FORGERY PUSHERS ON TRIAL

Chapter 10

By Yordan Lyubenov

THE START OF ANTI-SEMITIC COMMITTEES

T

sar Nikolas II & Count Lamsdorf’s idea to form anti-Semitic alliance

Nazi party stealing the idea – propaganda is one of the greatest

weapons for Hitler, Communist Manifesto

Propaganda books (Mein Kampf, Protocols) and their distribution

via

Weltdienst

Secret conferences, anti-Semitic brochures and the Protocols

THE FIRST TRIAL IN SOUTH AFRICA

Strauss von Moltke, Harry Victor Inch, and David

Hermannus Olivier (Grey Shirt Movement) and their even

more malicious and crude Protocols-like creation

Citation of the Rabbi, creating the hideous and untrue

picture of violent and disrespectful ravaging of Germans

over Jew

Victor Inch’s false witness testimonials about the origin of

the document

THE FIRST TRIAL IN SOUTH AFRICA

T

he “genuinely deceived” David Oliver and his lying comrades

V

on Moltke’s “150 Jew abduction” and his “rescue” mission

T

he result of the trial – von Moltke and Victor Inch had been

fined heavily compared to David Oliver; Inch was sentenced

to 3 months of hard labour

THE SECOND TRIAL IN BERNE

The Jewish community in Berne against the 13th

edition of the Protocols by Theodor Fritsch, and all

anti-Semitic publications (6 people in total)

The expert-finding problem – the defendents

couldn’t find one

The witness inconsistency problem – only one, and

his testimonials were insufficient

THE SECOND TRIAL, CONTINUED

Ulrich von Roll and the different paths Weltdienst and von Roll

had

Princess Karadja’s passive position towards von Roll’s request

Assignment of Boris Toedtli as von Roll’s substitute for the trial

Reassignment was done because of unscrupulous nature of Toedtli

Toedtli’s historical background – how his experience taught him

that Russians were the good guys and Jews – the bad ones

THE SECOND TRIAL, CONTINUED

Toedtli was to blame for the dependence of the Swiss Nazis on

Germany, which was von Roll’s concern

‘White’ Russian’s purposeful propaganda of the Protocols

(they knew that the Protocols were a lie)

‘White’ Russian’s contempt – the trial was about the existence

of the Protocols, not about their content – what Jews were

against

Maurice Joly’s Dialogue aux Enfers influence on the Protocols

THE SECOND TRIAL, CONTINUED

Conspiration around Joly’s work, according to Ulrich

Fleischhauer, the expert for the defendents

Italian Baron vouching for Fleischhauer

The court’s final decision – The Protocols are a lie

Appeal by the defendents, but again they were told that

the Protocols were used mainly for worsening Jews’ lives

Fleischhauer’s recognition beyond the trial

THE END

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION!