Upload
lytuyen
View
224
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Guidance Note on
Accounting for Real
Estate Transactions
Dinesh Jangid
Background and current accounting
practices
Agenda
2
© 2012 KPMG, an Indian Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network
of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative
(“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 3
Background
Current accounting is mostly driven by the GN of the Institute of Chartered
Accountant of India (ICAI) on ‘Recognition of Revenue by Real Estate Developers’
which was issued in June 2006
On 11 February 2012, the ICAI finalized the revised GN on Accounting for Real
Estate Transactions. This GN supersedes the above existing GN of ICAI
The revised GN seeks to align the current diverse accounting practices by giving
certain bright-lines for determining the eligibility of real estate projects for
revenue recognition
The revised GN should be applied to all projects in real estate which will
commence or on which the revenue is recognised for the first time on or after 1
April 2012. Early application is permitted
4© 2012 KPMG, an Indian Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member
firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights
reserved.
Key principles of the existing GN of 2006 (1/2)
© 2012 KPMG, an Indian Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member
firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights
reserved.
For recognition of revenue in case of real estate sales, it is necessary that ALL the following
conditions, specified in paragraphs 10 and 11 of Accounting Standard (AS) 9, Revenue
Recognition are satisfied:
Ultimate collection is reasonably assured
the property in the goods or all significant risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred to
the buyer
Seller retains no effective control of the goods transferred to a degree usually associated with
ownership
no significant uncertainty exists regarding the amount of the consideration
The point of time at which all significant risks and rewards of ownership can be
considered as transferred, is required to be determined on the basis of the terms
and conditions of the agreement for sale.Issue
5© 2012 KPMG, an Indian Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member
firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights
reserved.
Key principles of the existing GN of 2006 (2/2)
© 2012 KPMG, an Indian Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member
firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights
reserved.
As per the existing GN, legally enforceable agreement for sale with the buyer at initial stages of
construction is considered to have the effect of transferring all significant risks and rewards of
ownership to the buyer provided the following conditions have been satisfied:
a) Price risk has been transferred to the buyer
b) The buyer has a legal right to sell or transfer his interest in the property
In case the seller is obliged to perform any substantial acts after the transfer of all significant risks
and rewards of ownership, revenue should be recognised on proportionate basis as the acts are
performed.
The existing GN does not give guidance on the application of the Percentage of
Completion (POC) method but refers to AS 7, Construction Contracts.Issue
6© 2012 KPMG, an Indian Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member
firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights
reserved.
Current accounting practices – A great diversity in practice
© 2012 KPMG, an Indian Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member
firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights
reserved.
Some of the key areas where there is inconsistency in application of the erstwhile GN:
Completed contract vs. POC method
Method for determining the POC – Input vs. output method
Threshold for revenue recognition
Project costs – whether cost of land and development rights are part of the project costs
Borrowing costs – capitalization and the manner of computation
Because of the diversity in practice in the above key areas, it has been
extremely difficult to compare the financial results and true assets of
companies in this sector
Impact
7© 2012 KPMG, an Indian Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member
firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights
reserved.
Highlights of the revised GN 2012
Agenda
7
8© 2012 KPMG, an Indian Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member
firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights
reserved.
© 2012 KPMG, an Indian Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member
firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights
reserved.
Agreement for sale is considered to have the effect of transferring all significant
risk and rewards of ownership to the buyer provided the agreement is legally
enforceable
Impact
The revised GN 2012 – Percentage of Completion Method
The GN mandates the application of the POC method in respect of transactions in real estate where the
economic substance is similar to construction type contracts
Indicators for determining if the economic substance of the transactions is similar to construction type
contracts :
Period of project is in excess of 12 months
Project features include land development, structural engineering, architectural design, construction
etc.
Individual units are interdependent upon completion of a number of common activities or amenities
Construction or development activities form a significant proportion of the project activity
9© 2012 KPMG, an Indian Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member
firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights
reserved.
© 2012 KPMG, an Indian Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member
firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights
reserved.
Revenue recognition to be deferred until key approvals (environmental and other
clearances, approval of plans & designs, title to land, change in land use) are
obtained
Land and development right costs to be excluded for computation of the 25% cost
threshold (as above)
Impact
The revised GN 2012 – Key principles
There is a rebuttable presumption that the outcome of a real estate project can be estimated reliably
and that revenue should be recognised based on POC method only when all the following events are
completed:
All critical approvals necessary for commencement of the project have been obtained
Expenditure incurred on construction and development is higher than 25 percent of the construction
and development costs
At least 25 percent of the saleable project area is secured by contracts or agreements with buyers; and
At least 10 percent of the total revenue realized from each contracts
10© 2012 KPMG, an Indian Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member
firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights
reserved.
