14
JAVA EE What happens when over 1 environment? Last year, ZeroTurnaround OÜ application containers in the Ja sharing info about their develop results helpful. This year we expanded on that, a accurate information. The survey and those responses were analyz What is more popular, Ant Which Java IDE is the mos What Java EE standards a Which Java Framework is What Java Container / App How much development tim We asked the people we met at J promoted the survey in the media they would be notified again once chance to win free JRebel license are published. A total of 1027 responses were an - they were requested to provide d including all calculations is availab ZeroTurnaround OÜ © E Productivity Report 2011 1000 Java developers compare thei published a report i on turnaround time, t ava ecosystem. Over 1300 Java develope pment environment, and over 40,000 peo asking more and better questions to give you itself ii provided data from over 1000+ Java zed to create this report. We set out to disco or Maven? st popular? are used the most? most prevalent? p Server is used the most? me is spent redeploying Java containers? JavaOne 2010, emailed previous survey res a. They were sent an email with the link to th e the results were made available. Participan es and one recipient will receive an iPad onc nalyzed to create this report. Of these, 28% data from before they were purchasers. The ble for download iii . © 2010. All rights reserved. ir development tools and ers ended up ople found these u better and more EE developers over: spondents and he survey and told nts were offered a ce the final results % are JRebel users e raw data

JAVA EE Productiv JAVA EE Productivity Report - ZeroTurnaround

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    23

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: JAVA EE Productiv JAVA EE Productivity Report - ZeroTurnaround

JAVA EE Productivity Report 2011

What happens when over 1000 Java developers compaenvironment?

Last year, ZeroTurnaround OÜ application containers in the Java ecosystem. Over 1300 Java developers ended up sharing info about their development environment, and over 40,000 people found these results helpful.

This year we expanded on that, asking more andaccurate information. The survey itselfand those responses were analyzed to create this report. We set

• What is more popular, Ant or Maven?• Which Java IDE is the most popular?• What Java EE standards are used the most?• Which Java Framework is most prevalent?• What Java Container / App Server is used the most?• How much development time is spent

We asked the people we met at JavaOne 2010, emailed previous survey respondents and promoted the survey in the media. They were sent an email with the link to the survey and told they would be notified again once the results wchance to win free JRebel licenses and one recipient will receive an iPad once the final results are published.

A total of 1027 responses were analyzed to create this report. Of these, 28% are JRebel users - they were requested to provide data fromincluding all calculations is available for download

ZeroTurnaround OÜ © 2010. All rights reserved

JAVA EE Productivity Report 2011

What happens when over 1000 Java developers compare their development

ZeroTurnaround OÜ published a reporti on turnaround time, tools and application containers in the Java ecosystem. Over 1300 Java developers ended up sharing info about their development environment, and over 40,000 people found these

This year we expanded on that, asking more and better questions to give you better and more survey itselfii provided data from over 1000+ Java EE developers

and those responses were analyzed to create this report. We set out to discover:

What is more popular, Ant or Maven? Which Java IDE is the most popular? What Java EE standards are used the most? Which Java Framework is most prevalent? What Java Container / App Server is used the most? How much development time is spent redeploying Java containers?

We asked the people we met at JavaOne 2010, emailed previous survey respondents and promoted the survey in the media. They were sent an email with the link to the survey and told they would be notified again once the results were made available. Participants were offered a chance to win free JRebel licenses and one recipient will receive an iPad once the final results

A total of 1027 responses were analyzed to create this report. Of these, 28% are JRebel users they were requested to provide data from before they were purchasers. The raw data

available for downloadiii.

ZeroTurnaround OÜ © 2010. All rights reserved.

re their development

turnaround time, tools and application containers in the Java ecosystem. Over 1300 Java developers ended up sharing info about their development environment, and over 40,000 people found these

better questions to give you better and more provided data from over 1000+ Java EE developers

out to discover:

We asked the people we met at JavaOne 2010, emailed previous survey respondents and promoted the survey in the media. They were sent an email with the link to the survey and told

ere made available. Participants were offered a chance to win free JRebel licenses and one recipient will receive an iPad once the final results

A total of 1027 responses were analyzed to create this report. Of these, 28% are JRebel users they were purchasers. The raw data

Page 2: JAVA EE Productiv JAVA EE Productivity Report - ZeroTurnaround

Build Tools and IDEs – Setting the scene

What is more popular, Ant or Maven?

