Upload
trannhi
View
228
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ICSCE4, Cambridge, Sept. 2008 Institut Néel - CNRS htt p://neel.cnrs.fr/ 1
Introduction to Bose – Einstein condensation of microcavity polaritons
Le Si Dang
T = 20 K
N < N0 N0 N > N0
J. Kasprzak et al., 2006
ICSCE4, Cambridge, Sept. 2008 Institut Néel - CNRS htt p://neel.cnrs.fr/ 2
Introduction to Bose – Einstein condensation of microcavity polaritons
Le Si Dang
T = 20 K
N < N0 N0 N > N0
J. Kasprzak et al., 2006
Polaritons
Rb atoms
M.H. Anderson et al. 1995
Rb
mpolariton ~ 10 – 9 mRb
ICSCE4, Cambridge, Sept. 2008 Institut Néel - CNRS htt p://neel.cnrs.fr/ 3
Microcavity polaritons
Polariton BEC
Why not photon lasing?
Outline
ICSCE4, Cambridge, Sept. 2008 Institut Néel - CNRS htt p://neel.cnrs.fr/ 4
Microcavity polaritons
Photons in cavity
Excitons
In QW
Phonons Carriers
Mirror leakage R < 100%
Polaritons = Mixed (exciton – photon)
Strong (exciton – photon) coupling if >
QW ~ 10 nm
Optical cavity ~ 1 µm
HRmirror
Exciton → Photon → Exciton → Photon …
ICSCE4, Cambridge, Sept. 2008 Institut Néel - CNRS htt p://neel.cnrs.fr/ 5
Microcavity polaritons
QW ~ 10 nm
Optical cavity ~ 1 µm
HRmirror
-0,10 -0,05 0,00 0,05 0,10-20
0
20
40
exciton
cavity photon
In-plane wave vector k// (106cm-1)
Ene
rgy
(m
eV)
1730
1710
1690
1670
Ene
rgy
(meV
)
In-plane dispersion
Polaritons = Mixed (exciton – photon)
ICSCE4, Cambridge, Sept. 2008 Institut Néel - CNRS htt p://neel.cnrs.fr/ 6
Microcavity polaritons
QW ~ 10 nm
Optical cavity ~ 1 µm
HRmirror
Polaritons = Mixed (exciton – photon)
-0,10 -0,05 0,00 0,05 0,10-20
0
20
40
ΩRabi
lowerpolariton
upperpolariton
In-plane wave vector k// (106cm-1)
Ene
rgy
(m
eV)
1730
1710
1690
1670
Ene
rgy
(meV
)
In-plane dispersion
ICSCE4, Cambridge, Sept. 2008 Institut Néel - CNRS htt p://neel.cnrs.fr/ 7
-0,10 -0,05 0,00 0,05 0,10-20
0
20
40
lowerpolariton
upperpolariton
In-plane wave vector k// (106cm-1)
Ene
rgy
(m
eV)
1730
1710
1690
1670
Ene
rgy
(meV
)
In-plane dispersion
Parabolic well
mpol ~ 10– 5me
pol
2//
2
//m2
k)k(E
h=
BEC temperature ∝ 1 / mass
Polariton condensation at RT!
Microcavity polaritons
ICSCE4, Cambridge, Sept. 2008 Institut Néel - CNRS htt p://neel.cnrs.fr/ 8
-0,10 -0,05 0,00 0,05 0,10-20
0
20
40
lowerpolariton
upperpolariton
In-plane wave vector k// (106cm-1)
Ene
rgy
(m
eV)
1730
1710
1690
1670
Ene
rgy
(meV
)
In-plane dispersionpump
Injection of hot e-h pairs
Relaxation
Exciton reservoir
Microcavity polaritons
X – X scattering
Phonon scattering
N0 ~ 1
Stimulated scatterings
Massive occupation of ground state
How to observe microcavity polaritons?
ICSCE4, Cambridge, Sept. 2008 Institut Néel - CNRS htt p://neel.cnrs.fr/ 9
How to observe microcavity polaritons?
Microcavity polaritons
Microcavity emission measured as a function of emission angle
Polariton distribution in LPB
Polaritons → Photons
Conservation of E and k//
Microcavity emission (θ, φ) = Polaritons (k//)
ICSCE4, Cambridge, Sept. 2008 Institut Néel - CNRS htt p://neel.cnrs.fr/ 10
Microcavity polaritons
Polariton BECBimodal distributionMacroscopic spatial coherence
Why not photon lasing?
Outline
ICSCE4, Cambridge, Sept. 2008 Institut Néel - CNRS htt p://neel.cnrs.fr/ 11
M.H. Anderson et al. 1995
Rb
Bimodal distribution
Condensate
Thermal cloud
Phase transition driven by
decreasing T and/or increasing N
ICSCE4, Cambridge, Sept. 2008 Institut Néel - CNRS htt p://neel.cnrs.fr/ 12
kBT
N = constant Decreasing T
Bimodal distribution of CdTe polaritons
Bimodal distribution
Condensate
Thermal cloud
ICSCE4, Cambridge, Sept. 2008 Institut Néel - CNRS htt p://neel.cnrs.fr/ 13
kBT
T = 5 K Increasing N
Bimodal distribution of CdTe polaritons
5 K 20 K
ICSCE4, Cambridge, Sept. 2008 Institut Néel - CNRS htt p://neel.cnrs.fr/ 14
kBT
T = 5 K Increasing N
Bimodal distribution of CdTe polaritons
ICSCE4, Cambridge, Sept. 2008 Institut Néel - CNRS htt p://neel.cnrs.fr/ 15
kBT
T = 5 K Increasing N
Bimodal distribution of CdTe polaritons
ICSCE4, Cambridge, Sept. 2008 Institut Néel - CNRS htt p://neel.cnrs.fr/ 16
kBT
T = 5 K Increasing N
Bimodal distribution of CdTe polaritons
ICSCE4, Cambridge, Sept. 2008 Institut Néel - CNRS htt p://neel.cnrs.fr/ 17
kBT
T = 5 K Increasing N
Bimodal distribution of CdTe polaritons
ICSCE4, Cambridge, Sept. 2008 Institut Néel - CNRS htt p://neel.cnrs.fr/ 18
kBT
T = 5 K Increasing N
Bimodal distribution of CdTe polaritons
ICSCE4, Cambridge, Sept. 2008 Institut Néel - CNRS htt p://neel.cnrs.fr/ 19
kBT
T = 5 K Increasing N
Bimodal distribution of CdTe polaritons
ICSCE4, Cambridge, Sept. 2008 Institut Néel - CNRS htt p://neel.cnrs.fr/ 20
kBT
T = 5 K Increasing N
Bimodal distribution of CdTe polaritons
ICSCE4, Cambridge, Sept. 2008 Institut Néel - CNRS htt p://neel.cnrs.fr/ 21
kBT
T = 5 K Increasing N
Bimodal distribution of CdTe polaritons
ICSCE4, Cambridge, Sept. 2008 Institut Néel - CNRS htt p://neel.cnrs.fr/ 22
kBT
T = 5 K Increasing N
Bimodal distribution of CdTe polaritons
Bimodal distribution
ICSCE4, Cambridge, Sept. 2008 Institut Néel - CNRS htt p://neel.cnrs.fr/ 23
Tbath = 5 K
Tbath = 5 K
Bimodal distribution of CdTe polaritons
Thermal cloud
Teff = 16 ± 1 K
Condensate
ICSCE4, Cambridge, Sept. 2008 Institut Néel - CNRS htt p://neel.cnrs.fr/ 24
GaAs polaritons
Bose-Einstein condensation of microcavity polaritons in a trap R. Balili et al., Science 316, 1007 (2007)
Stress induced harmonic potential trap
0.05 mW 0.4 mW
0.6 mW 0.8 mW
T = 4.2 K
ICSCE4, Cambridge, Sept. 2008 Institut Néel - CNRS htt p://neel.cnrs.fr/ 25
GaAs polaritons
Bose-Einstein condensation of microcavity polaritons in a trap R. Balili et al., Science 316, 1007 (2007)
T = 97 KPolariton temperature = 97 K
0.05 mW 0.4 mW
0.6 mW 0.8 mW
T = 4.2 K
ICSCE4, Cambridge, Sept. 2008 Institut Néel - CNRS htt p://neel.cnrs.fr/ 26
GaAs polaritons
Maxwell-Boltzmann
Bose-Einstein
T = 4.4 K
In thermal equilibrium with lattice at T = 4.2 K
Quantum degenerate exciton-polaritons in thermal equilibrium H. Deng et al., PRL 97, 146402 (2006)
Pumping into exciton reservoir
P = 4P0
ICSCE4, Cambridge, Sept. 2008 Institut Néel - CNRS htt p://neel.cnrs.fr/ 27
Macroscopic spatial coherence
~ 20 µm
Emission spot = Polariton system
B
