Hyperbolic Knot Theory
Jessica S. Purcell
These notes consist of lectures from a graduate course I taught at BrighamYoung University in winter semester 2010. They are somewhat rough, butpossibly of interest to others.
The material here is primarily due to W. Thurston. Much of the materialis inspired by his notes , and a few figures are taken directly from thosenotes (credited in text). Some material is also inspired by discussion andexercises in his book .
I also would like to thank the organizers of the workshop on Interactionsbetween hyperbolic geometry, quantum topology, and number theory heldat Columbia University in June 2009. These notes were written while thoseworkshops were still fresh in my mind, and several talks related to thesenotes. Finally, these notes have also benefitted from discussions with DavidFuter and Henry Segerman on best ways to describe hyperbolic geometry ofknots.
Any errors are, of course, my own. Please let me know about them.
Jessica S. PurcellDepartment of MathematicsBrigham Young UniversityProvo, UT 84602USAjpurcell@math.byu.edu
Chapter 1. Introduction 51.1. Some motivation and history 51.2. Basic terminology 6
Chapter 2. Polyhedral decomposition of the Figure8 knot complement 92.1. Introduction 92.2. Vocabulary 92.3. Polyhedra 92.4. Exercises 14
Chapter 3. Hyperbolic geometry and ideal tetrahedra 193.1. Basic hyperbolic geometry 193.2. Exercises 23
Chapter 4. Geometric structures on manifolds 274.1. Geometric structures 274.2. Complete structures 324.3. Developing map and completeness 394.4. Exercises 39
Chapter 5. Hyperbolic structures on knot complements 415.1. Geometric triangulations 415.2. Gluing equations 455.3. Completeness equations 505.4. Exercises 52
Chapter 6. Completion and Dehn filling 556.1. MostowPrasad rigidity 556.2. Completion of incomplete structures on hyperbolic manifolds 556.3. Hyperbolic Dehn surgery space 596.4. Exercises 63
1.1. Some motivation and history
Knots have been studied mathematically since approximately 1833, whenGauss developed the linking number of two knots. Peter Tait was one ofthe first to try to classify knots up to equivalence. He created the first knottables, listing knots up to seven crossings . However, the study of thegeometry of knots, particularly hyperbolic geometry, did not really beginuntil the late 1970s and early 1980s, with work of William Thurston.
In the 1980s, William Thurston conjectured that every 3manifold de-composes along spheres and incompressible tori into pieces that admit uniquelyone of eight 3dimensional geometries (geometric structures) . This isthe geometrization conjecture, and the proof of the full conjecture was an-nounced in 2003 by Perelman. However, Thurston proved the conjecturefor certain classes of manifolds, including manifolds with boundary, in theearly 1980s. In fact, it has been known for nearly three decades that knotcomplements in S3 decompose into geometric pieces.
What are the eight 3dimensional geometries? Peter Scott has writtenan excellent introduction to these geometries . For our purposes, weneed to know that six of the eight geometries are so-called Seifert fibered,and the last and most important geometry is hyperbolic.
Thurston showed that a knot complement will either be Seifert fibered,toroidal, meaning it contains an embedded incompressible torus, or hyper-bolic. If the knot is toroidal, to obtain its geometric pieces one must cutalong the incompressible torus and consider each resulting piece separately.We know exactly which knot complements are Seifert fibered, toroidal, orhyperbolic, again due to work of Thurston in the 1980s.
Figure 1.1. Left: a torus knot. Right: a satellite knot.
6 1. INTRODUCTION
Theorem 1.1 (Thurston ). The knots whose complement can beSeifert fibered consist of torus knots: knots which can be drawn on thesurface of a torus, as in Figure 1.1. Toroidal knot complements are exactlythe satellite knots: knots which can be drawn inside the complement of a(possibly knotted) solid torus, as on the right in Figure 1.1. All other knotsare hyperbolic.
Hyperbolic knots form the largest and least understood class of knots. Ofall knots up to 16 crossings, classified by Hoste, Thistlethwaite, and Weeks, 13 are torus knots, 20 are satellite knots, and the remaining 1,701,903are hyperbolic.
