64
GIVE ME ODDS GIVE ME ODDS FORECASTING ENSEMBLE

GIVE ME ODDS

  • Upload
    chill

  • View
    39

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

ENSEMBLE. FORECASTING. GIVE ME ODDS. KEY POINTS. THERE ARE INEVITABLE UNCERTAINTIES IN NWP DUE TO UNCERTAINTIES IN INITIAL CONDITIONS AND MODEL FORMULATION WEATHER FORECASTING, THEREFORE, IS INHERENTLY STOCHASTIC, NOT DETERMINISTIC IN NATURE - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: GIVE ME ODDS

GIVE ME ODDSGIVE ME ODDS

FORECASTING

ENSEMBLE

Page 2: GIVE ME ODDS
Page 3: GIVE ME ODDS
Page 4: GIVE ME ODDS
Page 5: GIVE ME ODDS

KEY POINTSKEY POINTS

• THERE ARE INEVITABLE UNCERTAINTIES IN NWP DUE TO UNCERTAINTIES IN INITIAL CONDITIONS AND MODEL FORMULATION

• WEATHER FORECASTING, THEREFORE, IS INHERENTLY STOCHASTIC, NOT DETERMINISTIC IN NATURE

• ENSEMBLE PREDICTION - REVOLUTIONARY CHANGE IN THE THRUST OF OPERATIONAL NWP (“WAVE OF THE FUTURE”) - CONSISTS OF MULTIPLE PREDICTIONS FROM SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT INITIAL CONDITIONS AND/OR WITH VARIOUS VERSIONS OF MODELS, THE OBJECTIVES BEING TO:

– IMPROVE SKILL THROUGH ENSEMBLE AVERAGING, WHICH ELIMINATES NON-PREDICTABLE COMPONENTS

– PROVIDE RELIABLE INFORMATION ON FORECAST UNCERTAINTIES (E.G., PROBABILITIES) FROM THE SPREAD (DIVERSITY) AMONGST ENSEMBLE MEMBERS

• REALITY - POSITIVE RESULTS ON BOTH COUNTS WITH OPERATIONAL GLOBAL MODEL ENSEMBLE SYSTEM; EXPERIMENTAL REGIONAL MODEL ENSEMBLES ENCOURAGING (OPERATIONAL EARLY 2000?)

– NET RESULT - ENHANCE UTILITY OF NWP FOR VIRTUALLY ALL APPLICATIONS

• REALIZING THE PRACTICAL UTILITY OF ENSEMBLES ACCOMPLISHED VIA A VARIETY OF NEW PRODUCTS DESIGNED TO CONDENSE AND MAXIMIZE INFORMATION CONTENT FOR USERS; USER FEEDBACK ESSENTIAL AND ENCOURAGED!!!

Page 6: GIVE ME ODDS

KEY CONSIDERATIONSKEY CONSIDERATIONS

• STRATEGIES FOR CREATING ENSEMBLES

– PROCDEDURES FOR GENERATING INITIAL STATE PERTURBATIONS

• RANDOM

• TIME LAGGING

• ANALYSES FROM OTHER CENTERS

• “BREEDING”

• SINGULAR VECTORS

– PERTURBING MODEL (E.G., CONVECTIVE PARAMETERIZATION) AND/OR MULTI-MODEL ENSEMBLES

– MODEL CONFIGURATION?

• RESOLUTION

• PHYSICAL SOPHISTICATION

• DOMAIN

– ENSEMBLE SIZE

NOTE: OPTIMUM STRATEGY UNKNOWN (NO CONCENSUS)!!

IDEAL: EFFECTIVE/EFFICIENT SAMPLING OF ALTERNATIVE SCENARIOS, I.E., PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS. LIMITED COMPUTER RESOURCES GENERALLY REQUIRE COMPROMISES RELATIVE TO PERCEIVED OPTIMUM, E.G., MODEL RESOLUTION VERSUS ENSEMBLE SIZE)

Page 7: GIVE ME ODDS
Page 8: GIVE ME ODDS
Page 9: GIVE ME ODDS
Page 10: GIVE ME ODDS
Page 11: GIVE ME ODDS
Page 12: GIVE ME ODDS
Page 13: GIVE ME ODDS
Page 14: GIVE ME ODDS
Page 15: GIVE ME ODDS
Page 16: GIVE ME ODDS
Page 17: GIVE ME ODDS
Page 18: GIVE ME ODDS

KEY CONSIDERATIONS(CONT.)KEY CONSIDERATIONS(CONT.)

• PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT

OBJECTIVE:CONDENSE LARGE AMOUNTS OF OUTPUT INTO A “USER FRIENDLY” FORM THAT PROVIDES RELIABLE ESTIMATES OF THE RANGE AND LIKLIHOOD OF ALTERNATIVE SCENARIOS

– PRODUCTS CAN RANGE FROM DISPLAY OF ALL FORECASTS THROUGH MEANS/SPREAD AND CLUSTERS TO FULL PROBABILITIY DISTRIBUTIONS DISPLAYED IN VARIOUS FORMATS

• STATISTICAL POSTPROCESSING (E.G., BIAS CORRECTIONS, CALIBRATION OF PROBABILITIES

• ENSEMBLE OUTPUT STATISTICS

• ADDITIONAL/ALTERNATIVE PRODUCTS CONTINUAL INTERACTION AMONGST CONTINUAL INTERACTION AMONGST DEVELOPERS AND USERSDEVELOPERS AND USERS

• VALIDATION

– STANDARD SKILL SCORES

– MEASURES OF SPREAD

– MEASURES OF RELIABILITY

• EDUCATION AND TRAINING

– COMET SYMPOSIUM

– TRAINING MODULES

– ON SITE VISITS

– WEB BASED

– ??

Page 19: GIVE ME ODDS

N-AWIPS GRAPHICAL PRODUCTSN-AWIPS GRAPHICAL PRODUCTS(GEMPAK META FILES)(GEMPAK META FILES)

• SPAGHETTI CHARTS– 500 Z– 1000Z– 1000/500 TCK– MSLP– 850 T– 700 RH

• SPREAD– 1000 Z– 500 Z

• CLUSTERS– 1000 Z– 500 Z

• PROBABILITIES– 500 Z > THRESHOLDS– 700 RH > 70%– TCK <540– 250 V > THRESHOLDS– 850 T > 0C

• MSLP CENTERS

Page 20: GIVE ME ODDS

PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT INCLUDESPRODUCT DEVELOPMENT INCLUDES

• PROBABILITIES

– VIRTUALLY ALL RELEVANT AND MODEL DERIVED PARAMETERS, E.G.,

• SEVERE WEATHER INDICES• AVIATION WINDS > THRESHOLD• SENSIBLE WEATHER ELEMENTS (MODEL

DERIVED/INFERRED• CIRCULATION INDICES (E.G., BLOCKING)

• EXPANDED CLUSTERED PARAMETERS AND FOR SPECIALIZED REGIONS

• VERTICAL PROFILES

• METEOGRAMS

• ENSEMBLE DERIVED MOS

• TROPICAL STORM TRACKS

– DIRECT FROM ENSEMBLES– BACKGROUND FOR GFDL MODEL ENSEMBLES

Page 21: GIVE ME ODDS

SOME APPLICATIONSSOME APPLICATIONS

• FORECASTS OF ENSEMBLE MEAN, SPREAD, PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS, ETC. OF ANY MODEL FIELD/PARAMETER OR QUANTITIES DERIVED THEREFROM ENHANCE THE ENHANCE THE UTILITY OF FORECASTSUTILITY OF FORECASTS

• APPLICABLE TO MODELS FROM VERY SHORT RANGE CLOUD SCALE THROUGH REGIONAL MESOSCALE SHORT RANGE AND GLOBAL MEDIUM RANGE TO COUPLED OCEAN/ATMOSPHERE CLIMATE PREDICTION SYSTEMS

• IMPROVE DATA ASSIMILATION SYSTEMS

• ADAPTIVE/TARGETED OBSERVATIONS

• DATA SETS FOR FUNDAMENTAL RESEARCH ON PREDICTABILITY ISSUES

NOTE: LARGE CURRENT USER COMMUNITY (OPERATIONAL GLOBAL SYSTEM) INCLUDES NCEP SERVICE CENTERS, WFO’S, USAF, OH, PRIVATES/BROADCASTERS

Page 22: GIVE ME ODDS
Page 23: GIVE ME ODDS
Page 24: GIVE ME ODDS
Page 25: GIVE ME ODDS
Page 26: GIVE ME ODDS
Page 27: GIVE ME ODDS
Page 28: GIVE ME ODDS
Page 29: GIVE ME ODDS
Page 30: GIVE ME ODDS
Page 31: GIVE ME ODDS
Page 32: GIVE ME ODDS
Page 33: GIVE ME ODDS
Page 34: GIVE ME ODDS
Page 35: GIVE ME ODDS
Page 36: GIVE ME ODDS
Page 37: GIVE ME ODDS

CLUSTER ANALYSISCLUSTER ANALYSIS

OBJECTIVELY GROUP TOGETHER FORECASTS WHICH ARE SIMILAR ACCORDING TO SOME CRITERIA

GOAL: IDENTIFY EXTREMES, GROUPINGS (CLUSTERS) WITHIN ENVELOPE OF POSSIBILITIES (“ATTRACTORS”)

• ISSUES:

– QUANTITY

• MSLP• 500 Z• ETC.

– MEASURE

• ANOMALY CORRELATION• CIRCULATION PARAMETERS• PATTERN RECOGNITION• PHASE-SPACE MEASUREMENTS

– REGION

Page 38: GIVE ME ODDS
Page 39: GIVE ME ODDS
Page 40: GIVE ME ODDS
Page 41: GIVE ME ODDS
Page 42: GIVE ME ODDS
Page 43: GIVE ME ODDS
Page 44: GIVE ME ODDS
Page 45: GIVE ME ODDS
Page 46: GIVE ME ODDS

EVALUATION/VERIFICATIONEVALUATION/VERIFICATION

• SITUATIONAL AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL CASE STUDIES (E.G., CYCLOGENESIS, FLOOD POTENTIAL)

• STATISTICAL

– STANDARD AC, RMS, SCORES (E.G., APPLIED TO ENSEMBLE MEAN VS. CONTROL, RELATIVE CLOSENESS OF MEMBERS TO ANALYSIS)

– “TALAGRAND” (VERIFICATION RANK) DIAGRAMS - MEASURES OF BIASES IN DISTRIBUTION OF ENSEMBLE MEMBERS INCLUDING FREQUENCY OF OUTLIERS)

– BRIER, RANKED PROBABILITY SCORES (PROBABILITY SKILL SCORES)

– RELIABILITY DIAGRAMS (OBSERVED VERSUS FORECAST FREQUENCIES; ENABLES CALIBRATION OF PROBABILITIES)

– MOS VERSUS ENSEMBLE POPS

– RELATIVE OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS (ROC); (EXPLICIT COMPARISON OF THE RELATIVE UTILITY OF DETERMINISTIC AND ENSEMBLE PREDICTIONS)

Page 47: GIVE ME ODDS
Page 48: GIVE ME ODDS
Page 49: GIVE ME ODDS
Page 50: GIVE ME ODDS
Page 51: GIVE ME ODDS

SHORT RANGE ENSEMBLE FORECASTING SHORT RANGE ENSEMBLE FORECASTING (SREF)(SREF)

• OBJECTIVE: DEVELOP A REGIONAL MODEL, SHORT-RANGE (0-3 DAYS) ENSEMBLE PREDICTION SYSTEM TO PROVIDE OPERATIONALLY RELEVANT AND USEFUL GUIDANCE ON THE PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTION OF WEATHER ELEMENTS OR EVENTS, ESPECIALLY FOR QPF

• GOAL: IMPLEMENT INITIAL OPERATIONAL PRODUCTION OF A REGIONAL MODEL BASED ENSEMBLE SYSTEM AND PRODUCT SUITE (SREF-I) BY ~ JANUARY, 2000

– TARGET SYSTEM:• ETA PLUS RSM MULTI-MODEL• 10 MEMBER• 40 KM RESOLUTION • ~ETA DOMAIN• RUN TWICE PER DAY• PERTURBATIONS; REGIONAL “BREEDING”

– PRODUCT SUITE:• ENSEMBLE MEAN/SPREAD CHARTS• SPAGHETTI CHARTS• PROBABILITY CHARTS• METEOGRAMS

• STATUS MILESTONES• CONDUCT PILOT STUDIES (10/96-3/98)• PARTICIPATE IN STORM AND MESOSCALE ENSEMBLE

EXPERIMENT (SAMEX) (3/98-11/98)

• SOME ISSUES– ALTERNATIVE PERTURBATION STRATEGIES– TRADEOFFS; RESOLUTION, ENS SIZE/DOMAIN– PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT– VALIDATION PROCEDURES– DATA/PRODUCT DISSEMINATION– EDUCATION AND TRAINING

Page 52: GIVE ME ODDS

STATUS/MILESTONES

COMPLETED (PILOT STUDIES)

• MAJOR TASKS/ACCOMP MAJOR TASKS/ACCOMP (CONT.)(CONT.)