Phase correlation between A and B
A0.5 mm
M.R. Andrews et al. 1997
Interference between twoBose condensates
Na
ICSCE4, Cambridge, Sept. 2008 Institut Néel - CNRS htt p://neel.cnrs.fr/ 28
Michelson interferometer
40 x emission spot
Arm 1 0 – 6 π
BS
Arm 2Retro-reflector
Overlapped images
Correlations between (x,y) and (-x,-y)
Arm 2
Flipped image
Arm 1
Macroscopic spatial coherence of CdTe polaritons
ICSCE4, Cambridge, Sept. 2008 Institut Néel - CNRS htt p://neel.cnrs.fr/ 29
Pumping = 1.9 P0
++++ ====
Delay between arms 1 and 2 → Interference contrast → g (1) (r, -r)
Macroscopic spatial coherence of CdTe polaritons
ICSCE4, Cambridge, Sept. 2008 Institut Néel - CNRS htt p://neel.cnrs.fr/ 30
Spatial correlation mapping
Below threshold Above threshold
40% correlation over 14 µmDistance between polaritons ≈ 0.5 µm
Macroscopic spatial coherence of CdTe polaritons
λdB ~ 2.6 µmTpol ~ 20 K
ICSCE4, Cambridge, Sept. 2008 Institut Néel - CNRS htt p://neel.cnrs.fr/ 31
GaAs polaritons
Spatial coherence of a polariton condensate H. Deng et al., PRL 99, 126403 (2007)
Double slit experiment at 4.2 K
Slit separation = 2.7 µm
7 P0
6.7 P0
0.5 P0
ICSCE4, Cambridge, Sept. 2008 Institut Néel - CNRS htt p://neel.cnrs.fr/ 32
GaAs polaritons
Bose-Einstein condensation of microcavity polaritons in a trap R. Balili et al., Science 316, 1007 (2007)
Condensates
Interference in thermal cloud
PL fromarm 1 arm 2
Interference in thermal cloud
Michelson interferometer
Below threshold Above threshold
ICSCE4, Cambridge, Sept. 2008 Institut Néel - CNRS htt p://neel.cnrs.fr/ 33
Microcavity polaritons
Polariton BEC
Why not photon lasing?
Outline
ICSCE4, Cambridge, Sept. 2008 Institut Néel - CNRS htt p://neel.cnrs.fr/ 34
Polariton BEC VS Photon lasing
Exciton – PhotonPolaritons
Microcavity
• Stimulated emission• Beam narrowing• Spontaneous coherence
and polarization
Polariton BEC
Vertical Cavity Surface Emitting Laser (VCSEL)
(e, h) – Photon Photon lasing
ICSCE4, Cambridge, Sept. 2008 Institut Néel - CNRS htt p://neel.cnrs.fr/ 35
Polariton BEC VS Photon lasing
Exciton – PhotonPolaritons
Microcavity
Vertical Cavity Surface Emitting Laser (VCSEL)
(e, h) – Photon
Polariton BEC
Photon lasing in GaAs microcavity
Bajoni et al.PRB 76, 201305 (2007)
Thermal cloud
Optical modes!
ICSCE4, Cambridge, Sept. 2008 Institut Néel - CNRS htt p://neel.cnrs.fr/ 36
Polariton BEC VS Photon lasing
Exciton – PhotonPolaritons
Vertical Cavity Surface Emitting Laser (VCSEL)
(e, h) – Photon
Polariton BEC
Photon lasing
Strongcoupling
Weakcoupling
Interactingbosons
Non interactingbosons
• Photon dispersion• Strong-weak
coupling crossover
• Blue shift withincreasing density
• Decoherence
ICSCE4, Cambridge, Sept. 2008 Institut Néel - CNRS htt p://neel.cnrs.fr/ 37
Strong – weak coupling crossover
Energy (meV)
PL
int.
/ pum
p po
wer
(ar
b. u
nits
)
LP UP
Uncoupled X and cavity modes
Stimulation of polariton PL in semiconductor microcavity
Le Si Dang et al., PRL 81, 3920 (1998)
ICSCE4, Cambridge, Sept. 2008 Institut Néel - CNRS htt p://neel.cnrs.fr/ 38
Energy (meV)
PL
int.
