, 68.000# DWG. The pavement PCI's range from 67 (Fair) on the runway, 74 (Satisfactory) on the taxiways, & 67 (Fair) on the apron. The airport currently has operations by aircraft in excess of the pavement design strength.

0605 - Pavement Strength - Runway

Division 5 and KTRPO Prioritization 4.0 Submittals-Aviation Projects

**

* Note: Aviation Projects A130316 & A130318 were submitted by Division 5. The bottom line is that this makes no difference to KTRPOand Local Input Points can be assigned to these projects.

p.20

1

2

3

46

47

97

99

116

A C D E F G J M N O P Q X

SpotIDP4.0

Submittal Type

Existing or Submittal

TIPProject

CategorySubmitter

Public Transportation Div

CommentsRouteFacilityName ProjectDescription SpecificImprovementType All MPOs/RPOs All Divisions

T130114 Existing ExistingRegional Impact

Kerr-Tar RPO

Cost to NCDOT adjusted to match 10% of estimated total project cost

HendersonExpansion Vehicle-KARTS is requesting 1 expansion LTV. In order to meet demand KARTS will have to continue increasing operational capacity by 2 units annually.

1 - Expansion Vehicle Kerr-Tar RPO, , Division 5, ,

T130115 Existing ExistingRegional Impact

Kerr-Tar RPO


HendersonExpansion Vehicle-KARTS is requesting 1 expansion LTV. In order to meet demand KARTS will have to continue increasing operational capacity by 2 units annually.


T150699 New Submittal 0Regional Impact

Kerr-Tar RPO


RoxboroExpansion Vehicle-PATS requests 1 expansion LTV. In order to meet demand, PATS will have to continue increasing operational capacity.


T150709 New Submittal 0Division Needs

Kerr-Tar RPO


Roxboro

Construct 15 bus shelters along PATS route corridor. The Bus shelter stops are: Cleveland Lane, Brookstone/Shale Circle, Walmart, Weeks Drive, Madison Square Center, Person Memorial hospital, Piedmont Community College, Oaks Apartments, Pine Ridge Apartments, Roses/Food Lion, Person Plaza, Person Industries, Long Memorial Church Lot, Courthouse, and the Library.

2 - Facility Kerr-Tar RPO, , Division 5, ,

T150843 New SubmittalDivision Needs

Kerr-Tar RPOPark and Ride Lot in Uptown Roxboro

Create a Park and Ride Lot in Uptown Roxboro 2 - Facility Kerr-Tar RPO, , Division 5, ,

KTRPO Priortization P4.0 Submittals-Transit Projects (Page 1 of 1)

Submittal Info Comments Basic Info Ownership Info

p.21

1

Prioritization 4.0-Adopted KTRPO P3 Methodology with Draft Modifications for P4

Kerr-Tar Regional Transportation Planning Organization Prioritization 3.0 Project Solicitation, Local Point Assignment, and Ranking Process

Approved by KTRPO TAC on March 27, 2014

Introduction: The North Carolina legislature and NC Department of Transportation (NCDOT) require all regional transportation planning organizations (rural and metropolitan) to develop a local ranking process for projects across all modes of transportation (highway, bicycle/pedestrian, public transit, aviation, rail, and ferry). The following local ranking process will be submitted to the NCDOT’s Strategic Prioritization Office of Transportation (SPOT) for their review and comment and then, the modifications will be presented for adoption by the Kerr-Tar RPO’s Transportation Advisory Committee (TAC) on February 25, 2016 to ensure compliance with the legislative mandate. The TAC approved methodology will be made available to the public for a period of public comment consistent with the KTRPO Public Involvement Plan (PIP).

Applicability: This process applies to all projects ranked by Kerr-Tar RPO in Person, Granville, Vance, Warren or Franklin counties that are ranked as “regional” or “division” funding level projects. Funding levels are defined in the 2013 Strategic Transportation Investments law.

SCHEDULE Local Point Assignment Methodologies: The KTRPO will submit its proposed modified P4.0 Prioritization methodology to NCDOT and to KTRPO TAC/TCC members in January and February, 2016. It is anticipated that comments on the modified methodology for P4.0 will be received from NCDOT in January 2016 and incorporated into the revision. A copy of the TAC approved (March 27, 2014) KTRPO P 3.0 methodology will be posted on the KTRPO website along with the methodology modifications for P4.0 and any NCDOT comments. It is anticipated that the revised document with NCDOT comments incorporated will be distributed to the TAC/TCC in late-January in time to be posted on the KTRPO website (www.ktrpo.com) for public comment. Pending NCDOT review and approval, the KTRPO TAC/TCC will approve the modified KTRPO point assignment methodologies described herein at the February 25, 2016 TAC/TCC meeting.

Project Ranking: The TCC and TAC evaluated the full list of new, existing and modified projects for our five counties from August to October 2015. Final approval, point assignment, and submission to the SPOT office occurs during November 2015 to August 2016 and the final P4.0 scores will be released in October 2016.

PHASE I: Identify Candidate Projects ● Project Modifications and anticipated Intersection/ Interchange projects due September 1, 2015

● Alternate Criteria for Regional Impact and Division Needs scoring due October 1, 2015

● TCC/TAC evaluates list of new, existing and modified projects August-October 2015

● KTRPO allowed to submit up to 12 new projects entered via SPOT On!ine October-November 2015

PHASE II: Assign Points & Final Rankings ● TAC votes on modified methodology for P4.0(from approved P3.0) February 25, 2016

● NCDOT releases Quantitative Scores & Programmed Statewide Mobility Projects Draft List End of March 2016

● Regional Impact Local Input Point window opens for two months April 1, 2016

● Draft list of Programed Regional Impact Projects released End of July 2016

● Division Needs Local Input Point window opens for two months August 1, 2016

● Final P4.0 Scores released October 2016

Revisions Incorporated from Jan. 14, 2016 P4.0 Internal Methodology Review Committee

p.22

http://www.ktrpo.com/

2

PUBLIC INPUT PROCESS Local Methodology: KTRPO will release the methodology for a 30-day public comment period in mid to late January (anticipated). This 30-day period will be advertised on the RPO website (www.ktrpo.com) a process conducted in accordance with KTRPO’s Public Involvement Plan. The results of the public comment period will be presented to the TCC and TAC at their February 25 meeting for final approval. All public comment will be documented and reasonable edits to the methodology may be made prior to final approval by the TAC and submission to the Strategic Prioritization Office of Transportation.

Project Ranking: The RPO will present the recommended local points assignments and total scores of all projects to the TCC and TAC at a meeting before the NCDOT deadlines. Upon approval of the TAC, the RPO will release the recommended projects and points assignments for a 30-day public comment period. This 30-day period will be advertised on the RPO website and all relevant documents will be available on the RPO website. The process will be conducted in accordance with KTRPO’s Public Involvement Plan. The results of the public comment period will be presented to the TCC and TAC for their consideration at the May 26 and August 25 meeting, during which the public will also be permitted to submit comments. All public comment will be documented. In May 2016, the TAC will be asked to approve the project list for Regional Impact Projects and in August 2016 the TAC will be asked to approve the project list for Division Needs. The lists and assignments will be available on the RPO website. Projects will be scored based on the criteria established regardless of the eligible funding category (statewide, regional or division) and then segregated by eligible funding category into Regional and Division projects.

● Statewide Projects: Entirely determined by quantitative score. For KTRPO, the types of projects that arestatewide category are highway and one rail project. The statewide routes in KTRPO are US401, US1, US158and I-85. Any project that scores well enough will be removed from the process before KTRPO assigns localinput points. All other routes will be included in the Regional level process.

● Regional Level Projects: US501, US15, all NC routes, and Kerr Area Regional Transportation System (KARTS)are evaluated on the Regional Level.

● Division Level Projects: Projects involving SR routes, bicycle and pedestrian, Person Area TransportationSystem (PATS) transit, and two airports are evaluated at the Division Level.

RANKING Ranked List Development: Kerr-Tar RPO receives 1,300 points at the Regional Level and 1,300 points at the Division Level to allocate to projects for local prioritization. The maximum number of points any project can receive is 100.

KTRPO staff will use the following process to create a pool of the top projects from across all tiers. KTRPO will then filter out projects into separate lists by tier. To rank all projects, staff will add together the SPOT quantitative score and the score from ranking process outlined on the next several pages. Final projects scores will reflect 100% (NCDOT) SPOT Office score at Statewide Level; 70% SPOT Office score at Regional and 50% SPOT Office score at Division.

The top two projects in each county from the Regional list will be assigned 100 points for a total of 1000 points. Three more projects will come from the next highest ranked projects regardless of county. Those projects will also be assigned 100 points each for a total of 1300 points.

p.23


3

Only projects that originate at the Statewide or Regional Level are eligible for scoring and local point’s allocation under this methodology.

The same process will be used for the Division level with the exception that at least one of the thirteen (13) ranked projects on the draft Division Ranked Priority list must be non-highway mode.

Only projects that originate at the Regional or Division Level are eligible for scoring and local point’s allocation under this methodology

Use of Public Input and Comments in Final Methodologies and Rankings: The TCC and TAC will review all public comment received. Public comments will be documented, filed by the RPO, and distributed to appropriate local entities to inform future Prioritization processes and transportation plans. No new projects will be added to the current Prioritization 4.0 list; however, as the NCDOT deadline for submitting new projects will have passed.

Final Ranking and Local Points Assignment: The TAC and TCC will consider the public comments. They will be able to make changes to the draft Ranked Priority lists at the Regional and Division level where they can decide to delete up to 2 projects in each list and replace them with projects from the project lists or, donate the points to a project outside of KTRPO.

The TAC has the final discretion regarding assignment of local points and retains the flexibility to make changes to these point assignments if it is able to document a reason for doing so.

Policy addressing project split across another MPO/RPO and left over points: In the event that extra points are left over if a project falls partially into another MPO/RPO, these remaining points may be donated to the MPO/RPO to assign points on behalf of KTRPO. If the MPO/RPO has also set aside points for the project, the points may be allocated to the next highest KTRPO project to help boost its score. If this project has received the maximum number of points, the remaining points will go down the line to the next available project that has not received the maximum number of points.

p.24

4

Highway – Maximum 100 Points

Criteria 5 points 15 points 0 points 10 points 25 points

Crash frequency (25%) 0 crashes 2 or fewer

crashes 3 to 5 crashes 6 to 10 crashes 11 or more crashes

Number of automobile crashes most recent 3-year period

Supportive of comprehensive economic development strategy (CEDS) using the CTP as the measure (25%)

Project is not in CTP or other adopted plan

Project is included in CTP but no

other plan

Project is included in CTP and is

included in other adopted plan(s)

Is the proposed project part of an existing, adopted transportation plan; does the project support a goal / objective of the Kerr-Tar Region CEDS?

Criteria 0 points 10 points 20 points

Destinations served (20%)

No direct access to major

destination

Direct access to one destination from among the

list below

Direct access to at least two

destinations from among the list

below

Does the project connect directly to an educational (such as elementary/middle school, high school, or community college), health care (such as hospitals or community clinics), employment (such as factories or industry) or recreation/entertainment destination (such as theatre, convention center or arena)?


Multimodal accommodations (15%)

Project does not include

bike/ped or transit-

supportive facilities or

connections

Project includes one bike/ped or

transit-supportive facility or

connection

Project does include more than

one bike/ped or transit-supportive

facilities or connections

Whether the project includes facilities such as sidewalks, bicycle lanes, transit-supportive facilities including park and ride lots, shelters and stations, or a connection to these type facilities

Criteria 0 points 15 points

Project completes an unfinished project ( f o r e x a m p l e , s e g m e n t A a n d B a r e c o m p l e t e , b u t s e g m e n t C s t i l l n e e d s t o b e

c o m p l e t e d ) ( 1 5 % )

No Yes

p.25

5

Non-Highway (Bike and Pedestrian Projects) – Maximum 100 Points


Crash frequency (25%)

0 crashes 2 or fewer


Number of pedestrian and/or bicycle crashes over the most recently tabulated 3-year period.

Transportation plan consistency (25%)

Project is not in CTP or other locally adopted transportation plan

Project is included in CTP or other locally

adopted transportation plan

Is the proposed project part of an existing, adopted transportation plan?

Destination served (25%)

No direct access to major destination

Direct access to at least one destination from among the list

below

Direct access to more than one

destination from among the list below


Project addresses a regional goal / objective (25%)

Project does not meet any approved goal or

objective

Project supports one to two approved

goal(s) and/or objective(s)

Project supports more than 3

approved goal(s) and/or objective(s)

Includes: Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS); Public Health Plan; Safe Routes to School Plan; Jobs Access and Mobility Objective

p.26

6

Non-Highway (Rail and Aviation Projects) - Maximum 100 Points


Project addresses an identified facility safety Issue (25%)

No Improves facility

safety Improves facility and

community safety

These include, but are not limited to, improvements to track or runway condition, lighting, warning signalization, railroad crossings, control tower improvement


Project is not in CTP or other

locally adopted transportation

plan




Project expands facility capacity (25%)

Capacity is not increased

Ability to handle more rail or aircraft

May include new or expanded runway, terminals, rail sidings, or additional track among other capacity-related improvements


Project does not meet any

approved goal or objective

Project supports a goal of the approved

CEDS

Includes: Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS); local area plan; local economic plan

p.27

7

Non-Highway (Public Transportation Projects) - Maximum 100 Points

Criteria 0 points 25 points 15 points 50 points

Project expands capacity, destinations served and/or enhances the ability of passengers to utilize service (50%)

No impact on the criteria

Project impacts at least one criteria

Project impacts two or more

criteria

Projects may include transit shelters, information systems, new vehicles to support new or expanded routes


Project improves fuel economy (10%)

Fuel economy is not addressed

Fuel economy is improved by the

project

Project enhances transit providers’ fuel savings and reduces average annual fuel expenditures per vehicle


Passenger safety (10%) Safety is not addressed

Passenger Safety is Addressed by

the Project

Will the project enhance on-board and/or passenger safety generally





Project supports a single goal or

objective

Project supports multiple goals

and/or objectives

Includes: Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS); Locally-Coordinated Human Service Plan; Jobs Access and Mobility Objective; local public plan goal and/or other public goal or objective

p.28

1

Prioritization 4.0-Adopted KTRPO P3 Methodology with Draft Modifications for P4

Kerr-Tar Regional Transportation Planning Organization Prioritization 3.0 Project Solicitation, Local Point Assignment, and Ranking Process

Approved by KTRPO TAC on March 27, 2014 P4.0 Local Input Methodology Conditional Approval Version Approved by KTRPO TAC on February 25, 2016

Introduction: The North Carolina legislature and NC Department of Transportation (NCDOT) require all regional transportation planning organizations (rural and metropolitan) to develop a local ranking process for projects across all modes of transportation (highway, bicycle/pedestrian, public transit, aviation, rail, and ferry). The following local ranking process will be submitted to the NCDOT’s Strategic Prioritization Office of Transportation (SPOT) for their review and comment and then, the modifications will be presented for adoption by the Kerr-Tar RPO’s Transportation Advisory Committee (TAC) on February 25, 2016 to ensure compliance with the legislative mandate. The TAC approved methodology will be made available to the public for a period of public comment consistent with the KTRPO Public Involvement Plan (PIP).

Applicability: This process applies to all projects ranked by Kerr-Tar RPO in Person, Granville, Vance, Warren or Franklin counties that are ranked as “regional” or “division” funding level projects. Funding levels are defined in the 2013 Strategic Transportation Investments law.

SCHEDULE Local Point Assignment Methodologies: The KTRPO will submit its proposed modified P4.0 Prioritization methodology to NCDOT and to KTRPO TAC/TCC members in January and February, 2016. It is anticipated that comments on the modified methodology for P4.0 will be received from NCDOT in January 2016 and incorporated into the revision. A copy of the TAC approved (March 27, 2014) KTRPO P 3.0 methodology will be posted on the KTRPO website along with the methodology modifications for P4.0 and any NCDOT comments. It is anticipated that the revised document with NCDOT comments incorporated will be distributed to the TAC/TCC in late-January in time to be posted on the KTRPO website (www.ktrpo.com) for public comment. Pending NCDOT review and approval, the KTRPO TAC/TCC will approve the modified KTRPO point assignment methodologies described herein at the February 25, 2016 TAC/TCC meeting.

Project Ranking: The TCC and TAC evaluated the full list of new, existing and modified projects for our five counties from August to October 2015. Final approval, point assignment, and submission to the SPOT office occurs during November 2015 to August 2016 and the final P4.0 scores will be released in October 2016.

PHASE I: Identify Candidate Projects ● Project Modifications and anticipated Intersection/ Interchange projects due September 1, 2015

● Alternate Criteria for Regional Impact and Division Needs scoring due October 1, 2015

● TCC/TAC evaluates list of new, existing and modified projects August-October 2015

● KTRPO allowed to submit up to 12 new projects entered via SPOT On!ine October-November 2015

PHASE II: Assign Points & Final Rankings ● TAC votes on modified methodology for P4.0(from approved P3.0) February 25, 2016

● NCDOT releases Quantitative Scores & Programmed Statewide Mobility Projects Draft List End of March 2016

● Regional Impact Local Input Point window opens for two months April 1, 2016

● Draft list of Programed Regional Impact Projects released End of July 2016

● Division Needs Local Input Point window opens for two months August 1, 2016

● Final P4.0 Scores released October 2016

Revisions Incorporated from Jan. 14, 2016 P4.0 Internal Methodology Review Committee

p.29


2

PUBLIC INPUT PROCESS Local Methodology: KTRPO will release the methodology for a 30-day public comment period in mid to late January (anticipated). This 30-day period will be advertised on the RPO website (www.ktrpo.com) a process conducted in accordance with KTRPO’s Public Involvement Plan. The results of the public comment period will be presented to the TCC and TAC at their February 25 meeting for final approval. All public comment will be documented and reasonable edits to the methodology may be made prior to final approval by the TAC and submission to the Strategic Prioritization Office of Transportation.

Project Ranking: The RPO will present the recommended local points assignments and total scores of all projects to the TCC and TAC at a meeting before the NCDOT deadlines. Upon approval of the TAC, the RPO will release the recommended projects and points assignments for a 30-day public comment period. This 30-day period will be advertised on the RPO website and all relevant documents will be available on the RPO website. The process will be conducted in accordance with KTRPO’s Public Involvement Plan. The results of the public comment period will be presented to the TCC and TAC for their consideration at the May 26 and August 25 meeting, during which the public will also be permitted to submit comments. All public comment will be documented. In May 2016, the TAC will be asked to approve the project list for Regional Impact Projects and in August 2016 the TAC will be asked to approve the project list for Division Needs. The lists and assignments will be available on the RPO website. Projects will be scored based on the criteria established regardless of the eligible funding category (statewide, regional or division) and then segregated by eligible funding category into Regional and Division projects.

● Statewide Projects: Entirely determined by quantitative score. For KTRPO, the types of projects that arestatewide category are highway and one rail project. The statewide routes in KTRPO are US401, US1, US158and I-85. Any project that scores well enough will be removed from the process before KTRPO assigns localinput points. All other routes will be included in the Regional level process.

● Regional Level Projects: US501, US15, all NC routes, and Kerr Area Regional Transportation System (KARTS)are evaluated on the Regional Level.

● Division Level Projects: Projects involving SR routes, bicycle and pedestrian, Person Area TransportationSystem (PATS) transit, and two airports are evaluated at the Division Level.

RANKING Ranked List Development: Kerr-Tar RPO receives 1,300 points at the Regional Level and 1,300 points at the Division Level to allocate to projects for local prioritization. The maximum number of points any project can receive is 100.

KTRPO staff will use the following process to create a pool of the top projects from across all tiers. KTRPO will then filter out projects into separate lists by tier. To rank all projects, staff will add together the SPOT quantitative score and the score from ranking process outlined on the next several pages. Final projects scores will reflect 100% (NCDOT) SPOT Office score at Statewide Level; 70% SPOT Office score at Regional and 50% SPOT Office score at Division.

The top two projects in each county from the Regional list will be assigned 100 points for a total of 1000 points. Three more projects will come from the next highest ranked projects regardless of county. Those projects will also be assigned 100 points each for a total of 1300 points.

p.30


3

Only projects that originate at the Statewide or Regional Level are eligible for scoring and local point’s allocation under this methodology.

The same process will be used for the Division level with the exception that at least one of the thirteen (13) ranked projects on the draft Division Ranked Priority list must be non-highway mode.

Only projects that originate at the Regional or Division Level are eligible for scoring and local point’s allocation under this methodology

Use of Public Input and Comments in Final Methodologies and Rankings: The TCC and TAC will review all public comment received. Public comments will be documented, filed by the RPO, and distributed to appropriate local entities to inform future Prioritization processes and transportation plans. No new projects will be added to the current Prioritization 4.0 list; however, as the NCDOT deadline for submitting new projects will have passed.

Final Ranking and Local Points Assignment: The TAC and TCC will consider the public comments. They will be able to make changes to the draft Ranked Priority lists at the Regional and Division level where they can decide to delete up to 2 projects in each list and replace them with projects from the project lists or, donate the points to a project outside of KTRPO.

The TAC has the final discretion regarding assignment of local points and retains the flexibility to make changes to these point assignments if it is able to document a reason for doing so.

Policy addressing project split across another MPO/RPO and left over points: In the event that extra points are left over if a project falls partially into another MPO/RPO, these remaining points may be donated to the MPO/RPO to assign points on behalf of KTRPO. If the MPO/RPO has also set aside points for the project, the points may be allocated to the next highest KTRPO project to help boost its score. If this project has received the maximum number of points, the remaining points will go down the line to the next available project that has not received the maximum number of points.

p.31

4

Highway – Maximum 100 Points


Crash frequency (25%) 0 crashes 2 or fewer


Number of automobile crashes most recent 3-year period

Supportive of comprehensive economic development strategy (CEDS) using the CTP as the measure (25%)

Project is not in CTP or other adopted plan

Project is included in CTP but no

other plan

Project is included in CTP and is

included in other adopted plan(s)

Is the proposed project part of an existing, adopted transportation plan; does the project support a goal / objective of the Kerr-Tar Region CEDS?


Destinations served (20%)

No direct access to major

destination

Direct access to one destination from among the

list below

Direct access to at least two

destinations from among the list

below



Multimodal accommodations (15%)

Project does not include

bike/ped or transit-

supportive facilities or

connections

Project includes one bike/ped or

transit-supportive facility or

connection

Project does include more than

one bike/ped or transit-supportive

facilities or connections

Whether the project includes facilities such as sidewalks, bicycle lanes, transit-supportive facilities including park and ride lots, shelters and stations, or a connection to these type facilities


Project completes an unfinished project ( f o r e x a m p l e , s e g m e n t A a n d B a r e c o m p l e t e , b u t s e g m e n t C s t i l l n e e d s t o b e

c o m p l e t e d ) ( 1 5 % )

No Yes

p.32

5

Non-Highway (Bike and Pedestrian Projects) – Maximum 100 Points


Crash frequency (25%)

0 crashes 2 or fewer


Number of pedestrian and/or bicycle crashes over the most recently tabulated 3-year period.


Project is not in CTP or other locally adopted transportation plan




Destination served (25%)

No direct access to major destination

Direct access to at least one destination from among the list

below

Direct access to more than one

destination from among the list below



Project does not meet any approved goal or

objective

Project supports one to two approved

goal(s) and/or objective(s)

Project supports more than 3

approved goal(s) and/or objective(s)

Includes: Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS); Public Health Plan; Safe Routes to School Plan; Jobs Access and Mobility Objective

p.33

6

Non-Highway (Rail and Aviation Projects) - Maximum 100 Points


Project addresses an identified facility safety Issue (25%)

No Improves facility

safety Improves facility and

community safety

These include, but are not limited to, improvements to track or runway condition, lighting, warning signalization, railroad crossings, control tower improvement


Project is not in CTP or other

locally adopted transportation

plan




Project expands facility capacity (25%)

Capacity is not increased

Ability to handle more rail or aircraft

May include new or expanded runway, terminals, rail sidings, or additional track among other capacity-related improvements