By the MostowPrasad rigidity theorem [13, 14], if a knot complementadmits a hyperbolic structure, then that structure is unique. More carefully,Mostow showed that if there was an isomorphism between the fundamentalgroups of two closed hyperbolic 3manifolds, then there was an isometrytaking one to the other. Prasad extended this work to 3manifolds withtorus boundary, including knot complements. Thus if two hyperbolic knotcomplements have isomorphic fundamental group, then they have exactlythe same hyperbolic structure. Finally, Gordon and Luecke showed that iftwo knot complements have the same fundamental group, then the knots areequivalent  (up to mirror reflection). Thus a hyperbolic structure on aknot complement is a complete invariant of the knot. If we could completelyunderstand hyperbolic structures on knot complements, we could completelyclassify hyperbolic knots.
1.2. Basic terminology
Definition 1.2. A knot K S3 is a subset of points homeomorphicto a circle S1 under a piecewise linear (PL) homeomorphism. We may alsothink of a knot as a PL embedding K : S1 S3. We will use the samesymbol K to refer to the map and its image K(S1).
More generally, a link is a subset of S3 PL homeomorphic to a disjointunion of copies of S1. Alternately, we may think of a link as a PL embeddingof a disjoint union of copies of S1 into S3.
We assume our knots are piecewise linear to avoid wild knots. Whilewild knots may have interesting geometry, we wont be concerned with themin these notes.
Definition 1.3. We will say that two knots (or links) K1 and K2 areequivalent if they are ambient isotopic, that is, if there is a (PL) homotopyh : S3 [0, 1] S3 such that h(, t) = ht : S3 S3 is a homeomorphismfor each t, and h(K1, 0) = h0(K1) = K1 and h(K1, 1) = h1(K1) = K2.
What we will deal with in this course is a special type of 3manifold,the knot complement (or link complement).
Definition 1.4. For a knot K, let N(K) denote an open regular neigh-borhood of K in S3. The knot complement is the manifold S3rN(K).
1.2. BASIC TERMINOLOGY 7
Notice that it is a compact 3manifold with boundary homeomorphic to atorus.
For our applications, we will typically be interested in the interior ofthe manifold S3rN(K). I will denote this manifold by S3rK, and usually(somewhat sloppily) just refer to this manifold as the knot complement.
Definition 1.5. A knot invariant (or link invariant) is a function fromthe set of links to some other set whose value depends only on the equivalenceclass of the link.
Knot and link invariants are used to prove that two knots or links aredistinct, or to measure the complexity of the link in various ways.
We wish to put a hyperbolic structure on (the interior of) our knot com-plements. We will define a hyperbolic structure on a manifold more carefullyduring the course. For now, if a manifold has a hyperbolic structure, then wecan measure geometric information about the manifold, including lengths ofgeodesics, volume, minimal surfaces, etc.
Polyhedral decomposition of the Figure8 knot
We are going to decompose the figure-8 knot complement into idealpolyhedra. This decomposition appears in Thurstons notes , and with alittle more explanation in his book . Menasco generalized the procedureto all link complements . His work is essentially what we present below.
Definition 2.1. A knot diagram is a 4valent graph with over/undercrossing information at each vertex. Figure 2.1 shows a diagram of theFigure-8 knot complement.
Definition 2.2. A polyhedron is a closed 3ball whose boundary islabeled with a finite number of simply connected faces, edges, and vertices.
An ideal polyhedron is a 3ball whose boundary is labeled with a finitenumber of simply connected faces, edges, and vertices, but all of whosevertices have been removed. That is, to form an ideal polyhedron, startwith a regular polyhedron and remove the points corresponding to vertices.
Sometimes it is easier to study manifolds if we split them into smaller,simpler pieces. We are interested in knot complements S3rK. We willcut S3rK into two ideal polyhedra. We will then have a description ofS3rK as a gluing of two ideal polyhedra. That is, given a description of thepolyhedra, and gluing information on the faces of the polyhedra, we mayreconstruct the knot complement S3rK.
Figure 2.1. A diagram of the figure8 knot
10 2. POLYHEDRAL DECOMPOSITION OF THE FIGURE8 KNOT COMPLEMENT
Figure 2.2. Faces for the figure-8 knot.
Figure 2.3. The knot is shown in bold. Faces labeled Uand T meet at the edge shown.
The example we will walk through is that of the figure-8 knot com-plement. We will see that this particular knot complement has many niceproperties.
As homework, you will be asked to walk through the techniques below todetermine decompositions of other knot complements into ideal polyhedra.
2.3.1. Overview. Start with a diagram of the knot. There will be twopolyhedra in our decomposition. These can be visualized as two balloons:One balloon expands above the diagram, and one ballo