/ pum
p po
wer
(ar
b. u
nits
)
LP UP
Uncoupled X and cavity modes
Stimulation of polariton PL in semiconductor microcavity
Le Si Dang et al., PRL 81, 3920 (1998)
Strong coupling
Strong – weak coupling crossover
ICSCE4, Cambridge, Sept. 2008 Institut Néel - CNRS htt p://neel.cnrs.fr/ 39
Energy (meV)
PL
int.
/ pum
p po
wer
(ar
b. u
nits
)
LP UP
Uncoupled X and cavity modes
Stimulation of polariton PL in semiconductor microcavity
Le Si Dang et al., PRL 81, 3920 (1998)
Strong coupling
Strong – weak coupling crossover
ICSCE4, Cambridge, Sept. 2008 Institut Néel - CNRS htt p://neel.cnrs.fr/ 40
Energy (meV)
PL
int.
/ pum
p po
wer
(ar
b. u
nits
)
LP UP
Weak coupling
Uncoupled X and cavity modes
Stimulation of polariton PL in semiconductor microcavity
Le Si Dang et al., PRL 81, 3920 (1998)
Strong coupling
Strong – weak coupling crossover
ICSCE4, Cambridge, Sept. 2008 Institut Néel - CNRS htt p://neel.cnrs.fr/ 41
Energy (meV)
PL
int.
/ pum
p po
wer
(ar
b. u
nits
)
LP UP
Uncoupled X and cavity modes
Weak coupling
Strong coupling
Stimulation of polariton PL in semiconductor microcavity
Le Si Dang et al., PRL 81, 3920 (1998)
Strong – weak coupling crossover
ICSCE4, Cambridge, Sept. 2008 Institut Néel - CNRS htt p://neel.cnrs.fr/ 42
Polariton = Interacting boson
Continuous blue shiftIncreasing density ≠ Photon laser !
Broadening
D. Porras and C. Tejedor, PRB 67, 161310 R (2003)
BEC VS Lasing in CdTe
ICSCE4, Cambridge, Sept. 2008 Institut Néel - CNRS htt p://neel.cnrs.fr/ 43
Polariton blueshift
F. Marchetti et al., PRB 2008
Phase diagram for condensation of microcavitypolaritons: from theory to practice
S. Utsunomiya et al., Nature Physics 2008
Observation of Bogoliubov excitations in exciton-polariton condensates
CdTe
GaAs
ICSCE4, Cambridge, Sept. 2008 Institut Néel - CNRS htt p://neel.cnrs.fr/ 44
k
E
Conclusion
"Phase transition" (N, T)
Massive occupation of ground state
Macroscopic spatial coherence
Polariton condensate
ICSCE4, Cambridge, Sept. 2008 Institut Néel - CNRS htt p://neel.cnrs.fr/ 45
< 10% > 90%
He atoms
Condensate fraction
Interaction
50%
polaritons
2006 Solids Polaritons < 50 K
1925 Prediction
1938 Liquids 4He superfluid 2.2 K
1995 Gases Atoms 10-6 K
Conclusion
ICSCE4, Cambridge, Sept. 2008 Institut Néel - CNRS htt p://neel.cnrs.fr/ 46
Interaction
Some polariton (hot) issues …
Polariton
Exciton – Photon
τ ~ 10 -12 s
Thermalization?
Thermodynamics? Kinetics?
Out of equilibriumBEC / BKT? Coherence?
Superfluidity?
Vortex?
Solid state Disorder Fragmentation?
RT BEC
Polariton "laser"
GaN, ZnO
Organics
WGM in microdisk
Slow Bloch modes in PC
0D, 1D
Josephson junction
ICSCE4, Cambridge, Sept. 2008 Institut Néel - CNRS htt p://neel.cnrs.fr/ 47
University of Crete (Nature 2008)
GaAs – based microcavity
Strong coupling up to 220 K
Polariton device
ICSCE4, Cambridge, Sept. 2008 Institut Néel - CNRS htt p://neel.cnrs.fr/ 48
Polariton BEC
J. Kasprzak (Cardiff)
M. Richard
R. André
Le Si Dang
F.M. Marchetti
M.H. Szymanska
J. Keeling
P. Littlewood
D. Solnyshkov
G. Malpuech
A. Baas
K. Lagoudakis
M. Wouters
I. Carusotto (Trento)
G. Nardin
B. Pietka
V. Savona
B. Deveaud-Plédran
A. Love
D. Krizhanovskii
D. Whittaker
M. Skolnick LPN Marcoussis J. Bloch, P. Senellart
U. A. Madrid C. Tejedor, L. Vina
U. Southampton A. Kavokin
U. Durham M. Kaliteevski