6
AASCIT Journal of Health 2015; 2(4): 26-31 Published online July 20, 2015 (http://www.aascit.org/journal/health) Keywords Intestinal Parasites, Nematodes, Trematodes, Cestodes, Protozoans, Acanthocephalans, Schilbe mystus Received: June 30, 2015 Revised: July 10, 2015 Accepted: July 11, 2015 Isolation of Intestinal Parasites of Schilbe mystus from the Mid Cross River Flood System Southeastern Nigeria Uneke Bilikis Iyabo, Egboruche Joy Dept of Applied Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Ebonyi State University, Abakaliki, Ebonyi State, Nigeria Email address [email protected] (U. B. Iyabo), [email protected] (U. B. Iyabo) Citation Uneke Bilikis Iyabo, Egboruche Joy. Isolation of Intestinal Parasites of Schilbe mystus from the Mid Cross River Flood System Southeastern Nigeria. AASCIT Journal of Health. Vol. 2, No. 4, 2015, pp. 26-31. Abstract A survey of Schilbe mystus of the mid Cross River flood system was conducted between August and October, 2014 to determine the presence of parasitic infection in S. mystus. The fish were collected with gill nets, hook and line. Seventy five out of the one hundred fish examined were infected (75.0%) with parasites. The end oparasites recovered were mostly nematodes, trematodes, cestodes, protozoa and acanthocephalans. Numerical abundance of parasites showed that a total of 128 species of end oparasites occurred in the fish examined. Nematodes had 33.6% (43/128), trematodes 11.7% (15/128), cestodes 24.2% (31/128), protozoa 12.5% (16/128) and acanthocephalan 18.0% (23/128). The prevalence of end oparasites of the fish showed that parasites were most prevalent in fishes with length Class 14.1-16 cm TL with 67.2% while class 21.1-22cm had the least prevalence (1.60%). This weight graph showed that those within the range of 11-15(g) had the highest prevalence rate (30.6%) while those within the range of 36-40(g) had the least of prevalence (2.76%). Sex wise distribution of parasites amongst the study population showed that female fish were more infected than male fishes. Fishes from the river system should be properly cooked or smoked before consumption to avoid health risk due to ingestion of the parasites. 1. Introduction Most fish carry pathogens and parasites. Usually this is at some cost to the fish. If the cost is sufficiently high, then the impacts can be characterized as a disease (Idodo-Umeh, 2003). All of the major groups of animal parasites are found in fish, and apparently healthy wild fish often carry heavy parasite burdens. Parasites with direct life cycles can be important pathogens of cultured fish; parasites with indirect life cycles frequently use fish as intermediate hosts. Knowledge of specific fish hosts greatly facilitates identification of parasites with marked host and tissue specificity, while others are recognized because of their common occurrence and lack of host specificity. Examination of fresh smears that contain living parasites is often diagnostic. Like humans and other animals, fish suffer from diseases and parasites. Fish defenses against disease are specific and non-specific. Non-specific defenses include skin and scales, as well as the mucus layer secreted by the epidermis that traps microorganisms and inhibits their growth. If pathogens breach these defenses, fish can develop inflammatory responses that increase the flow of blood to infected areas and deliver white blood cells that attempt to destroy the pathogens. Specific defenses are specialized responses to particular pathogens recognized by the fish's body,

Isolation of Intestinal Parasites of Schilbe mystus from the Mid …article.aascit.org/file/pdf/9720726.pdf · Trematodes, Cestodes, Protozoans, Acanthocephalans, Schilbe mystus fish

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    9

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Isolation of Intestinal Parasites of Schilbe mystus from the Mid …article.aascit.org/file/pdf/9720726.pdf · Trematodes, Cestodes, Protozoans, Acanthocephalans, Schilbe mystus fish

AASCIT Journal of Health

2015; 2(4): 26-31

Published online July 20, 2015 (http://www.aascit.org/journal/health)

