Upload
debra-scott
View
160
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Technology Plan Analysis
Citation preview
Debra Scott
Julian Young
Technology Plan Update
FRIT 8132 – Spring 2012
Georgia Southern University
Part I: &arrative
Introduction:
Located in the Atlanta metropolitan area, Georgia Perimeter College (GPC) is the
largest associate degree-granting college and the third largest institution in the University
System of Georgia. As of fall 2011, the student population was 27,000 students, attending 5
campuses, as well as taking part in online instruction. International students account for 15
percent of the total student population and represent 157 countries (Fact Sheet, 2010).
In March 2009, Georgia Perimeter College began implementing a strategic planning project
for information technology. The Chief Information Officer began an internal environmental
assessment through the use of presidential open forums, personal interviews, and input from an
Information Technology Advisory Council (ITAC) to gather information from various stakeholders
(i.e. students, faculty, staff, and community).
An ongoing planning process to execute specific strategic tactics based on a quarterly review
process was to be implemented. In March 2010, five information technology open forum sessions were
held to inform the college community of recommendations and actions resulting from the data collected.
The open forum process has continued annually and is evidence of the college’s commitment to shared
governance. Though the initial plan clearly recognized the need for continuous development and revision
of the strategic plan, it appears that the actual document has not been officially updated from the original
2009 version (“Strategic plan,” 2009).
Overview: Strengths and Weaknesses
Goals and Strategies:
The IT plan has six broad strategic areas that cover twenty-eight specific objectives. This
section is well organized and moderately detailed. All of the goals and objectives are clearly related
to learner outcomes and are specifically linked to the college’s strategic plan. Many of the objectives
not only relate to the college’s strategic plan, but they also link to other IT goals within the plan
itself.
This section lacks detailed information that answers the questions of who, how, or when. A
general timeframe of 1-2 years or 3-5 years is given for the completion of the goals with no specifics
of how they are to be accomplished or the methods that will be used. Many of the objectives have
vague descriptions that make it difficult to understand what the objectives are actually addressing.
The goals and strategies section of the technology plan receives an assessment score of two due to
the fact that the plan does an excellent job of relating its technology goals with that of the college’s
strategic plans, but lacks specifics about who, when, and how.
Professional Development Strategy:
The professional development strategy outlined in the plan focused primarily on a commitment
to continuous staff development and training for the IT staff with the ultimate goal of providing
1outstanding support for the faculty, students, and staff. The overall objectives included enhancing and
simplifying the learning environment, enhancing teaching excellence, and assisting in facilitating
collaboration within the college as well as with local, state, national and global communities.
The strategic plan targeted several areas for improving faculty support: provide more “brown
bag luncheons” to encourage faculty to share instructional strategies using innovative technologies;
clearly define a faculty support portfolio; implement a regular communication plan for collaboration
between IT and faculty; define an advisory process for proposing software acquisition; establish a
periodic review process for academic support services; and define categories of support designed to
streamline faculty productivity.
The strategic goals were clearly identified with a timeframe of 3-5 years but the specific tactics
identifying who will do what, when, and how was not specified therefore the professional development
strategy section receives an assessment score of 2, indicating proficient performance.
Assessment of Technology:
The tech plan gives very little information about the assessment of technology. Computers,
laptops, networking, and video conferencing are mentioned, but with no detail concerning quantity,
age, type, or any other specifics. No technology inventory is included in the plan. There is no
information about the learning environment. No mention of technology in the classroom, computer
labs, or any other areas on campus are given. This section receives an assessment score of 1 due to
the lack of information and no technology inventory.
Evaluation Process:
The strategic plan clearly indicates a commitment to the implementation of an ongoing
information technology planning process to cultivate ideas, formalize the ideas into proposals, and
ultimately gain commitments and deliverables. The goals include: better defining a philosophy for the
adoption of new technologies, defining a support model for early adopters of new technologies,
defining a process for collaboration between faculty, vendors, and other institutions to generate ideas,
and developing an ongoing evaluation process to critically evaluate the ideas as they relate to the
college’s core values.
The strategic goals were clearly identified with a timeframe of 3-5 years but the specific tactics
identifying who will do what, when, and how was not specified therefore the evaluation process section
receives an assessment score of 2, indicating proficient performance.
Summary
Overall the greatest strength of the strategic plan is its commitment to the alignment of the IT
goals with the college’s overall goals and objectives. The level of details provided offered a firm
foundation for continuous revision and development. The plan recognized the need for a continuous
development process but the lack of revision indicates that it has not been given sufficient priority.
One of the greatest weaknesses of the plan is the organization of ideas within the document.
Determining an assessment in any given area required associating details located in various sections
of the document, which would eventually allow a comprehensive view of the criteria, but did not
readily provide a snapshot view of critical areas.
The information technology strategic planning core team seemed to be representative of
numerous and diverse entities within the college. The overall document addresses the needs of each
of the entities but lacks detailed action plans and timelines required to facilitate its implementation.
The technology plan was a good starting point for future revisions. However, its lack of detail made
the plan feel rushed and incomplete.
