26

GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE · 1 1 50 500 1 Solving, h r = 0.667 m = 66.7 cm Step 4: Saving in embankment thickness (%) With the use of geotextile saving in

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE · 1 1 50 500 1 Solving, h r = 0.667 m = 66.7 cm Step 4: Saving in embankment thickness (%) With the use of geotextile saving in
Page 2: GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE · 1 1 50 500 1 Solving, h r = 0.667 m = 66.7 cm Step 4: Saving in embankment thickness (%) With the use of geotextile saving in

GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE

Prof. J. N. Mandal

Department of civil engineering, IIT Bombay, Powai , Mumbai 400076, India. Tel.022-25767328email: [email protected]

Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

Page 3: GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE · 1 1 50 500 1 Solving, h r = 0.667 m = 66.7 cm Step 4: Saving in embankment thickness (%) With the use of geotextile saving in

Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

Module - 8LECTURE - 42

Geosynthetics for embankments on soft foundations

Page 4: GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE · 1 1 50 500 1 Solving, h r = 0.667 m = 66.7 cm Step 4: Saving in embankment thickness (%) With the use of geotextile saving in

Recap of previous lecture…..

Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

Design of basal reinforced embankment (remaining)

Serviceability limit state

Placement of geosynthetics underneath embankment

Construction of basal reinforced embankment

Widening of existing roadway embankment

Design example (partly covered)

Page 5: GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE · 1 1 50 500 1 Solving, h r = 0.667 m = 66.7 cm Step 4: Saving in embankment thickness (%) With the use of geotextile saving in

Step 4: Check for sliding failureEmbankment slides over the reinforcement after formationof crack in the embankment

Force diagram:

Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

Page 6: GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE · 1 1 50 500 1 Solving, h r = 0.667 m = 66.7 cm Step 4: Saving in embankment thickness (%) With the use of geotextile saving in

Total resisting force (Rg)

= Ws. tan e + Ca. Ls (Ca = 0 for granular soil)

= 0.5. γe. Ls. He. tan e + 0

= 0.5 x 17 x 8.75 x 3.5 x 0.8 x tan30°

= 120.233 kN/m

Factor of safety against sliding

= Rg / Pfill

= 120.233/34.36 = 3.5 > 2 (Safe)

Total driving force (Pfill) = 34.36 kN/m

Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

Page 7: GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE · 1 1 50 500 1 Solving, h r = 0.667 m = 66.7 cm Step 4: Saving in embankment thickness (%) With the use of geotextile saving in

Step 5: Check for pullout strength

(Tg)design= τtop Le + τbottom Le

Le= Embedded length of the geosynthetic beyond slip line,τtop = σv tan δe, and

τbottom = Ca

Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

Page 8: GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE · 1 1 50 500 1 Solving, h r = 0.667 m = 66.7 cm Step 4: Saving in embankment thickness (%) With the use of geotextile saving in

Now, For top layer (Tg)design = 200 kN/m

200 = (17 x 3.5 x 0.7 x tan 30° + 3.6) x Le

or, Le = 7.23 m

For both layers adopt Le = 7.23 m

Given that,Ci = Interaction coefficient = 0.7,

Ca = 40 % of Cu = 0.4 x 9 = 3.6 kPa in foundation

Hence, (Tg)design = σv tan δe Le + Ca Le

= γe He x Ci x tan e x Le + Ca Le

Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

Page 9: GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE · 1 1 50 500 1 Solving, h r = 0.667 m = 66.7 cm Step 4: Saving in embankment thickness (%) With the use of geotextile saving in

Step 6: Required elastic strength of the geotextile

Considering 5% strain, εf = 0.05

Now, Tdesign = required tensile strength of the geotextile fortop layer = 200 kN/m.

