Final ethnography elizabeth narvez cardona march 20th

  • Published on
    26-Jun-2015

  • View
    428

  • Download
    0

Transcript

  • 1. 1Initiatives on educating writers in Colombian Higher Education: reading ethnographically their websites as a pre-fieldwork Elizabeth Narvez-CardonaAbstractWriting in higher education in Spanish-speaking countries is an emerging field of social sciences in Latin-America. An ongoing project aiming at mapping current initiatives in the region have revealed that in theColombian case, one of the less frequent initiatives undertaken seems to be the writing centers.Consequently, exploring what counts as "writing centers" in the Colombian case might provide insightsupon conceptions on educating writers from this specific institutional site as well as understandings of thesmall presence of this type of initiative. To this exploratory project the websites publicizing the writingcenters are pieces of a larger everyday phenomena related to such initiatives. Therefore, I have deemedthis project an effort in starting the pre-field work, particularly, in reading ethnographically two websitesof Colombian writing centers. Ethnography involves an ongoing inquiry process in which theethnographer slowly grasps meaning from the community while acknowledges what could be aninteresting focus of analysis. To pursue a dynamic view of the writing centers, this preliminary projectrequires gathering more information in the actual fields in which such initiatives have been undertaken inthe Colombian universities. Especially, what is not ordinary and problematic should be investigated giventhat the information provided by the websites is not enough to talk about these aspects of the everydaylife in writing centers.IntroductionWriting in higher education in Spanish-speaking countries is an emerging field of social sciencesin Latin-America (Figure 1). The scholarship led by the Chairs of UNESCO for reading and writing in Latin-America (Argentina, Chile, Colombia, and Mexico), has advocated since 90s to educating writers forcitizenship (Ortiz-Casallas, 2011). This means educating readers and writers able for self-learning, and asthoughtful consumers of the abundant information provided by mass media, technologicalcommunication, and commercial discourses (Martnez, 2001 & 2004).Different tendencies have emerged from these initiatives. One movement has argued, until 2006approximately, that incoming university students bring shortcomings as writers; thus, writing has beentaught in freshman courses (Murillo, 2010). A recent movement, mostly influenced by the leadership of anargentine scholar, has advocated in the last 6 years that academic writing is a disciplinary practice learnedexclusively in higher education (Carlino, 2001; 2006; 2008). Consequently, it is expected that universitiesprovide diverse, intensive, and sustained specialized settings to encourage writing developments ofundergraduate and graduate students (Murillo, 2010).Regarding public policies, the Colombian government has mandated since 2010 a compulsoryundergraduate assessment in the last year of the programs. The assessment on writing abilities in Spanishis one of the components of this public policy.

2. 2Figure 1The benchmarks of the Colombian field on higher education writing The government mandated the large scaleassessment (writing abilities in Spanish)Pruebas del Saber PRO2010 19992006 2006 2012 UNESCOforreading andwriting Argentineinfluence(Paula movements in Latin-America for Carlino/Phycology ) educating writers for citizenship and Scholar movements advocating academic self-learningliteracy to educating faculty members and Scholar movementsadvocatinggraduate students as disciplinary writers freshman courses to remediate student Theoreticalframeworks: sociocultural shortcomings psychology, new literacy studies (literature Theoreticalframeworks:textualin Spanish), and WACandWID linguistics, discourse analysis, genre movements (literature in English) studies, psycholinguistic, and didactic of mother tongue (Spanish).2009Emerged the first generation of writingcenters in the country An ongoing project called Initiatives on reading and writing in higher education, ILEES, Latin-1Americahas collected information through an online survey applied to about 67 scholars in Argentina,Chile, Colombia, and Mexico. Among other issues, these scholars have provided information about theinitiatives led by their universities or other universities, up to 10 institutions, in their countries. In the Colombian case, one of the less frequent initiatives seems to be the writing centers alongwith initiatives undertaken in foreign languages, and programs in charge of integrating the initiatives asfreshman courses, disciplinary writing after the first year, and writing across the curriculum, or graduatewriting courses (figure 2).1 This project started in summer 2012 as part of my doctorate experience, which has been developed along with aChilean colleague and by the guidance of Professor Bazerman of the Department of Education in University ofCalifornia, Santa Brbara. 3. 3Figure 2Tendencies of the initiatives in the Colombian case Exploring what counts as "writing centers" in the Colombian case might provide insights uponconceptions on educating writers from this specific institutional site as well as understandings of the smallpresence of this type of initiative displayed by the outcomes of the online survey applied in the ILEESproject. Further, conducting micro-ethnographies upon such initiatives might be useful in understandingtheir local meaning-making processes. This paper is organized in four sections. The first one presents the theoretical framework assumedthus far; the following section deploys the process of data collection and analysis of the pre-field workthat I have conducted in reading ethnographically two websites of Colombian writing centers; and finally,the third section proposes further research efforts from an ethnographic perspective. 4. 4Theoretical framework The academic field on higher education writing has addressed different disciplinary and researchapproaches, which have been strongly configured by the features of the local university systems and thehome-based public policies in education. Consequently, researching on higher education writing hasaimed at exploring two sites. On the one hand, the expectations of the governments through their publicpolicies and of the university directives; and, on the other hand, the historical accounts about how andwhy writing in higher education has become either a pedagogic goal or a research focus. Identifying bothtypes of accounts are useful and necessary in guiding further research agendas regarding how and whypedagogies on writing might impact higher education. Theoretically speaking, this field has framed writing as an intertwined practice within universitycontexts and disciplinary epistemologies (Lea y Street, 1998; Carlino, 2008). As a result, writing isconceived as a historical and ideological practice and thus highly cognitively specialized (Bazerman, 2006;Kalman, 2008). Consequently, literacy practices of students and faculty are part of a specialized knowledgeassociated with epistemological and institutional contexts of higher education (Lea y Street, 1998). Accordingly, theoretical developments in the field have claimed that becoming a writer is a complexphenomenon highly configured by the conventions and expectations of their practitioners; however, sincesuch conventions and expectations are mostly a tacit knowledge, the access and practice of writing inhigher education are embedded in a struggle process for newcomers (Soliday, 2011; Thaiss & Myers,2006). Under this assumption, students shortcomings as writers are not interpreted as lacking ofgrammar knowledge. Rather, these difficulties are seen as evidence of a complex process ofacknowledging, using, and accessing to literacy practices affected by the own personal histories(Herrington y Curtis, 2000), and by institutional and disciplinary requirements and expectations,particularly, from academic and university cultures (Hall y Lpez, 2011). To sum up, in this project the writing difficulties of students or faculty are not seen as deficits(Ganobcsik-Williams, 2004). Rather, writing is understood as a specialized learning and practice forparticipating within academic contexts (Carter, 2007); therefore, writing is an intellectual challenge and astruggling process whereby writers build their own identities as members of disciplinary and universitycommunities (Herrington y Curtis, 2000; Castell, 2007). The figure 3 displays an attempt in summarizing and integrating visually some of the categoriesinvolved in the theoretical framework presented. 5. 5Figure 3Depiction of the theoretical categories 6. 6Methodological approachTo this exploratory project the websites publicizing the writing centers are pieces of a largereveryday phenomena related to such initiatives. Despite the websites have been designed by otherprofessionals not necessarily involved directly with the initiatives, these websites designs have beenapproved by the leaders of the initiatives; thus, inferences might be drawn from such online information.Accordingly, I conducted an online search by Google under the key words in Spanish Centro deescritura en Colombia to identify writing centers websites. The figure 4 displays the geographic locationof the four writing centers identified by the online search. These writing centers belong to privateuniversities located in the capital of the country, Bogot D.C. (# 1 # 3), Santiago de Cali (# 2), andBarranquilla (# 4). These three cities might be deemed as urban centers in economic terms. This firstapproximation enabled me to frame ethnographically the first question: What counts as writing centers inthe Colombian case?Figure 4The Colombian writing center websites appointed by the Google search 7. 7A first attempt in turning reality into texts The first attempt in exploring meanings of the community that can be seen as a writing center, Istarted making detailed written descriptions from the websites. This first attempt in turning what has beenstated by the websites into texts confirmed me that the huge challenge in analyzing ethnographically iscontrolling ethnocentrism (Emerson, Fretz, Shaw, 1995). Accordingly, I conducted carefully a grand tourobservation to describe a website as well as using emic terms and taxonomies of the cultural grammarpertain to the phenomenon analyzed (Green, Dixon, & Zaharlic, 2003). I started to analyze the website of the writing center # 1 given this initiative belongs to the most 2important private university in the country, Universidad de los Andes (Figure 1). To start my gran tourobservation, I decided to read the information available in the home page of the website, but aiming at 3describing process and practices that could be inferred from the information deployed by the website .Figure 1A snapshot of the home page of the website of the writing center #12Universidad de los Andes has been deemed as the best private university based on a Colombian ranking, which tookin consideration the number of international publications produced by the faculty members and the number ofresearch groups. Additionally, the ranking place took in consideration the amount of master and doctorate programsoffered by the University and that have been approved by the Ministry of Education in the institution. This informationhas been retrievedfrom:http://www.guiaacademica.com/educacion/personas/cms/colombia/articulos_de_expertos/2012/ARTICULO-WEB-EEE_PAG-11598041.aspx3The website is available at: http://programadeescritura.uniandes.edu.co/index.php/centro-de-escritura 8. 8 I used a rubric with three columns in which I arranged texts, descriptions of cultural process orpractices, and my interpretations or glosses (Table 1). I have called texts to those sections in the websitethat were clearly delimited graphically in the website design, because were envisioned as meaning units ormessages to interact with websites readers. The figure 2 illustrates graphically the segmentations of thetexts in the case of the website of the writing center # 2.Table 1First analytic rubric designed # TextInscribed cultural process/practiceMy interpretation or gloss1University students could ask for the services of an university site called: a writing center to succeed in their programs In doing so, the student can set anWhat countsas writingQu es el Centro de Escritura?appointment with someone calledassignmentsforthe --------------------------------------tutor to receive assistance in participants? El Centro de Escritura es un lugar al que los writing assignments estudiantes de todas las carreras pueden asistir para This tutor will be a graduate student recibir tutoras que los lleven a mejorar sus habilidades During the appointment the tutor What this mean? What is the de escritura para enfrentar exitosamente los retoswill work with the student who set difference between working acadmicos de la vida universitaria. Los tutores delthe appointment, not with his/herwith the student rather than Centro trabajan con los estudiantes para mejorar sustextsworking with his/her text? textos, no con los textos.Students could practice theirWhat counts of those for the reading and writing skills according participants (tutor and to their needs student)? Especially, whatwould be a need? Studentshould bring to Why? appointments the instructors prompts and the textFigure 2Graphic depiction of the segmentation of the website pages by texts Text 1 Text 2 9. 9 After having detailed descriptions in the rubric, semantic relationships were identified to categorizethe cultural grammar emerging from the data translated from the website (Spradley, 1979). The table 2deploys an example of this analytic procedure.Table 2Rubric to analyzing semantic relationshipsRelationshipForm Example Comments/glossSpatial X is a place in Y A writing center is a place (ispart of) in the Universidad delos AndesCause-effectX is a result of YSucceed in the programs is theUniversidad de los Andes is aresult of attending to thewriting centerRationale X is a reason for doing Y Having writing assignments is a If it so, the entire studentreason to setting appointmentspopulation should attend toin the writing center the writing center, becausewriting assignments are themost common means toevaluate studentsAttribution Xisan attribution Being a graduate student is an(characteristic) of Y attribution of being a tutorSince I realized that I had not been consistently systematic in making visible the culturalknowledge (e.g., beliefs, views the world, rights, and obligations), the following analytic rubric (Table 3) 10. 10has been designed to pursue such aim (Green, Dixon., & Zaharlick, 2003). For this second analytic attempt,I explored the website of the writing center # 2 of the Pontificia Universidad Javeriana in Santiago de Cali.Table 3An analytic rubric to make visible cultural knowledgeNo. TextsWhat is FirstActorsRoutinesMeanings Membership happening? impressions/questions for theactors1 This university Who could be theseThe writing Free The Members ofBienvenido al Centrounit is givingothers? centerwritinguniversityacademicde Escritura Javerianowelcometo tutoring unit is for communityLa Pontificia othersMembers of members of(?)Universidad Javeriana thethese ponea la This university academic academicvanguardia de las unitdeems communityunit (?)universidades deitself as anColombia lanzando elinnovativenuevo Centro de initiative,Escritura Javeriano.because it isEste es el primer first writingcentro de escritura encenter in theColombia, y uno decountryandlosprimeros enone of the firstAmrica Latina, que inLatinofrece servicios de Americantutoras de escritura,regionde manera gratuita, alos miembros de suThe universitycomunidad unit offers freeacadmica.writingtutoringtomembers ofthe academiccommunityFinally, I re-read the translations I had been done thus far, and I decided to conduct moreconsistent efforts to describe ethnographically the website of the writing center # 2 of the PontificiaUniversidad Javeriana in Santiago de Cali. This website seems to be more complete in providinginformation in contrast to the website of the writing center # 1, of the Universidad de los Andes. In doingso, this final analytic attempt pursued to describe the information relied on the basic questions to startethnographies in education (Green, Skuskaikate & Baker, 2012). The table # 4 illustrates the rubric used indoing such analysis. 11. 11Table 4Describing the website from ethnography in education questionsTexts What isWhat isBy whom?WithWhatWhat WhatWhat What What WhatWhatComment happenin beingwhom? counts asroles are relationshi norms areexpectatio rights are obligation counts assg?accomplisdisciplinar constructe ps areconstructe ns are constructes areHEhed?y d by andconstructe d by andconstructed by andconstructewriting? knowledg afforded d by andafforded d by and afforded d by ande in thismembers?afforded members?affordedmembers?afforded particular members? members?members?group?Screensh The WC Offeringthe WC ? Knowing WC,WC is a WC WC has Students WC Somethiot 1 offers resource how to students, kind of offers the and should ng that resource swrite andhelp to resource answers universit answer WC sforuniversituniversit sy students knows studentsyyteachersandand and teachers teachers can ask teachers universit universitandquestion y ystudents steachers teachers andstudentsdo notknowThe analysis conducted thus far enabled me to pose provisional answers upon what is ordinaryand predictable in the daily life of a writing center (Green & Zaharlic, 1991). For instance, a writing centercounts as a university site in which the students could ask for free writing tutoring to succeed in theirprograms. In doing so, the student can set an appointment with someone called tutor to receiveassistance in accomplishing their writing assignments. This tutor will be a graduate student. During theappointment the tutor interacts with the students and not with their texts. The students should bring tothe appointments, the instructors prompts and the actual texts written as part of their writingassignments.Furthermore, regarding the conceptions on educating writers, the preliminary analysis mightreveal that writing in writing centers is conceived mostly to support writing assignments to fulfill facultyexpectations; thus, students are provided by guidelines offered by the websites to support, among otherissues: a) citation strategies; b) strategies to understand and decipher the instructors expectations withthe writing assignments; and, c) strategies to incorporate language instructor patterns and specificdiscourse style into writing assignments. The table 4 summarizes the semantic relationships identified aspart of a preliminary domain analysis conducted in which I relied to create the prior descriptions(Spradley, 1979). 12. 12Table 4Semantic relationships Relationship FormSpatialWC is a place within universitiesCause-effect To succeed in higher education, writing assignments might be accomplished with the support of WCRationaleHaving writing assignments is a reason to set appointments in WC Since WC provides resources to understand and decipher writing assignments, obtaining appointments in WC is useful. Students has the right to not knowing how to start, develop, and finish their writing as well as not knowing different types of documentsLocation for actionThe WC is place offering strategies upon how to start writing assignmentsFunction Writing prompts are used to understand and decipher assignmentsSequence Understand and decipher faculty expectations is the first step in fulfill the assignments Getting the prompt for the assignment is the prior step to set an appointment in the WCMeans-endUnderlining specific demands in the prompts is a way to decipher the assignments. Writing paragraphs and sections following the specific topics, questions or points written by faculty in the prompts is a way to accomplish the assignments Identify specific language patters and faculty discourse style is a way to accomplish faculty expectationsAttributionBeing a graduate student is an attribution of being a tutorFurther research efforts from an ethnographic perspectiveEthnography involves an ongoing inquiry process in which the ethnographer slowly graspsmeaning from the community while acknowledges what could be an interesting focus of analysis (Green,Dixon, Zaharlick, 2012). To pursue a dynamic view of the writing centers, this preliminary project requiresgathering more information in the actual fields in which such initiatives have been undertaken in theColombian universities. Especially, what is not ordinary and problematic should be investigated given thatthe information provided by the websites is not enough to talk about these aspects of the everyday life inwriting centers (Green & Zaharlic, 1991).Ethnography in education is a field enabling to doubt upon common senses regarding learning,knowledge, success, and effectiveness in formal educational settings (Green & Bloom, 1997). Accordingly,further fieldwork from a diachronic approach is useful in pursuing to explore the actual literate practicesconfigured by a daily life of the Colombian writing centers (Heath, 1982). Any attempt in understandingthe tensions of the competing values between specific institutional sites, as the writing centers, and thelarger university missions allows boosting the Colombian debate of the scope of educating writers inhigher education. 13. 13Given that members of groups and communities do not hold roles and points of views evenly,further efforts includes creating data from the perspective of the different members of the community inwriting centers, namely, chairs of these initiatives, tutors, students, faculty members, and universitydirectives. Conducting interviews and collecting maps and representations provided by the participantsupon how they represent the daily-life of the events involved in the writing center practices might beuseful (Green, Dixon, Zaharlick, 2012).ReferencesBazerman, C. (2006). The writing of social organization and the literate situation cognition:Extending Goodys social implications of writing. In D. Olson & M. Cole (Eds.), Technology literacy and theevolution in society: Implications of the work of Jack Goody (pp. 279-294). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrance ErlbaumAssociates.Carlino, P. (2001). Hacerse cargo de la lectura y la escritura en la enseanza universitaria de lasciencias sociales y humanas. Trabajo presentado como ponencia en las Jornadas de Intercambio deExperiencias sobre la Lectura y la Escritura como prcticas Acadmicas Universitarias, Lujn, Argentina.Retrieved from http://www.unlu.edu.ar/~redecom/libro. htm#confi10Carlino, P. (2006). Procesos y prcticas de escritura en la educacin superior . Revista Signo y Sea,16, 9-15. Recuperado de http://www.escrituraylectura.com.ar/posgrado/revistas/SyS16.pdfCarlino, P. (2008). Leer y escribir en la universidad, una nueva cultura: Por qu es necesaria laalfabetizacin acadmica? En E. Narvez & S. Cadena (comps.), Los desafos de la lectura y la escritura enla educacion superior: caminos posibles. (pp. 159-194). Cali: Universidad Autnoma de Occidente.Carter, M. (2007). Ways of Knowing, Doing, and Writing in the Disciplines. National Council ofteachers of English, 58(3),385-418. Retrieved fromhttp://widatmec.commons.gc.cuny.edu/files/2009/09/carter__ways_of_knowing.pdf/2009/09/carter__ways_of_knowing.pdfCastell, M. (2007). Los efectos de los afectos en la comunidad acadmica. En Castell, M., Mirs,M., Sol, I., Teberosky, A., Iesca, A., y Zanotto, N. (Eds.), Escribir y comunicarse en contextos cientficos yacadmicos Pp. 135-162. Barcelona: Gra.Emerson, R., Fretz, R. & Shaw, L.L. (1995). Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. Chicago: University ofChicago Press, 1995.Green, J. & Zaharlich, A., (1991). Ethnographic research. In J. Flood, J. S. Jensen, D.Lapp & J. Squire (Eds.), Handbook on teaching the English language arts New York: MacMillan, pp. 205-226. 14. 14Green, J. & Bloome, D. (1997). Ethnography and ethnographers of and in education: A situatedperspective. In Flood, J., Heath, S. B., & Lapp, D. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching literacy throughthe communicative and visual arts. New York: Macmillan Publishers, pp. 181-202Green, J., Dixon, C., & Zaharlick, A., (2003). Ethnography as a Logic of Inquiry. In J. Flood, D. Lapp& J. Squire (Eds.) The Handbook for Research in the Teaching of the English Language Arts. New Jersey:Erlbaum.Green, Skuskaikate, & Baker, (2012). Ethnography as epistemology. In: Arthur, J., Waring, M. J.,Coe, R. & Hedges, L. V. (Eds.). Research methods and methodologies in education. London: Sage. Pp. 309-321.Hall, B. y Lpez, M. (2011). Discurso acadmico: manuales universitarios y prcticas pedaggicas.Lit. lingistica,23,167-192. Retrieved fromhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S071658112011000100010&lng=es&nrm=isoHeath, S. B. (1982). Ethnography in Education: defining the essentials. In: GILLMORE, P;GLATTHORN, A. (Ed..) Children in and out of school: Ethnography and education. Washington, DC: Centerfor Applied Linguistics, p. 35-55.Herrington, A. & Curtis, M. (2000). Persons in Process. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers ofEnglish. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED437670.pdfKalman, J. (2008). Discusiones conceptuales en el campo de la cultura escrita. RevistaIberoamericana, 46, 107-134. Retrieved from http://www.rieoei.org/rie46a06.pdfLea, M y Street, B. (1998). Student writing in higher education: an academic. Literacies approach.Studies in Higher Education, 23 (2), 157-173. Retrieved from http://www.kent.ac.uk/uelt/academic-practice/docs/studwritinginhe.pdfMartnez, M. (2001). Anlisis del discurso y prctica pedaggica. Una propuesta para leer, escribiry aprender mejor. Argentina, ed. Homo Sapiens.Martnez, M. (2004). Discurso y Aprendizaje. Colombia, ed. Universidad del Valle Ctedra UNESCOpara la Lectura y la Escritura.Murillo, M. (2010). La actividad discursiva en la construccin del conocimiento en una situacin deescritura en las disciplinas: los gneros acadmicos en la universidad. El estado de la investigacin en laenseanza de la lectura y la escritura en el mbito universitario en Colombia y Latinoamrica. 11-46.UniversidadAutnomadeBarcelona. Espaa. Retrievedfromhttp://www.tesisenred.net/bitstream/handle/10803/32100/memf1de1.pdf?sequence=1 15. 15Ortiz-Casallas, E.M. (2011). La escritura acadmica universitaria: estado del arte. kala, Revista delenguajey cultura,16,17-41. Recuperadodehttp://redalyc.uaemex.mx/src/inicio/ArtPdfRed.jsp?iCve=255019720002Soliday, M. (2011). Everyday Genres: Writing Assignments across the Disciplines. Carbondale:Southern Illinois UP.Spradley, J. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. For Worth, TX: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Thaiss, C, & Myers, T. (2006). Engaged Writers and Dynamic Disciplines: Research on theAcademic Writing Life. Boynton/Cook Heinemann Press.The Royal Literary fund. (2004). A report of the teaching of the academic writing in UK highereducation.London:Ganobcsik-Williams,L. Retrieved fromhttp://www.rlf.org.uk/fellowshipscheme/documents/TeachingWritingUKHE.pdf