37
Grounded Theory Group D

Grounded Theory

  • Upload
    kele

  • View
    37

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Grounded Theory. Group D. Group Members: Nur Afiqah bte Hj Sahminan 11M8060 Hajah Siti Hasara Haji Matussin 11M8123 Mohd Suzyreen b Hj Suhaili 11M8124 Marazibah Hj Matyassin 11M8125 Hajah Norehsan bte Haji Muhamad Diah 11M8126 Norazlinawati bt Hj A. Magon 11M8128 . Group D. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Grounded Theory

Grounded Theory

Group D

Page 2: Grounded Theory

Group D

Group Members:

Nur Afiqah bte Hj Sahminan 11M8060

Hajah Siti Hasara Haji Matussin 11M8123

Mohd Suzyreen b Hj Suhaili 11M8124

Marazibah Hj Matyassin11M8125

Hajah Norehsan bte Haji Muhamad Diah 11M8126

Norazlinawati bt Hj A. Magon 11M8128

Page 3: Grounded Theory

OutlineIntroduction

Definition History

Features

When should Grounded Theory be used?Types of Grounded TheoryProcess of Grounded TheorySimilarities and differences with other qualitative method

Data Analysis

Page 4: Grounded Theory

Introduction-DefinitionGlaser&Strauss (1967):

‘The discovery of theory from data- systematically obtained and analysed in social research’

Strauss (1987:1):‘The methodological thrust of grounded theory is towards

the development of theory, without any particular commitment to specific kinds of data, lines of research, or theoretical interest...Rather it is a style of doing qualitative analysis that includes a number of distinct features...and the use of a coding paradigm to ensure conceptual development and density’

Page 5: Grounded Theory

Introduction-DefinitionStrauss & Corbin:

“is a general methodology for developing theory that is grounded in data systematically gathered and analyzed”.

Schwandt, 1997: “is often used in a nonspecific way to refer to any

approach to developing theoretical idea ( concepts, models, formal theories) that somehow begins with data”.

Page 6: Grounded Theory

Introduction-FounderBackground of the two scholars

Anselm Strauss joined University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) School of Nursing appointed as Director of the Department of Social and Behavioral Science.Barney Glaser completed his PhD at Columbia University in New Your, Strauss was granted a four-year funded study to examine the experience of dying, and recruited Glaser to the research team.

Page 7: Grounded Theory

Introduction-HistoryGlaser’s beliefs of induction and empiricism emphasised the generation of theory from the viewpoint of the participantsStrauss’s interpretive beliefs influenced the fieldwork and the participant-focused side of grounded theory.

Page 8: Grounded Theory

Introduction-History

Glaser Strauss

Empiricism Interpretive

GROUNDED THEORY

Page 9: Grounded Theory

Introduction-HistoryGlaser’s and Strauss’s beliefs enable qualitative research to become an explanatory theoretical framework. In the 1990’s, Strauss joined with Corbin to take grounded theory in another direction, to include predetermined categories for data and acknowledge problems with validity and reliability.

Page 10: Grounded Theory

When should GTM be used? According to Glaser:"Grounded Theory becomes an answer where other methodologies did not work well enough, especially in the sensitive dependent variable fields within the health science and business and management.“ According to Stern:“ the strongest case for the use of grounded theory is in investigations of relatively uncharted water, or to gain a fresh perspective in a familiar situation."

Page 11: Grounded Theory

Types of Grounded Theory

There are three dominant designs for grounded theory:

Systematic design (Strauss and Corbin:1998)This grounded theory design has three stages of coding which assist in developing categories from the data collected and creating a visual depiction of the coding paradigm. These categories evolve into theory generation and, subsequently, hypothesis.

Page 12: Grounded Theory

Types of Grounded Theory

Emerging design (Glaser: 1992) This design stresses the importance of comparing and connection categories and emerging theories from the data collected, allowing the research to develop a theory and discuss the relationships between categories.

Page 13: Grounded Theory

Types of Grounded Theory

Constructivist approach (Charmaz 1990, 2000, 2006).

This form of research design focuses on the importance of meanings individuals attribute to the focus of the study. Applying active codes, the researcher looks at the participants’ thoughts, feelings, stances, viewpoints, assertions etc. and places this information into categories during the data collection. Furthermore, this techniques allows the research bring some of their own views, beliefs, feelings and questions to the data.

Page 14: Grounded Theory

Process of Grounded Theory

The following steps are a systematic form of investigation which is often used in grounded theory research as it is easy to follow and allows some structure for beginning inexperienced researchers. However, emerging and constructivist forms of inquiry are also useful in conducting grounded theory research.

