34
File Organizations and Indexing Chapter 8

File Organizations and Indexing Chapter 8. Review: Memory, Disks, & Files Everything won’t fit in RAM (usually) Hierarchy of storage, RAM, disk, tape

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: File Organizations and Indexing Chapter 8. Review: Memory, Disks, & Files Everything won’t fit in RAM (usually) Hierarchy of storage, RAM, disk, tape

File Organizations and IndexingChapter 8

Page 2: File Organizations and Indexing Chapter 8. Review: Memory, Disks, & Files Everything won’t fit in RAM (usually) Hierarchy of storage, RAM, disk, tape

Review: Memory, Disks, & Files

• Everything won’t fit in RAM (usually)• Hierarchy of storage, RAM, disk, tape• “Block” - unit of storage in RAM, on disk• Allocate space on disk for fast access• Buffer pool management

– Frames in RAM to hold blocks– Policy to move blocks between RAM & disk

• Storing records within blocks

Page 3: File Organizations and Indexing Chapter 8. Review: Memory, Disks, & Files Everything won’t fit in RAM (usually) Hierarchy of storage, RAM, disk, tape

Today: File Storage

• How to keep blocks of records on disk• but must support operations:

– scan all records– search for a record id “RID”– insert new records– delete old records

Page 4: File Organizations and Indexing Chapter 8. Review: Memory, Disks, & Files Everything won’t fit in RAM (usually) Hierarchy of storage, RAM, disk, tape

Alternative File OrganizationsMany alternatives exist, each good for some

situations, and not so good in others:– Heap files: Suitable when typical access is a

file scan retrieving all records.– Sorted Files: Best for retrieval in search key

order, or only a `range’ of records is needed.– Clustered Files (with Indexes): Coming

soon…– Unclustered Files (with Indexes): Coming

soon…

Page 5: File Organizations and Indexing Chapter 8. Review: Memory, Disks, & Files Everything won’t fit in RAM (usually) Hierarchy of storage, RAM, disk, tape

Cost Model for Analysis

We ignore CPU costs, for simplicity:– B: The number of data blocks (pages)– R: Number of records per block– D: (Average) time to read or write disk block– Measuring number of block I/O’s ignores

gains of pre-fetching and sequential access; thus, even I/O cost is only loosely approximated.

– Average-case analysis; based on several simplistic assumptions.

Good enough to show the overall trends!

Page 6: File Organizations and Indexing Chapter 8. Review: Memory, Disks, & Files Everything won’t fit in RAM (usually) Hierarchy of storage, RAM, disk, tape

Some Assumptions in the Analysis

• Single record insert and delete.• Equality selection - exactly one match

(what if more or less???).• Heap Files:

– Insert always appends to end of file.• Sorted Files:

– Files compacted after deletions.– Selections on search key.

Page 7: File Organizations and Indexing Chapter 8. Review: Memory, Disks, & Files Everything won’t fit in RAM (usually) Hierarchy of storage, RAM, disk, tape

Cost of Operations

B: The number of data pagesR: Number of records per pageD: (Average) time to read or write disk page

Heap File Sorted File Clustered File

Scan all records

Equality Search

Range Search

Insert

Delete

Page 8: File Organizations and Indexing Chapter 8. Review: Memory, Disks, & Files Everything won’t fit in RAM (usually) Hierarchy of storage, RAM, disk, tape

Cost of Operations

B: The number of data pagesR: Number of records per pageD: (Average) time to read or write disk page

Heap File Sorted File Clustered File

Scan all records

BD BD

Equality Search

Range Search

Insert

Delete

Page 9: File Organizations and Indexing Chapter 8. Review: Memory, Disks, & Files Everything won’t fit in RAM (usually) Hierarchy of storage, RAM, disk, tape

Cost of Operations

B: The number of data pagesR: Number of records per pageD: (Average) time to read or write disk page

Heap File Sorted File Clustered File

Scan all records

BD BD

Equality Search

0.5 BD (log2 B) * D

Range Search

Insert

Delete

Page 10: File Organizations and Indexing Chapter 8. Review: Memory, Disks, & Files Everything won’t fit in RAM (usually) Hierarchy of storage, RAM, disk, tape

Cost of Operations

B: The number of data pagesR: Number of records per pageD: (Average) time to read or write disk page

Heap File Sorted File Clustered File

Scan all records

BD BD

Equality Search

0.5 BD (log2 B) * D

Range Search

BD [(log2 B) + #match pg]*D

Insert

Delete

Page 11: File Organizations and Indexing Chapter 8. Review: Memory, Disks, & Files Everything won’t fit in RAM (usually) Hierarchy of storage, RAM, disk, tape

Cost of Operations

B: The number of data pagesR: Number of records per pageD: (Average) time to read or write disk page

Heap File Sorted File Clustered File

Scan all records

BD BD

Equality Search

0.5 BD (log2 B) * D

Range Search

BD [(log2 B) + #match pg]*D

Insert 2D ((log2B)+B)D (because R,W 0.5)

Delete

Page 12: File Organizations and Indexing Chapter 8. Review: Memory, Disks, & Files Everything won’t fit in RAM (usually) Hierarchy of storage, RAM, disk, tape

Cost of Operations

B: The number of data pagesR: Number of records per pageD: (Average) time to read or write disk page

Heap File Sorted File Clustered File

Scan all records

BD BD

Equality Search

0.5 BD (log2 B) * D

Range Search

BD [(log2 B) + #match pg]*D

Insert 2D ((log2B)+B)D

Delete 0.5BD + D ((log2B)+B)D (because R,W 0.5)

Page 13: File Organizations and Indexing Chapter 8. Review: Memory, Disks, & Files Everything won’t fit in RAM (usually) Hierarchy of storage, RAM, disk, tape

Indexes

• Sometimes, we want to retrieve records by specifying the values in one or more fields, e.g.,

– Find all students in the “CS” department– Find all students with a gpa > 3

• An index on a file is a disk-based data structure that speeds up selections on the search key fields for the index.– Any subset of the fields of a relation can be the

search key for an index on the relation.– Search key is not the same as key (e.g. doesn’t have

to be unique ID).

Page 14: File Organizations and Indexing Chapter 8. Review: Memory, Disks, & Files Everything won’t fit in RAM (usually) Hierarchy of storage, RAM, disk, tape

Indexes• An index contains a collection of data

entries, and supports efficient retrieval of all data entries k* with a given key value k.– Given data entry k*, we can find record with

key k in possibly one disk I/O. (Details soon …)

Page 15: File Organizations and Indexing Chapter 8. Review: Memory, Disks, & Files Everything won’t fit in RAM (usually) Hierarchy of storage, RAM, disk, tape

First Question to Ask About Indexes• What kinds of selections do they support?

– Selections of form field <op> constant– Equality selections (op is =)– Range selections (op is one of <, >, <=, >=, BETWEEN)– More exotic selections:

• 2-dimensional ranges (“west of Boston and east of Brighton and North of South Boston and South of Summerville”)

– Or n-dimensional• 2-dimensional distances (“within 2 miles of Soda Hall”)

– Or n-dimensional• Ranking queries (“10 restaurants closest to LOVE

BUILDING”)• Regular expression matches, genome string matches, etc.• One common n-dimensional index: R-tree

– Supported in Oracle and Informix

Page 16: File Organizations and Indexing Chapter 8. Review: Memory, Disks, & Files Everything won’t fit in RAM (usually) Hierarchy of storage, RAM, disk, tape

Index Classification• What selections does it support• Representation of data entries in index

– i.e., what kind of info is the index actually storing?

