Georges Cailletaud Centre des Matériaux MINES …mms2.ensmp.fr/emms_paris/rheologie/transparents/EMMS...Georges Cailletaud Centre des Matériaux MINES ParisTech/CNRS October 2013

Plan Mechanical tests Rheological models Summary on rheology

Rheology

Georges Cailletaud

Centre des MatériauxMINES ParisTech/CNRS

October 2013

Georges Cailletaud | Rheology 1/44


Contents

1 Mechanical testsStructuresRepresentative material elements

2 Rheological modelsBasic building bricksPlasticityViscoelasticityElastoviscoplasticity



Tests on a civil plane

www.mts.com


http://www.mts.com


Vibration of a wing

www.mts.com


http://www.mts.com


Biological structures (1/2)

www.mts.com


http://www.mts.com


Biological structures (2/2)

www.mts.com


http://www.mts.com


Food industry

www.mts.com


http://www.mts.com


Testing machines

www.mts.com


http://www.mts.com


Tension test on a metallic specimen

www.mts.com


http://www.mts.com


Mechanical tests

Basic tests

Time independent plasticityTension test, or hardening testCyclic load, or fatigue test

Time dependent plasticityTest at constant stress, or creep testTest at constant strain, or relaxation test

Other tests

Multiaxial loadTension–torsionInternal pressure

Bending tests

Crack propagation tests



Typical result on an aluminum alloy

For a stress σ0.2, it remains 0.2% residual strain after unloading

Stress to failure, σu

0.2% residual strainElastic slope

Tension curve

ε(mm/mm)

σ(M

Pa)

0.040.030.020.010

600

500

400

300

200

100

0

E=78000 MPa, σ0.2=430 MPa, σu=520 MPa Doc. Mines Paris-CDM, Evry



Typical result on an austenitic steel

Material exhibiting an important hardening : the yield stress increasesduring plastic flow

0.2% residual strainElastic slope

Tension curve

ε(mm/mm)

σ(M

Pa)

0.080.070.060.050.040.030.020.010

600

500

400

300

200

100

0

E=210000 MPa, σ0.2=180 MPa, σu=660 MPa Doc. ONERA-DMSE, Châtillon



Push–pull test on an aluminum alloy

Test under strain control ± 0.3%

Positive residual strain at zero stress

Negative stress at zero strain

ε(mm/mm)

σ(M

Pa)

0.0050.0030.001-0.001-0.003-0.005

300

200

100

0

-100

-200

-300

Doc. Mines Paris-CDM, Evry



Schematic models for the preceding results

σ

σ y

E

0 εa. Elastic–perfectly plastic

ε0

E

TE

σ

σy

b. Elastic–plastic (linear)

Elastoplastic modulus, ET = dσ/dε.

ET = 0 : elastic-perfectly plastic material

ET constant : linear plastic hardening

Et strain dependent in the general case



How does a plasticity model work ?

0 0’

A

B

ε

σ

Elastic regimeOA, O’B

Plastic flowAB

Residual strainOO’

Strain decomposition, ε = εe + εp ;

Yield domain, defined by a load function f

Hardening, defined by means of hardening variables,AI .



Result of a tension on a steel at hightemperature

Viscosity effect : Strain rate dependent behaviour

ε = 1.6 10−5s−1ε = 8.0 10−5s−1ε = 2.4 10−4s−1

725◦C

ε

σ(M

Pa)

0.10.080.060.040.020

80

60

40

20

0

Doc. Ecole des Mines, Nancy



Creep test on a tin–lead wire

Mines Paris-CDM, Evry



Creep on a cast iron

σ=25MPaσ=20MPaσ=16MPaσ=12MPa

t (s)

εp

10008006004002000

0.03

0.025

0.02

0.015

0.01

0.005

0




Schematic representation of a creep curve

Primary creep , with hardening in the material

Secondary creep , steady state creep : εp is a power function ofthe applied stress

Tertiary creep , when damage mechanisms start

pε

III

III

t



Creep on a cast iron (2)

T=800◦CT=700◦CT=600◦CT=500◦C

σ (MPa)

εp(s−1

)

100101

0.001

0.0001

1e-05

1e-06

1e-07

1e-08




Relaxation test

Constant strain during the test

During the test :ε = 0 = ε

p + σ/E

dεp =−dσ/E

The viscoplastic strain increases meanwhile stress decreases

The asymptotic stress may be zero (total relaxation) or not (partialrelaxation)

Partial relaxation if there is an internal stress or a threshold in thematerial



Schematic representation of a relaxation curve

The current point in stress space is obtained as the sum of a thresholdstress σs and of a viscous stress σv

The threshold stress represents the plastic behaviour that is reached forzero strain rate

σv

pε

σs

t

σ σ

E



Contents

1 Mechanical testsStructuresRepresentative material elements

2 Rheological modelsBasic building bricksPlasticityViscoelasticityElastoviscoplasticity



Building bricks for the material models



Various types of rheologies

Time independent plasticity

ε = εe + ε

p dεp = f (...)dσ

Elasto-viscoplasticity

ε = εe + ε

p dεp = f (...)dt

ViscoelasticityF(σ, σ,ε, ε) = 0



Time independent plasticity



Elastic–perfectly plastic model

The elastic/plastic regime is defined by means ofa load function f (from stress space into R)

f (σ) = |σ|−σy

Elasticity domainif f < 0 ε = ε

e = σ/E

Elastic unloading

if f = 0 and f < 0 ε = εe = σ/E

Plastic flowif f = 0 and f = 0 ε = ε

p

The condition f = 0 is the consistency condition



Prager model

Loading function with two variables, σ and X

f (σ,X) = |σ−X |−σy with X = Hεp

Plastic flow if both conditions are verified f = 0 and f = 0.

∂f∂σ

σ+∂f∂X

X = 0

sign(σ−X) σ− sign(σ−X) X = 0 thus : σ = X

Plastic strain rate as a function of the stress rate

εp = σ/H

Plastic strain rate as a function of the total strain rate (once an elasticstrain is added)

εp =

EE +H

ε



Equation of onedimensional elastoplasticity

Elasticity domainif f (σ,Ai) < 0 ε = σ/E

Elastic unloading

if f (σ,Ai) = 0 and f (σ,Ai) < 0 ε = σ/E

Plastic flow

if f (σ,Ai) = 0 and f (σ,Ai) = 0 ε = σ/E + εp

The consistency condition writes :

f (σ,Ai) = 0



Illustration of the two hardening types



Isotropic hardening model

Loading function with two variables, σ and R

f (σ,R) = |σ|−R−σy

R depends on p, accumulated plastic strain : p = |εp|dR/dp = H thus R = Hp

Plastic flow iff f = 0 and f = 0

∂f∂σ

σ+∂f∂R

R = 0

sign(σ) σ− R = 0 thus sign(σ) σ−Hp

Plastic strain rate as a function of the stress rate

p = sign(σ) σ/H thus εp = σ/H

Classical modelsRamberg-Osgood : σ = σy +Kpm

Exponential rule : σ = σu +(σy −σu)exp(−bp)



Viscoelasticity



Elementary responses in viscoelasticity

Serie, Maxwell model : ε = σ/E0 +σ/η

Creep under a stress σ0 : ε = σ0/E0 +σ0 t /η

Relaxation for a strain ε0 : σ = E0ε0 exp[−t/τ]

Parallel, Voigt model : σ = Hε+ηε or ε = (σ−H ε)/η

Creep under a stress σ0 : ε = (σ0 /H)(1−exp[−t/τ′])

The constants τ = η/E0 and τ′ = η/H are in seconds, τ denoting the socalled le relaxation time of the Maxwell model



More complex models

a. Kelvin–Voigt

(E0)

(H)

(η)

b. Zener

(η)(E2)

(E1)

Creep and relaxation responses

ε(t) = C(t)σ0 =

(1

E0+

1H

(1−exp[−t/τf ])

)σ0

σ(t) = E(t)ε0 =

(H

H +E0+

E0

H +E0exp[−t/τr ]

)E0ε0



Elasto-viscoplasticity

Scheme of the model Tensile response

X = Hεvp

σv = ηεvp |σp|6 σy

σ = X +σv +σp

Elasticity domain, whose boundary is |σp|= σy



Model equations

Three regimes

(a) εvp =0 |σp|= |σ−Hε

vp| 6σy

(b) εvp >0 σp =σ−Hε

vp−ηεvp =σy

(c) εvp <0 σp =σ−Hε

vp−ηεvp = −σy

(a) interior or boundary of the elasticity domain (|σp| < σy )(b),(c) flow (|σp|= σy and |σp| = 0 )

One can summarize the three equations (with < x >= max(x ,0)) by

ηεvp = 〈|σ−X |−σy 〉 sign(σ−X)

or :

εvp =

< f >

ηsign(σ−X) , with f (σ,X) = |σ−X |−σy



Creep with a Bingham model

t

σ σo y-

H

εvp

Viscoplastic strainversus time

σ

σ

Xo

y

σ

vpεEvolution in the planestress– vsicoplastic

strain

εvp =

σo−σy

H

(1−exp

(− t

τf

))with : τf = η/H



Relaxation with a Bingham model

σ

H-E

vpε

σ

y

Relaxation

H

ε

Transitoire : OA = BC

Relaxation : AB

Effacementincomplet : CDO

A

B

DC

vp

Fading memory

σ = σyE

E +H

(1−exp

(− t

τr

))+

Eεo

E +H

(H +E exp

(− t

τr

))with : τr =

η

E +H



Ingredients for classical viscoplastic models

Bingham model

εvp =

< f >

ηsign(σ−X)

More generallyε

vp = φ(f )

φ(0) = 0 and φ monotonically increasing

εvp is zero if the current point is in the elasticity domain or on theboundary

εvp is non zero if the current point is outside from the elasticity domain

There are models with/without threshold, with/without hardening



Viscoplastic models without hardening

Models without threeshold : the elastic domain is reduced to the origin(σ = 0)

Norton model

εvp =

( |σ|K

)n

sign(σ)

Sellars–Tegart model

εvp = Ash

( |σ|K

)sign(σ)

Models with a thresholdPerzyna model

εvp =

⟨ |σ|−σy

K

⟩n

sign(σ) , εvp = ε0

⟨ |σ|σy−1

⟩n

sign(σ)



Viscoplastic models with hardening

The concept of additive hardening : The hardening comes from thevariables that represent the threshold (X and R)

εvp =

⟨ |σ−X |−R−σy

K

⟩n

sign(σ−X)

X stands for the internal stress (kinematical hardening)R +σy stands for the friction stress (isotropic hardening)σv is the viscous stress or drag stress

The concept of multiplicative hardening : one plays on viscous stress, forinstance :

εvp =

( |σ|K (εp)

)n

sign(σ) =

( |σ|K0|εp|m

)n

sign(σ)

strain hardening



For plasticity and viscoplasticity...

Elasticity defined by a loading function f < 0

Isotropic and kinematic variables

For plasticity :

Plastic flow defined by the consistency condition f = 0, f = 0

Plastic flow :dε

p = g(σ, . . .)dσ

For viscoplasticity :

Flow defined by the viscosity function if f > 0

Possible hardening on the viscous stress

Delayed viscoplastic flow

dεvp = g(σ, . . .)dt



Identification of the material parametersNorton model on tin–lead wires

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000

cree

p st

rain

time (s)

1534 g1320 g1150 g997 g720 g

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000

stre

ss (

MP

a)

time (s)

expsim

Creep test Relaxation ε=20%

Curves obtained with a Norton model

εp =

(σ

800

)2.3

I try by myself on the site mms2.ensmp.fr O


http://mms2.ensmp.fr/mms_paris/experimental/exercices/f_crrel.pdf


Identification of the creep on salt

0

0.001

0.002

0.003

0.004

0.005

0.006

0.007

0.008

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

stra

in

time (Ms)

expsim

Specimen Three level test (3, 6, 9 MPa)

Curves obtained with a Lemaitre model (strain hardening)

εp =

(σ

K

)n(εp + v0)

m

I try by myself on the site mms2.ensmp.fr O


http://mms2.ensmp.fr/mms_paris/experimental/exercices/intro_salt.pdf

Documents

Georges Cailletaud Centre des Matériaux MINES …mms2.ensmp.fr/emms_paris/rheologie/transparents/EMMS...Georges Cailletaud Centre des Matériaux MINES ParisTech/CNRS October 2013