Required Elastic Modulus of the geotextile (Erequired) for toplayer = 200/ 0.05 = 4000 kN/m

Similarly, Required Elastic Modulus of the geotextile(Erequired) for bottom layer = 100/ 0.05 = 2000 kN/m

f

reqdreqd

TE

Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

Page 10: GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE · 1 1 50 500 1 Solving, h r = 0.667 m = 66.7 cm Step 4: Saving in embankment thickness (%) With the use of geotextile saving in

Step 7: Check for lateral squeezing

PA = 0.5.γf.Hf2 Ka - 2.cf. Hf Ka + qe1. Hf Ka

= 0.5. γf.Hf2 - 2.cf. Hf + qe1. Hf (qe1 = γe x He + qs)

PB = 0.5. γf.Hf2.Kp + 2.cf. Hf. Kp

= 0.5. γf.Hf2 + 2.cf. Hf (Kp = 1)

Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

Page 11: GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE · 1 1 50 500 1 Solving, h r = 0.667 m = 66.7 cm Step 4: Saving in embankment thickness (%) With the use of geotextile saving in

Shear force at the top of the foundation block in EFportion (Tt)= (Ca + vt tanf) x Ls

= Ca Ls

= 0.4 x 9 x 8.75 = 31.5 kN/m

Here, qs = 0

PA = 0.5 x 16 x 2.52 – 2 x 9 x 2.5 + (17 x 3.5) x 2.5 = 153.75 kN/m

PB = 0.5 x 16 x 2.52 + 2 x 9 x 2.5 = 95 kN/m

Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

Page 12: GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE · 1 1 50 500 1 Solving, h r = 0.667 m = 66.7 cm Step 4: Saving in embankment thickness (%) With the use of geotextile saving in

Shear force at the bottom of the foundation block in EFportion (Tb)= (cf + vb tanf) x Ls

= cf Ls = 9 x 8.75 = 78.75 kN/m

Factor of safety against squeezing,

A

btBsq P

TTPFS

3.1335.175.153

75.785.3195FSsq

(Safe)

Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

Page 13: GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE · 1 1 50 500 1 Solving, h r = 0.667 m = 66.7 cm Step 4: Saving in embankment thickness (%) With the use of geotextile saving in

Step 8: Check for Drainage and Filtration

Required grain size distribution of sub-grade soil

Calculate :

1) Retention criteria (maximum apparent opening size of Geotextile)

2) Permeability criteria (Kg > Ks)

3) Clogging criteria (minimum apparent opening size of Geotextile)

Step 9: Check settlement and construction sequence

Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

Page 14: GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE · 1 1 50 500 1 Solving, h r = 0.667 m = 66.7 cm Step 4: Saving in embankment thickness (%) With the use of geotextile saving in

Step 10: Required properties of geosynthetics

Ultimate tensile strength of Geotextile in the machine direction ≥ 200 kN/m (top layer )

Ultimate tensile strength of Geotextile in the machine direction ≥ 100 kN/m (bottom layer)

Ultimate tensile strength of Geotextile in the cross-machine direction ≥ 60 kN/m (for both layers)

Seam strength of Geotextile ≥ 60 kN/m (for both layers)

Limit strain = 5 %

Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

Page 15: GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE · 1 1 50 500 1 Solving, h r = 0.667 m = 66.7 cm Step 4: Saving in embankment thickness (%) With the use of geotextile saving in

Summary of required geotextile properties:

Ultimate tensile strength of geotextile in the machinedirection ≥ 200 kN/m (top layer)

Ultimate tensile strength of geotextile in the machinedirection ≥ 100 kN/m (bottom layer)

Ultimate tensile strength of geotextile in the cross-machine direction ≥ 60 kN/m (for both layers)

Seam strength of Geotextile ≥ 60 kN/m (for both layers)

Limit strain = 5 %

Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

Page 16: GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE · 1 1 50 500 1 Solving, h r = 0.667 m = 66.7 cm Step 4: Saving in embankment thickness (%) With the use of geotextile saving in

Example:

Determine the minimum height of a low embankment (i.e.unpaved roadways) without and with geotextile toprevent foundation failure due to wheel load. Alsocompare the results. Use the following given details:

Cohesion of the sub grade soil is 10 kPa,Axle load = 102 kN,

Wheel load = 51 kN,

Allowable tire pressure (P) = 500 kPa,

Rut depth = 5 cm, and

Number of passages = 1000Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

Page 17: GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE · 1 1 50 500 1 Solving, h r = 0.667 m = 66.7 cm Step 4: Saving in embankment thickness (%) With the use of geotextile saving in

