59
1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Illegality: Perfectionism F.H. Buckley [email protected]

George Mason School of Law

  • Upload
    allayna

  • View
    44

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

George Mason School of Law. Contracts II Illegality: Perfectionism F.H. Buckley [email protected]. When Are Promises Not Binding?. 1. Perfectionism The Enforcement of Morals. When Are Promises Not Binding?. 1.Perfectionism The Enforcement of Morals 2. Paternalism Vices of capacity. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: George Mason School of Law

1

George Mason School of Law

Contracts II

Illegality: Perfectionism

F.H. Buckley

[email protected]

Page 2: George Mason School of Law

When Are Promises Not Binding?

1. Perfectionism The Enforcement of Morals

2

Page 3: George Mason School of Law

When Are Promises Not Binding?

1. Perfectionism The Enforcement of Morals

2. Paternalism Vices of capacity

3

Page 4: George Mason School of Law

When Are Promises Not Binding?

1. Perfectionism The Enforcement of Morals

2. Paternalism Vices of capacity

3. Vices of Consent Fraud, Duress

4

Page 5: George Mason School of Law

When Are Promises Not Binding?

1. Perfectionism The Enforcement of Morals

2. Paternalism Vices of capacity

3. Vices of Consent Fraud, Duress

4. Unconscionability Substantive Unfairness?

5

Page 6: George Mason School of Law

6

Perfectionism

The subject has immoral preferences which the perfectionist would reform

As contractual enforcement benefits the parties, courts might enforce morality by refusing to enforce immoral agreements

Page 7: George Mason School of Law

7

We’ve already seen an example of this

Page 8: George Mason School of Law

8

That’s an example of protecting third partiesBut this is about reforming the individual

Page 9: George Mason School of Law

Anti-perfectionism (neutralism)

Mill’s harm principle: “The only purpose for which power can

rightfully be exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others.” Mill, On Liberty (1859)

9

Page 10: George Mason School of Law

John Stuart Mill & Harriet Taylor

Page 11: George Mason School of Law

The Film Version

With Hugh Grant as JSM

Page 12: George Mason School of Law

The Film Version

And Emma Thompson As Harriet Taylor

Page 13: George Mason School of Law

The Film Version“Hi Mom. Hi Dad. I’m home!”

And Jerry Mathers As The Beaver

Page 14: George Mason School of Law

14

Perfectionism defies stereotypes

Right-wing perfectionism Drug laws Sexual immorality Same sex marriage

Left-wing perfectionism Smoking Expansive civil rights laws Same sex marriage

Page 15: George Mason School of Law

15

Perfectionism in the Law

Contracts rendered illegal by statute: Watts v. Malatesta

Contracts illegal at common law: Baby M

Page 16: George Mason School of Law

WattsEx turpi causa oritur non actio

16

A suitable case for perfectionism?

Page 17: George Mason School of Law

Watts

17

If a contract is illegal, what’s the best contract law response? No remedy of any kind?

Ex turpi causa oritur non actio In pari delicto, portior est conditio defendentis

Or NY Penal Code § 994, which reverses this?

How do the incentive effects cut?

Page 18: George Mason School of Law

Watts

Π Δ

18

$37,500

$37,500 +++

Π sues under NY Penal Law § 994 to recover his losses.

Can Δ offset against this claim his far greater losses to Π?

Page 19: George Mason School of Law

WattsIn pari delicto, portior est conditio defendentis

How did the In pari delicto maxim apply? Crane on the mischief rule.

Was it fairly applied here? Crane’s dissent

19

Page 20: George Mason School of Law

Watts

Just how do professional gamblers collect their winnings?

20

Page 21: George Mason School of Law

Remember Nick the Chin?

How do professional gamblers collect their winnings?

21

I’m tinkin’ youse should pay what youse owe

Page 22: George Mason School of Law

A special case

Contracts in restraint of trade

Why do cartel arrangements tend to break down?

22

Page 23: George Mason School of Law

Hewitt Does marriage matter?

“Merely lacking legal formality”: Is that how you see marriage?

Does the state have an interest in promoting it?

Is child support a separate issue?

23

Page 24: George Mason School of Law

Baby M

24

How do you imagine Mary Beth Whitehead?

Page 25: George Mason School of Law

Baby MMary Beth Whitehead

25

Page 26: George Mason School of Law

Baby MMary Beth Whitehead

26

Page 27: George Mason School of Law

Baby MThe Sterns

27

Page 28: George Mason School of Law

Baby M

28

Why did the Whiteheads enter into the contract?

Page 29: George Mason School of Law

Baby M

29

Why did the Sterns not have their own children?

Page 30: George Mason School of Law

Baby M

30

What was the problem with the name “Melissa”?

Page 31: George Mason School of Law

So what did the court hold?

31

Page 32: George Mason School of Law

So what did the court hold?

Contrary to statute

Contrary to public policy

32

Page 33: George Mason School of Law

What about the following?

A futures contract for a kidney?

33

Page 34: George Mason School of Law

What about the following?

A futures contract for a kidney?

A sale of a kidney?

34

Page 35: George Mason School of Law

What about the following?

A futures contract for a kidney?

A sale of a kidney?

A sale of one’s eyes?

35

Page 36: George Mason School of Law

So what did the court hold?

Contrary to statute

Contrary to public policy

Sara Elizabeth Whitehead or Melissa Sterns?

36

Page 37: George Mason School of Law

Baby MWho’s got the better c.v.?

37

Who is more likely to:subscribe to The New Republic? attend an Arthur Miller play?read a Jonathan Franzen novel?

Page 38: George Mason School of Law

Baby M

38

Was it relevant that “most of his family had been destroyed in the Holocaust.”

Page 39: George Mason School of Law

Baby M

39

Did Whitehead’s extreme attachment to her daughter render her an unfit mother?

Page 40: George Mason School of Law

Surrogacy Contracts

Should they be enforced? Note that the industry has expanded,

AFTER Baby M. Are there ground rules you’d adopt to

make it more palatable? Is this merely about the surrogate’s

capacity to contract?

40

Page 41: George Mason School of Law

41

Two kinds of Perfectionism

Private Perfectionism overrules personal choice to make the subject a better person

Social Perfectionism overrules personal choice to protect third parties from moral externalities

Page 42: George Mason School of Law

42

Social Perfectionism

Mill’s harm principle: “The only purpose for which power can

rightfully be exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others.” Mill, On Liberty (1859)

But what counts as a harm?

Page 43: George Mason School of Law

43

Physical spillovers

Page 44: George Mason School of Law

44

Moral spillovers?

Couture, Les Romains de la decadence, 1847

Page 45: George Mason School of Law

45

Social Capital

Physical Capital

Page 46: George Mason School of Law

46

Social Capital

Physical capital Human Capital

Intelligence and health Private virtue, good character

Page 47: George Mason School of Law

47

Social Capital

Physical capital Human Capital Social Capital

Do you have any preferences about your neighbors and fellow citizens?

Republic of Defection: Edward Banfield’s Montegrano,

The Moral Basis of a Backward Society

Page 48: George Mason School of Law

What’s wrong with hog-dog fights?

48

Page 49: George Mason School of Law

What’s wrong with hog-dog fights?

49

Page 50: George Mason School of Law

50

Social Capital

What were the externality concerns in Baby M? Was it simply the child, as the casebook

suggests? Are surrogate parents any worse than

natural parents? Posner and Landes on baby-selling

Page 51: George Mason School of Law

51

So what kind of social virtues would one look for?

The Bourgeois Virtues Honesty Fidelity Prudence Moderation Reciprocity

The Romantic Virtues Transcendence, Passion

Page 52: George Mason School of Law

52

How to Protect Social Capital?

The Hart-Devlin Debate Lord Devlin, The Enforcement of Morals H.L.A. Hart, Law, Liberty and Morality

Page 53: George Mason School of Law

53

How to Protect Social Capital?

The Hart-Devlin Debate Lord Devlin, The Enforcement of Morals H.L.A. Hart, Law, Liberty and Morality

Devlin’s Disintegration Thesis Just how does a society disintegrate Is change always for the worst?

Page 54: George Mason School of Law

54

Neutralism and Slippery Slopes

The Battle of the Slippery Slopes. The Perfectionist fears that a slight

change in moral habits will lead to the Decline and Fall of our civilization.

The neutralist fears that any kind of Perfectionism will lead to Holy Fascism.

Page 55: George Mason School of Law

55

Can the state be trusted to legislate morals?

No one expects the

Spanish Inquisition!

Page 56: George Mason School of Law

56

Can the state be trusted to legislate morals?

President Johnson signs the 1964 Civil Rights Act

Page 57: George Mason School of Law

57

Do laws have expressive effects?

President Johnson signs the 1964 Civil Rights Act

Page 58: George Mason School of Law

58

Can the state be trusted to legislate morals?

Jim Crow laws were legislated by the states

Page 59: George Mason School of Law

59

George Mason School of Law

Contracts II

Paternalism

F.H. Buckley

[email protected]