A critical objective of the technology plan update is to reorganize the data in a format that
provides a clear snapshot view of each of the identified areas. Sections will be updated to include
greater detail and current status. Several sections not included in the original document will be added
in order to provide a more comprehensive view of the role of information technology at Georgia
Perimeter College.
Outline of Planned Changes
Action Plan/Multi-Year Planning
1. The problem(s) that you see in the existing plan.
Strategic goals were identified with a 3-5 year time frame but clear objectives with specific
measurable outcomes were not clearly defined. Who will do what, when, and how was also
unspecified.
2. The change(s) that you want to make in this section of the plan.
Clearly define objectives with specific measurable outcomes to be achieved in a 1-2 year time
frame. Specify who will do what, when, and how.
3. Why you believe this change is necessary and what resources are required.
This change will make the document more relevant as well as identify personnel, funding, and
skill sets required.
Professional Development
1. The problem(s) that you see in the existing plan.
Strategic goals were identified with a 3-5 year time frame but clear objectives with specific
measurable outcomes were not clearly defined. Who will do what, when, and how was also
unspecified.
2. The change(s) that you want to make in this section of the plan.
Clearly define objectives with specific measurable outcomes to be achieved in a 1-2 year time
frame. Specify who will do what, when, and how.
3. Why you believe this change is necessary and what resources are required.
This change will make the document more relevant as well as identify personnel, funding, and
skill sets required.
Evaluation
1. The problem(s) that you see in the existing plan.
Strategic goals were identified with a 3-5 year time frame but clear objectives with specific
measurable outcomes were not clearly defined. Who will do what, when, and how was also
unspecified.
2. The change(s) that you want to make in this section of the plan.
Clearly define objectives with specific measurable outcomes to be achieved in a 1-2 year time
frame. Specify who will do what, when, and how.
3. Why you believe this change is necessary and what resources are required.
This change will make the document more relevant as well as identify personnel, funding, and
skill sets required.
Needs Assessment, Standards, Funding Alternatives, School Pilot Projects/Educational Research,
Model Classroom Configurations, Facilities, Software Agreements, Gifts and Disposal, Staff
Development
1. The problem(s) that you see in the existing plan.
All of the above mentioned topics were not specifically addressed in the original technology
plan. Information regarding the current status of these issues was accessible from a variety of
reliable sources.
2. The change(s) that you want to make in this section of the plan.
Add the sections to the technology plan along with clearly defined objectives and specific
measurable outcomes to be achieved in a 1-2 year time frame. Specify who will do what, when,
and how.
3. Why you believe this change is necessary and what resources are required.
This change will make the document more comprehensive, making it the ultimate resource for all
technology related issues.
Expected Consequences of Proposed Changes
As a result of the changes in the Information Technology Strategic Plan, we hope to
provide a comprehensive source for all stakeholders for any technology related concerns. We
would like for the document to truly become a “live” document that is constantly being
updated and revised using a SharePoint site to allow all applicable departments to take
ownership of relevant parts of the document and edit their sections as needed.
The original technology plan provided a firm foundation for continued development.
Numerous strategic plans were implemented and executed based upon the plans outlined in
the document. It appears that the various stakeholders began to execute tactics from
particular vantage points without giving as much consideration to how each tactic impacts
the overall technology plan. There are many good ideas, but because of budget and resource
constraints, they cannot all be executed. It is very difficult to conceptualize many technology
projects being executed simultaneously without referencing a single document source.
Despite not having a comprehensive document, significant progress has been made
toward accomplishing the strategic goals. Providing access to a comprehensive document
with priorities, resources, and budget constraints clearly defined (and or linked to an external
reference) will allow decisions to clearly be data driven. Georgia Perimeter College is
committed to shared governance. GPC’s dynamic Shared Governance Model is linked to its
Strategic Plan, with an emphasis on work that is timely, targeted, transparent, and temporary.
The Shared Governance Model is a composite of college-wide Standing Committees, Task
Teams, and Presidential Think Tanks, each comprised of constituents from across the
college. These groups along with the President’s Policy Advisory Board, Executive Team,
Policy Councils, President’s Cabinet, Faculty and Staff Senates, and Open Forum
participants comprise GPC’s shared governance model (“Shared governance,” n.d.). A
comprehensive instructional technology strategic plan will enhance the shared governance
process by providing the transparency clearly valued.
Part II - Technology Plan Update
Broad-Based Support IT Advisory & Governance
Information Technology Advisory Council
The Georgia Perimeter College Information Technology
Advisory and Policy Councils review current and proposed
policies and procedures for all issues related to any and all
matters associated with information technology, information
systems and information security to enhance teaching, learning
or scholarly activities. In addition, they provide advice and
consultation to the Chief Information Officer (CIO), and
communication for the strategic and tactical planning of
information technology from a college perspective.
