27
JOHARI WINDOW How much you know yourself? Presented to: Dr. A.K. Singh Presented by: Divya Jyoti Behl

Johari Window

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Johari Window

JOHARI WINDOWHow much you know yourself?

Presented to:Dr. A.K. Singh

Presented by:Divya Jyoti Behl

Page 2: Johari Window

Objectives•What is JOHARI WINDOW•Objectives of Study•Selection of Questionnaire•Data Collection•Statistical tools•Data analysis•Conclusions•Limitations

Page 3: Johari Window
Page 4: Johari Window

•Developed by American psychologists Joseph Luft and Harry Ingham in the 1950's.•The Johari Window is a communication model that can be used to improve understanding between individuals within a team or in a group setting.•Based on disclosure, self-disclosure and feedback, it can also be used to improve a group's relationship with other groups

What is Johari window?

Page 5: Johari Window

There are two key ideas behind the tool:•Individuals can build trust between themselves by disclosing information about themselves.

•Individuals can learn about themselves and come to terms with personal issues with the help of feedback from others.

Johari window

Page 6: Johari Window

Johari –Quadrant 1

‘Open self/area’ or ‘free area’ or ‘public area’, or ‘arena’•It is the area known by the person ('the self') and known by the group ('others'). •It gives information about the person’s - behaviour, attitude, feelings, emotion, knowledge, experience, skills, views, etc •The aim is to develop the 'open area‘ , because when we work in this area with others we are at our most effective and productive, and the team is at its most productive too•It is the space where good communications and cooperation occur, free from distractions, mistrust, confusion, conflict, and misunderstanding

Page 7: Johari Window

Johari –Quadrant 2

‘Blind self' or ‘blind area’ or ‘blindspot’•It is the area what is known about a person by others in the group, but is unknown by the person him/herself.•The aim is to reduce this area by seeking or soliciting feedback from others and thereby to increase the open area, i.e., to increase self-awareness•Discovery through communications, active listening and experience, will reduce the unknown area.

Page 8: Johari Window

Johari –Quadrant 3‘Hidden self' or 'hidden area' or 'avoided self/area' or 'facade‘•What is known to ourselves but kept hidden from, and therefore unknown, to others•Represents information, feelings, etc, anything that a person knows about him/self, but which is not revealed or is kept hidden from others•Also include sensitivities, fears, hidden agendas, manipulative intentions, secrets - anything that a person knows but does not reveal.•Relevant hidden information and feelings, etc, should be moved into the open area through the process of 'self-disclosure' and 'exposure process’

Page 9: Johari Window

Johari –Quadrant 4‘Unknown self‘, 'area of unknown activity‘, 'unknown area'•Information feelings, aptitudes, experiences etc, that are unknown to the person and unknown to others in the group.•It could include repressed or subconscious feelings rooted in formative events and traumatic past experiences, which can stay unknown for a lifetime.•It can be prompted through self-discovery or observation by others, or through collective or mutual discovery•Counseling can also uncover unknown issues

Page 10: Johari Window

Complete Johari Window Model

Page 11: Johari Window

Objectives of Study

•To study the behavior of people in terms of their self awareness.•To study the relation between the behavior of students and working professionals and their responses.•To analyze the responses between male and female•To analyze the responses of students and working professionals.

Page 12: Johari Window

Respond to each of the 20 statements using the following scale:* Carefully read each numbered item and its statements marked "A" and "B." * Assign a point value to the A and B statements as follows: * The total point value for A and B added together is five (5). * If statement A is most similar to what you would do, mark 5 for A and 0 for B. * If A is not wholly satisfactory, but in your judgment better than B, mark 4 or 3 for A and 1 or 2 for B. * The converse is true: if B is best mark 5 for B and 0 for A and so on.

Questionnaire

Page 13: Johari Window

•If a colleague of mine had a ‘personality conflict’ with a Manager of another department, with whom it is important that he cooperate for the success of work, I would :___A. Tell the colleague that he was partially responsible for the conflict and indicate how the other person is being affected by him.___B. Not get involved for fear that my relationship would get affected with them.

•If one of my colleagues with whom I had a heated argument in the past, and I realized that since then he is uncomfortable in my presence, I would:___A. Avoid making matters worse by calling attention to that behavior and let the whole thing drop.___B. Comment on his behavior and ask him how our argument has affected our relationship

Questionnaire…

Page 14: Johari Window

Mode of Data Collection• Visiting the PSUs and Private offices-37 samples•Online filling of Forms from working professionals/students: 70•Females-36; males-71 and Students-55; working Professionals-52

Page 15: Johari Window
Page 16: Johari Window

Data Analysis...

Page 17: Johari Window

Chi Square Test-1

Null Hypothesis:Ho: There is no significant difference between the responses of males and females.

Alternate HypothesisHa: There is significant difference between the responses of males and females

Gender

Self disclosu

re FeedbackMale 35 40

Female 20 20

Page 18: Johari Window

•Significance Level : 5%•Χ2 Observed: 6.9808•Χ2 critical: 3.841Degree of freedom:1Conclusion: Since Χ2  Observed > Χ2 Critical, hence we do not accept the Null Hypothesis

•Conclusion: Responses of questionnaire are dependent of the fact that whether the respondent is male or female.

Chi Square Test-1

Page 19: Johari Window

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Feedback

Gender

Self disclosu

re FeedbackMale 35 40

Female 20 20

OPEN BLIND

HIDDEN UNKNOWN

Page 20: Johari Window

Chi Square Test-2

Null Hypothesis:Ho: There is no significant relation between the sectors and the Johari parameters.

Alternate HypothesisHa: There is significant relation between the sectors and the Johari parameters.

SectorSelf

DisclosureFeedba

ckStudent 35 40Working

Professionals 18 18

Page 21: Johari Window

•Significance Level : 5%•Χ2 Observed: 8.74•Χ2 critical: 3.841Degree of freedom:1

Conclusion: Since Χ2  Observed > Χ2 Critical, hence we do not accept the Null Hypothesis

•Conclusion: Responses of questionnaire are dependent of the fact that which sector the respondent belongs to.

Page 22: Johari Window

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

FeedbackOPEN BLIND

HIDDEN UNKNOWNSector

Self Disclosure

Feedback

Student 35 40Working

Professionals 18 18

Page 23: Johari Window

Conclusions

•Responses of questionnaire are dependent of the fact that whether the respondent is male or female. •Responses of questionnaire are dependent of the fact that which sector the respondent belongs to.

Page 24: Johari Window

Limitations

•Small sample size may cause errors a it may not be the actual representation of the universe.

• Unequal number of samples in each group can give skewed results.

• The results might suffer form individual biases and prejudices.

Page 25: Johari Window

Bibliography• http://www.teampts.com/surveys/johariwindowquest.pdf

• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johari_window

•Statistics for Management – Levin Rubin (7th Edition)

• http://www.mindtools.com/CommSkll/JohariWindow.htm

• http://www.authorstream.com/presentation/Mentor-23904-Johari-Window-as-Entertainment-ppt-powerpoint/

Page 26: Johari Window

Questions

Page 27: Johari Window

Thank You