prev

next

of 21

View

65Download

5

Tags:

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Inductive vs Deductive Reasoning. Inductive vs Deductive Reasoning. Inductive Reasoning. When we make conjectures based on observations. Ex. For 3 weeks, the cafeteria served pizza on Wednesday. I conclude next Wed. the cafeteria will have pizza. Deductive Reasoning. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Inductive vs Deductive Reasoning Inductive vs Deductive Reasoning

Inductive ReasoningWhen we make conjectures based on observations.Ex. For 3 weeks, the cafeteria served pizza on Wednesday. I conclude next Wed. the cafeteria will have pizza.

Deductive ReasoningUse facts, definitions and accepted properties in logical order to write a logical argument.Ex. Dictionaries are useful books. Useful books are valuable. Therefore, dictionaries are valuable.

Inductive or Deductive??

1. Julie knows that Dell computers cost less than Gateway computers. Julie also knows that Gateway computers cost less than compaq computers. Julie reasons that Dell computers cost less than compaq computers.Deductive Reasoning.

2. If you live in Nevada and are between ages of 16 and 18, then you must take drivers education classes to get your license. Mark has always lived in Nevada, is 16, and has his drivers license. Therefore, Mark took drivers education classes.Deductive Reasoning

3. Matt noticed that every Tuesday since school started it has rained. Matt thinks it is going to rain next Tuesday.

Inductive reasoning.

Law of DetachmentIf p q is a true conditional statement and p is true, then q is true.Ex. If I pass the test, then I get an A in geometry. I passed the test. So I got an A in geometry.

Law of SyllogismIf p q and q r are true conditional statements, then p r is true.Ex. If I pass the test, then I get an A in geometry. If I get an A in geometry, then I get a new car.Conclusion. I passed the test so I get a new car.

Example 6Determine if statement (3) follows from statement (1) and (2) by the Law of Detachment or the Law of Syllogism. If it does, state which law was used. If it does not, write invalid.

- Law of Detachment or Law of Syllogism #11. If an angle is acute, then it is not obtuse.2.
- Law of Detachment or Law of Syllogism #21. Right angles are congruent.2.
Law of Detachment or Law of Syllogism #31. If you save a penny, then you have earned a penny.2. Art saves a penny.3. Art has earned a penny. Valid by Law of Detachment.

Law of Detachment or Law of Syllogism #41. If you are a teenager, then you are always right.2. If you are always right, then people will listen to you.3. If you are a teenager, then people will listen to you.Valid by Law of Syllogism.

Law of Detachment or Law of Syllogism #51. If you drive 50 miles per hour in a school zone, then you will get a speeding ticket.2. Pat received a speeding ticket.3. Pat was driving 50 miles per hour in a school zone. Invalid. Pat could have received a speeding ticket for speeding on the highway.

- Law of Detachment or Law of Syllogism #61. If m
Write a conclusion using the true statements. If no conclusion is possible, write no conclusion.

Example 1If Tim gets stung by a bee, then he will get very ill. If he gets very ill, then he will go to the hospital. Tim gets stung by a bee.Conclusion?Tim will go to the hospital.Law of Syllogism

Example 2If Hank applies for the job, then he will be the new lifeguard at the pool. If he is the new lifeguard at the pool, then he will buy a new car. Hank applies for the job.Conclusion?Hank will buy a new car.Law of Syllogism

Example 3If two planes intersect, then their intersection is a line. Plane A and plane B intersect.Conclusion?Plane A and plane B intersect in a line.Law of Detachment

Example 4If you cut class, then you will receive a detention. You cut class.Conclusion?You received a detention.Law of Detachment

Example 5If Jay doesnt work hard, then he wont start the game and will quit the team. Jay quit the team.Conclusion?No conclusion. We do not why he quit the team.