Project supports a goal of the approved

CEDS

Includes: Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS); local area plan; local economic plan

p.34

7

Non-Highway (Public Transportation Projects) - Maximum 100 Points

Criteria 0 points 25 points 15 points 50 points

Project expands capacity, destinations served and/or enhances the ability of passengers to utilize service (50%)

No impact on the criteria

Project impacts at least one criteria

Project impacts two or more

criteria

Projects may include transit shelters, information systems, new vehicles to support new or expanded routes


Project improves fuel economy (10%)

Fuel economy is not addressed

Fuel economy is improved by the

project

Project enhances transit providers’ fuel savings and reduces average annual fuel expenditures per vehicle


Passenger safety (10%) Safety is not addressed

Passenger Safety is Addressed by

the Project

Will the project enhance on-board and/or passenger safety generally





Project supports a single goal or

objective

Project supports multiple goals

and/or objectives

Includes: Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS); Locally-Coordinated Human Service Plan; Jobs Access and Mobility Objective; local public plan goal and/or other public goal or objective

The Kerr-Tar RPO Local Input Methodology (granted conditional approval by the P4.0 Methodology Internal Review Committee that met on 1-14-16 and incorporating its revisions, with final conditional approval on 1-19-16) will be done in accordance with our normal RPO procedures.

____________________________________________, TAC Chair

p.35

CTP STUDY NEEDS SPREADSHEET - 2016

RPO 2016

Contact 2

IMPORTANT!!! DO NOT REQUEST / LIST AREAS THAT WILL NOT, OR CAN NOT, MEET LAND DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA OR STUDIES THAT ARE UNDERWAY OR CANNOT MEET WITHIN 6 WEEKS

COUNTY RPOTPB

GROUP

CTP Committee

Established

Land Devel.

Plan Date

RPO

REQUEST

PRIORITY

RPO

PRIORITY

POINTS

# NEW

LOCATION

SECTIONS

# MILES

ADDIT'L

LANES

TOTAL

GRANVILLE Kerr-Tar Eastern 1 Yes pre-2009 1 5 Yes 5 Yes 5 Yes 5 1 3 11 2008 7 Low 3 Low 3 1.13% 7 50WARREN Kerr-Tar Eastern 1 No in progress 2 4 No 0 Yes 5 Yes 5 0 0 0 2010 5 Loss 0 Low 3 1.91% 11 33

- - Yes 2009 3 3 No 0 No 0 No 0 0 0 0 2015 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 3- - Yes 2008 4 2 No 0 No 0 No 0 0 0 0 2015 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 2- - Yes 2010 5 1 No 0 No 0 No 0 0 0 0 2015 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 1- - Yes 2010 6 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 0 0 0 2015 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 0- - Yes 2010 7 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 0 0 0 2015 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 0- - Yes 2010 8 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 0 0 0 2015 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 0- - Yes 2010 9 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 0 0 0 2015 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 0- - Yes 2010 10 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 0 0 0 2015 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 0

MAXIMUM POINTS 100

DIRECTIONS ON HOW TO USE THIS WORKSHEET - DO NOT USE LAST YEAR'S SPREADSHEET Full Update - complete reanalysis and traffic projections of the area (every 6-10 years depending on growth)

1) Fill in or choose appropriate answer to all boxes in YELLOW. The comments box below is optional. Minor Update - Very minor reanalysis to modify a few recommendations

2) Save the EXCEL file to your computer as an EXCEL spreadsheet.

3) SEND THE EXCEL FILE in e-mail to your TPB Coordinator AND Scott Walston ([email protected]) by February 1, 2016 Current (LIVE) STIP

4) If you have NO requests to submit, please let your TPB Coordinator and Scott Walston know by e-mail by February 1, 2016 http://tinyurl.com/live-stip

SUBMISSIONS AFTER FEBRUARY 1, 2016 MAY NOT BE RANKED. DO NOT SUBMIT AS A PDF FILE.

TOTALS

Test County #2

Kerr-Tar

Ann Stroobant # OF REQUESTS

BIKE

PLANPED PLANCTP REQUEST

YEAR

COUNTY POPULATION

GROWTH

VMT

GROWTH

UNIFIED

PLAN

PROJECTS ON CURRENT STIP

20

LAST STUDY

DATE

10 10

2009-14

GROWTH

20

2020-2030

GROWTH

2010-2020

GROWTH

5

RPO POINTSLAST STUDY

DATE

Test County #1

5 5 205

p.36

http://tinyurl.com/live-stip

XXXXXXX RPO 1 FY 20009-10

I. DATA COLLECTION AND ASSESSMENT

I-1 DATA COLLECTION AND ASSESSMENT $ 2,600 $ 10,400 $ 13,000

I-1.1 CTP Inventory and AssessmentRegional CTP Needs Administrative Kerr Tar 1617_000

