Global Studies Heike Roth Debating Global Studies Debating

Global StudiesHeike Roth

Debating

Global Studies

Debating

youtube - best taiwanese parliament fights of all time!.avi


Debating

Debating

1. How to Start2. Bewertung3. schriftliche

Leistungsmessung

Global Studies


Debating

1. How to Start

Lecture 1:

introduction to debating

Lecture 2:

arguments and

rebuttal

Lecture 3:

structuring arguments

Lecture 4:

first debate

Lecture 5:

Points of Information &reply speech

Lecture 6:

second debate with POI &

reply speech

Lecture 7:

third debate


Debating

Lecture 1: Introduction to Debating

Video Definition Zielsetzung Teams

Einstieg Gruppenarbeit

motion 2 Teams =>

Proposition and Opposition

Argumente sammeln

pro Schüler mind. ein Argument

„debate“

Teams sitzen sich gegenüber

phrases zig-zagging zwei Runden:

ungeordnet geordnet

Reflexion

Strukturierung

Sitzordnung formaler Ablauf


Debating

ChairpersonTime-keeper

Proposition Opposition

1

2

3

4

1

2

3

4

Floor – audience

Judges

optionaloptional

Debating – Seating


Debating

Debating – formaler Ablauf IPROPOSITION OPPOSITION

1st speaker

definition: introduces motion, defines words if necessary

teamline: gives overview of arguments given by the team throughout the debate

gives 1-2 arguments1st speaker definition: accepts or redefines

proposition’s definition rebuttal: tears arguments given by

1st speaker of the proposition into pieces

gives 1-2 arguments, in general the most important one’s

2nd speaker

rebuttal gives 1-2 arguments

2nd speaker

rebuttal gives 1-2 arguments


Debating

3rd speaker

rebuttal for the most part max. 1 new minor argument

3rd speaker

rebuttal for the most part max. 1 new minor argument =>

can’t be contradicted!

Reply speech

Either 4th speaker, or done by 1st or 2nd speaker

summerizes debate: demolishes the other side’s case gives an overview of own case and

teamline puts own case into a broader, more

general context

Reply speech

Judges hand in their marksheetsChairperson announces verdict

Debating – formaler Ablauf IIPROPOSITION OPPOSITION


Debating

Lecture 1: Introduction to Debating

Video Definition Zielsetzung Teams

GruppenarbeitEinstieg „debate“ Strukturierung

motion 2 Teams =>

Proposition and Opposition

Argumente sammeln

pro Schüler mind. ein Argument

Teams sitzen sich gegenüber

phrases zig-zagging zwei Runden:

ungeordnet geordnet

Reflexion

Sitzordnung formaler Ablauf

Hausaufgabe:motions to debate, guide to parliamenary debate


Debating

Lecture 2: Arguments and Rebuttal

Brainstorming

alles erlaubt keine Bewertung keine Taboos

Strukturierung

Wie gut sind die Argumente?

Welche Argumente gehören zusammen?

Welches Argument ist wichtig, welches weniger?

Wie lassen sich die Argumente begründen?

Übung: Hot Chair

Stuhlkreis mit 2 Stühlen in der Mitte

Schüler wechseln sich ab, argumentieren und widerlegen

Hausaufgabe:phrases


Debating

Lecture 3: Structuring Arguments

social

political

econom

ic

religious

m

oral

ARGUMENTS

„ S P E R M “ A

R

E

Assertion kurze, prägnante Aussage

(label)

Reasoning Begründung der Aussage

Evidence Beweise für die

Richtigkeit der Aussage

Hausaufgabe:Schüler schreiben teamline


Debating

Capital punishment is 100% effective as a deterrent to the criminal being executed; that killer cannot commit any more crimes. As a deterrent to others, it depends on how effectively the death penalty is applied; in the USA where less than 1% of murderers are executed, it is difficult to assess the true effect of deterrence. But for example, a 1985 study (Stephen K. Layson, University of North Carolina) showed that 1 execution deterred 18 murders.

Opponents of the death penalty prefer to ignore the fact that they themselves are responsible for its high costs, by causing a never-ending succession of appeals. Prisons in many countries are over-crowded and under-funded, and this problem is made worse by life sentences or delayed death sentences for murderers. Why should the taxpayer bear the cost of supporting a murderer for an entire lifetime?

Motion: This House believes that the death penalty should be allowed everywhere.

