Upload
birch
View
20
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Introduction to Sellars and Quine. Pete Mandik Chairman, Department of Philosophy Coordinator, Cognitive Science Laboratory William Paterson University, New Jersey USA. Two Giants. Wilfrid Sellars 1912-1989 Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind (1956) Willard van Orman Quine 1908-2000 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Introduction to Sellars and Quine
Pete MandikChairman, Department of PhilosophyCoordinator, Cognitive Science LaboratoryWilliam Paterson University, New Jersey USA
2
Two Giants
Wilfrid Sellars1912-1989Empiricism and the
Philosophy of Mind (1956)
Willard van Orman Quine
1908-2000Word and Object (1960)
3
Sellars and Quine vs. PositivismBoth revolutionized analytic philosophy
by opposing Logical Positivism aka Logical Empiricism
4
Logical Positivism
“…restated the foundationalist epistemology of British empiricism…” (EPM p.2)
Verifiability Principle- All truths are either analytic (logical tautologies) or synthetic (knowable through sensory perception)
Sense Datum Theory- Everything known by the senses is reducible to constructions of sense data
5
Quine
Attacked the Verifiability Principle by attacking the Analytic/synthetic distinction
6
Sellars
Attacked Sense Datum Theory by attacking the “Myth of the Given” and the “bad philosophical habit which the British empiricists took over from Descartes--the habit of asking whether the mind ever succeeds in making unmediated contact with [the] world, and remaining skeptical about the status of knowledge-claims until such contact can be shown to exist” (EPM p. 9)
7
Sellars and the Myth
“Intuitions without concepts are blind.” (EPM p. 3)
“All awareness…is a linguistic affair” (EPM p. 4)
“Locke, Berkeley, and Hume were wrong in thinking that we are ‘aware…simply by having sensations and images’.” (ibid.)
“in characterizing an episode or a state as that of knowing, we are not giving an empirical desription of that episode or state; we are placing it in the logical space of reasons, of justifying and being able to justify what one says” (ibid.)
8
THE END