Upload
lenhi
View
216
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Insights from Behavioral Economics to Small Business Banking Antoinette Schoar Michael Koerner '49 Professor of Entrepreneurial Finance MIT Sloan School of Management CEPR-EBRD: “Understanding Bank in Emerging Markets” September 5-6, 2013
Traditional – Mapping Intention to Action
A
C
Yes
No
Yes
No
B
D
Decision Actions Outcome
Behavioral – Obstacles to the Translation
Decision Actions Outcome
People misjudge how the will behave
Ex post need to justify actions (or just confused)
A
B
Yes
No
Yes
No
• Small changes in how financial products are set up significantly affect customer outcomes – Credit risk is not a fixed type but endogenous to
the state of the credit market – The sophistication of financial institutions causally
affects the structure of credit risk in the economy
• Banks have embraced retail financial tools for SME banking to reduce transaction costs – But opportunities to use psychological insights to
improve repayment behavior
Why is this Relevant for Finance?
Getting to the top of mind: testing the effectiveness of reminders
• Banks in Bolivia, Peru, the Philippine and Uganda
• Customers with loans of savings accounts
• Monthly text message reminders – Estimate size of effect – Generic text message
reminder or highlight a particular goal
Source: Karlan, McConnell, Mullainathan, and Zinman (2010) and Cadenas and Schoar (2011).
Text message have similar effects as 20% reduction in interest rate
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
No reminder Generic reminder Goal-specific reminder
% re
duct
ion
in la
te p
aym
ent
SMS Reminder Cash incentives for on time payments
* Heterogeneity who responds to each treatment: the young are more like to respond to SMS
Text message reminders increase savings
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
No reminder Generic reminder Goal-specific reminder
Perc
enta
ge in
crea
se in
savi
ngs
Information Avoidance: Foreclosure Resolution
Mullainathan, Schoar and Shafir (2011) 13
• Distress homeowners do not return calls and mailing about mortgage reduction offers
• >85% of borrowers in distress do not call back
• Lack of information seeking to avoid dealing with pain
• Type of outreach matters • Highly distressed borrowers
respond only to “soft touch”, constructive messaging
• Casually distressed borrowers respond to harsh messages (strategic default)
Take Away
• People suffer from inattentiveness even toward
goals that are important to them – Not following through on goals results in sub-optimal
outcomes
• Reminders can help people stick to a plan – Text message reminders are very cost-effective – Content and type of message matters
Loyalty as Alternative Collateral
• Idea: Many SMEs do not have collateral to get a bank
loan even if they have cash flow to pay it. Test a collateral free loan product and use relationships as alternative collateral?
Different Hypotheses for Effectiveness of Outreach
• Challenge: Test if relation building can ensure repayment and increase client loyalty • Can the services that bank provides substitute for the
lack of financial infrastructure in the market?
• Depends on the reasons behind defaults • Strategic default: Reduction of moral hazard? • Loyalty: Build personal relationship between loan
officer and clients? • Behavioral factors: SMEs have poor planning skills
• Only uncollateralized lending facility to SMEs in India • Credit assessment is based on a score card model • Centralized risk team makes credit decisions based
on observable information, e.g. tax filing, bank statements
• Loans are structured as a one year overdraft facilities • Payment modality like a credit card: monthly interest
payments and 5% of balance has to be paid • Loan size between $10k-$50K • Penalty interest rate starts after 30 days late
Set Up
• Hire six relationship managers to follow up with clients in treatment groups A and B • Very clear separation from credit assessment team • Convey to borrowers that relationship managers will
not be involved in loan renewal
• Relationship managers have set scripts to call clients • Check in every two weeks independent of loan
status. Solve problems with accounts, remind customers of delays in payment if necessary etc
• No cross selling (!)
Implementation
Experiment Set-up
• Group A: No monitoring treatment – Control Group
• Group B: Reminder treatment
– Send SMS with interest and principal due every month. Follow up with phone call if clients have outstanding balances
• Group C: Medium touch treatment
– Random loan officers follow up with clients regularly to solve problems, understand the nature of the business
• Group D: Personal touch treatment – Assign individual loan officer to create “ongoing relationship”
with client. Treatment as in Group C.
Default Rates Differ Drastically by Treatment
6 %
9%
0 %
8%
10 % 9%
10 %
12%
3%
19%
11 %
15 %
6 %
14 %
0%
2 %
4 %
6%
8 %
10%
12 %
14%
16 %
18%
20%
SBL, Loans 5+ Lakh, CPA Cities [N=774]
SBL Power, Loans 5 + Lakh, CPA Cities
[N= 311 ]
SBL, Loans 5 + Lakh, Non - CPA Cities
[N= 158 ]
SBL Power, Loans < 5 Lakh, Non - CPA Cities
[N= 505 ]
Delinquent Customers per Treatment Group
High - Touch (Relationship) Medium - Touch (Monitoring) Low - Touch (Reminders) Control
-
• Significant reduction in late payments for borrowers in groups A and B • Almost 20% reduction in late payments • Onset of late payment and number of late payment
spells are reduced for treatment groups A and B • Ultimate default seems to converge: Accounts in
default are handled by separate department
• Improved outcomes at renewal stage for borrowers in groups A and B
Results I
• Compare treatment groups A versus B • Other treatment groups did not have outreach data • Significant higher likelihood of reaching clients in A
group than B; especially on second follow up call • Likelihood of complaints are lower for treatment
group A but conditional on complaint the nature of the complaint seems more serious
• Find similar results for ability to reach customers for follow up calls by ICICI bank and cross selling
Results II
Take Away
• Personalized attention by loan officers matters for repayment behavior and loan renewal decisions • Groups A & B have significant change in repayment
• Relationship lending affects client’s willingness
to engage in moral hazard behavior and loyalty to the bank • Relationships constitute “alternative collateral”
• Rethink model of credit risk in loan markets • Default decisions are situation contingent • Screening versus moral hazard? • Stability of prediction models?
• Advances in lending products helps borrowers
improve their credit type • Virtuous cycle of credit access
• Need more work on equilibrium effects and
competitive responses of banks
Conclusion