Academic Technology Advisory Committee
Provides advice and guidance to the Chief Information
Officer (CIO) and Information Technology Advisory
Committee (ITAC) for issues related to any and all matters
associated with technology to enhance teaching, learning or
scholarly activities including classroom instructional
technologies, e-portfolio products, online collaboration tools,
and support services for faculty who are integrating technology
into their instructional programs. The Academic Technology
Advisory Committee is charged with serving as ‘the’ voice for
faculty technology needs for both operational purposes and
strategic purposes, and collect and solicits ideas from
colleagues.
Student Technology Advisory Committee
Provides advice and guidance to the Chief Information
Officer (CIO) and Information Technology Advisory
Committee (ITAC) for issues related to student use of
technology. The Student Technology Advisory Committee is
charged with serving as ‘the’ voice for student technology needs
for both operational purposes and strategic purposes, and
collects and solicits ideas from the student body (“IT Advisory,”
n.d.).
The Information Technology Strategic Planning Core
Team Members include representation from all areas of the
college:
Assistant Vice President and Chief Information Officer Associate Professor Director of Educational Technology Director of Admissions and Recruitment Director of IT Infrastructure Executive Vice President for Administration Assistant Director, Instructional Technology Business Analyst Director, Facilities Planning
Director of Information Systems Executive Director of GPC Online Senior Administrative Secretary Associate Vice President for Enrollment Management Director, Instructional Support Services, GPC Online Director of Learning Resources & Assistant Professor Vice President for Academic and Student Affairs Director, Center for Teaching and Learning Director of Institutional Research and Planning Faculty Chief Information Security Officer Associate Director, Admissions and Records Dean of Academic Services
Needs Assessment Include an assessment of the current state of technology
Mission OIT provides information technology services and
resources that support and enhance Georgia Perimeter College’s
teaching, learning, research, and administrative activities. OIT’s
primary goal is to provide technology services that enable our
students, faculty, and staff to be successful at GPC. OIT
employees strive to provide excellent customer service, respond
to the changing needs of the college community, and make it
easy and convenient for everyone to use technology at Georgia
Perimeter College.
It is very important to us in OIT that all of our customers
are completely satisfied with their service
experience. OIT believes that GPC’s future depends on our
ability to retain our customers (students, faculty and staff) by
providing exceptional experiences (“Information Technology,”
n.d.).
Vision The vision for information technology engagement at
GPC is that information technology at the college is to become a
nationally recognized model among two-year public institutions
by:
• Creating and supporting a transparent and seamless
environment for academic learning, creative endeavors, and
appropriate research.
• Enabling student success, facilitating faculty activities and
supporting efficient and effective administration of the
college.
• Fostering collaboration among its diverse community of
students, faculty, and staff.
• Promoting and supporting continuous innovation.
• Measuring the success of information technology
accomplishments by its relevance to the college’s mission
(“Strategic plan,” 2009).
Goals and Objectives In defining IT strategic directions that will be
consistent with the college’s four strategic goals, this plan
asserts that pursuing six major IT Strategic Goals will result
in advancing the college’s already planned strategies:
1) Information technology should empower and enhance the
academic learning process.
2) The college must continue to build and expand reliable, robust
and secure access to information and technology systems.
3) The college must promote customer-centered information
technology services and support.
4) Innovation through technology must be assured, but not at the
expense of sacrifice of stable service delivery.
5) The effectiveness of the college’s administration and
management should be enhanced through technology systems
and data mart and data warehouse infrastructure and tools.
6) The college should continuously look for ways to enhance its
management of information technology and information
systems as a true institutional strategic asset, like
corresponding other institutional assets: human, fiscal,
intellectual and physical (“Strategic plan,” 2009).
Action Plan/Multi-
year Planning Goal#1:Empower and Enhance Academic Learning and
Processes
Recommendation: Increase pilot program participation by faculty.
Communicate the impact of mobile device technology on faculty
practices and perceptions.
Proposed Timeline: Ongoing
Responsible Department(s) – Academic Technologies
Measurable Outcome: Schedules for administration of surveys and
questionnaires. Analysis of survey, questionnaires, and student &
faculty logs.
Recommendation: Develop strategies to convey information
utilizing various electronically based applications. Provide faculty
with mobile, electronic devices, to promote the exploration of using
mobile technology with students. Develop podcasts content to
customize learning opportunities utilizing mobile devices.
Instructors involved in pilot programs must be available to be
contacted by other faculty for guidance and consultation, present
workshops, and/or be willing to provide scheduled access to their
classroom for other faculty (iTeach, 2011).
Increased Access to Classes
Growth of use of hybrid courses can have an effect of reducing seat
time and demand for classrooms during peak hours, providing more
access to high demand courses. This may, in turn, reduce student
difficulties in getting classes needed to complete courses of study in
specific time frames.
Recommendation: Increase access to hybrid courses. Increase
access to training for faculty in hybrid best practices. Appoint a
hybrid coordinator, master hybrid instructors, and an assessment
team.
Proposed Timeline: 1-3 years
Responsible Department(s): Academic Technology, Academic
Services
Measurable Outcome: Review of Hybrid Department
meeting minutes posted on the GPC governance and policy
webpages. An annual report submitted by the Hybrid
Assessment Team. A list of evaluated hybrid courses and
the final assessment.
Goal #2: Build and Expand Reliable, Robust, and Secure
Access to Information and Technology
Technology Infrastructure:
GPC is a leader in innovative infrastructure technology
deployment:
• New eco-friendly power and cooling system in the
Clarkston data center.
• Partnership with PeachNet to create a North Atlanta
fiber ring to connect three of our campuses to this USG
backbone.
• A USG leader in Cisco voice-over-IP telephony.
• The first large USG institution to deploy Banner on the
Linux operating system. This has provided much higher
performance for significantly lower operating cost,
resulting in dramatically improved efficiency.
• The first USG institution to implement the Banner
Enrollment Management Suite software product.
This SunGard Higher Education product uses data
analysis to make enrollment decisions.
• GPC is the first University System of Georgia (USG)
institution to implement Business Intelligence using
Cognos to facilitate data-driven decision making.
Recommendation: Preserve and enhance the network
infrastructure through an ongoing commitment to upgrade,
extend and diversify its capabilities and support.
Timeline: 3 year replacement cycle
Responsible Department(s): Infrastructure Technology
Measurable Outcomes: Annual report of the technology
replacement schedule
Recommendation: Continue to develop and fund a model for
the availability of consistent, up-to-date technology. Establish
and clearly define an Acquire, Retire, and Upgrade cycle for
computers, software, and other information technology.
Implement processes and measures to ensure consistency where
applicable across the college.
Timeline: Variable replacement cycle(s)
Responsible Department(s): Infrastructure Technology
Measurable Outcome: Annual report of the technology
replacement schedule
Goal #3: Promote Customer-Centered Information
Technology Services and Support
Information technology encourages and supports an operational
environment that is customer-centered and provides quality
assurance for information technology services and support. To
accomplish this goal, the following imperatives are
recommended:
Recommendation: Continue to expand IT support for students.
The following support areas are currently accessible on at least
one GPC campus location:
JagSpots are located on each campus. JagSpots provide
students, faculty and staff an area in which they may access
computers to check emails, study, research, write and print
papers, and take online tests. JagSpot assistants are on duty to
answer questions.
MediaSpots offer GPC students access to state-of-the-art media
production and post-production equipment, facilities, and
training. MediaSpots are currently located on the Clarkston and
Dunwoody campuses.
TechSpots will provide access to GPC technicians offering
laptop support to students. Services will include virus scanning,
system cleaning info, browser configuration, installation
assistance for GPC-provided software, troubleshooting
hardware, and assistance with wireless, peripherals, and system
maintenance. The first two TechSpots will be located inside the
Clarkston and Newton JagSpots.
GroupSpots are technology enhanced student collaboration
spaces. They are to be located in open student centric areas
around campus (Classrooms and Labs, n.d.).
Proposed Timeline: 1-3 year implementation schedule
Responsible Department: Educational Technologies, Academic
Services
Measurable Outcome: Increase in the number of IT support “spots.”
Increase in the number of work stations at each location. Increase in
the variety of software and hardware available.
Goal #4: Ensure Continuous Innovation, Yet a Stable
Production Environment
Aggressive experimentation with new technologies occurs in a
controlled, non-production environment to determine whether and
when new technologies should be deployed more generally across
the college. To accomplish this goal, the following imperatives are
recommended:
Recommendation: Publish the Projects & Planning Office’s
Technology Project Portfolio on the Projects & Planning website
pages to increase visibility of completed, current, and completed
projects.
Timeline: ongoing
Responsible Department(s): Project & Planning Office,
Academic Services, Academic Technology
Measurable Outcome: The portfolio will clearly be accessible
on the GPC website.
Recommendation: To increase awareness, market the process
which invites Georgia Perimeter College students, student
organizations, faculty and staff, or any grouping of our
community, to submit proposals to request funding to provide
technology resources to our students. The Student Technology
Fee Committee is responsible for reviewing and evaluating
student technology proposals and recommends funding
allocations to the President and Chief Information officer and
the Executive Cabinet.
Timeline: 6 mos. to a year
Responsible Department(s): Marketing, Academic Technology,
Executive Cabinet
Measurable outcome: Increase in the number of proposals
received and processed by the Projects & Planning Office
(“Projects and Planning,” n.d.).
Goal #5: Support College Administration and Management
Recommendation: Develop responsive and secure system to
access administrative information that facilitates informed
college decisions. Acquire and implement a college-wide
system of data management, tools and processes that focus on
data integrity and effective reporting support. Critical attention
should be paid to assuring that access granted to information is
commensurate with the specific need to perform one’s duties,
whether operational or strategic in nature. Continue the
Deployment of Content Management System. This system
would facilitate routing electronic documents through business
and academic processes.
Recommendation: Implement a system of electronic signatures in
order to move manual paper-based business functions to electronic
paperless functions.
Proposed Timeline: 1 to 3 years
Responsible Department: Information Systems, Administrative
Support
Measurable Outcome: Steadily increasing number of documents
revised from paper submission to electronic submission.
Recommendation: Continue to expand the use of collaboration
software such as SharePoint to clearly define workflow
processes across departments and facilitate project coordination.
Timeline:
Responsible Departments: Information Systems
Measurable Outcome: Increased interdepartmental collaboration
reported by project management teams.
Recommendation: Continue to deploy a unified web authoring tool
for web content management.
Proposed Timeline: 1 year
Responsible Department(s): Marketing, Information Technology
Measurable Outcome: Unified look and feel of all college affiliated
web pages.
Goal #6: Plan and Manage Information Technology
External Liaisons and Collaboration:
Recommendation: Fund an administrative staff position that is
responsible for building and facilitating discussion by creating
virtual and face-to-face professional communities. Sharing of
technical expertise will reduce duplication of effort across all
the Georgia Perimeter College campuses (“Strategic plan,”
2009).
Timeline: 1-2 years
Responsible Department(s): Administrative Support
Measurable Outcome: Increased collaboration efforts reported
in published departmental meeting minutes.
Recommendation: Ensure institutional participation in appropriate
national, regional, and statewide collaborative efforts to maintain
competitiveness, and capitalize on best practices and innovation in
the use of information technology in higher education.
Timeline: ongoing
Responsible Departments: Academic Technology, Academic
Services
Measurable Outcome: Generate a report that outlines the colleges &
faculty participation (attendance/presenting/hosting) of conferences.
Program Integration This Information Technology Strategic Plan includes in its scope
not only issues related to the technology, but also includes
managing aspects of the human resources, services to be delivered,
managed expectations and fiscal resources required to accomplish
the strategic goals. The plan encompasses all departments of the
institution with no specific domain restrictions based on
organizational unit or functional uses of information technology.
This includes uses of these technologies, systems and resources in
both the academic, administrative and operational infrastructure
components of the college.
The Information Technology Strategic Plan is closely aligned with
the four overarching institutional goals in the College Strategic Plan
(“Strategic plan,” 2009).
Curriculum
Integration
Educational Technologies
Educational Technology consists of the following areas that
provide ongoing training and support:
Instructional Technology area is responsible for
providing technology training and support that enhances the
teaching and learning practice using pedagogically sound
instructional design principles.
Classroom and Event Technology is focused on the
integration of classroom technology through design, installation
and use. Also, providing audio visual support for college
sponsored events.
The Technology Support area endeavors to provide
desktop and classroom support that is prompt, proactive, highly
responsive and adaptable to the needs of the college community
(Organizational Units, n.d.).
Recommendation: Based upon the evidence of positive impact
on teaching and learning determined by analysis of collected
data, expansion of the following pilot programs are
recommended:
The Nursing iTouch Pilot Project began in the Fall of
2009. It is a partnership between the nursing department and
Instructional Technology Services. The GPC Nursing
Department received a grant that would allow for 12 iTouches
to be purchased and loaned to nursing students and faculty.
Instructional Technology Services purchased licenses for
the Unbound Medicine App, Nursing Central. The app was
loaded on the iTouches. Additionally, Instructional Technology
Services worked with the nursing department to make their
lectures and lecture notes available to students as podcasts
viewable on the iTouch.
The Health Science Mobile Device Pilot Project is a
partnership between the Health Science discipline and the
Office of Information Technology. Faculty teaching in the
Health Sciences will receive a iPad or iPod Touch. First year
Health Science students will receive an iPod Touch. Second
year Health Science students will receive an iPad. Discipline
specific apps such as Unbound Medicine's Nursing Central app
will be provided to the faculty and students. Faculty will be
creating podcasts of lectures and skills labs for students to view
(Academic Technology Projects, n.d.).
Evaluation Continuous staff development and training are essential for an IT
organization to maintain its core competencies. The IT organization
must know how it measures customer service, what service level
expectations are needed and how to manage expectations in a
proactive, communicative manner.
Recommendation: Assess faculty utilization of technology
enabled instruction through the administration and analysis of pre
and post surveys. Evaluate student perceptions and practices
through use of pre and post student surveys. Develop assessment
instrument to evaluate both faculty and student level of ability to
use various software applications and hardware. Assess student
impressions of electronically based applications and mobile
devices collected from Student logs.
Evaluate student academic performance by comparing the
average of e scores in technology enabled instruction vs. face-
to-face web enhanced instruction. Compare scores on the end of
course assessment.
During a pilot technology program, both faculty and students
are required to complete surveys & logs regarding their
experiences (Academic Technology Projects, n.d.).
Recommendation: Create a small evaluation body that can
comment authoritatively on use of new software and hardware
based on established campus technology specifications.
Timeline: ongoing
Responsible Department(s): Academic Technology
Measurable Outcome: Annual assessment of current software and
hardware as well as those under consideration for future use.
Recommendation: Evaluation of the design of all hybrid
courses using an approved Hybrid course design rubric. Courses
must meet 75% of the specified standards in order to gain
approval for implementation.
Timeline: 1-2 years
Responsible Department(s): Academic Technology, Academic
Services
Measurable Outcome: Annual reports of the Hybrid Course
Coordinator and the published departmental meeting minutes
Standards
Funding Alternatives The Office of Grants and Sponsored Programs exists to support
Georgia Perimeter College's faculty, staff, and administrators in
obtaining funding from external sources in support of instructional
programs, professional development, demonstration, and public
service projects targeted to implementing the goals of Georgia
Perimeter College's Strategic Plan (“Grants,” n.d.).
Private support comes primarily from five sources: GPC (and
DeKalb College) alumni, GPC Faculty and Staff, corporations,
philanthropic foundations and friends. The GPC Foundation works
hard to create and strengthen corporate and community partnerships
(GPC Foundation, 2012).
Recommendation: Continue to aggressively seek alternative
funding sources by researching grants, and building and maintaining
relationships with local and global community.
Timeline: ongoing
Responsible Department(s): GPC Foundation, Institutional
Advancement
Measurable Outcome: Annual reports of collected funds.
School Pilot
Projects/Educational
Research
In order to promote the GPC strategic plan to strengthen student
success, Academic Technology continues to initiate and support
projects such as the following that expand teaching and
learning opportunities for faculty and students:
Respondus LockDown Browser Pilot
Spring/Summer 2010-Present
Online and face-to-face faculty pilot the use of the
Respondus LockDown Browser, an Internet browser that blocks
all other computer applications while a student is taking an
online quiz, test, or exam.
&ursing iTouch Pilot
Fall 2009/Spring 2010 -Present
In partnership with the nursing department, Instructional
Technology Services purchased apps and provided instructional
support for the use of iTouches acquired by grant funding.
Health Sciences Mobile Device Pilot
Fall 2010/Spring 2011, Fall 2011, Spring 2012
In partnership with the Health Science discipline, the
Office of Information Technology provided faculty with an iPad
or iPod Touch, first-year students with an iPod Touch, and
second-year students with an iPad.
Student Media Projects
Spring 2010-Present
Instructional Technology Services and Media Developer,
team with instructors to assist students with the creation of
course related videos (Academic Technology Projects, n.d.).
Model Classroom
Configurations
Georgia Perimeter College classrooms are equipped with
advanced instructional technology tools to enhance instruction.
Standard Classroom Hardware: o Classroom Computer o LCD Projector o Sympodium o DVD/VCR player o Document Camera o Speaker System o Laptop Connection o Wall Panel Switch o Ethernet Access at the Presentation station o Wireless Access for students
Specialty Classroom Hardware: o GPC Rewind / Echo360 Lecture Capture – available in
select classrooms o Presentation Capture - available in select classrooms o Turning Technologies Clickers – available by request
GPC classroom computers are equipped with specialty
software in addition to the standard GPC computer software.
The classroom computer uses software called Deep Freeze that
returns the computer to default settings after logout in order to
ensure that the user experience is not disrupted by the alterations
of other users.
Specialty software is available on classroom
computers:
SMART &otebooks (available on all classroom
computers) – This software works in tandem with the
Sympodium to allow mark up using the Sympodium stylus.
SMART Sync (available in computer classrooms) – a
computer monitoring software that allows the instructor's
computer to interact with and monitor student computers in
computer classroom (Classroom Technology, n.d.).
Facilities The Instructional Design Labs offer faculty a place to
experiment with technology and to design innovative
instructional materials. We maintain specialized hardware and
software to give faculty the opportunity to experiment with
instructional technology tools and develop new forms of
instructional content. In the IDL, faculty can: build web pages,
practice with a Sympodium, create videos, use a scanner, or just
brainstorm with an Instructional Technologist.
IDL Locations:
• Alpharetta 217A- Under development
• Clarkston CH2161
• Decatur SC1148
• Dunwoody NE2903
• Newton 1N3415
• Clarkston- GPC Online Offices JCLRC
Additionally, Instructional Technology Services have a
training facility located at the Clarkston Campus in Room
H2160. This room can be reserved for small group training.
Student MediaSpots, multimedia development labs for
students are located on the Clarkston and Dunwoody campuses
(“Facilities,” 2012).
Maintenance/Support The GPC Technology Service Desk acts as a central
point of contact for technology-related questions, issues and
problem resolution.
Physical and Environmental Security
Georgia Perimeter College will implement and maintain
security controls and safety measures to protect computer
operations (systems, buildings, equipment, and related
supporting infrastructures) against physical and environmental
threats. GPC will implement physical security measures to
prevent, detect, and mitigate unauthorized physical access or
damage to information assets, and environmental controls to
protect against fire, flood, and other environmental and natural
hazards (“Physical and Environmental,” 2010).
Infrastructure Technology Security Infrastructure Technology operations is responsible for the
operation of enterprise-wide computers and monitoring
enterprise-wide applications and the campus-wide network.
Infrastructure Technology is responsible for providing the
following services:
System Status and Availability
Network Status and Availability
Storage of Backup Media
Problem Escalation for Enterprise Applications and
Campus-wide Network
Network Services team provides internet and
telecommunication services for Georgia Perimeter College’s
(GPC) students, faculty, staff and GPC guests who are mobile
users. The Network Services group supports a voice and data
network, which is an Ethernet based network IP network
spanning 55 buildings on six campuses. The data network
includes border routers, core routers and distribution routers that
are interconnected via gigabit Ethernet between Alpharetta,
Clarkston, Decatur, Dunwoody, Newton and Lakeside
campuses. Network service is responsible for Firewall,
Intrusion detection, packet shaping, and content filtering. The
Network Service team also provides design for data cabling,
voice cabling (including multi-pair backbone cabling), fiber
optic cabling (both interior and outside patch cabling), all
associated pathways, and termination hardware and wire
management. Network Services installs, maintains and supports
the data network from the wall plate to our Internet services.
Telecommunication support is also provided from the Network
Services team. This support is for all Georgia Perimeter College
students, faculty and staff. The premise-based system is
deployed using the advance VOIP services for voice and
messaging services. The services also provide local and long-
distance dial tone, faxing, fire alarm, and analog service.
The GPC Data Center provides a secure facility with
redundant power, network connectivity and systems monitoring.
Enterprise Server Support (ESS) team provides support for all
server and database services for all of Georgia Perimeter
College Faculty, staff, students, and Guest. The Enterprise
Server Support team operates over 500 server-based systems
supporting GPC. The systems are located at two large data
centers and 6 smaller supporting data centers. ESS provides
centralized data backup, and archival and tape storage.
Application support for Email, Banner, Maximo, student email,
Enrollment Management as well assistant Database support for
Microsoft SQL Server, MySQL, and Oracle.
In addition, backup services is an additional service
offered by Enterprise Services Support. This allows server
administrators to backup server data and operating systems to
the centralized backup environment. In addition to onsite
storage, the backup environment as a whole is backed up and
sent offsite, thus maximizing the redundancy of your data.
Enterprise Services Support also runs an enterprise level
VMWare server environment which allows a single physical
server to be partitioned into multiple “virtual machine” servers,
each with the appearance and capabilities of running on its own
dedicated machine. Each virtual server can run its own
operating system (Windows or Linux), is assigned its own
hostname and may be independently administered, configured
and rebooted without impact on other virtual servers.
Technology Support - The Assistant Director of
Technology Support leads the Technology Support Group and
multi-campus Teams to resolve all computing and audio visual
challenges of our Students, Faculty and Staff. Responsible for
providing leadership, overall coordination and direction for the
Georgia Perimeter College, OIT, Technology Support
Department, in support of technical services delivery and
customer support initiatives. Champions and coordinates service
reliability and customer service improvement initiatives for
Students, Faculty and Staff. Operations include management of
the personnel, procedures and policies governing the
implementation, deployment and maintenance of Technology in
the GPC environment; includes the integration of micro
computing hardware, software Audio Visual and networking
components. Analyzes, maintains and revises existing practices,
performance metrics and processes to drive operational
excellence and support product life-cycle management. Project
management duties include task management, action plans,
implementation timelines and activities. Coordinates the
equipment upgrade program, specifies equipment pool, and the
cost effective procurement of upgrade equipment. Approves
College Technology purchases as “Supportable in the
environment” and ensures warranties are sufficient to sustain
lifecycle. (Organizational Units, n.d.).
Recommendation: Annually review end-of-life status of the
District’s servers, computers, digital projectors, and audiovisual
assets to project annual expenditures.
Measurable Outcome: Annual report detailing current status and
replacement schedule.
&etwork Infrastructure Physical Security:
Recommendation: Improve security to ensure that physical
access to wiring closets limits unauthorized access to
physical electronic and cable components in these closets.
Measurable Outcome: Reports of traffic entering secured
areas using card key access.
Software Agreements Software Licensing and Management
Recommendation: Evaluate opportunities for providing
universally available software licenses, processes to support
volume purchasing of software, access to the software regardless
of geographic location, and central maintenance and
clearinghouse capabilities.
Responsible Department(s) – Information Technology
Timeline: ongoing
Measurable Outcome: Annual report of research and evaluation.
Information Security Third Party Software Policy
Faculty and staff will only use software applications and
services provided by the Georgia Perimeter College to conduct
official business with students and each other. These College-
provided applications and services ensure that: 1) appropriate
information security procedures are used, 2) individual privacy
rights are protected, and 3) Georgia Perimeter College
intellectual property rights are preserved. Use of any third-party
application software or service not provided by the College
requires approval of the Office of the Chief Information Officer
and the Chief Information Security Officer, who will ensure that
appropriate contractual safeguards are in place.
This policy applies to all GPC faculty and staff. The
Chief Information Officer and Chief Information Security
Officer are responsible for assessing and approving requests for
any software or services not provided by the College.
In order to appropriately protect GPC’s valuable and
sensitive information, including personal information of the
students, faculty, and staff, all applicable users are required to
comply with this policy. Persons in violation of this policy are
subject to a range of sanctions, including the loss of computer
network access privileges, disciplinary action, dismissal from
the College and legal action. Some violations may constitute
criminal offenses, as outlined in the Georgia Computer Systems
Protection Act and other local, state, and federal laws. The
College will carry out its responsibility to report such violations
to the appropriate authorities. Appeals should be directed
through the existing procedures established for employees or
students (“Policy Statement,” 2010).
Copyright/Acceptable
Use Policy
The purpose of the Georgia Perimeter College (GPC)
Copyright Compliance Policy: Library and Classroom is to
provide a summary of U.S. copyright law as it relates to the use
of text-based copyright-protected works in the classroom and
library at GPC, and to provide guidelines and procedures for
obtaining copyright permission to use these works (“Copyright
Guide,” 2005).
FAIR USE A provision for fair use is found in the Copyright Act at Section
107. Under the fair use provision, a reproduction of someone
else's copyright-protected work is likely to be considered fair if
it is used for one of the following purposes: criticism, comment,
news reporting, teaching, scholarship and research. If the
reproduction is for one of these purposes, a determination as to
whether the reproduction is fair use must be made based upon
four factors:
1. The purpose and character of use (principally, whether for
commercial or nonprofit educational use);
2. The nature of the copyright-protected work;
3. The amount and substantiality of the portion used; and
4. The effect of the use being evaluated upon the potential
market for or value of the copyright-protected work.
Gifts and Disposal Equipment Re-Use or Disposal GPC will ensure equipment or media containing
institutional information will be rendered unrecoverable prior to
re-use or disposal. The disposal of equipment or media will be
done in accordance with all applicable surplus property and
environmental disposal laws, regulations, or policies (“Physical
and Environmental,” 2010).
Staff Development Training Provided by Academic Technology
The area of Academic Technology provides face-to-face
and online training for various software applications and
hardware. Online sessions are delivered live via Wimba
classroom or are accessible as video tutorials. In addition, some
vendors and organizations offer free training. Throughout the
year, we also host conferences and events which provide
supplemental training and allow faculty to showcase innovative
classroom and online teaching techniques (“Academic
Technology, n.d.).
Customized training can be scheduled specifically for
departments or groups of 3 or more participants. A
representative from the group should place a work order with
the helpdesk to schedule training. Times and dates are subject to
the training personnel schedules and computer room availability
(Customized Training, n.d.).
The training schedule is planned one month at a time to
allow maximum flexibility and to allow us to address changes in
training needs. On all campuses, the times and dates are subject
to computer room availability. In general, offerings will usually
rotate between the Clarkston, Decatur, Dunwoody, Alpharetta,
and Newton campuses each month in order to provide a fair
opportunity for participation on all campuses. Online instructor-
led training via Wimba Classroom is also offered. (Training
Policies, n.d.).
References
Academic technology projects. (n.d.). Retrieved April 12, 2012, from
http://www.gpc.edu/oit/?q=its_projects
Campus guide to copyright compliance. (2005). Retrieved April 12, 2012, from
http://www.copyright.com/Services/copyrightoncampus/compliance/policy_sample.html
Classrooms and labs. (n.d.). Retrieved April 12, 2012, from http://www.gpc.edu/oit/jagspot
Classroom technology. (n.d.). Retrieved April 12, 2012, from
http://www.gpc.edu/oit/classroom_tech
Customized training. (n.d.). Retrieved April 12, 2012, from
http://www.gpc.edu/oit/training/customized
Fact sheet. (2012). Retrieved April 5, 2012, from
http://www.gpc.edu/News_and_Information/fact.php3#data
Georgia Perimeter College’s shared governance model. (n.d.). Retrieved April 12, 2012,
from http://depts.gpc.edu/governance/governancemodelinteractive.pdf
GPC foundation. (2012). Retrieved April 12, 2012 from http://depts.gpc.edu/Foundation/
Grants and sponsored programs. (2012). Retrieved April 12, 2012, from
http://depts.gpc.edu/~gpcgsp/mission.htm
Information security physical and environmental security. (2010). Retrieved April 12, 2012,
from http://depts.gpc.edu/governance/policies/New600/614.pdf
Information security third party policy statement. (2010). Retrieved April 5, 2012, from
http://depts.gpc.edu/governance/policies/New500/506.pdf
Information technology strategic plan. (2009). Retrieved April 12, 2012, from
http://www.gpc.edu/oit/itplan.pdf
Instructional technology facilities. (2012). Retrieved April 12, 2012, from
http://depts.gpc.edu/~gpcits/resources/facilities.html
IT advisory and governance. (n.d.). Retrieved April 12, 2012, from
http://www.gpc.edu/oit/it_governance
iTeach. (2011). Retrieved April 12, 2012, from http://www.gpc.edu/iteach/
Organizational units. (n.d.). Retrieved April 12, 2012, from
http://www.gpc.edu/oit/about/organizational
Projects and planning office. (n.d.). Retrieved April 12, 2012, from
http://www.gpc.edu/oit/projectplan
Welcome to the office of information technology. (n.d.). Retrieved April 12, 2012, from
http://www.gpc.edu/oit/sliderstory1
Training policies. (n.d.). Retrieved April 12, 2012, from
http://www.gpc.edu/oit/training/policies
Training provided by academic technology. (n.d.). Retrieved April 12, 2012, from
http://www.gpc.edu/oit/training