© 2012 KPMG, an Indian Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member
firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights
reserved.
Companies that are currently following output method, may either switch to the
input method or maintain a parallel input method based computations
Companies to keep track of defaulting customers to determine the overall cap of
revenue recognition
Impact
The revised GN 2012 – Key principles
Revenue from sale of undeveloped plots of land (including long term sale type leases) not to be recognized
before possession is effectively handed over to the buyer and other conditions have been satisfied
For POC, input method is preferred but other methods are also allowed. Revenue per the other method shall
not exceed the revenue per the input method
Overall restriction on recognition of revenue when there are outstanding defaults in payment by customers
TDRs acquired by giving up of rights over existing structures or open land to be valued at lower of the fair
market value and net book value of the portion given up
For contracts with multiple deliverables, the total sales consideration to be split based on fair market value of
each component
11© 2012 KPMG, an Indian Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member
firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights
reserved.
© 2012 KPMG, an Indian Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member
firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights
reserved.
The revised GN 2012 – Project costs
Project cost includes
Cost of land and cost of development rights
Borrowing costs and
Construction and development costs.
Cost of land and cost of development rights may include cost of land itself or development rights and other
related costs such as stamp duty, registration, brokerage and other incidental expenses. It also includes
rehabilitation costs.
Borrowing costs are capitalized in accordance with AS-16, Borrowing Costs which are incurred directly in
relation to a project
12© 2012 KPMG, an Indian Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member
firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights
reserved.
© 2012 KPMG, an Indian Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member
firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights
reserved.
The revised GN 2012 – Project costs
3) Construction and development costs include:
• Costs that relate directly to a specific project including:
• land conversion costs, betterment charges, municipal sanction fee and other charges for obtaining building
permissions;
• site labour costs, including site supervision;
• costs of materials used in construction or development of property;
• depreciation of plant and equipment used for the project;
• costs of moving plant, equipment and materials to and from the project site;
• costs of hiring plant and equipment;
• costs of design and technical assistance that is directly related to the project;
• claims from third parties
• estimated costs of rectification and guarantee work, including expected warranty costs
13© 2012 KPMG, an Indian Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member
firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights
reserved.
© 2012 KPMG, an Indian Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member
firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights
reserved.
The revised GN 2012 – Project costs
Costs that may be attributable to protect activity in general and allocated to specific projects includes:
• insurance;
• costs of design and technical assistance that is not directly related to a specific project;
• construction and development overheads (includes preparation and processing of construction personnel
payroll cost)
• borrowing costs
NOTE: These allocation is to be based on the normal level of project activity.
Exclusion from project cost, if they are material:
• general administration costs;
• research and development costs;
• depreciation of idle plant and equipment;
• cost of unconsumed or uninstalled material delivered at site; and
• payments made to sub-contractors in advance of work performed.
• selling costs (like brokerage charges);
14© 2012 KPMG, an Indian Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member
firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights
reserved.
© 2012 KPMG, an Indian Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member
firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights
reserved.
The revised GN 2012 – Cost of TDR
*Fair market value may be determined by reference either to the asset or portion thereof given up or to
the fair market value of rights acquired whichever is more clearly evident.
Purchase/ Acquisition: When TDRs are utilized in a real estate project by an entity, the cost of
acquisition should be added to the projects costs.
Sale/ Transfer: When TDRs are sold or transferred, revenue should be recognized when:
• title to the development rights is transferred to the buyer
• it is not unreasonable to expect ultimate realization of revenue.
Mode of acquisition Cost of acquisition
Direct purchase Cost of purchases
Development and construction
of built-up area
Amount spent on development or construction of built-up area
Exchange of rights over
existing structures or open
land
Lower of
* Fair market value or
Net book value
Transferable development rights (TDRs)
15© 2012 KPMG, an Indian Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member
firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights
reserved.
The revised GN 2012 – Sale of plot of land
16© 2012 KPMG, an Indian Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member
firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights
reserved.
© 2012 KPMG, an Indian Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member
firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights
reserved.
Transition – Long term projects where even a small revenue is recognised before 1 April 2012,
will be accounted for based on the existing GNIssues
The revised GN 2012 – Implementation challenges
The Guidance Note should be applied to all projects in real estate:
which are commenced on or after April 1, 2012; and
to projects which have already commenced but where revenue is being recognized for the first time on or
after April 1, 2012.
