25
Grid and Particle Based Methods for Complex Flows - the Way Forward Tim Phillips Cardiff University EPSRC Portfolio Partnership on Complex Fluids and Complex Flows Dynamics of Complex Fluids 10 Years On

Grid and Particle Based Methods for Complex Flows - the Way Forward

  • Upload
    wilma

  • View
    38

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Grid and Particle Based Methods for Complex Flows - the Way Forward. Tim Phillips Cardiff University EPSRC Portfolio Partnership on Complex Fluids and Complex Flows. Dynamics of Complex Fluids 10 Years On. Grid-Based Methods. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Grid and Particle Based Methods for Complex Flows - the Way Forward

Grid and Particle Based Methods for Complex Flows - the Way

Forward

Tim PhillipsCardiff University

EPSRC Portfolio Partnership on

Complex Fluids and Complex Flows

Dynamics of Complex Fluids

10 Years On

Page 2: Grid and Particle Based Methods for Complex Flows - the Way Forward

Grid-Based Methods

• Finite difference, finite element, finite volume, spectral element methods

• Traditionally based on macroscopic description• Characterised by the solution of large systems of

algebraic equations (linear/nonlinear)• Upwinding or reformulations of the governing

equations required for numerical stability e.g. SUPG, EEME, EVSS, D-EVSS, D-EVSS-G,log of conformation tensor, …

Page 3: Grid and Particle Based Methods for Complex Flows - the Way Forward

FE/FV spatial discretisation and median dual cell

FV control volume and MDC for FE/FV

FE with 4 fv sub-cells for FE/FV

T3T2

T1

T6

T5

T4l

fe triangular elementfv triangular sub-cells

fe vertex nodes (p, u, )

fe midside nodes (u, )

fv vertex nodes ()

Finite Volume Grid for SLFV

i , j + 2

i , j - 2

i , j + 1

i + 2 , ji - 2 , j i , ji - 1 , j i + 1 , j

i , j - 1

SLFV spatial discretisation

U

V

P, xx, yy,

xy

Page 4: Grid and Particle Based Methods for Complex Flows - the Way Forward

SXPP, 4:1 planar contraction, salient corner vortex intensity and cell size -

scheme, Re and We variation

= 1/9, = 1/3, = 0.15, q = 2.

Salient corner vortex intensity Salient corner vortex cell size

Page 5: Grid and Particle Based Methods for Complex Flows - the Way Forward

The eXtended pom-pom model parameters

g q r

0.0038946 72006 1 7 0.3

0.05139 15770 1 5 0.3

0.50349 3334 2 3 0.15

4.5911 300.8 10 1.1 0.03

Data is of DSM LDPE Stamylan LD2008 XC43, Scanned from Verbeeten et. al. J Non-Newtonian Fluid mech. (2002)

Dimensionless parameters are:

/i i i pg %

For U=1 and where

We q 1/r

0.0038946 0.067567 1 0.142857 0.3

0.05139 0.195259 1 0.2 0.3

0.50349 0.404442 2 0.333333 0.15

4.5911 0.332732 10 0.909091 0.03

0.3i

iq

sii

bi

Page 6: Grid and Particle Based Methods for Complex Flows - the Way Forward

Backbone Stretch – Max We=3.15

Page 7: Grid and Particle Based Methods for Complex Flows - the Way Forward

Dynamics of Polymer SolutionsMicroscopic Formulation

• The stress depends on the orientation and degree of stretch of a molecule

• Coarse-grained molecular model for the polymers is derived neglecting interactions between different polymer chains

• Polymeric stress determined using the Kramers expression

)(QQFI

Page 8: Grid and Particle Based Methods for Complex Flows - the Way Forward

Dumbbell Models

2

2)(

2

1)(

2

1)(

QQFQt

tc

Two beads connected by a spring. The equation of motion of each bead contains contributions from the tension force in the spring, the viscous drag force, and the force due to Brownian motion.

Q

The dimensionless form of the Fokker-Planck equation for homogeneous flows is

Page 9: Grid and Particle Based Methods for Complex Flows - the Way Forward

Force Laws

Hookean FENE FENE-P

21 /Q bQ

21 /Q bQ

3

)()()(R

dQQQfQf

Q

Page 10: Grid and Particle Based Methods for Complex Flows - the Way Forward

General Form of the Dimensionless Fokker-Planck Equation

Equivalent SDE (see Öttinger (1995))

where D(Q(t),t) = B(Q(t),t) BT(Q(t),t)

1, , ) , , ,

2t t t t t

t

Q A Q Q D Q QQ Q Q

, ,d t t t dt t t d t Q A Q B Q W

Page 11: Grid and Particle Based Methods for Complex Flows - the Way Forward

Fokker-Planck v. Stochastic Simulations• Stochastic simulation techniques are CPU intensive,

require large memory requirements and suffer from statistical noise in the computation of p (Chauvière and Lozinski (2003,2004))

• The competitiveness of Fokker-Planck techniques diminishes for flows with high shear-rates.

• Fokker-Planck techniques are restricted to models with low-dimensional configuration space due to computational cost – but see recent work of Chinesta et al. on reduced basis function techniques.

Page 12: Grid and Particle Based Methods for Complex Flows - the Way Forward

Micro-Macro Techniques

• CONNFFESSIT – Laso and Ottinger

• Variance reduction techniques

• Lagrangian particle methods – Keunings

• Method of Brownian configuration fields - Hulsen

Page 13: Grid and Particle Based Methods for Complex Flows - the Way Forward

Method of Brownian Configuration Fields

• Devised by Hulsen et al (1997) to overcome the problem of tracking particle trajectories

• Based on the evolution of a number of continuous configuration fields

• Dumbbell connectors with the same initial configuration and subject to same random forces throughout the domain are combined to form a configuration field

• The evolution of an ensemble of configuration fields provides the polymer dynamics

Page 14: Grid and Particle Based Methods for Complex Flows - the Way Forward

Semi-Implicit Algorithm for the FENE Model

jj

jjjjj W

tt

btQ

tQtQttQtQ

/)(1

)(

2

1)()()()(

21

jj

jjjjj

jjj

Wt

tbtQ

tQtQttQt

tQtQbtQ

t

/)(1

)(

2

1)()()()(

2

1

)()(/)(14

11

211

11

2

Page 15: Grid and Particle Based Methods for Complex Flows - the Way Forward

Two Dimensional Eccentrically Rotating Cylinder Problem

RJ

RB

ex

y

= 1,s = 0.1, p = 0.8, t = 0.01, = 0.3,Nf = 10000.

k = 4,N = 6,RB = 2.5,RJ = 1.0,e = 1.0, = 0.5,

A

Page 16: Grid and Particle Based Methods for Complex Flows - the Way Forward

Force Evolution results for the Eccentrically Rotating Cylinder Model

Oldroyd B vs Hookean

0 5 10 15

-9

-8

-7

-6

-5

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

Time0 5 10 15

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

0 5 10 15

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

Time

Time

Fx

Fy Torque

Page 17: Grid and Particle Based Methods for Complex Flows - the Way Forward

FENE and FENE-P Modelsλ=1, ω=2, b=50

Page 18: Grid and Particle Based Methods for Complex Flows - the Way Forward

FENE and FENE-P Modelsλ=3, ω=2, b=50

Page 19: Grid and Particle Based Methods for Complex Flows - the Way Forward

Particle Based Methods

• Lattice Boltzmann Method - characterised by a lattice and some rule describing particle motion.

• Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics – based on a Lagrangian description with macroscopic variables obtained using suitable smoothing kernels.

Page 20: Grid and Particle Based Methods for Complex Flows - the Way Forward

D2Q9 Lattice

• 9 velocity model.

• Allows for rest particles.

• Multi speed model.

• Isotropic.

Page 21: Grid and Particle Based Methods for Complex Flows - the Way Forward

Spinodal Decomposition(density ratio=1, viscosity ratio=3)

Page 22: Grid and Particle Based Methods for Complex Flows - the Way Forward

t=3000

t=1500 t=2000

t=4000

Page 23: Grid and Particle Based Methods for Complex Flows - the Way Forward

t=6000

t=15000

t=8000

t=10000

Page 24: Grid and Particle Based Methods for Complex Flows - the Way Forward

t=20000 t=25000

t=30000

Page 25: Grid and Particle Based Methods for Complex Flows - the Way Forward

Particle Methods for Complex Fluids

• Extension of LBM – possibly using multi relaxation model by exploiting additional eigenvalues of the collision operator or in combination with a micro approach to the polymer dynamics.

• Extension of SPH to include viscoelastic behaviour.