I-1.2 Bicycle and Pedestrian Inventory and Assessment

I-1.3 Parking Inventories

I-1.4 Vehicle Occupancy Rates (VOR) Counts and Assessment

I-1.5 Traffic Volume Counts and Assessment

I-1.6 Crash Data and AssessmentCrash Data and Assessment Summary/Assessment Louisburg town 1617_000

I-1.7 Public Transportation Service Data and AssessmentUpdate public transportation data for Locally Coordinated Transportation Plan (Tony will work on as MM) Summary/Assessment Kerr Tar 1617_000

I-1.8 Multimodal Data Collection and Assessment

I-1.9 Freight Data Collection and Assessment

I-1.10 Socioeconomic Data InventoryUpdate KTRPO data for regional transportation website Summary/Assessment Kerr Tar 1617_000

I-1.11 Environmental and Land use Data Inventory and Assessment205j Water Quality Application Other Kerr-Tar 1617_000

I-1.12 Demographic Data Collection and AssessmentUpdate KTRPO data for regional transportation website Summary/Assessment Kerr Tar 1617_000

II. TRANSPORTATION PLANNING

II-1 COMPREHENSIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN (CTP) DEVELOPMENT $ 3,000 $ 12,000 $ 15,000

II-1.1 Develop CTP VisionII-1.1.a CTP Study Setup

Prepare meeting minutes Administrative GRANVILLE 1617_001

II-1.1.b Local CTP Vision

II-1.2 Conduct CTP Needs AssessmentII-1.2.a Data Collection and Assessment

Assist in Data Collection Other GRANVILLE 1617_001Community Understanding Report (CUR) with NCDOT Other GRANVILLE 1617_001

II-1.2.b Current and Future Year Data Endorsements

II-1.2.c Deficiency Assessment

II-1.3 Analyze Alternatives and Environmental ScreeningII-1.3.a Alternatives Assessment

II-1.3.b Local Alternative ConsensusPresentation to local board Meeting Participation GRANVILLE 1617_001

II-1.4 Develop Final PlanII-1.4.a Develop CTP Maps

Assist NCDOT to develop and/or review CTP maps Mapping GRANVILLE 1617_001Participate in workshops/meetings to gather input on CTP Meeting Participation GRANVILLE 1617_001

II-1.4.b Local EndorsementAssist in adoption of plan Other GRANVILLE 1617_001

II-1.4.c Adopt Plan

II-1.4.d CTP DocumentReview documentation Administrative GRANVILLE 1617_001

II-1.4.e CTP and Local Land Use Revisions

II-1.4.f Development of Local Implementation Strategies

II-2 PRIORITIZATION AND PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT $ 5,376 $ 21,505 $ 26,881

II-2.1 Local Project PrioritizationII-2.1.a Local Project Prioritization

STI Committee Meeting Participation Kerr Tar 1617_002

Review local and update local projects for prioritization, submit any new candidate projects, assign Regional Impact Local Input points (based on tentative P4.0 Schedule)

Administrative Kerr Tar 1617_002

Consolidated CTP Project Lists Spreadsheet Kerr Tar 1617_002

II-2.1.b Project Entry and SPOT Prioritization Process

II-2.2 STIP ParticipationII-2.2.a STIP Participation

Distribute and facilitate comments for P4.0 / STI to members; receive and review documentation and guidance about new funding, project scores and rankings, and process.


II-3 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT $ 430 $ 1,720 $ 2,150

II-3.1 Problem Statement and Purpose and NeedII-3.1.a Purpose and Need Data

II-3.1.b Public Involvement Strategies

Disseminate information about projects for comment and public information


II-3.2 Merger ProcessII-3.2.a Meeting Attendance

II-3.2.b Review and CommentReceive and distribute project plans Administrative Kerr Tar 1617_000

II-3.3 Indirect and Cumulative EffectsII-3.3.a ICE Assessment of Probable Growth

II-4 GENERAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING $ 8,800 $ 35,200 $ 44,000

II-4.1.a Regional or Statewide Planning

Participation in regional and local planning efforts and committee as the KTRPO representative (i.e. US-158 Corridor Association; Granville CTP Committee)

Meeting Participation Kerr Tar 1617_000

NCARPO Website-Provide routine site maintenance including updating posts for meetings, posting minutes, hotel info, and agendas, and contact info, announcements and links.

Administrative NC STATE 1617_000

NCARPO Meeting Participation Kerr Tar 1617_000

II-4.1.b Special Studies and Projects

Henderson I-85/NC39 Uptown Gateway Corridor Study Report HENDERSON 1516_000

Lakes District Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Marketing and Outreach Other Kerr Tar 1415_004Madison Blvd Visualization Other Roxboro 1213_009May add additional special study contingent on proposals and meeting with TCC/TAC

II-4.1.c CMAQ PlanningRegional CMAQ funding updates and new project identification; assistance with applications; technical assistance and endorsements as necessary


II-4.1.d Air Quality AssessmentReceive and review SICM air quality data Administrative Kerr Tar 1617_000

II-4.1.e Alternative Funding

II-4.1.f Training and Certification Technical Training (such as TEAAS training) Administrative Kerr Tar 1617_000

Professional Training and Memberships Other Kerr Tar 1617_000

II-4.2 Title VIII-4.2.a RPO Affirmation of Title VI Compliance

II-4.2.b Transportation Initiatives and ADA Compliance

II-4.2.c Environmental Justice Assessment

II-4.2.d Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Assessment

III. ADMINISTRATION OF TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND POLICIES

III-1 ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT $ 4,000 $ 16,000 $ 20,000

III-1.1 AdministrativeIII-1.1.a Planning Work Program

FY18 PWP Administrative Kerr Tar 1617_000FY17 PWP Implementation Administrative Kerr Tar 1617_000FY17 Revisions Amendment Administrative Kerr Tar 1617_000

III-1.1.b 5-Year Planning CalendarPrepare 5 year planning calendar for 2017-2022 Administrative Kerr Tar 1617_000

III-1.1.c Quarterly Invoice and Progress ReportsPrepare quarterly Invoices and progress reports Administrative Kerr Tar 1617_000

III-1.1.d TCC/TAC Work FacilitationPrepare meeting agendas, minutes, speakers Administrative Kerr Tar 1617_000

III-1.1.e Regulatory DocumentsSEI FY17 Administrative Kerr Tar 1617_000

III-1.1.f Miscellaneous Expenses

III-1.2 Public InvolvementIII-1.2.a Public Involvement Plan (PIP)

III-1.2.b Documentation of Public Input

$ 24,206 $ 96,825 $ 121,031

Approved by the T _____________________________________________, 20##.

__________________________________________________Signature, TAC Chairman

__________________________________________________Signature, RPO Secretary

TOTAL

SPENDING DETAILS PER LINE ITEM ARE REQUIRED EACH QUARTER.














DRAFT FY 2016-2017

Kerr-Tar Rural Planning OrganizationANNUAL PROPOSED FUNDING SOURCES TABLE

PLANNING WORK PROGRAM

TASKCODE

WORKPRODUCTFORMAT

TOTAL

HIGHWAY/TRANSIT

LOCAL

20%

STATE

80%

GEOGRAPHYPRIMARY

PROJECT # (IF

APPLICABLE)

FY_00X

TASK CODE/WORK PRODUCT

DESCRIPTION

RPO PROGRAM FUNDS

p.37

YEARPlanning Work

Program

Recommendation to

State TIPGIS Database Data Collection Local CTP Special Studies

Transportation Enhancement /

Transit PlanningCMAQ

FY 2016 - 2017Draft February 2017;

Final May 2017

Review Prioritization Policy;

Prepare comments for 2016-2022

Draft TIP

Maintain Databases; Coordinate updates

with local agencies.Data collection as requested by local partners.

Evaluate needs for updates for

municipal/county plans; Work on Granville

County CTP if approved by TPB; assist in

CUR for Granville County: apply for

Warren County CTP if not already

awarded.

Conclude projects from previous year;

Initiate study for Henderson I-85/NC39

Uptown Gateway Corridor Study, a

downtown master redevelpment plan for the

City of Henderson which will include the

multi modal station as an element and also

looks at land use, urban design, access and

economic development potential in

partnership with local planing and ED

leaders. Start Lakes District Bicycle and

Pedestrian Plan Marketing and Outreach.

Additional efforts as identified by survey

and discussions with RPO TCC. Conduct

membership survey for future planning

project ideas.

Continue to assist with applications,

technical assistance and endorsements as

necessary. Continue to expand

collaboration with Mobility Management

and create on-line resource to link

passengers with mobility. Continue to work

with mobility manager to update LCP.

Continue to work with regional and state

partners to study locations and facilities for

park and ride and intrastate transit

services. Work with PATS and KARTS to

design and plan facilities to enhance

"Around Town" shuttle and regional transit

services. Work with southside Virginia to

look at transit options for Region K workers

to access jobs in southern Virginia.

Assistance with applications; technical

assistance and endorsements as necessary


Final May 2018

Submit TIP Priority List for 2018-

2024 TIP


with local agenciesData collection as requested by local partners.


municipal/county plans; Finalize Granville

County CTP; Begin Warren County CTP

Continue with the Henderson I-85/NC39

Uptown Gateway Corridor Study. Continue

with Lakes District Bicycle and Pedestrian

Plan Marketing and Outreach. Examine

potential and limitations to expanding freight

rail in the region. Additional efforts as

identified by survey and discussions with

RPO TCC.

Technical Assistance to Member Govts as

needed




Final May 2019



Draft TIP




municipal/county plans; Work on Warren

County CTP


and discussions with RPO TCC.


needed




Final May 2020

Submit TIP Priority List for 2019-

2025 TIP. Review existing project

scopes and review potential

changes




municipal/county plans; Finalize Warren

County CTP




needed




Final May 2021



Draft TIP




municipal/county plans; work as required




needed



Draft 2016-2021 Kerr-Tar RPO 5 Year Work Plan

p.38