22
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 13 | 1 Theory of Strategic Management with Cases, 8e Hills, Jones Chapter Thirteen Corporate Strategy across Countries and Industries

Hill 8e Basic Ch13

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Hill 8e Basic Ch13

Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 13 | 1

Theory of Strategic Management with Cases, 8e

Hills, Jones

Chapter Thirteen Corporate Strategy across Countries and Industries

Page 2: Hill 8e Basic Ch13

Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 13 | 2

Managing Corporate Strategy Through the Multidivisional Structure

Addresses the problems and economizes the costs of managing the handoffs between value-

chain functions across industries

The Multidivisional Structure:1. Divisions

• Responsible for day-to-day operations• Self-contained – with a full set of value-chain functions• May share value-chain functions with other divisions

2. Corporate headquarters staff • Monitor divisional activities• Exercise financial control over each division• Strategic responsibilities

Page 3: Hill 8e Basic Ch13

Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 13 | 3

Multidivisional StructureFigure 13.1

Page 4: Hill 8e Basic Ch13

Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 13 | 4

Advantages of a Multidivisional Structure

Enhanced corporate financial control• Profitability of divisions is clearly visible• Corporate office acts as the ‘investor’ –channeling funds to high-

yield uses Enhanced strategic control

• Frees corporate managers from business-level responsibilities• Corporate managers can deal with the wider strategic issues

Growth• Overcomes organizational limit to its growth

Stronger pursuit of internal efficiency• Can compare one division against another• In a better position to identify inefficiencies that result in

bureaucratic costs

Research suggests that large companies that adopt a multidivisional structure outperform those that retain the functional structure.

Page 5: Hill 8e Basic Ch13

Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 13 | 5

Problems in Implementing a Multidivisional Structure

Establishing the divisional- corporate authority relationship

Distortion of informationCompetition for resourcesTransfer pricingShort-term R&D focusDuplication of functional resources

Page 6: Hill 8e Basic Ch13

Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 13 | 6

Unrelated Diversification

Operates as a ‘portfolio’ of independent businesses• Divisions have considerable autonomy• No integration among divisions is necessary• Businesses bought & sold as conditions change• Idea of ‘corporate culture’ is meaningless

No exchanges or linkages among divisions• Easiest and cheapest strategy to manage• Lowest level of bureaucratic costs

Controls to evaluate divisional performance easily and accurately• Each division evaluated by output controls, e.g. ROIC• Sophisticated accounting controls

For unrelated diversification, the multibusiness model is based on general managerial capabilities in entrepreneurship, organizational design, or strategy.

Page 7: Hill 8e Basic Ch13

Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 13 | 7

Vertical Integration

Bureaucratic costs are more complex and expensive than unrelated diversification

Multidivisional structure provides necessary controls to achieve benefits from the control of resource transfers

Must strike balance between centralized and decentralized control

Divisions must have input regarding resource transfer Integration is managed through a combination of corporate

and divisional controls

The vertically integrated company requires the centralized control – in order to achieve the benefits from the sequential flow of resources from one division to the next.

Page 8: Hill 8e Basic Ch13

Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 13 | 8

Related Diversification

Gains derived from the transfer, sharing, or leveraging across divisions

Output control difficult as businesses share resources

Integration and control at divisional level required

Incentives and rewards for cooperation necessary

Principle benefits of related diversification come from transferring, sharing, or leveraging functional resources or skills and some exchange of distinctive competencies across divisions.

Page 9: Hill 8e Basic Ch13

Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 13 | 9

Corporate Strategy and Structure and Control

Table 13.1

Page 10: Hill 8e Basic Ch13

Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 13 | 10

Implementing Strategy Across Countries

Localization Strategy• Local responsiveness • Decentralized control in each country it operates

International strategy• Centralized R&D and marketing in home country • Other value creation functions are decentralized

Global standardization strategy• Oriented toward cost reductions • Centralized functions at optimal global location

Transnational strategy• Local responsiveness and cost reduction• Select best global location to achieve these objectives

Page 11: Hill 8e Basic Ch13

Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 13 | 11

Global Strategy/Structure Relationships

Table 13.2

Page 12: Hill 8e Basic Ch13

Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 13 | 12

Implementing a Localization Strategy

Value creation activities duplicated in every region or country of operation

Decentralized authority in each overseas division Managers at global headquarters evaluate

performance of overseas divisions No integrating mechanisms needed No global organizational culture Duplication of specialist activities raises costs

A company pursuing a localization strategy generally operates with a global area structure, establishing overseas divisions in regions or countries.

Page 13: Hill 8e Basic Ch13

Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 13 | 13

Global-Area StructureFigure 13.2

Page 14: Hill 8e Basic Ch13

Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 13 | 14

Implementing an International Strategy

Foreign sales organizations added to existing structure using the same control system

Product customization is minimal Subsidiary handles local sales and distribution System of behavior controls set up to keep the home

office informed Global divisions coordinate the flow of different

products across different countries

A company shifts to an international strategy when it decides to sell domestically made products in markets abroad.

This arrangement of tasks and roles reduces the transaction of managing handoffs across

countries and world regions.

Page 15: Hill 8e Basic Ch13

Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 13 | 15

Global Division StructureFigure 13.3

Page 16: Hill 8e Basic Ch13

Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 13 | 16

Implementing a Global Standardization Strategy

Company locates its manufacturing and other value-chain activities at the global location that will allow it to increase efficiency, quality, and innovation using a global product-group structure.

Focus is on centralized control by product group. This makes it difficult for different product divisions

to trade information an knowledge.

Page 17: Hill 8e Basic Ch13

Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 13 | 17

Global Product-Group StructureFigure 13.4

Page 18: Hill 8e Basic Ch13

Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 13 | 18

Implementing a Transnational Strategy

Decentralized control provides flexibility for local issues

Product and corporate managers at headquarters have centralized control to coordinate company activities on global level

Knowledge and experience can be transferred to create value with the ‘matrix-in-the-mind’

Global corporate culture is created IT integration mechanisms provide coordination

Many companies implemented a global-matrix structure to simultaneously lower their global cost structures and differentiate their activities.

The task of integrating and controlling a global-matrix structure can be a difficult task.

Page 19: Hill 8e Basic Ch13

Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 13 | 19

Global-Matrix StructureFigure 13.5

Page 20: Hill 8e Basic Ch13

Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 13 | 20

Entry Mode and Implementation

1. Internal new venturing The internal venturing process needs to give new-

venture manages the autonomy and motivation they need to develop new products.

2. Joint venturing Allocating authority and responsibility is the first

major implementation issue when companies share resources to collaborate on the development of a new business model to compete in a new market or industry.

3. Mergers and acquisitions The profitability of mergers and acquisitions

depends on the structure and control systems that companies adopt to integrate and manage them.

Page 21: Hill 8e Basic Ch13

Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 13 | 21

The Role of Information Technology

IT provides a common software platform that can make it less problematic for divisions to share information.

IT facilitates output and financial controls. IT helps corporate managers react more quickly

because of higher-quality, more timely information. IT makes it easier to decentralize control to divisional

managers, but react quickly if necessary. IT makes it difficult to distort information because of

standardized information. IT eases the transfer pricing problem.

IT is having increasingly important effects on the way multibusiness companies implement their strategies:

Page 22: Hill 8e Basic Ch13

Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 13 | 22

IT, the Internet, and Outsourcing IT and strategy implementation

• Knowledge leveraging through IT to achieve low costs and differentiation

• Flattening the organization - moving toward decentralization and integration through IT

• Virtual organization• Knowledge management system

Strategic outsourcing and network structure• IT increases the efficiency of interorganizational relationships• Business-to-business (B2B) networks• Network structure

The implications of IT for strategy implementation are still evolving -

as new hardware and software reshape companies’ business models and strategies.