Lecture 3: Sample Arguments

Arguments proposition

http://www.idebate.org/debatabase/topic_details.php?topicID=106: (30.01.2008)


Debating

Lecture 4: First debate

rhetorische Übungen

Intonation Zungenbrecher-

übung

Debating Rubric

Vorstellen des Bewertungsschemas

Verteilen von Beobachtungsaufträgen

Debate

Sprechzeit: 2 Minuten

Feedback

Hausaufgabe:Vorbereiten einer Rede über eine berühmte Persönlichkeit


Debating

Lecture 5: POIs and Reply Speech

Definition Zielsetzung Regeln

Points of Information Übungen

Celebrity game => Balloon Debate To stand trial

Reply Speech

Definition Zielsetzung Does and Dont‘s

Hausaufgabe:Erstellen der Reply Speech für Motion der letzten Stunde


Debating

leak

Tasks:

Choose a historical/contemporary/mythical character you can identify with.

Prepare a convincing statement that justifies your staying in the balloon. At least one longish sentence must be made. Time limit: 3 minutes.

Time for preparation: 10 minutes

Tasks:

Choose a historical/contemporary/mythical character you can identify with.

Prepare a convincing statement that justifies your staying in the balloon. At least one longish sentence must be made. Time limit: 3 minutes.

Time for preparation: 10 minutes

Debate:

All sit on chairs in a large circle. Each in turn has time to stand up and speak in his/her own favor.

Everyone has to speak freely, without notes!Play-acting to support your statement is

strongly encouraged.

Points of information are permitted and encouraged at any time!

Each candidate has one vote but may not vote for him/herself.

Debate:

All sit on chairs in a large circle. Each in turn has time to stand up and speak in his/her own favor.

Everyone has to speak freely, without notes!Play-acting to support your statement is

strongly encouraged.

Points of information are permitted and encouraged at any time!

Each candidate has one vote but may not vote for him/herself.

Balloon Debate


Debating

Lectures 6 & 7: Debattieren

Lecture 6

Debate gleiche Motion wie in 4.

Sitzung mit POIs und Reply Speech Sprechzeit: 3 Minuten

Festlegung der neuen Motion und Vorbereitung

Lecture 7

erste komplett selbst vorbereitete Debate

Sprechzeit: 3-4 Minuten Beobachtungsaufträge

Feedback


Debating

Debating

1. How to Start2. Bewertung einer Debate3. schriftliche Leistungsmessung

Global Studies


Debating

2. Bewertung

Speaker 1 Speaker 2 Speaker 3 Reply

Speech and style:

- free speech and fluency

- dynamics:

speed/volume/pauses etc.

- rhetoric

- body language

Content

- issues addressed

- support with facts/examples

- structure

- reasoning/conclusions

Points per speaker

Additional points for teamline

structure, refutation and

points of information

points*2

Comments

Total

points

Evaluation SheetDate: Judge:Motion: ________________________________________________________________Proposition

9/10superior

7/8excellent

5/6good

3/4 fair 1/2

poor


Debating

2. Bewertung

Content

addressing issue

did not address topic

rarely addressed topic

usually addressed topic

addressed topic, very few exceptions

always addressed topic

support with facts and examples

arguments lacked evidence

arguments supported with few evidence,

arguments supported with evidence and examples

many examples/ facts given: most of them relevant

many relevant, supporting examples and facts given

reasoning and inferences

no relevant arguments given, argu-ments never clear and convincing, no inferences

few relevant arguments given, arguments rarely clear and convincing, poor inferences

some relevant arguments given, some-times clear and convincing, average inferences

most argu-ments given: most of them relevant, clear and convincing, complex and elaborated, compre-hensible inferences

most relevant arguments given in sup-port, clear, convincing, eloquent, complex and elaborated arguments, very well laid out inferences

Item Expression 1 – poor 2 – fair 3 – good 4 - excellent 5 – superior


Debating

Debating

1. How to Start2. Bewertung einer Debate3. schriftliche

Leistungsmessung

Global Studies


Debating

3. schriftliche Leistungsmessung

Schriftliche

Leistung

Tests über phrases

neue Motion

• Angaben von Fakten in

junks => Schüler for-

mulieren Argument/

Rede

Motion aus Unterricht

• Teamline schreiben

• Argument vorgeben =>

Schüler schreibt Rebuttal

formulieren sinnvolle POIs

• Reply Speech schreibenAbfragen von Fakten


Debating

Global Studies

Debating

???

Documents

Global Studies Heike Roth Debating Global Studies Debating