Keywords Intestinal Parasites,

Nematodes,

Trematodes,

Cestodes,

Protozoans,

Acanthocephalans,

Schilbe mystus

Received: June 30, 2015

Revised: July 10, 2015

Accepted: July 11, 2015

Isolation of Intestinal Parasites of Schilbe mystus from the Mid Cross River Flood System Southeastern Nigeria

Uneke Bilikis Iyabo, Egboruche Joy

Dept of Applied Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Ebonyi State University, Abakaliki,

Ebonyi State, Nigeria

Email address [email protected] (U. B. Iyabo), [email protected] (U. B. Iyabo)

Citation Uneke Bilikis Iyabo, Egboruche Joy. Isolation of Intestinal Parasites of Schilbe mystus from the

Mid Cross River Flood System Southeastern Nigeria. AASCIT Journal of Health.

Vol. 2, No. 4, 2015, pp. 26-31.

Abstract A survey of Schilbe mystus of the mid Cross River flood system was conducted between

August and October, 2014 to determine the presence of parasitic infection in S. mystus.

The fish were collected with gill nets, hook and line. Seventy five out of the one hundred

fish examined were infected (75.0%) with parasites. The end oparasites recovered were

mostly nematodes, trematodes, cestodes, protozoa and acanthocephalans. Numerical

abundance of parasites showed that a total of 128 species of end oparasites occurred in

the fish examined. Nematodes had 33.6% (43/128), trematodes 11.7% (15/128),

cestodes 24.2% (31/128), protozoa 12.5% (16/128) and acanthocephalan 18.0%

(23/128). The prevalence of end oparasites of the fish showed that parasites were most

prevalent in fishes with length Class 14.1-16 cm TL with 67.2% while class 21.1-22cm

had the least prevalence (1.60%). This weight graph showed that those within the range

of 11-15(g) had the highest prevalence rate (30.6%) while those within the range of

36-40(g) had the least of prevalence (2.76%). Sex wise distribution of parasites amongst

the study population showed that female fish were more infected than male fishes.

Fishes from the river system should be properly cooked or smoked before consumption

to avoid health risk due to ingestion of the parasites.

1. Introduction

Most fish carry pathogens and parasites. Usually this is at some cost to the fish. If the

cost is sufficiently high, then the impacts can be characterized as a disease (Idodo-Umeh,

2003). All of the major groups of animal parasites are found in fish, and apparently healthy

wild fish often carry heavy parasite burdens. Parasites with direct life cycles can be

important pathogens of cultured fish; parasites with indirect life cycles frequently use fish

as intermediate hosts. Knowledge of specific fish hosts greatly facilitates identification of

parasites with marked host and tissue specificity, while others are recognized because of

their common occurrence and lack of host specificity. Examination of fresh smears that

contain living parasites is often diagnostic. Like humans and other animals, fish suffer

from diseases and parasites. Fish defenses against disease are specific and non-specific.

Non-specific defenses include skin and scales, as well as the mucus layer secreted by the

epidermis that traps microorganisms and inhibits their growth. If pathogens breach these

defenses, fish can develop inflammatory responses that increase the flow of blood to

infected areas and deliver white blood cells that attempt to destroy the pathogens. Specific

defenses are specialized responses to particular pathogens recognized by the fish's body,

Page 2: Isolation of Intestinal Parasites of Schilbe mystus from the Mid …article.aascit.org/file/pdf/9720726.pdf · Trematodes, Cestodes, Protozoans, Acanthocephalans, Schilbe mystus fish

