GRCC Data Team

GRCC Data Team

August 25, 2010September 10, 2010

Purpose of the Data Team To review student outcomes

to determine those areas where the greatest achievement gaps exist

Role of the data team is NOT to determine what strategies we should consider to address achievement gaps That will come later…….

GRCC Data Team to study……

…the number of students who. . .

Complete developmental courses

Succeed in the gatekeeper courses

Complete courses with a grade of “C” or better

Re-enroll from one semester to the next

Complete--earn certificates and degrees

Relationship to Other Campus Teams/Work Strategic Planning (Strategic

Leadership Team) Achieving the Dream AQIP College Action Projects Department Action Projects AGC/Deans Council

ATD Framework “Achieving the Dream is especially

interested in low-income students and students of color because research shows that they are most at risk of not achieving success. At the same time, by improving outcomes for these students, colleges will be able to increase success rates for all students overall.”

From the “Field Guide for Improving Student Success, 2009”

Data Team – Aug/Sept 2010

ATD Project Teams– October 2010 – March 2011

Ongoing……

Data for two audiences. . . Simple,

repetitive data that we all wish EVERYONE AT THE COLLEGE KNEW ALL OF THE TIME:

graduation rate? Ethnic makeup of

student population?

Percentage of students needing dev ed?

DETAILED DATA FOR THE DATA TEAM:

Retention data by segment groups

Graduation rate data by segment groups

Course level data by segment groups

Ten Things Everyone at GRCC Should Know If we want all students who attend GRCC

to be successful and accomplish their goals, it’s important that we know the “basics” about our students and how well they are currently doing. By joining together to create a culture of evidence, we can diagnose problem areas and create strategies to improve student results.

Source: Institutional Research and Planning

Demographic Data/Outcome Data Credit student headcount Total number of unique students served in a

calendar year Ethnic makeup of student population Gender makeup of student population Age breakdown of students Percent of students receiving financial aid Fall to fall retention rate Graduation rate Percent of students needing developmental

education (AFP) Course success rate


1. Credit Student Headcount

1999 2000 2110 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009100001100012000130001400015000160001700018000

126021345113479

13923141111420614820

152721524715430

16992

Fall Enrollment


35% increase over 10 years

2. Total Number of Students Served Per Year

1999-00

2000-01

2001-02

2002-03

2003-04

2004-05

2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

20000220002400026000280003000032000

2376324720

23491 2348625282

23853

26226 2603228017

29430

Credit and Non-CreditUnduplicated


23% increase over 10 years

3. Ethnic Makeup

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

African American HispanicNative American AsianWhite

Fall 2009African American- 12.7%Hispanic – 7.3%Asian – 2.9%Native American – 1.0%White – 74%

Fall 1999African American- 6.5%Hispanic – 3.2%Asian – 2.7%Native American – 0.7%White – 83%Source: Institutional Research and Planning

4. Gender Makeup

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Male Female


Fall 2009Male – 48%Female – 52%

Fall 1999Male – 52%Female – 48%

5. Age Breakdown

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

0

10

20

30

40 4136 34 31 31 30 29 30 30 31 34

% of Students Age 25 or Older

Year Average Age

2002 24.92003 24.92004 24.72005 24.72006 24.82007 24.82008 24.92009 25.3


6. Percent of Students Receiving Needs-Based Financial Aid

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

No Financial AidFinancial Aid Recipients

Number (%) of Financial Aid Recipients in Fall 2009: 7636 (45%)

Number (%) of Financial Aid Recipients in Fall 2000:2290 (17%)


7. Fall to Fall Retention Rate

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

01020304050607080

60.3 6064.6 64.5 61.4 61.6 62.6 59

43.6 41.7 38.848.4 44.7 43.4 43.8 44.6

64.1 63.5 63.7 63.3 63.1 63.6 64 67.2

35.9 36.1 39 38.2 38 36.9 37.1 37.1

Full time - GRCCPart time - GRCCFull time - CSRDE BenchmarkPart time - CSRDE Benchmark


Very large Institutions

8. Graduation Rate - 3 Year (Degree/Certificate Seeking Students Only)

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 200602468

1012141618

16.715.7

16.915.5

14.4 15.1

2.74.6

3.2 3.4 2.54.3

12.3 11.6 11.7 11.1 11 10.6

2.7 2.4 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.6

Full time - GRCCPart time - GRCCFull time - CSRDE BenchmarkPart time - CSRDE Benchmark

Cohort Year (Year Student Began at GRCC)


Very large Institutions

9. Number of Developmental Education Placements

Fall 2007 Fall 2008 Fall 20090%

10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

1063 13102449

Placed into Developmental EducationAcademically Prepared

25% 31%51%

NOTE: In Fall 2009 placement testing was required for any student with an ACT component score of 17 or lower. Previously, the threshold was an ACT composite score of 15 or lower.