– ILLUSTRATE SIGNIFICANCE ILLUSTRATE SIGNIFICANCE

OF UNCERTAINTIES IN SREFOF UNCERTAINTIES IN SREF

– DEMONSTRATE THE DEMONSTRATE THE

POTENTIAL POTENTIAL OF SREF TO OF SREF TO

PROVIDE OPERATIONALLY PROVIDE OPERATIONALLY

USEFUL INFORMATIONUSEFUL INFORMATION

– PROVIDE BASIS FOR A PROVIDE BASIS FOR A

PROTOTYPE OPERATIONAL PROTOTYPE OPERATIONAL

SYSTEMSYSTEM

Page 53: GIVE ME ODDS

STATUS/STATUS/MILESTONESMILESTONES

COMPLETED (PILOT STUDIES)COMPLETED (PILOT STUDIES)

• SOME KEY FINDINGSSOME KEY FINDINGS

– ENHANCED DIVERSITY OF ENHANCED DIVERSITY OF

SOLUTIONS (SPREAD) SOLUTIONS (SPREAD)

WITH:WITH:

• MULTI-MODEL ENSEMBLEMULTI-MODEL ENSEMBLE

• HIGHER RESOLUTION HIGHER RESOLUTION

• GLOBAL BRED (VS GLOBAL BRED (VS

“RANDOM”)“RANDOM”)

• REGIONAL ENHANCEMENTREGIONAL ENHANCEMENT

Page 54: GIVE ME ODDS
Page 55: GIVE ME ODDS
Page 56: GIVE ME ODDS

STATUS/MILESTONESSTATUS/MILESTONESCOMPLETED (PARTICIPATE IN SAMEX)COMPLETED (PARTICIPATE IN SAMEX)

• BOTTOM LINE:BOTTOM LINE:

– MUCH GAINED, MUCH GAINED, ACCOMPLISHED, LEARNEDACCOMPLISHED, LEARNED

– RESULTS GENERALLY RESULTS GENERALLY FAVORABLEFAVORABLE

– SOME DISSAPPOINMENTS SOME DISSAPPOINMENTS RELATIVE TO RELATIVE TO EXPECTATIONS, EXPECTATIONS, BUTBUT WE WE UNDERSTAND WHYUNDERSTAND WHY

– REMAIN COMMITED TO REMAIN COMMITED TO BASIC STRATEGYBASIC STRATEGY

Page 57: GIVE ME ODDS

STATUS/STATUS/MILESTONESMILESTONES

COMPLETED (PARTICIPATE IN SAMEX)COMPLETED (PARTICIPATE IN SAMEX)

• SOME KEY FINDINGSSOME KEY FINDINGS

– IMPROVED ENS MEAN IMPROVED ENS MEAN

SKILL, RELIABILITY, RPSS SKILL, RELIABILITY, RPSS

WITH MULTI-MODEL WITH MULTI-MODEL

APPROACH APPROACH

– INSUFFICENT SPREAD INSUFFICENT SPREAD

• DOMAIN TOO SMALL - DOMAIN TOO SMALL -

NEGATIVE IMPACT OF NEGATIVE IMPACT OF

BC’SBC’S

– PRECIPITATION FORECASTS PRECIPITATION FORECASTS

“WOEFUL”“WOEFUL”

• WEAK FORCING, WEAK FORCING,

SUMMER LIKE PATTERN SUMMER LIKE PATTERN

Page 58: GIVE ME ODDS

SAMEX DOMAIN

LARGE

SMALL

SAMEX SYSTEM:

MULTI-MODEL (ETA/RSM)10 MEMBERS32 KM RESOLUTIONSAMEX DOMAINREGIONAL ENHANCEMENT

Page 59: GIVE ME ODDS
Page 60: GIVE ME ODDS
Page 61: GIVE ME ODDS
Page 62: GIVE ME ODDS
Page 63: GIVE ME ODDS
Page 64: GIVE ME ODDS