Grieser & Eichler - University of Oklahoma · ,Henry, EFrezon, S 1991 Petroleum Geology of •the Anadarko Basin Region, Province (115), Kansas, Oklahoma, and ... Wallow Field, Texas

Grieser & Eichler

1

•Granite Wash:

•Where Engineering and Geology Collide.

•An Unstoppable Force Meets An Immovable Object

Bill Grieser Carla Eichler Nov 13th 2014

© 2014 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 1

•Outline

•I Granite Wash Deposition

•I Subsurface visualization

•I Granite Wash Stack Play Completions Overview

•I Completion averages 2005-2014

•I Fracture geometry

•I Questions

•© 2014 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 2

Grieser & Eichler

2

•

•

•

•

•

•

•Ball et al, 1991.

•Geologic History

••

•10.0oo

•Anadarko

•Basin 20,0•:;1)44,•:::i

i. •Dalhart Basin

•7 .

•I-Eardeman Basin ..... sr:N-N'"--.V IN, • I

•..., . •(Hollis) Wichita 1_, t---tizt-,',•Mtn. Uplift ,„,•)..... ,- -. ),...,

•).0 .'C,It?, --%--•;---r'

•Ardmore Basin * . o0,... •Muenster Arch '00o ,

•Fort W orth 0 Basin

•Mitchell, 2011.

•100 MI.

•NASA •Sown •TEXAS •KANSAS

•OKLAHOM

A

{panhandle),

•TERTIARY •CRETACEOUS PERMIAN

•SHALLOW •SHELF PF10,110E

• Ingl Grano° warn

Carbone./

SanaIalona ..nNo

Fault

•10 20 33 OH SO MILES a 1 • .

• DIAGRAMMATIC NORTH-SOUTH CROSS

SECTION THROUGH THE DEEP ANADARKO

BASIN

•DEEP BASIN PROVINCE

•GRANITE WASH PLAY DEPOSITIONAL MODEL

•Deepwater

Submarine Fan

Lobes (Proximal to

Medial to Distal)

•Fan Della ial Fan Lobe

•04. •1>4)/

)

•r e nt

•MOUNT MKS

CLIMATE AHD

NEATHEROG

•issairCve OII •cocust rwti MAROON smut?

•© 2014 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 3 Ball et al, 1991. HALLIBURTON

•Area of Interest

•Roger

•Mills •County

•Wheeler •County


Grieser & Eichler

3

•Stratigraphic Correlation

•Hendrickson et al., 2001


•

Stratigraphy and

Structure

•Avant Member •t i

•proa, liamdan Wash

•Cherokee Member

•Red Fork Wash

•Lower Skinner Wash

•Red Fork Wash •••Cherokee Member •Lower Marmeton

•Cherokee Member •Red Fork Wash

•lia,mxon

•kiddie Skinner Wash


•Douglas Sandstone

•JPP2, kb,q1.0.254

= 2 .

•Lower Marmaton

•A

'

•Cnactommd Llmovanx

PP2r kramannidganA

•Red Fork Wash

•Law.,at. Wasp

•Atoka Washes

•\ A t o k a W a s h e s

•l=l

•Dnopies sendeton

•Haskel l Unit •Haskel l Unit

•Cherokee Member

Upper Skinner Wash

kiddie Skinner Wash


•Cherokee Member

Upper Skinner Wash

Piddle Skinner Wash


•JP11.2, kb,11.31.1,54

•Lower Marmaton

•CICrtIlMrd

•LIPPer kra,a,AnW.h

•Lower Marmaton •Lower Skinner Wash

•Red Fork Wash

•Cherokee Member

Middle Skinner Wash


•Haskell Unit

•Haskel l Unit

•Avant Member

•Red Fork Wash

•Red Fork Wash

•I I H a s k e l l U n i t

•Avant Member

•Avant Member

•0.a,tawe mcuasa

•Haskel l Unit

•Avant Member


•Red Fork Wash

Douglas Sandstone Haskell Unit

Avant Member

Horionnter Limestone

Chec kb o a rd

Limestone Upper

Marmaton Wash Lower

Marmaton Cherokee

Member . Jpper Skinner

Wash diddle Skinner

Wash Lower Skinner

Wash Pink Interval

Red Fork Wash Middle Cherokee Wash

Lower Cherokee Wash

Atoka Washes

•© 2014 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 6 HALLIBURTON

Grieser & Eichler

4

•Framework


•3D View of Granite Wash Framework


Grieser & Eichler

5

•Well Placement

•Lateral Well in Lateral Well in

•Lower Skinner Upper Skinner

•Wash Wash


•References

•▌ Ball, M. M., Henry, M. E., Frezon, S. E., 1991, Petroleum Geology of•the Anadarko Basin Region, Province (115), Kansas, Oklahoma, and

•Texas: USGS Open-File Report 88-450W, 38 p.

•▌ Mitchell, J., 2011, Horizontal Drilling of Deep Granite Wash•Reservoirs, Anadarko Basin, Oklahoma and Texas: Shale Shaker, v.

•62, p. 118 – 167.

•▌ Hendrickson, W. J., Smith, P. J., Woods, R. J., 2001, Regional•Correlation of Mountain-Front “Washes” and Relationship to Marine

•Sediments of Anadarko Basin and Shelf: Oklahoma Geological

•Survey Circular 104, p. 71 - 80.


Grieser & Eichler

6

•Granite Wash Names

Cleveland Wash

Hogshooter

Marmaton A-F

Alvin GW

ClearFork

Caldwell

Des Moines Wash

Colony Wash

Strawn Wash

Cherokee Wash

Granite Wash A-H

RedFork A-D

Atoka A-E


•Granite Wash Area

•Active Counties

•Wheeler

•Hemphill

•Roberts •Area

•4800 sq miles

•Gray

•3000-17000 •Depth TVD

•Beckham •GOR scf/bbl •30,000-42,000

•Roger Mills •23-32

•Yield bbl/MMCF

•Custer •API •54

•Washita •Cost Horz •$4-7 MM

•Greer

•Dual Lateral •ERVED.

•$8-10 MM

Grieser & Eichler

7

•O

•Z

•2

• UNDIFFERENTIATED ATOKAN WASH

•© 2014 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. •13

1M

diN... UNDIFFERENTIATED MAR WIATON WASH

lb

UNDIFFERENTIATED

CT

-TE

RO

KE

E G

RO

UP

_ -

CHEROKEE WASH

mw.--

ME

IMMII

-..•GR AN TTE WASH A

N

0 N GRANITE WASH B

4 0

2 q

GRANITE WAST-T C -

....

GRANITE WASH D 41, 5

alrAr.4.

GRANITE WASH E

I 1 4

GRANITE WASH F

•

•• •HALLIBURTON

•Ll

•Stacked Play

•O

•GRANITE WASH G

•GRANITE WASH

•U-

•re

•X f

•re

•X f

•Drainage Moderate Perm Drainage Low Perm

•Area = 4000X1200 = 110 acre

•Lateral Length = 4000 ft.

•2Xf =

1200 ft.

•Well

EUR

•Depends

•On (kh)

•Not

( h)

•Horizontal drainage = (lateral length)* (2Xf) •© 2014 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 14

Grieser & Eichler

8

•1

•5

•Spacing (SP) = (SL) – (NC)(CL)

•(NC-1)

•Overall Stage Length (SL)

•Number of Clusters (NC)

•Cluster Length (CL)

•Stimulation Span (SS) = stage bottom perf – stage top

perf

•SL

•CL •S

S

•SP


•

•

•

•

•

•Average Lateral Length VS YEAR •Average Lateral Length by Year

•Marking:

•4673 ▪ Marking

•4387 •4262

•3397

•3919 •3929

4 5 0 0

4 0 0 0

3 5 0 0

3 0 0 0

2 5 0 0

2 0 0 0

1 5 0 0

1 0 0 0

500

0

4000

3450

Avg

(Hori

zon

tal

Well

Late

ral

Len

gth

)

2211

•Color by Year(DATE)

2 0 0 5

2 0 0 6

· 2 0 0 7

2006 2009 2 0 1 0 M 2 0 1 1 2012 2013 2014

•2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

•Year(DATE)

•© 2014 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 16HALLIBURTON

Grieser & Eichler

9

•Number of Frac Stages VS Year •Stage Count BY Year

•3 0

•2 5

•Marking:

Marking

•Color by

Year(DATE)

2 0 0 5

2 0 0 6

2 0 0 7

2 0 0 8

2 0 0 9

M2 0 1 0

2 0 1 1

M2 0 1 2

2 0 1 3

2 0 1 4

•C •0 20

•O •0 (

•1 5

•1 0

5

0

•B r D F l 1 1 1 - i k i M R T Y B C D F l H H J M O R i W B H L P T B B r C D F l I - 1 H J I M M R S N I Z C K I R B F r M S t E r l I R B D H M W B E l L R Z y

•2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

•Year(DATE), WELL NAME

•© 2014 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 17 HALLIBURTON

•

•Gallons/stage VS Year •Average Gallons Per Stage

•2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

•Year(DATE)

700000

650000

663706

600000 581629

550000

500000

450000

418270

400000 391184

363399 361268

350000

298215

300000

250000

200000

150000

100000

50000

0

•Avg

(Sta

ge

Gal

.)

•Marking: Marking

•Color by Year(DATE)

•486724

•imEMI

•I

•467545

•404964

2 0 0 5

2 0 0 6

2 0 0 7

2 0 0 6

2 0 0 0

2010 2011 2012 2013

2014

•CO 2014 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 18HALLIBURTON

Grieser & Eichler

10

•Lbs prop/stage VS Year •Average Lbs Per Stage

•Marking:

•260190 • Marking

260000

240000

220000

236569

250061

204060

200000

180000

160000 158212

152623

c ,140000

136945

132328

c c,

c, , 120000

100000

80000

60000

40000

20000

0

L

176785

•Color by

Year(DATE)

2 0 0 5

2 0 0 6

· 2 0 0 7

2 0 0 6

2 0 0 9

2 0 1 0

M 2 0 1 1

2 0 1 2

2 0 1 3

2 0 1 4

•236045

•4

•2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

•Year(DATE)

•© 2014 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 19HALLIBURTON

Rate-

Liq+Prop

Clean

Vol. Proppant Proppant Conc.

Prop.

Mass

80 20000 0 0

80 40000 0 0

80 22000 40/70 0.1 2200

80 15000 sweep 0 0

80 22000 40/70 0.1 2200

80 15000 sweep 0 0

80 22000 40/70 0.25 5500

80 15000 sweep 0 0

80 22000 40/70 0.25 5500

80 15000 sweep 0 0

80 22000 40/70 0.5 11000

80 15000 sweep 0 0

80 22000 40/70 0.5 11000

80 15000 sweep 0 0

80 22000 40/70 0.5 11000

80 15000 sweep 0 0

80 22000 40/70 0.6 13200

80 15000 sweep 0 0

80 22000 40/70 0.6 13200

80 15000 sweep 0 0

80 22000 40/70 0.6 13200

80 15000 sweep 0 0

80 22000 40/70 0.7 15400

80 15000 sweep 0 0

80 22000 40/70 0.7 15400

80 15000 sweep 0 0

80 22000 40/70 0.7 15400

80 15000 sweep 0 0

80 22000 40/70 0.9 19800

80 15000 sweep 0 0

80 26000 40/70 1 26000

80 15000 sweep 0 0

80 25000 40/70 1 25000

80 15000 sweep 0 0

80 25000 40/70 1 25000 80 ©

16197.3 LLBURTO

flush LL RIGH RV 0 0

700197.3 230000

•GW Completions

•Lateral stim length (SL) =4000-4300 ft.

•Number of stages 8-21

•Stim Span Ft/stage (SS) 200-525 ft.

•Lateral stim length (SL) =9600-9800 ft.

•Number of stages 25-30

•Stim Span Ft/stage (SS) 325 – 388 ft.

•Perforations:

•3 clusters 3 ft. 6spf 54 holes 127 ft spacing

•4 clusters 3 ft. 4spf 48 holes 107 ft. spacing

•1.5 to 1.7 BPM/perf

•2 0

Grieser & Eichler

11

•Granite Wash Horizontal Frac Planes From MSM

•132 planes (7 families 77°, 111°, 82°,110°, 118°,254°)

9.99e7 ft2 Fracture Face Area


•


•SPE 104546 •Granite Wash Field Study-Buffalo

Wallow Field, Texas Panhandle

•SPE 106531 •Enhancing and Sustaining

Well Production - Granite

Wash, TX Panhandle

•SPE 88530 •Holistic Field Evaluations Improve

Prospect Opportunities

•SPE 39814 •Granite Wash Completion Optimization

with the Aid of Artificial Neural Networks

•SPE 67198 •Zone Selection and Production

Prediction Using Advanced Logging

Technology

•SPE 125732 •What Can Injection Falloff Tell About

Job Placement and Production in Tight

Gas Sand

•Questions

Documents

Grieser & Eichler - University of Oklahoma · ,Henry, EFrezon, S 1991 Petroleum Geology of •the Anadarko Basin Region, Province (115), Kansas, Oklahoma, and ... Wallow Field, Texas