10. Course Success Rate

Winter 06

Fall 06 Winter 07

Fall 07 Winter 08

Fall 08 Winter 09

Fall 09 Winter 10

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

67 67 67 6866

7068

7169

Percent of grades “C or better”


Drill Down Data for Data Team Gender by Ethnicity Fall to Fall Retention by Subgroups Graduation Rate by Subgroups Enrollment in Gatekeeper Courses Success in Gatekeeper Courses Developmental and Subsequent Course

Success Success Rates for First Semester

Students Success in Gatekeeper Courses by

Subgroups Success in Developmental Courses by

Subgroups

Segment Groups Race/Ethnicity (White, Black,

Hispanic, Asian, Native American, Non-resident Alien, No Response)

Age (Less than 20, 20-24, 25+) Gender (F, M) Pell (Yes, No)

Gender by Ethnicity

Male 77% White 12% African-

American 7% Hispanic 3% Asian 1% American Indian

Female 74% White 14% African-

American 8% Hispanic 3% Asian 1% American

Indian

Females are slightly more highly represented in African American and Hispanic ethnicities

Fall to Fall Retention – Drill Down

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 20080

1020304050607080

TOTALFemaleMaleAfr AmerHispWhiteDev Ed

Graduation Rate– Drill Down

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 20060

5

10

15

20

25

TOTALFemaleMaleAfr AmerHispWhiteDev Ed

Enrollment in Gatekeeper Courses Gatekeeper courses

are those courses that have the highest enrollments.

Success is measured as the % of students who earn A, B, or C in the course

Failure is measured as the % of students who earn a D, F, I, NS, WP or WF in the course

Fall 2009 Data

Course EnrollmentEN 101 2,675PS 110 2,214PY 201 1,576MA 107 1,480MA 104 1,263EN 102 1,181BI 101 878COM 135 815CO 101 771COM 131 670CLS 100 619EN 100 569WE 156 559CJ 110 559SP 101 559

Success in Gatekeeper Courses Gatekeeper

courses are those courses that have the highest enrollments.

Success is measured as the % of students who earn A, B, or C in the course

Failure is measured as the % of students who earn a D, F, I, NS, WP or WF in the course

Fall 2009 Data

Course Enrollment “Success” MA 104 1,263 61% EN 100 569 62% CO 101 771 63% MA 107 1,480 65% SP 101 559 68% EN 101 2,675 71% CJ 110 559 72% PS 110 2,214 75% EN 102 1,181 75% BI 101 878 76% PY 201 1,576 77%

CLS 100 619 77% COM 131 670 78% COM 135 815 80% WE 156 559 88%

26

GRCC Top 15 Courses by Enrollment--Fall 2009

Course Enrollment As Bs Cs Ds Fs I,NS,WsTotal D, F, I, N, S, Ws

MA 104 1,263 16% 24% 21% 11% 10% 18% 39%

EN 100 569 21% 22% 19% 7% 14% 16% 38%

CO 101 771 37% 17% 10% 5% 4% 28% 37%

MA 107 1,480 24% 21% 20% 8% 9% 18% 35%

SP 101 559 27% 22% 19% 4% 10% 18% 32%

EN 101 2,675 23% 30% 19% 6% 10% 13% 29%

CJ 110 559 25% 27% 21% 9% 13% 6% 28%

EN 102 1,181 31% 31% 13% 5% 5% 15% 25%

PS 110 2,214 26% 28% 21% 7% 7% 11% 25%

BI 101 878 16% 33% 27% 9% 6% 9% 24%

CLS 100 619 40% 23% 14% 5% 9% 9% 23%

PY 201 1,576 31% 26% 20% 6% 7% 10% 23%

COM 131 670 36% 30% 12% 4% 5% 13% 22%

COM 135 815 40% 31% 10% 5% 7% 8% 20%

WE 156 559 71% 16% 1% 0% 1% 11% 12%

All 53,044 34% 25% 14% 5% 7% 14%

Developmental and Subsequent Course Success Rates

From Title 3 Application (Aug 2010) , Fall 2008 DataSuccess Rates: Developmental Courses Enrollment Grades A-C

EN 097 Academic Foundations English 662 58%

MA 003 Mathematics for College Students 633 47%

RD 097 Introduction to College Reading 244 60%Success Rates: Subsequent Gateway Courses EN 100 College Writing, 101 English Composition or BA 101 Business and Technical English

388 61%

MA 104 Elementary Algebra 304 54%

PS 110 Survey of American Government 139 43%

28

Success Rates for First Semester Students

Fall 2005

Fall 2006

Fall 2007

Fall 2008

Fall 2009

05

101520253035404550

3227 30 30

3841 42 42 42 45

AFP FTIAC Non-AFP FTIAC

29

Percent of students who earned all A-Cs during their first semester

Course Completion/Success – All Enrollments—Fall 2009Success is defined as grades of A, B, C

White non-

Hispanic

Black Non-

Hispanic Hispanic

Asian / Pacific

Islander

Native America

n

Non resident

Alien

No respons

e or other Total

Race/Ethnicity Number Course Enrollments

39,435 6,893 3,748 1,459 583 111 815 53,044

Number Successful Course Enrollments

29,270 3,538 2,509 1,052 362 95 573 37,399

Percent Successful Course Enrollments

74.2% 51.3% 66.9% 72.1% 62.1% 85.6% 70.3% 70.5%

Less

than 20 20-24 25 or older Total

Age Number Course Enrollments21,222 17,459 14,363 53,044

Number Successful Course Enrollments14,717 12,016 10,666 37,399

Percent Successful Course Enrollments69.3% 68.8% 74.3% 70.5%

Female Male Total

Gender Number Course Enrollments26,183 26,861 53,044

Number Successful Course Enrollments19,119 18,280 37,399

Percent Successful Course Enrollments73.0% 68.1% 70.5%

Yes No Total

Pell Number Course Enrollments23,012 30,032 53,044

Number Successful Course Enrollments15,041 22,358 37,399

Percent Successful Course Enrollments65.4% 74.4% 70.5%

Documents

GRCC Data Team