Upload
shahril-affandi-mat-yusof
View
219
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/30/2019 Guidelines Macro Teaching Evaluation Form Ef5 2009
1/4
Copyright IPGM Kampus Keningau 2009 1
GUIDELINES FOR USING MICRO/MACRO EVALUATION FORM (EF5)
(A) LESSON PLANNING
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
a. Learning Objectives
Learning outcomes are not
explicit, unsuitable with
students cognitive abilities
and inconsistent with syllabus
needs.
Learning outcomes are explicit
but moderately accurate and
inconsistent with students
abilities and syllabus needs.
Learning outcomes are
explicit, accurate, clear but
not specifically stated
according to students abilities
and syllabus needs.
Learning outcomes are
explicit, accurate, clear and
specifically stated according to
students abilities and syllabus
needs.
b. Content
Content is inconsistent with
learning outcomes and
syllabus specification.
Steps taken in understanding
the content are not in
sequence to achieve the
learning outcomes
Content is consistent with
learning outcomes and
syllabus specification.
Steps taken in understanding
the content are not clearly in
sequence to achieve the
learning outcomes
Content is consistent with
learning outcomes and
syllabus specification.
Steps taken in understanding
the content are in sequence to
achieve the learning outcomes
Content is very consistent with
learning outcomes and
syllabus specification.
Steps taken in understanding
the content are clearly in
sequence to achieve the
learning outcomesc. Teaching & Learning
Strategies
The strategies and activities
are not suitable and did not
take into consideration the
intended learning outcomes,
content, students abilities,
resources, time and situation /
surrounding.
The strategies and activities
are moderately suitable and
moderately take into
consideration the intended
learning outcomes, content,
students abilities, resources,
time and situation /
surrounding.
The strategies and activities
are suitable and take into
consideration the intended
learning outcomes, content,
students ability, resources,
time and situation /
surrounding.
The strategy and activities are
very suitable and take into
consideration all aspects of
teaching and learning
including constructivist
approach and inquiry learning.
d. Teaching & Learning
Resources
Selected resources are not
suitable, insufficient,
unattractive, unchallenging
and not functioning.
Selected resources are
moderately suitable,
moderately effective and
moderately able to motivate
the students.
Selected resources are good
and suitable, as well as able to
improve the effectiveness of
the teaching and learning
process.
Selected resources are
excellent and very suitable in
assisting the teaching and
learning process including the
use of ICT.
e. Scientific skills and/or
thinking skill
No statement made about
scientific skills/thinking skills.
No evidence of using thinking
tools. Examples of thought
provoking questions or stimuli
are not given.
There are statements about
scientific skills/thinking skills
but unsuitable with lesson
content. Use of thinking tools
unclear. Inadequate use of
thought provoking stimuli that
is consistent with the statedthinking skills. Inadequate
challenging activities.
There are statements about
scientific skills/thinking skills
that are relevant to the lesson
content. Thinking tools and
thought provoking stimuli are
used but moderately suitable
to the teaching and learningprocedure and activities.
Highly suitable scientific
skills/thinking skills are stated
clearly. Teaching and learning
procedures to achieve the
stated scientific skills/thinking
skills are stated clearly .
Thinking activities, use ofthinking tools including
questioning techniques and
thought provoking stimuli are
clearly planned and stated.
f. Inculcation of Values
Inculcation of values in the
lesson is not planned.
The selected values are
unsuitable to be inculcated in
the lesson.
The selected values are
moderately suitable to be
inculcated in the lesson.
The selected values are very
suitable to be inculcated in the
lesson.
g. Evaluation
Selected types of evaluation
are unsuitable, insufficient,
and unable to measure the
learning objectives
Selected types of evaluation
are moderately suitable and
moderately effective to
measure the learning
Selected types of evaluation
are good and suitable, as well
as able to measure the
learning objectives.
The selected types of
evaluation are excellent and
very effective to measure the
learning objectives
7/30/2019 Guidelines Macro Teaching Evaluation Form Ef5 2009
2/4
Copyright IPGM Kampus Keningau 2009 2
objectives.
h. Creativity and flexibility
Uncreative and inflexible. Shows glimpses of creativity
and flexibility.
Shows moderate creativity
and flexibility.
Shows good creativity and
flexibility.
(B) MACRO TEACHING
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
a.Introduction/OrientationInsensitive to students
readiness to learn. Starts the
lesson with the class in
disarray.
Does not use a stimulating
introduction to the lesson.
Moderately successful in
generating students readiness
to learn.
Moderately effective in
introducing the lesson using
various techniques.
Successful in generating
students readiness to learn.
Successful in attracting the
attention of a majority of the
students using a
suitable/attractive
introduction.
Successful in generating
students readiness to learn.
Successful in attracting the
attention of all the students
using suitable, attractive,
delightful and motivating
introduction.
b. Lesson Development
Unsuccessful in implementing
the planned lesson steps.
Insensitive to students needs.
Unable to control the class. As
a result, lesson development is
disrupted.
Unsystematic / Erratic delivery
of lesson content.
Moderately successful in
implementing the plannedlesson steps.
Moderately able to vary lesson
activities to cater to students
needs and abilities.
Able to implement the lesson
steps in intended order
Able to vary lesson activities
to cater to students needs
and abilities, consistent with
learning outcomes.
Able to implement the lesson
steps in an orderly and
controlled manner.
Information / concepts /
materials were successfully
delivered in sequence / proper
stages.
Rate of delivery suitable with
students level of ability.
Various methods of evaluation
are used to monitor the
learning outcomes.
c. Quality of Learning
Most of the students are
confused with the content of
the lesson.
Students ask questions due to
lack of comprehension.
Students are unable to answer
or give incorrect answers to
most of the evaluation
questions.
Most of the students show
signs of comprehending the
concepts/information
delivered.
Minimal confusion.
Distinct students
comprehension but
occasionally inaccurate
answers received.
Students are able to carry out
activities and instructions but
occasionally inaccurate.
Lesson is wholly
comprehended and students
are able to give accurate
answers.
Distinct evidence of
concept/content
comprehension.
Students show behavioural
changes.
d. Students involvementStudents show indifference to
teaching and learning
activities.
Partial students participation. Active and responsive
students participation.
Students are very responsive
and participate wholly in the
activities.
e. Inculcation of scientific
attitude and noble values
Failed to inculcate all the
planned values / attitudes.
A few of the planned values /
attitudes are inculcated
through lesson activities.
Able to inculcate most of the
values/attitudes at
appropriate stage/time of the
lesson.
Able to effectively inculcate all
the values/attitudes at
appropriate stage/time of the
lesson.
f. Communication
Has problems with
pronunciation and usage of
language to communicate
Uses clear and suitable
language.
Able to motivate students
through the usage of
expressive and effective
Able to motivate students
through the usage of
expressive and effective
7/30/2019 Guidelines Macro Teaching Evaluation Form Ef5 2009
3/4
Copyright IPGM Kampus Keningau 2009 3
with individuals/ students /
class.
No variation in voice
intonation and speaking style.
Insensitive to students level
of language usage.
Shows effort in varying voice
in terms of articulation, tone,
and intonation.
Sensitive to students level of
language usage.
language.
Stimulating and exuberant
delivery of lesson.
language.
Excellent voice quality in
terms of articulation, tone,
and intonation.
Pronunciation clear, accurate,
attractive and able to sustain
students attention.g. Class Management
Has problems in managing and
controlling the class.
Learning environment is not
conducive.
Insensitive to students
discipline. Class discipline is
uncontrolled.
Frequently taking actions that
are inaccurate in handling
students behaviour.
Indecisive in facing disturbing
students.
Instructions are confusing.
Moderately able to generate a
partly conducive learning
environment.
Able to get students to do
individual / group activities
but insufficient control /
monitoring.
Sensitive to learning
environment but unable to
benefit from it.
Instructions are clear but not
followed by students due to
lack of reinforcement.
Successful in generating a
conducive learning
environment for most of the
students.
Able to manage learning
activities satisfactorily.
Able to successfully motivate a
majority of the students.
Shows effort in controlling
students discipline but still
exhibit minimal indecisive
actions. Instructions clear and
obeyed.
Successful in generating a
conducive, pleasant and
unstressful learning
environment.
Able to handle problems that
arise efficiently and wisely.
Successfully in sustaining the
attention of all the students.
Able to handle effectively any
unforeseen disturbances.
h. Time management
Poor time management.
Moderate time management. Good time management. Excellent time management.
i. Closure
Unable to finish the lesson.
Unable to summarize /
conclude the lesson.
No reinforcement /
enrichment.
Students disperse / exit the
class without clear instructions
Indiscipline class dispersion.
Shows effort in concluding the
lesson but unrelated to the
lesson topic.
Not all of the mainpoints/facts are reviewed
/summarized.
Instruction for dispersion is
given but the implementation
is not properly controlled.
Suitable but unattractive
closure of the lesson.
Able to successfully
summarize / conclude thelesson.
Reinforcement of most of the
main contents/concepts.
Suggested further activities
are given.
Conclude the lesson with
effective enrichment
/evaluation activities.
Able to highlight all maincontents/concepts.
Able to manage the students
effectively.
Instruction for orderly
dispersion is given and the
implementation is very
disciplined and controlled.
Suggested further activities
are given.
j. Attainment of LearningObjectives
Failed to attain all learning
outcomes.A few of the learning
outcomes are attained.
Most of the learning outcomes
are attained.
All learning outcomes are
attained.
(C) REFLECTION
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
a. Identification of strength
and weaknesses
Unable to identify the strength
and weaknesses of the lesson.
Identify the strengths and
weaknesses but unable to
describe them.
Identify the strengths and
weaknesses but unclear
description.
Identify and describe clearly
the strengths and weaknesses.
b. Suggestion of follow upaction
7/30/2019 Guidelines Macro Teaching Evaluation Form Ef5 2009
4/4
Copyright IPGM Kampus Keningau 2009 4
Unable to relate cause and
effect of every action during
implementation of macro
teaching.
No suggestion to overcome
weaknesses
Unable to relate cause and
effect of every action during
implementation of macro
teaching.
Unable to suggest suitable
actions to overcome the
weaknesses.
Able to relate cause and effect
of every action during
implementation of macro
teaching.
Able to suggest some suitable
actions to overcome the
weaknesses.
Able to relate cause and effect
of every action during
implementation of macro
teaching.
Able to suggest suitable and
relevant actions to overcome
weaknesses.c. Attainment of experience /
knowledge
Unable to state elements of
new experiences / knowledge
gained.
Able to state some new
experiences / knowledge
gained but description
unclear.
Able to state clearly some new
experiences / knowledge
gained.
Able to state clearly new
experiences / knowledge
gained.
d. Level of thinking skills
Shows poor analytical and
critical level of thinking.
Shows moderate analytical
and critical level of thinking.
Shows good analytical and
critical level of thinking.
Shows excellent analytical and
critical level of thinking.
e. Relating theory and
practiceUnable to relate theory and
practice.
Able to relate theory and
practice but unable to
describe them.
Able to relate theory and
practice but unclear
description.
Able to relate and describe
clearly theory and practice.
(D) ATTITUDE
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
a. Self appearance
Attire unsuitable with
profession and place.
Unable to adapt to current
situation and condition.
Neatly attired, polite and good
mannered.
Shows effort in eliciting a
friendly and unstressful
environment amongst
students.
Neatly attired, polite, good
mannered, friendly and shows
qualities of a good teacher.
Shows confidence in all
undertakings, friendly, a good
sense of humor, polite and
good mannered..
Shows qualities of a good
teacher.b. Concern
Does not show concern to the
needs of student with
different problems and ability.
Sensitive to the needs of
students and shows effort in
handling problems.
Shows humanistic
characteristics such as
sensitive, friendly, patient and
concerned with students
problems and needs.
Shows humanistic
characteristics such as
sensitive, friendly, patient,
empathy, considerate and
concerned with students
welfare and safety.
Able to take suitable action for
every problem faced.
c. Professional characteristics
Shows nonprofessional
characteristics such asirresponsible, undedicated,
lack of determination,
reluctant to sacrifice time, and
does not contribute ideas.
Aware of the professional
characteristics of a teacher.
Practices professional
characteristics, motivated,determined and contributes
ideas and opinions.
Practices professional
characteristics.Willing to sacrifice time and
effort.
Shows responsibility,
commitment and
determination.