We asked everyone to mark the tools they use

As you can, see Maven and Ant are used almost equally and some of the respondents use both. Clearly both of them are useful in some way. Tools like Gradle, Ivy and SBT were mentioned, but none of them gathered even 5 vote

ZeroTurnaround OÜ © 2010. All rights reserved

Setting the scene

What is more popular, Ant or Maven?

We asked everyone to mark the tools they use for building their application:

As you can, see Maven and Ant are used almost equally and some of the respondents use both. Clearly both of them are useful in some way. Tools like Gradle, Ivy and SBT were mentioned, but none of them gathered even 5 votes.

ZeroTurnaround OÜ © 2010. All rights reserved.

As you can, see Maven and Ant are used almost equally and some of the respondents use both. Clearly both of them are useful in some way. Tools like Gradle, Ivy and SBT were

Page 3: JAVA EE Productiv JAVA EE Productivity Report - ZeroTurnaround

Which Java IDE is the most popular?

The IDE results show a much wider distribution of preferences:

In terms of user base, Eclipse has emerged here as the clear leader, with only onerespondents using IntelliJ IDEA (#2) and Netbeansseparately and not doing the same for other Eclipse distributions like RAD was not the best idea, that's something we'll do better next year. It is interesting that accordchart Oracle's [ex]-flagship IDE, JDevindependent player MyEclipse.

ZeroTurnaround OÜ © 2010. All rights reserved

Which Java IDE is the most popular?

a much wider distribution of preferences:

In terms of user base, Eclipse has emerged here as the clear leader, with only onerespondents using IntelliJ IDEA (#2) and Netbeans (#3). Perhaps including MyEclipse separately and not doing the same for other Eclipse distributions like RAD was not the best idea, that's something we'll do better next year. It is interesting that according to this

flagship IDE, JDeveloper, is even more marginal than the small

ZeroTurnaround OÜ © 2010. All rights reserved.

In terms of user base, Eclipse has emerged here as the clear leader, with only one-third of (#3). Perhaps including MyEclipse

separately and not doing the same for other Eclipse distributions like RAD was not the best ing to this

eloper, is even more marginal than the small

Page 4: JAVA EE Productiv JAVA EE Productivity Report - ZeroTurnaround

Servers & Frameworks – Who are the popular kids at school?

Which Java Containers / App Servers are used the most?

Compared to the last year’s chartalso see that Jetty and Tomcat have a bigger share than last year, while Glassfishbit. The results from these 1000+ developers shows tWebSphere have lost a total of 8% of the market to the open source containers compared to last year.

We asked people to choose only one primary container in this companies several containers are in use. Since we were interested first of all, in what container do people spend most of their time in development it just made more sense to phrase it like that. So don't make any assumptions deployment, but it's a good estimate for the situation in development.

ZeroTurnaround OÜ © 2010. All rights reserved

Who are the popular kids at school?

Which Java Containers / App Servers are used the most?

last year’s chartiv we see % gains for the open source containers. We can also see that Jetty and Tomcat have a bigger share than last year, while Glassfishbit. The results from these 1000+ developers shows that Oracle WebLogic and IBM

phere have lost a total of 8% of the market to the open source containers compared to

We asked people to choose only one primary container in this question, even thoughcompanies several containers are in use. Since we were interested first of all, in what container do people spend most of their time in development it just made more sense to phrase it like that. So don't make any assumptions as to how this applies to the production deployment, but it's a good estimate for the situation in development.

ZeroTurnaround OÜ © 2010. All rights reserved.

Who are the popular kids at school?

we see % gains for the open source containers. We can also see that Jetty and Tomcat have a bigger share than last year, while Glassfish is sliding a

hat Oracle WebLogic and IBM phere have lost a total of 8% of the market to the open source containers compared to

even though in many companies several containers are in use. Since we were interested first of all, in what container do people spend most of their time in development it just made more sense to

as to how this applies to the production

Page 5: JAVA EE Productiv JAVA EE Productivity Report - ZeroTurnaround

What Java EE standards are used the most?

As far as Java EE standards are concerned we have the following picture:

Here the market penetration is more important than the comparison aspect. JPA is used almost as much as the venerable JSP, with 37% of market penetration. EJB versions altogether have 39%, which would make them the most popular standard, but there's likely some overlap between EJB2 and EJB3 users, so the actual total is likely a bit smaller. Upcoming CDI standard has gained 6% so far, will be very interesting to see how much this will change next year. We'll cover JSF in the next section.

ZeroTurnaround OÜ © 2010. All rights reserved

What Java EE standards are used the most?

As far as Java EE standards are concerned we have the following picture:

penetration is more important than the comparison aspect. JPA is used almost as much as the venerable JSP, with 37% of market penetration. EJB versions altogether have 39%, which would make them the most popular standard, but there's likely

tween EJB2 and EJB3 users, so the actual total is likely a bit smaller. Upcoming CDI standard has gained 6% so far, will be very interesting to see how much this will change next year. We'll cover JSF in the next section.

ZeroTurnaround OÜ © 2010. All rights reserved.

penetration is more important than the comparison aspect. JPA is used almost as much as the venerable JSP, with 37% of market penetration. EJB versions altogether have 39%, which would make them the most popular standard, but there's likely

tween EJB2 and EJB3 users, so the actual total is likely a bit smaller. Up-and-coming CDI standard has gained 6% so far, will be very interesting to see how much this will

Page 6: JAVA EE Productiv JAVA EE Productivity Report - ZeroTurnaround

Which Java Framework is most prevalent?

Let's take a look at the framework chart:

Spring and Hibernate are by far the most popular and in fact are still used more than standards. However, as far as web frameworks go, JSF looks like a popular choice with 24% of answers.

Unfortunately, we haven’t separated Spring MVC from Spring, but we assume (interpret this as you must) that it is at least as popular as JSF. The rest of the frameworks hold a share of 10% or less (GWT is barely over that and is the third most popular).

The third most popular framework in our survey was GWT, followed closely by Struts 1. We asked Matt Raiblev if these results alignepresentation Comparing JVM Web Frameworks presentation from Devoxxwhat he had to say:

"It's surprising to see that framework popularity closely aligns with the JVM Web Framework Matrix results I calculated at Devoxx. I had Spring MVC and GWT listed as the top JVM Frameworks, along with Ruby on Rails (running on JRuby of course).

ZeroTurnaround OÜ © 2010. All rights reserved

rk is most prevalent?

Let's take a look at the framework chart:

the most popular and in fact are still used more than standards. However, as far as web frameworks go, JSF looks like a popular choice with 24%

fortunately, we haven’t separated Spring MVC from Spring, but we assume (interpret this as you must) that it is at least as popular as JSF. The rest of the frameworks hold a share of 10% or less (GWT is barely over that and is the third most popular).

most popular framework in our survey was GWT, followed closely by Struts 1. We if these results aligned with his recent controversial

Comparing JVM Web Frameworks presentation from Devoxx 2010

"It's surprising to see that framework popularity closely aligns with the JVM Web Framework Matrix results I calculated at Devoxx. I had Spring MVC and GWT listed as the top JVM Frameworks, along with Ruby on Rails (running on JRuby of course).

ZeroTurnaround OÜ © 2010. All rights reserved.

the most popular and in fact are still used more than standards. However, as far as web frameworks go, JSF looks like a popular choice with 24%

fortunately, we haven’t separated Spring MVC from Spring, but we assume (interpret this as you must) that it is at least as popular as JSF. The rest of the frameworks hold a share of 10%

most popular framework in our survey was GWT, followed closely by Struts 1. We

2010vi and here's

"It's surprising to see that framework popularity closely aligns with the JVM Web Framework Matrix results I calculated at Devoxx. I had Spring MVC and GWT listed as the top JVM Frameworks, along with Ruby on Rails (running on JRuby of course).

Page 7: JAVA EE Productiv JAVA EE Productivity Report - ZeroTurnaround

"While this matrix was the result ofdecent technique for choosing a web framework to use. Of course, the way to choose a web framework is to pick a few you like, prototsatisfies your needs to best.

"More than anything, make sure the developers on your team like developing with it, as that's likely to be key in their productivity using it.

"I'm surprised to see so many folks using JSF, but I do understand why many companies choose it because it's such a "safe" choice as a standard. In fact, you could say that Struts 1 and Spring are pseudo

However, just because frameworks aruse them. There's other great componentTapestry come to mind) that are easier to use than JSF."

"I think the biggest thing that componentREST support. I think more and more components are being developed on the client (with frameworks like jQuery, ExtJS and SproutCore) and web frameworks should try to embrace that. I especially like frameworks that allow emitting JSON and HTMsame classes. This allows for easy web page and API development at the same time."

ZeroTurnaround OÜ © 2010. All rights reserved

matrix was the result of much controversyvii, I think it gives developers a decent technique for choosing a web framework to use. Of course, the way to choose a

to pick a few you like, prototype with them and see which one satisfies your needs to best.

"More than anything, make sure the developers on your team like developing with it, as that's likely to be key in their productivity using it.

e so many folks using JSF, but I do understand why many companies choose it because it's such a "safe" choice as a standard. In fact, you could

Struts 1 and Spring are pseudo-standards based on their popularity.

However, just because frameworks are popular doesn't mean you should automatically use them. There's other great component-based frameworks in Java (GWT, Wicket and Tapestry come to mind) that are easier to use than JSF."

"I think the biggest thing that component-based frameworks need to woREST support. I think more and more components are being developed on the client (with frameworks like jQuery, ExtJS and SproutCore) and web frameworks should try to embrace that. I especially like frameworks that allow emitting JSON and HTMsame classes. This allows for easy web page and API development at the same time."

ZeroTurnaround OÜ © 2010. All rights reserved.

, I think it gives developers a decent technique for choosing a web framework to use. Of course, the way to choose a

ype with them and see which one

"More than anything, make sure the developers on your team like developing with it, as

e so many folks using JSF, but I do understand why many companies choose it because it's such a "safe" choice as a standard. In fact, you could

standards based on their popularity.

e popular doesn't mean you should automatically based frameworks in Java (GWT, Wicket and

based frameworks need to work on is their REST support. I think more and more components are being developed on the client (with frameworks like jQuery, ExtJS and SproutCore) and web frameworks should try to embrace that. I especially like frameworks that allow emitting JSON and HTML from the same classes. This allows for easy web page and API development at the same time."

Page 8: JAVA EE Productiv JAVA EE Productivity Report - ZeroTurnaround

Turnaround Time - How different J2EE environments compare

This year we asked questions about the time it takes to redeploy the application and number redeploys per hour. We also asked those who don't have to redeploy to commenthappens. We specifically asked everyone to provide the answerswere glad to see the development in this area since last year:

• "I wait till I have enough changes to warrant a redeploy" like this, it's definitely one of the ways around the problem, but it can lead to a very artificial way of coding with little incremental feedback.

• "We use tests (unit tests, integraespecially if you are not doing UI), it's a great way to both avoid redeploys and ensure that the delivered system is stable and correct. Kudos to those who do this!

• "We use Eclipse/Sysdeo/Intellij IDEA/etquickly this is a great way to improve turnaround, by making the IDE republish changes every time they occur. Unfortunately for bigger applications it saves clicks, but not minutes.

• "We use HotSwap/Eclipse Debugmechanism is a great way to make small changes, but limited only to method bodies. Also, if you can't use exploded deployment, you still have to redeploy for any change in JSP/HTML/etc.

• "We use OSGi" -- only a couple of answers like that, but in a well designed OSGi application redeploy can be very quick, as only the changed bundle needs to be reinitialized.

• "We use Grails, Play! or Tapestry 5" that these extremely productive frameworks are being used.

• "We use JRebel" -- the most popular answer, but norespondents were JRebel users :)

We originally did not include a “30sec” answer to the question “How long does take to redeploy your application?” However, we have since received a few comments about that, and fixed it halfway through the responses. To compensate for that, we will use a “48sec” (0.8 minfor the “1 minute” answer.

ZeroTurnaround OÜ © 2010. All rights reserved

How different J2EE environments compare

This year we asked questions about the time it takes to redeploy the application and number redeploys per hour. We also asked those who don't have to redeploy to commenthappens. We specifically asked everyone to provide the answers without using JRebelwere glad to see the development in this area since last year:

I have enough changes to warrant a redeploy" -- we've got a few comments like this, it's definitely one of the ways around the problem, but it can lead to a very artificial way of coding with little incremental feedback. "We use tests (unit tests, integration tests, etc)" -- if you have enough tests (and especially if you are not doing UI), it's a great way to both avoid redeploys and ensure that the delivered system is stable and correct. Kudos to those who do this!"We use Eclipse/Sysdeo/Intellij IDEA/etc HotDeploy" -- for applications that deploy quickly this is a great way to improve turnaround, by making the IDE republish changes every time they occur. Unfortunately for bigger applications it saves clicks, but not

"We use HotSwap/Eclipse Debugger Session/etc" -- The built-in class replace mechanism is a great way to make small changes, but limited only to method bodies. Also, if you can't use exploded deployment, you still have to redeploy for any change in

couple of answers like that, but in a well designed OSGi application redeploy can be very quick, as only the changed bundle needs to be

Tapestry 5" -- a few answers for each of those, great to see that these extremely productive frameworks are being used.

the most popular answer, but not surprising considering that 28% respondents were JRebel users :)

id not include a “30sec” answer to the question “How long does take to redeploy your application?” However, we have since received a few comments about that, and fixed it halfway through the responses. To compensate for that, we will use a “48sec” (0.8 min

ZeroTurnaround OÜ © 2010. All rights reserved.