Page 15: Grounded Theory

1 •DECIDE if a grounded theory design best addresses the research problem

2 •IDENTIFY a process

3 •SEEK approval and access

4 •CONDUCT theoretical sampling

5 •CODE the data

6 •USE selective coding and developing theory

7 •VALIDATE your theory

8 •WRITE a grounded theory research report

Page 16: Grounded Theory

Similarities to other Qualitative Methods

Sources of data are the same:InterviewsField observationsDocument of all kinds (including diaries, letters, autobiographies, historical accounts and newspapers and other media materials)Videotapes

Providing evidence to support the validity of the theory, interpretations, must or should, include the perspectives and voices of those studied

Page 17: Grounded Theory

Differences to other Qualitative Method

Emphasis upon theory development rather than the nature of their methodologyVerification done throughout the course of a research project rather than through follow-up

Page 18: Grounded Theory

Article Review

Page 19: Grounded Theory

Leadership under Severe Stress : A Grounded Theory Study. By Gerry Larsson, Ann Johansson, Tina Jansson, Gunilla Gronlund

Humanitarian Nursing Challenges: A Grounded Theory Study. By CDR Angelica L.C.

Living With A Spinal Cord Injury: A Grounded Theory Approach. By Hsiao-Yu Chen & Jennifer RP Boore

Finding A Way: A Grounded Theory of Young People’s Experience of The Pathway to Mental Health Care. By S Webster & L Harrison.

The Difference Between Secondary School Principals’ Servant Leadership In Lower Achieving And Higher Achieving Secondary Schools. By Traci R. Pattison Dr. Cynthia Macgregor

Keeping Vigil Over The Profession: A Grounded Theory Of The Context Of Nurse Anaesthesia Practice. By Rita S Schreiber and Marjorie A MacDonald

Article 1

Article 2

Article 3

Article 4

Article 5

Article 6

Page 20: Grounded Theory

Aims:

Article 1

Article 2

Article 3

To develop a theoretical understanding of leadership under severe stress using a

grounded theory approach

To gather information about experiences of patients suffering spinal cord injury (SCI), their needs and perceptions, to

enhance effective rehabilitation nursing care.

1) To explain U.S Navy nurses’ experiences during Operation Unified Assistance (OUA) – how they prepared, clinically performed, and worked with non-governmental organization nurses.

2) To construct a grounded theory

Page 21: Grounded Theory

To explore how young people experienced the onset of mental health problems and to investigate their initial interactions with the health system by using Grounded Theory Method

The purpose of the study was to develop an understanding of the relationships between

secondary school principals’ servant leadership in lower achieving and higher

achieving schools and student achievement.

To explore how nurse anaesthetists protect and promote their profession.

Article 4

Article 5

Article 6

Page 22: Grounded Theory

Types of Grounded Theory Used

Articles Types of Grounded Theory

Article 1 Emerging design

Article 2 Systematic design

Article 3 Emerging design

Article 4 Systematic Design

Article 5 Emerging Design

Article 6 Systematic approach

Page 23: Grounded Theory

Sampling

Article 1

Article 2

Article 3

5 Swedish Officers and 3 soldiers 4 Norwegian Officers and 4

psychologist

11 Navy nurses consented to participate in the research study

15 patients (11 males and 4 females)

Page 24: Grounded Theory

Article 5

Article 1

Article 4

41 certified registered nurse anaesthetists, 18 males and 23

females

70 teachers from five higher achieving schools and five lower

achieving schools

8 males and 12 females between the ages of eighteen and twenty

five

Page 25: Grounded Theory

Article 1 •Individual Interviews and follow up group interviews (interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed according to constant comparative method

Article 2 •Tape-recorded interviews (face-to-face and telephone conversation).•Observations.•Field notes.•memos

Article 3 •Semi-structured, tape recorded interview and observation of a group discussion.•In open sampling, interview was done to explore as many properties of categories as possible.•After the core category emerged, theoretical sampling was performed.

Methodology

Page 26: Grounded Theory

Article 4 •Tape recorded in-depth semi-structured interviews.

Article 5 •An open ended question was administered.

Article 6 •Participant observation and•Interviews

Page 27: Grounded Theory

Analysis

Article 1

Open coding Sorted into categories by constant comparison between categories Fitting together the categories using constant comparative method

Article 2

Strauss and Corbin’s methodology of open coding, axial coding and selective coding was used to analyze the data. Examine each line of data to define and categorize information through open coding, then focused on

participants’ view of reality through line-by-line coding. Resulting data were divided into segments and re-examined for commonalities that reflected like categories or

themes. Once categorized, data were examined for properties such as specific attributes or subcategories. Throughout this process the constant comparative method was utilized where current data are compared to

incoming data. Progressed to discussion of the interconnections between categories and subcategories. The research team collaborated in selective coding, focus coding efforts and discussing. Subsequently, a theory grounded in the participants’ data which explained the phenomenon studied through a

visual model was formed. A grounded theory mentor was conducted to performed and review the research process as it unfolded and to

ensure dependability of the findings. To ensure the resulting theory was empirically grounded in the data, credibility of the findings was achieved

through “member checking” where the participants were given opportunities to review transcripts and validate that information accurately reflected their OUA experiences

Page 28: Grounded Theory

Article 3

Article 4

Constant Comparative Analysis during interviews (by using open ended questions)

Coding: to distinguish the difference in data Theoretical Saturation was evident after examining 16 transcripts

The following were interwoven with each other from the beginning of data collection until theoretical saturation was achieved: Constant comparison methods, Asking questions, Keeping memoranda and diagramming record, Reading literature.

Page 29: Grounded Theory

Article 5

Article 6

A diagnosis of open ended questions focused on the principal’s philosophy of leadership and impact on student achievement.

Assigned increasingly abstract codes and compared incoming data to other data, to concepts,and to emerging categories. Constantly madecomparisons among ideas about actions and interactionsoccurring in the data and constructed a theory ofnurse anaesthesia practice, Keeping Vigil comprisingtwo major categories.

Page 30: Grounded Theory

Article 1

Model of leadership under severe stress and the underlying circumstances

Second stage data used to add, elaborate and saturate codes and categories

Article 2A theoretical model was developed to illustrate how participants experienced the mission. Key lessons

learned were that most were unprepared for providing pediatric care and saying “No” in

delivering care.Article 3

The findings resulted in the core category ‘living with a spinal cord injury’ and identify the experiences of a SCI.

Three stages were identified as the individual experiences: A catastrophic life event,

Confronting challenged,

Moving forward or Withdraw from society.

Findings

Page 31: Grounded Theory

Article 4Finding A Way has four stages:

First Sign

Recognition

Understanding

Resolution

Article 5 Shared decision making and principal compassion and positive attitude emerged as the reoccurring pattern to the open ended questions

for teachers at higher achieving schools. Article 6From our study of the context of nurse

anaesthesia practice, it is clear that CRNAs are dedicated to protecting their ability to provide

high quality patient care by maintaining constant vigilance over their profession.

Page 32: Grounded Theory

Summary

Summary on Grounded Theory

Page 33: Grounded Theory

ReferencesBirks,M.& Mills, J.(2011). Grounded Theory: A Practicle Guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

CDR Angelica L.C (2009). Humanitarian Nursing Challenges: A Grounded Theory Study. Military Medicine, Volume 174. 5:479, from http://www.dtic.mil/cgibin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA520860

Chen, H.Y. & Boore, JRP. (2008). Living with a spinal cord injury: A grounded theory approach. Journal of Nursing and Healthcare of Chronic Illness in association with Journal of Clinical Nursing, 17(5a), 116–124. Retrieved 15th March 2012, from http://www.orthonurse.org/portals/0/living%20with%20spinal%20cord%20injury.pdf

Page 34: Grounded Theory

ReferencesFlavel,S & Meyers, J (2011, Mar 21). Grounded Theory.Retrieved March 11, 2012 from www.youtube.com/watch?v=6wmeGlaser, BG & Strauss, AL (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine De GouyterGlaser, BG. 1995. Grounded Theory 1984-1994. Sociology Press, pp. 880. [HM48 Gro CLMS, -] MEMO: Grounded Theory Methodology Reader, 2 volumes, from http://gtm.vlsm.org/gtm-17.en.html .Larsson G, Johansson A,Jansson T,Gronlund G (2001). Leadership under Severe Stress : A Grounded Theory Study in Lester, R.I. and Morton, A.G. (Eds): Concepts for Air Force Leadership, Air University Press, Maxwell, AL, pp.441-447. From:www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/au-24/;arsspm2.pdf

Page 35: Grounded Theory

ReferencesPattisonT.R (2010). The Difference Between Secondary School Principals’ Servant Leadership In Lower Achieving And Higher Achieving Secondary Schools. Dissertations, Academic -- University of Missouri--Columbia Schreiber R. S & MacDonald M. A (2010). Keeping vigil over the profession: A grounded theory of the context of nurse anaesthesia practice. BMC Nursing 2010, 9:13.Schwandt, T.A. (1997). Qualitative Inquiry: A Dictionary of Terms. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1998). Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Page 36: Grounded Theory

ReferencesWadham, B. (2009), Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory. Retrieved 9th March 2012, from http://web.me.com/benwadham/QualitativeResearch/grounded_theory.html.

Webster, S. & Harrison, L. (2009). Finding A Way: A Grounded Theory of Young People’s Experience of The Pathway to Mental Health Care. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26 (2), 85-94

Page 37: Grounded Theory

Thank you!