Geotextile base layer beneath the road embankment

Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

Page 18: GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE · 1 1 50 500 1 Solving, h r = 0.667 m = 66.7 cm Step 4: Saving in embankment thickness (%) With the use of geotextile saving in

Step 1: Given DataAxle load =102 kN

Allowable tyre pressure (P) = 500 kpa

Rut depth = 50 mm

Cu=10 kPa

NC = 3.3 with no geotextile,

No. of passes = 100, and

rut depth > 100 mm

NC = 5 with geotextile,

No. of passes = 1000, and

rut depth ≤ 50 mm

NC = 2.8 with no geotextile,

No. of passes = 1000, and

rut depth ≤50 mm

NC = 6 with geotextile,

No. of passes = 100, and

rut depth ≥ 100 mm

Value of Nc for different rut depths (Stewart et al., 1977)

Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

Page 19: GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE · 1 1 50 500 1 Solving, h r = 0.667 m = 66.7 cm Step 4: Saving in embankment thickness (%) With the use of geotextile saving in

The vertical stress (h) at a depth ‘h’ is given by Boussinesq (1883) for a loaded circular area.

Vertical stress due to circular loaded area

Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

Page 20: GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE · 1 1 50 500 1 Solving, h r = 0.667 m = 66.7 cm Step 4: Saving in embankment thickness (%) With the use of geotextile saving in

2/1

Pwr

= {51/( x 500)}1/2 = 0.18 m

2/32h

hr1

11P

P = allowable tire pressure = 500 kPar = Radial horizontal distance

Axle load =102 kN

w = single wheel load = 102/ 2 = 51 kN

Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

Page 21: GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE · 1 1 50 500 1 Solving, h r = 0.667 m = 66.7 cm Step 4: Saving in embankment thickness (%) With the use of geotextile saving in

Step 2: Calculation of the depth of the embankment (hu) without geotextile.

For rut depth = 50 mm and number of passes =1000, from Stewart et al. (1977),

Nc = 2.8 (without geotextile)

hu = Nc x Cu = 2.8 x Cu = 2.8 x 10 = 28 kPa

hu = bearing capacity of the foundation soil without geotextile

cu = cohesion of the foundation soil

hu = thickness of embankment without geotextile

Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

Page 22: GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE · 1 1 50 500 1 Solving, h r = 0.667 m = 66.7 cm Step 4: Saving in embankment thickness (%) With the use of geotextile saving in

Substituting the values in the Boussinesq’s equation,

2/32

uh18.01

1150028Solving,hu = 0.91 m = 91cm

2/32h

hr1

11P

Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

Page 23: GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE · 1 1 50 500 1 Solving, h r = 0.667 m = 66.7 cm Step 4: Saving in embankment thickness (%) With the use of geotextile saving in

Step 3: Calculation of the depth of the embankmentwith geotextile (hr)

For rut depth = 50 mm and number of passes =1000, from Stewart et al. (1977),

Nc = 5 (with geotextile)

hr = Nc x Cu = 5 x Cu = 5 x 10 = 50 kPa

hr = bearing capacity of the foundation soil with geotextile

hr = thickness of embankment with geotextile

Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

Page 24: GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE · 1 1 50 500 1 Solving, h r = 0.667 m = 66.7 cm Step 4: Saving in embankment thickness (%) With the use of geotextile saving in

2/32

rh18.01

1150050

Solving, hr = 0.667 m = 66.7 cm

Step 4: Saving in embankment thickness (%)

With the use of geotextile saving in thickness= 91cm - 66.7 cm = 24.3 cmPercentage saving = (24.3/ 91) x 100 = 26.7 %

Substituting the values in the Boussinesq’s equation,

2/32h

hr1

11P

Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

Page 25: GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE · 1 1 50 500 1 Solving, h r = 0.667 m = 66.7 cm Step 4: Saving in embankment thickness (%) With the use of geotextile saving in

Please let us hear from you

Any question?

Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

Page 26: GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE · 1 1 50 500 1 Solving, h r = 0.667 m = 66.7 cm Step 4: Saving in embankment thickness (%) With the use of geotextile saving in

Prof. J. N. Mandal

Department of civil engineering, IIT Bombay, Powai , Mumbai 400076, India. Tel.022-25767328email: [email protected]

Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay