Upload
dwayne
View
42
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Implementing MAP-21 Initiatives. Logistics Trade and Transportation Symposium February 26-27, 2014 University of Southern Mississippi - Gulf Port John Tompkins, Freight Project Manager Office of Freight & Commercial Vehicle Operations Minnesota Department of Transportation. Structure. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Logistics Trade and Transportation SymposiumFebruary 26-27, 2014
University of Southern Mississippi - Gulf Port
John Tompkins, Freight Project ManagerOffice of Freight & Commercial Vehicle Operations
Minnesota Department of Transportation
Overview
Implementation of MAP-21 initiatives
Questions & Comments after final speaker
Minnesota’s progress toward MAP-21 implementation
Statewide Freight System PlanHigher federal share for freight projectsFreight performance measures
Freight Advisory Committee
Primary Freight Network
Minnesota’s first Statewide Freight Plan Policy Plan
Ages ago…
Minnesota GO – New transportation vision
MAP- 21
Policy, Project development, Investment and Implementation Plan
Increase economic competitiveness of Minnesota & U.S.
Improve business growth & quality of life
Keep up with rapid industry change
Address critical infrastructure capacity and condition
A. Policy Integration:◦ Apply national best practices in long-range freight
planning ◦ Multi-jurisdictional coordination◦ Passenger & Freight Rail Plan and 1st Ports & Waterway
Plan 2013
B. Project development:◦ Freight Project Prioritization Rationale◦ Communication plan with public outreach
C. Performance Measures:◦ Applied Research (GPS data, Industries Cluster, Truck
Parking)◦ Other states
Minnesota Freight Advisory Committee (MFAC) established in 1998
Evaluate purpose and direction:◦ Roles and Responsibilities◦ Committee make-up◦ Governance ◦ Disseminate
Workshop in Spring 2014
State Overview
Information gathered from:State MPO’sMnDOTMAFCAASHTO
Range of views gathered to response to process
Response to 27K & 3K Centerline miles◦ Does not yield most critical routes◦ No connection to some key major freight facilities◦ Disagree with top-down approach
Methodology for achieving network◦ Eliminate cap; increase cap; flexible cap◦ Use corridor approach; connecting - regions,
states or countries (trading partners)◦ Have States and/or MPO determine network◦ Enforce statute: 23 USC 135
How NFN and its components will be used by freight stakeholders
◦ Resource to State Freight Networks, State Freight Plans and State Advisory Committees
◦ Funding criteria for CUFC, CRFC, PFN or Interstate◦ Support for a multimodal, economic, freight
network◦ Not a federal funding source based on proposed
network
Suggestions for an urban-area route designation process
◦ Integral to the PFN, but prohibited due to mileage limitation
◦ Urban segment not part of PFN◦ State DOTs should designate intermodal
connectors, in consultation with MPOs ◦ Consider routes lower than 8,500 AADT for
connectivity
Other comments:◦ HPMS – Federal investment needed to improve
data◦ Intermodal Connectors – revise criteria within
urban areas over 200K population◦ Include marine and other land ports of
significance◦ Decrease 10-year PFN designation cycle
Thanks for listening!