How different J2EE environments compare

This year we asked questions about the time it takes to redeploy the application and number of redeploys per hour. We also asked those who don't have to redeploy to comment on why this

without using JRebel. We

we've got a few comments like this, it's definitely one of the ways around the problem, but it can lead to a very

if you have enough tests (and especially if you are not doing UI), it's a great way to both avoid redeploys and ensure that the delivered system is stable and correct. Kudos to those who do this!

for applications that deploy quickly this is a great way to improve turnaround, by making the IDE republish changes every time they occur. Unfortunately for bigger applications it saves clicks, but not

in class replace mechanism is a great way to make small changes, but limited only to method bodies. Also, if you can't use exploded deployment, you still have to redeploy for any change in

couple of answers like that, but in a well designed OSGi application redeploy can be very quick, as only the changed bundle needs to be

a few answers for each of those, great to see

t surprising considering that 28% of

id not include a “30sec” answer to the question “How long does take to redeploy your application?” However, we have since received a few comments about that, and fixed it halfway through the responses. To compensate for that, we will use a “48sec” (0.8 min) value

Page 9: JAVA EE Productiv JAVA EE Productivity Report - ZeroTurnaround

How long does it take to restart your container and redeploy your app?

This was the first question we asked. The answers are distributed below:

We didn't ask with such accuracy last year, which makes it trends have stayed the same. The average redeploy time isdeviation is 2.8, which means that the redeploy time varies greatly.

It can be noted that a statistically significant segment of resdevelopers) responded that it takes

ZeroTurnaround OÜ © 2010. All rights reserved

How long does it take to restart your container and redeploy your app?

This was the first question we asked. The answers are distributed below:

We didn't ask with such accuracy last year, which makes it harder to compare, but it seems the The average redeploy time is 3.1 minutes, but the standard

, which means that the redeploy time varies greatly.

It can be noted that a statistically significant segment of respondents (just over 1 in every 10 takes over 10 minutes to fully redeploy.

ZeroTurnaround OÜ © 2010. All rights reserved.

How long does it take to restart your container and redeploy your app?

harder to compare, but it seems the , but the standard

pondents (just over 1 in every 10

Page 10: JAVA EE Productiv JAVA EE Productivity Report - ZeroTurnaround

In an hour of coding, how many times do you redeploy?

The average frequency is 4 times an hour

With these two questions answered, we can make a reliable estimate for the total time spent redeploying in an hour. We began by removing those who don't redeploy at all and those that reported redeploying more than 60 minutes an hour (ummm….

ZeroTurnaround OÜ © 2010. All rights reserved

In an hour of coding, how many times do you redeploy?

4 times an hour with the standard deviation of 3.2

these two questions answered, we can make a reliable estimate for the total time spent redeploying in an hour. We began by removing those who don't redeploy at all and those that

than 60 minutes an hour (ummm….what?)

ZeroTurnaround OÜ © 2010. All rights reserved.

3.2.

these two questions answered, we can make a reliable estimate for the total time spent redeploying in an hour. We began by removing those who don't redeploy at all and those that

Page 11: JAVA EE Productiv JAVA EE Productivity Report - ZeroTurnaround

How much time per hour do you spend redeploying?

The average respondent spends aboutdeviation of 9.8. This is about 17.5%day as "coding time", and assume 4 weeks out of each year are vacation time, then on average 5.3 full, 40-hour workweeks per year are spent exclusively r

ZeroTurnaround OÜ © 2010. All rights reserved

How much time per hour do you spend redeploying?

verage respondent spends about 10.5 minutes an hour redeploying with a standard 17.5% of total coding time. If you consider 5 hours out of each

day as "coding time", and assume 4 weeks out of each year are vacation time, then on hour workweeks per year are spent exclusively redeploying and restarting.

ZeroTurnaround OÜ © 2010. All rights reserved.

redeploying with a standard If you consider 5 hours out of each

day as "coding time", and assume 4 weeks out of each year are vacation time, then on edeploying and restarting.

Page 12: JAVA EE Productiv JAVA EE Productivity Report - ZeroTurnaround

Redeploy time per Java EE Container (as

Finally, we can also see how the choice of container correlates to the time spent redeploying. Note: This doesn't mean that bigger containers are that much slower, rather bigger apps influence the choice of container:

Not many changes from last year here, although it's nice to see the improvements in Glassfish v3.

ZeroTurnaround OÜ © 2010. All rights reserved

Redeploy time per Java EE Container (as a % of overall coding time)

Finally, we can also see how the choice of container correlates to the time spent redeploying. doesn't mean that bigger containers are that much slower, rather bigger apps

Not many changes from last year here, although it's nice to see the improvements in Glassfish

ZeroTurnaround OÜ © 2010. All rights reserved.

Finally, we can also see how the choice of container correlates to the time spent redeploying. doesn't mean that bigger containers are that much slower, rather bigger apps

Not many changes from last year here, although it's nice to see the improvements in Glassfish

Page 13: JAVA EE Productiv JAVA EE Productivity Report - ZeroTurnaround

Conclusions?

Interpreting data is always a hard and dangerous task. A sample of 1027 developers is reasonably large. But some bias is possible, as to answer.

The data gives a fair overview of what the Java development ecosystem looks like. Probably the most interesting thing is that, despite what some say, the world of open source and commercial software manage to coexist quite well.

Of course with companies like JBoss and SpringSource it's becoming increasingly difficult to distinguish the two, but commercial interestsSonatype backing Maven). It will beupcoming years:

• Whether it will be the vendorwill find the most use.

• How much the Open Core will be adopted by projects like Jetty, Tomcat and GlassFand their commercial backers.

• Will the closed-source containers and tools survive in the ecosystem? Will their role diminish or increase?

Come back next year, let's see what happens!

ZeroTurnaround OÜ © 2010. All rights reserved

Interpreting data is always a hard and dangerous task. A sample of 1027 developers is reasonably large. But some bias is possible, as it's likely the more active developers bothered

The data gives a fair overview of what the Java development ecosystem looks like. Probably the most interesting thing is that, despite what some say, the world of open source and

e manage to coexist quite well.

Of course with companies like JBoss and SpringSource it's becoming increasingly difficult to e two, but commercial interests are present on every single graph (if you include

Sonatype backing Maven). It will be interesting to see how this balance develops in the

Whether it will be the vendor-backed standards or community-backed frameworks that

How much the Open Core will be adopted by projects like Jetty, Tomcat and GlassFand their commercial backers.

source containers and tools survive in the ecosystem? Will their role

Come back next year, let's see what happens!

ZeroTurnaround OÜ © 2010. All rights reserved.

Interpreting data is always a hard and dangerous task. A sample of 1027 developers is it's likely the more active developers bothered

The data gives a fair overview of what the Java development ecosystem looks like. Probably the most interesting thing is that, despite what some say, the world of open source and

Of course with companies like JBoss and SpringSource it's becoming increasingly difficult to are present on every single graph (if you include

interesting to see how this balance develops in the

backed frameworks that

How much the Open Core will be adopted by projects like Jetty, Tomcat and GlassFish

source containers and tools survive in the ecosystem? Will their role

Page 14: JAVA EE Productiv JAVA EE Productivity Report - ZeroTurnaround

Footnotes and URLs i http://www.zeroturnaround.com/blog/java

ii http://www.zeroturnaround.com/survey2010/

iii http://www.zeroturnaround.com/docs/java_ee_productivity_report_2011_rawdata.zip

iv http://www.zeroturnaround.com/blog/java

v http://raibledesigns.com/

vi http://raibledesigns.com/rd/entry/my_comparing_jvm_web_frameworks

vii http://raibledesigns.com/rd/entry/how_i_calculated_ratings_fo

ZeroTurnaround OÜ © 2010. All rights reserved

http://www.zeroturnaround.com/blog/java-ee-container-redeploy-restart-turnaround-report/

http://www.zeroturnaround.com/survey2010/

http://www.zeroturnaround.com/docs/java_ee_productivity_report_2011_rawdata.zip

http://www.zeroturnaround.com/blog/java-ee-container-redeploy-restart-turnaround-report/

http://raibledesigns.com/rd/entry/my_comparing_jvm_web_frameworks

http://raibledesigns.com/rd/entry/how_i_calculated_ratings_for

ZeroTurnaround OÜ © 2010. All rights reserved.

report/