27 Uneke Bilikis Iyabo and Egboruche Joy: Isolation of Intestinal Parasites of Schilbe mystus from the Mid Cross River

Flood System Southeastern Nigeria

which is adaptative immune responses (Okaka, 1991). In

recent years, vaccines have become widely used in

aquaculture and ornamental fish, for example vaccines for

furunculosis in farmed salmon and koi herpes virus in koi

(Okaka, 1991). The most common parasites of fish are

protozoa. These include species found on external surfaces

and species found in specific organs. Most protozoa have

direct life cycles, but the myxosporidia require an

invertebrate intermediate host. Parasites in fish are a natural

occurrence and common. Parasites can provide information

about host population ecology. In fisheries biology, for

example, parasite communities can be used to distinguish

distinct populations of the same fish species co-inhabiting a

region. Additionally, parasites possess a variety of

specialized traits and life-history strategies that enable them

to colonize hosts. Understanding these aspects of parasite

ecology, of interest in their own right, can illuminate

parasite-avoidance strategies employed by hosts (Okaka,

1998). Usually parasites (and pathogens) need to avoid

killing their hosts, since extinct hosts can mean extinct

parasites. Evolutionary constraints may operate so parasites

avoid killing their hosts, or the natural variability in host

defensive strategies may suffice to keep host populations

viable. Parasite infections can impair the courtship dance of

male three spine sticklebacks. When that happens, the

females reject them, suggesting a strong mechanism for the

selection of parasite resistance (Okaka and Akhigbe, 1999).

However not all parasites want to keep their hosts alive, and

there are parasites with multistage life cycles who go to some

trouble to kill their host. For example, some tapeworms make

some fish behave in such a way that a predatory bird can

catch it. The predatory bird is the next host for the parasite in

the next stage of its life cycle Specifically, the tapeworm

Schistocephalus solidus turns infected three spine

stickleback white, and then makes them more buoyant so that

they splash along at the surface of the water, becoming easy

to see and easy to catch for a passing bird. Other parasitic

disorders includes; Gyrodactylus salaris, Ichthyophthirius

multifiliis, cryptocaryon, velvet disease, Brooklynella

hostilis, Hole in the head, Glugea, Ceratomyxashasta,

Kudoathyrsites, Tetracapsuloides bryosalmonae,

Cymothoaexigua, leeches, nematode, flukes, carp lice and

salmon lice. Some internal fish parasites are spectacular,

such as the philometrid nematode Philometra fasciati which

is parasitic in the ovary of female Blacktip grouper the adult

female parasite is a red worm which can reach up to 40

centimetres in length, for a diameter of only 1.6 millimetre;

the males are tiny. Schilbe mystus and Schilbe intermedius

belongs to family Schilbeidae and is a siluroid catfish of

commercial importance. The schilbeid catfish are salient

components of the ichthyofauna of many freshwater bodies

(Ekanemet al., 2011) and like other catfishes are heavily

exploited. Past work on biology of members of family

Schilbeidae in Nigeria aquatic ecosystems were mainly on

their food and feeding habits and reproduction (Oniyeet al.,

2004; Imam and Dewu, 2010; Awharitowa and Ehigiator,

2012). Thus, this paper seeks to identify the possible

intestinal parasites of Schilbe mystus, determine the various

classes of the parasites observed in the fishes, determine the

frequency distribution of the parasites isolated and access the

parasitic load in relation to sex and fish length of the fish

sample from the mid Cross River flood system, Southeastern

Nigeria.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The study area is the middle course of the Cross River

system located at Ndibe in Afikpo North local government

Area of Ebonyi state. It is about 5km east eastwards away

from Afikpo main town. This part of Cross River system

forms the basic border between Ebonyi state and Cross River

state. Cross River is a major component of the inland waters of

South Eastern Nigeria and its role to the fishery of the area is

quite significant (Okoh et al., 2007). Cross River originates

from Cameroon and flows through Ebonyi State and Cross

River State into the Atlantic Ocean. The river (Fig. 1) (Okoh et

al., 2007) lies in the area between 5057” latitude

5030’20”North and 7

058” longitude 5

030’20” East. The

approximate surface area of the Cross River is 3,900,000 ha

(Ita et al., 1985). The rainy seasonand the dry season are the

two main seasons of the area. The vegetation around the river

is predominately grasses, tall and thin palm trees, and bamboo

plants and elephant grasses unevenly distributed. Hence, the

vegetation and the ecological built of the area attract some

activities such as recreation (escortion, picnic), fishing,

lumbering farming activities as well as sand mining due to the

presence of sand banks. A mini market is located beside the

river where fishes are marketed immediately they are caught.

However, in most cases, fishes are transported to other areas

of Ebonyi state and Cross River state. There is also water

fluctuation in the Cross River system with season which goes

a long way to determine the agricultural activities of the

occupants during each period. During the dry season,

(between November and March), some areas of the river floor

is seen and covered with sand hence fishing activities is

usually hampered and most fishermen would abandon their

fishing activities and change over to sand mining. During the

raining season (April- September), water levels will increase

and reverse the activities of the people.

Page 3: Isolation of Intestinal Parasites of Schilbe mystus from the Mid …article.aascit.org/file/pdf/9720726.pdf · Trematodes, Cestodes, Protozoans, Acanthocephalans, Schilbe mystus fish

AASCIT Journal of Health 2015; 2(4): 26-31 28

Fig. 1. Map of Afikpo North Local Government Area showing the sampling locations in the Cross River basin (Okoh et al., 2007).

2.2. Sample Collection

A total of 100 fish specimen were collected from local

fishermen at the beach site for a period of three months

(August-October, 2014).The fishes used for this study were

caught by local fishermen at Ndibe River of the Cross River

basin using locally available crafts and fishing gears which

include canoes, cast nets, gill nets, hook and lines. The

experimental Africa Butter Catfish species caught were

collected and transported in ice chests to Applied Biology

laboratory of Ebonyi state University, Abakaliki, Southeastern

Nigeria where they were preserved in 10% formalin, to avoid

decay before examination for parasites.

2.3. Laboratory Analysis

In the laboratory, the fishes were sorted out and identified to

species level using key provided by Olaosebikan and Raji

(1998). The standard length (from the snout to the tip of

caudal fin) were measured to 0.1cm and recorded accordingly.

The weight of each fish was measured to the nearest 0.1g on a

top electronic weighing balance. Each fish sample was

assigned a reference. The sexes of the fish were determined

only after dissecting the fishes and noting the presence of

testes or ovaries. The intestines of individual fish were

carefully slit open and were placed in the glass petri dish.

Physiological saline floatation method and microscopy were

employed according to Cheesbrough (2000). The parasites

were identified using guides provided by Paperna (1980).

2.4. Data Analysis

For statistical analysis the student t- test was used to compare

the monthly prevalence of parasites of the African Butter catfish

Page 4: Isolation of Intestinal Parasites of Schilbe mystus from the Mid …article.aascit.org/file/pdf/9720726.pdf · Trematodes, Cestodes, Protozoans, Acanthocephalans, Schilbe mystus fish

29 Uneke Bilikis Iyabo and Egboruche Joy: Isolation of Intestinal Parasites of Schilbe mystus from the Mid Cross River

Flood System Southeastern Nigeria

and the relationship between parasites density-body

weight/body length was determined using chi-square analysis.

3. Results

Seventy five out of the one hundred fish examined from the

mid Cross River system were infected with parasites. The

endoparasites (75.0%) recovered were mostly nematodes,

trematodes, cestodes, protozoa and acanthocephalas.

Numerical abundance of parasites showed that a total of 128

species of endoparasites occurred in the landed fish examined.

Nematodes had 33.6% (43/128), trematodes 11.7% (15/128),

cestodes 24.2% (31/128), protozoa 12.5% (16/128) and

acanthocephalan 18.0% (23/128) (Table 1). Nematodes

43(33.6%) had highest number of abundance while Trematode

15(11.7%) had the least (Table 1). The prevalence of intestinal

parasites in S. mystusin relation to size (standard length)

showed that the length range 14-16cm SL were most infected

(67.2%) while the length range 20-22cm SL were the least

infected (1.6%). the length range 12-14(cm) and 16-18(cm)

had zero occurrence (Table 2). Prevalence rate (30.6%) in

relation to size (weight) revealed that the weight range 11-15g

had the highest prevalence rate while the weight range 35-40g

had the lowest prevalence (2.8) (Table 3). Table 4 shows the

pattern of parasites distribution in relations to sex of S. mystus.

Female samples were 54 in number while male samples were

46. The prevalence percentage of parasites in female fish

was 67.7% while that of male fish was 37.3%.

Table 1. Numerical abundance of endoparasites of S. mystus.

Parasite No. of parasites isolated Percentage (%)

Nematode:

Capillaria sp 8 18.6

Cucullanus barbi 2 4.7

Spinitectus allaeri 6 14.0

Cammallanus sp 10 23.4

Eustrongyloides sp 1 2.3

Dujardinascaris sp 3 7.1

Procamillanus laeviochus 2 4.7

Contracaecium micropapillatum 9 20.9

Anguillicola papernai 1 2.3

Total 43 33.6

Trematode:

Sporocyst of diplomatids 6 4.7

Pygidopsis metacercariae 4 3.1

Furcocercariae of diplomatids 5 3.9

Total 15 11.7

Cestode

Ligula intestinalis 6 4.7

Lystocestos marcusseni 4 3.1

Bothriocephalus acheilognathi 9 7.0

Caryophyllideran cystercoids 3 2.3

Protocephalus cargoproglotis 3 2.3

Monobothroides woodlandi 2 1.5

Amphillina sp 6 4.7

Total 31 24.2

Protozoa

Hexamita sp 9 7.0

Spironucleus sp 1 0.7

Trypasomes sp 6 4.7

Total 16 12.5

Acanthocephalan

Pallentis tetraodontis 8 6.3

Acanthella 6 4.7

Neochinorhynchus cylindratus 7 5.4

Paragorhynchus chariensis 2 1.6

Total 23 18.0

Overall total 128 100

Page 5: Isolation of Intestinal Parasites of Schilbe mystus from the Mid …article.aascit.org/file/pdf/9720726.pdf · Trematodes, Cestodes, Protozoans, Acanthocephalans, Schilbe mystus fish

AASCIT Journal of Health 2015; 2(4): 26-31 30

Table 2. Prevalence of intestinal parasites in relation to size (standard length) of S. mystus.

Standard length (cm) No. of fish examined No. of parasites recovered (%) Prevalence

10-12 19 18 14.1

12-14 0 0 0

14-16 65 86 67.2

16-18 0 0 0

18-20 14 12 9.4

20-22 2 2 1.6

Total 100 128 100

Table 3. Prevalence of intestinal parasites in relation to size (weight) of S. mystus.

Weight (g) No. of fish examined No. of fish infected (%) Prevalence

5-10 3 3 4.0

10-15 25 23 30.7

15-20 20 16 21.3

20-25 18 17 22.7

25-30 9 4 5.3

30-35 11 3 4.00

35- 40 6 2 2.7

41-45 8 7 9.3

Total 100 75 100

Table 4. Prevalence of intestinal parasites in relation to sex of S. mystus.

Months No. sampled No. of male sampled No. (%) of male infected No. of female sampled No. (%) of female infected

August 53 22 11(14.7) 31 28(37.3)

September 20 8 7(9.3) 12 9(12.0)

October 27 16 10(13.3) 11 10(13.3)

Total 100 46 28(37.3) 54 47(67.7)

4. Discussion

This preliminary investigation of the parasitofauna of S.

mystus presents 75.0% infection rate. This is a bit high as

compared to other similar work such as those of Awharitoma

and Okaka (1999) that recorded 60.8% infection rate for

cichlid fishes from Okhuaihe River in Edo State. Others are

Onwuliri and Mgbemena (1987), Umuoeren et al., (1988) who

recorded 60.4% and 53.8% respectively. However Ugwuzor

(1987) obtained a very low prevalence figure (7.7%) in the

fishes examined from Imo River. This shows that parasitic

infection rates vary greatly from one area to another and this

depends on a number of factors which include among other

things, the nature of the water which is reflected in the human

use and the endemicity of infection in the area. A water body

that is being used as a source of drinking water is likely to be a

clean water, while that which serves a collecting basin for all

kinds of waste (mainly organic waste) are usually unclean and

thus capable of harbouring different kinds of organisms

including parasites. Endoparasites recovered include

nematode, cestode, protozoa, trematode and acanthocephala

which was similar to Ekanem et al., (2011) who also reported

that the low infection rate in these fishes could be attributed to

the sanitary condition of the study areas, the location of the

river from living place, number and classes of people visiting

the river and their purposes. In the study nine species of

nematodes were recorded. Nematode parasites have been

reported as having common incidence among freshwater

fishes. Okaka and Omoigberale (2002) recorded nematodes as

the most common parasite, infecting 18.6% of the fish

population: trematodes infecting 13.7%; anthocephalans

infecting 8.8%, and cestodes infecting 17.6% of the total fish

population. Okaka (1998) also reported that nematode

parasites were found to infect most fish species studies at the

Ikpoba River. The number of nematodes (43) isolated in this

study was higher than acanthocephalan (23), trematode (15),

protozoa (16) and cestodes (31). This observation is similar to

Ekanemet al., (2011) and Onyedineke et al., (2010) who

reported higher number of nematodes than other parasites.

According to Ekanem et al., (2011), nematodes are known to

occur in body cavities and subcutaneous tissues. Host

specificity of nematodes agrees with the findings of

Akinsanyaet al., (2007) and Onyedinekeet al., (2010). In the

present study, acanthocephalans were found in the intestine of

fish examined which agrees with the findings of Onyedineke,

et al., (2010); Olurin and Somorin (2006) in fishes from Kainji

Lake and Owa stream respectively. This finding also support

the work of Rosas-Valdez. and de Leon (2011) who reported

that parasites show some level of preference for the host they

Page 6: Isolation of Intestinal Parasites of Schilbe mystus from the Mid …article.aascit.org/file/pdf/9720726.pdf · Trematodes, Cestodes, Protozoans, Acanthocephalans, Schilbe mystus fish

31 Uneke Bilikis Iyabo and Egboruche Joy: Isolation of Intestinal Parasites of Schilbe mystus from the Mid Cross River

Flood System Southeastern Nigeria

parasitize. According to Kabata (1985), Clinostomum

(Acanthocephalans) when ingested with poorly cooked fish is

capable of producing laryngopharyngitis which is an

unpleasant inflammatory condition in man. Comparing the

prevalence of parasites in relation to length classes for all the

species, 14-16cm SL recorded the hightest number of parasites

which disagrees with Ekanem et al., (2011) who reported

highest prevalence for all the species in length class

30-39.9cm SL. This might be attributed to large amount of

food intake by the animals. Sex wise distribution of parasites

amongst the study population showed that female fish were

more infected than male fishes. In conclusion, endoparasites

were recovered in seventy-five fish samples of S. mystus.

Endoparasites recovered include nematode, cestode,

trematode and acanthocephalan. It could be concluded that

fishes of the mid Cross River flood system are infected with

stomach and intestinal parasites that could pose public health

concern to fish consumers who consumes raw or improperly

cooked or smoked fish as popularly consumed. Therefore it is

recommended that fishes from the river system should be

properly cooked or smoked before consumption to avoid

health risk due to some parasites.

References

[1] Idodo-Umeh, G. (2003). Freshwater fishes of Nigeria; Taxonomy, Ecological notes, Diet and Utilization. Idodo-Umeh publishers Limited, Benin City. pp 232.

[2] Okaka, C.E. (1991). A survey into Helminth parasites of fishes of Asariver and its dam at Ilorin, Nigeria. Journal of Experimental and Applied Biology 3: 120-128.

[3] Okaka C.E (1998): Plerocercosis and other helminth infection among fresh water fishes of Osiomo and Benin rivers in Southern Nigeria. Tropical Freshwater Biology 7: 73-80.

[4] Okaka C.E and Akhigbe, J.E (1999) Helminth parasites of some Tropical Freshwater fish from Osse River in Benin, Southern Nigeria. Tropical Freshwater Biology 8: 41-48.

[5] Ekanem A.P, Eyo V.O, and Sampson A.F. (2011). Parasites of landed fish from Great Kwa River, Calabar, Cross River State, Nigeria. International Journal of Fisheries and Aquaculture 3(12): 225-230.

[6] Oniye S.J., Adebote D.A. and Ayanda O.I. (2004). Helminth parasites of Clariasgariepinus in Zaria, Nigeria. J. Aqu. Science 19(2): 71-76.

[7] Imam, T.S. and Dewu, R.A. (2010). Survey of Piscine ecto and intestinal parasites of Clarias spp. sold at Galadima Road Fish Market, Kano Metropolis, Nigeria. J. Biosci. Res. Comms. 22(4): 209-214.

[8] Awharitowa, A.O. and Ehigiator, F.A.R. (2012). Helminth parasites of fishes from some rivers in Southern Nigeria. African Scientist 13(2): 65-69.

[9] Okoh, F. A., Eyo, J. E. and Ezenwaji, H. M. G. (2007). Species composition and abundance of castnet fishery of atropical lotic freshwater ecosystem. Bio-Research 5(1), 201-206.

[10] Ita, E.O., Sado, E.K., Pandogari, J. K. A. and Ibitoye, B. (1985). Inventory survey of Nigerian inland waters and their fishery resources I. A preliminary checklist of inland water bodies in Nigeria with special reference to ponds, lakes, reservoirs and major rivers. Kainji Lake Research Institute Technical Report Series, No. 14, KLRI, New Bussa, 1-51.

[11] Olaosebikan, B.D. and Raji, A. (1998). Field guide to Nigerian freshwater fishes. Federal College of Freshwater Fisheries Technology, New Bussa, Nigeria. 1-106p.

[12] Cheesebrough, M. (2000). District laboratory practice in tropical countries; Part 2. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press 234p.

[13] Paperna, I. (1980). Parasites, infections and diseases of fish in Africa. Food and Agricultural Organization. C.I.F.A. Technical Paper 7: 2l6.

[14] Awharitoma, A.O and Okaka, C.E. (1999). Observation on the cichlid fishes in Ikpobariver and their parasitic infection. The Nigerian Journal of Parasitology 20: 129-137.

[15] Onwuliri, C.O.E. and Mgbemena, M.O. (1987). The Parasitic fauna of some freshwater fish from Jos Plateau, Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Applied Fisheries Hydrobiology 2:33-37.

[16] Ugwuzor, G.A. (1987). A survey of the helminthic parasites offish in Imo River. Nigerian Journal of Applied Fisheries and Hydrobiology 2: 25-30.

[17] Okaka, C.E, and Omoigberale, O.M (2002). Parasites of fishes of Okhuaihe River Edo State. African Scientist 3(1): 1-2.

[18] Onyedineke N.E, Obi .U, Ofoegbu P.u. and Okogo I. (2010). Helminth parasites of some fresh water fish from River Niger at llushi, Edo State, Nig. J. Ani. Sci. 6(3): 11-15.

[19] Akinsanya, B., Otubanjo O.A, and Ibidapo, C.A. (2007) HelminthBioload of Chrysichthysnigrodigitatus from Lekki Lagoon Lagos, Nigeria. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 7: 83-87.

[20] Olurin K.B, and Somorin C.A.( 2006). Intestinal helminths of the fishes of Owa Stream, South-west Nigeria. Research Journal of Fisheries and Hydrobiology 1(1): 6-9.

[21] Rosas-Valdez, R. and de Leon, G. (2011). Patterns of host specificity among helminth parasite fauna of freshwater Siluriformes: testing the biogeographical core parasite fauna hypothesis. Journal of Parasitology 97 (2): 361-363.

[22] Kabata Z. (1995). Parasite and diseases of fish cultured in the tropics. Appl. J. of Hydrobiology 9(3): 45-67.