An enterprise may choose to apply the Guidance Note from an earlier date provided it applies it to all
transactions which commenced or were entered into on or after such earlier date.
Project is the smallest group of units/plots/saleable spaces which are linked with a common set of
amenities in such a manner that unless the common amenities are made available and functional, these
units /plots / saleable spaces cannot be put to their intended effective use.
17© 2012 KPMG, an Indian Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member
firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights
reserved.
© 2012 KPMG, an Indian Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member
firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights
reserved.
A project is defined as a smallest group of units / plots / saleable spaces which are
linked with a common set of amenities…
For a few years, the real estate companies may have to keep two separate revenue
recognition computations – for projects pre and post the implement of the revised GN
Issues
The revised GN 2012 – Implementation challenges
Impact on revenue recognition if there are restriction of transfer during construction period
Transition – Long term projects where even a small revenue is recognised before 1 April 2012, will be
accounted for based on the existing GN
Payment defaults – It is not clear if post balance sheet date defaults or payments to be considered.
Accounting for costs in case if the revenue is restricted to non-defaulting contracts
Communication with stake holders – On deferral of revenue, some of the debt covenants may get broken.
Time and effective communication with different stakeholders is going to be a key in managing the
transition
18© 2012 KPMG, an Indian Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member
firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights
reserved.
Example
Agenda
18
© 2012 KPMG, an Indian Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member
firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights
reserved.
Examples
Illustration: Relevant details of the project are* :
Total saleable area 20,000 square feet
Land cost INR 30 million
Estimated construction cost INR 30 million
Estimated project costs INR 60 million
Work completed till the reporting date :
Land cost INR 30 million
Construction cost INR 6 million
Total area sold till reporting date 5,000 square feet
Total sale consideration as per agreements of sale executed INR 20 million
Amount realized till the end of reporting period** INR 5 million
*It is assumed that all critical approvals for commencement have been received
**It is assumed that there are no defaults from customers
Construction type contract (No revenue recognition)– Example (1/2)
© 2012 KPMG, an Indian Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member
firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights
reserved.
Examples
Solution:
Level of development 20% (percentage of total construction cost incurred of total estimated
construction cost)
Stage of development 60% (percentage of total project cost incurred of total estimated project cost)
Project area sold 25%
Agreement amount realized 25%
As at the end of the reporting period the entity will not be able to recognize any revenue as reasonable level of development, which is
25% of the total construction cost, has not been achieved.
Construction type contract (No revenue recognition)– Example (2/2)
© 2012 KPMG, an Indian Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member
firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights
reserved.
Examples
Illustration: Relevant details of the project are* :
Total saleable area 20,000 square feet
Land cost INR 30 million
Estimated construction cost INR 30 million
Estimated project costs INR 60 million
Work completed till the reporting date :
Land cost INR 30 million
Construction cost INR 9 million
Total area sold till reporting date 5,000 square feet
Total sale consideration as per agreements of sale executed INR 20 million
Amount realized till the end of reporting period** INR 5 million
*It is assumed that all critical approvals for commencement have been received
**It is assumed that there are no defaults from customers
Construction type contract (Revenue recognized) – Example (1/2)
© 2012 KPMG, an Indian Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member
firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights
reserved.
Examples
Solution:
Level of development 30% (percentage of total construction cost incurred of total estimated
construction cost)
Stage of development 65% (percentage of total project cost incurred of total estimated project
cost)
Project area sold 25%
Agreement amount realized 25%
As all the criteria for revenue recognition are being met, revenue can be recognized using the POCM. However, revenue should
not exceed estimated total revenue from legally binding contracts.
The revenue recognition and profits are:
Revenue recognized INR 13 million
(65% of INR 20 million as per agreement of sale)
Proportionate cost of revenue INR 9.75 million
(39 million X 5,000 sq ft/ 20,000 sq ft)
Income from project INR 3.25 million
Work in progress to be carried forward INR 29.25 million
(INR 39 million – INR 9.75 million)
Construction type contract (Revenue recognized)– Example (2/2)
23
&
Questions
Answers
© 2012 KPMG, an Indian Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network
of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative
(“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
Thank You
© 2012 KPMG, an Indian Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a
Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
The KPMG name, logo and "cutting through complexity" are registered trademarks or trademarks of KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International").
Dinesh Jangid
Associate Director
Accounting Advisory Services
KPMG in India
Phone: +91 (22) 30901953
Email: [email protected]