– 3 alternatives here• Primary vs. Secondary Indexes• Clustered vs. Unclustered Indexes• Single Key vs. Composite Indexes• Tree-based, hash-based, other

Page 17: File Organizations and Indexing Chapter 8. Review: Memory, Disks, & Files Everything won’t fit in RAM (usually) Hierarchy of storage, RAM, disk, tape

B+ Tree Indexes

Leaf pages contain data entries, and are chained (prev & next) Non-leaf pages have index entries; only used to direct searches:

P0 K 1 P 1 K 2 P 2 K m P m

index entry

Non-leaf

Pages

Pages (Sorted by search key)

Leaf

Page 18: File Organizations and Indexing Chapter 8. Review: Memory, Disks, & Files Everything won’t fit in RAM (usually) Hierarchy of storage, RAM, disk, tape

1717

Example B+ Tree

• Find 28*? 29*? All > 15* and < 30*• Insert/delete: Find data entry in leaf,

then change it. Need to adjust parent sometimes.– And change sometimes bubbles up the tree

2* 3*

Root

17

30

14* 16* 33* 34* 38* 39*

135

7*5* 8* 22* 24*

27

27* 29*

Entries <= 17 Entries > 17

Note how data entriesin leaf level are sorted

Pointers to Actual Data Pages (rid)

Page 19: File Organizations and Indexing Chapter 8. Review: Memory, Disks, & Files Everything won’t fit in RAM (usually) Hierarchy of storage, RAM, disk, tape

Hash-Based Indexes

• Good for equality selections. • Index is a collection of buckets.

– Bucket = primary page plus zero or more overflow pages.

– Buckets contain data entries. • Hashing function h: h(r) = bucket in

which (data entry for) record r belongs. h looks at the search key fields of r.– No need for “index entries” in this scheme.

Page 20: File Organizations and Indexing Chapter 8. Review: Memory, Disks, & Files Everything won’t fit in RAM (usually) Hierarchy of storage, RAM, disk, tape

Index Classification• Primary vs. secondary: If search key

contains primary key, then called primary index.– Unique index: Search key contains a

candidate key.

Page 21: File Organizations and Indexing Chapter 8. Review: Memory, Disks, & Files Everything won’t fit in RAM (usually) Hierarchy of storage, RAM, disk, tape

Alternatives for Data Entry k* in Index• Three alternatives:

Actual data record (with key value k) <k, rid of matching data record> <k, list of rids of matching data records>

• Choice is orthogonal to the indexing technique.– Examples of indexing techniques: B+ trees,

hash-based structures, R trees, …– Typically, index contains auxiliary information

that directs searches to the desired data entries• Can have multiple (different) indexes per

file.– E.g. file sorted by age, with a hash index on

salary and a B+tree index on name.

Page 22: File Organizations and Indexing Chapter 8. Review: Memory, Disks, & Files Everything won’t fit in RAM (usually) Hierarchy of storage, RAM, disk, tape

Alternatives for Data Entries (Contd.)

• Alternative 1: Actual data record (with key value k)– If this is used, index structure is a file

organization for data records (like Heap files or sorted files).

– At most one index on a given collection of data records can use Alternative 1.

– This alternative saves pointer lookups but can be expensive to maintain with insertions and deletions.

Page 23: File Organizations and Indexing Chapter 8. Review: Memory, Disks, & Files Everything won’t fit in RAM (usually) Hierarchy of storage, RAM, disk, tape

Alternatives for Data Entries (Contd.)Alternative 2

<k, rid of matching data record> and Alternative 3

<k, list of rids of matching data records>

– Easier to maintain than Alt 1. – If more than one index is required on a given file,

at most one index can use Alternative 1; rest must use Alternatives 2 or 3.

– Alternative 3 more compact than Alternative 2, but leads to variable sized data entries even if search keys are of fixed length.

– Even worse, for large rid lists the data entry would have to span multiple blocks!

Page 24: File Organizations and Indexing Chapter 8. Review: Memory, Disks, & Files Everything won’t fit in RAM (usually) Hierarchy of storage, RAM, disk, tape

Index Classification

• Clustered vs. unclustered: If order of data records is the same as, or `close to’, order of index data entries, then called clustered index.– A file can be clustered on at most one search

key.– Cost of retrieving data records through index

varies greatly based on whether index is clustered or not!

– Alternative 1 implies clustered, but not vice-versa.

Page 25: File Organizations and Indexing Chapter 8. Review: Memory, Disks, & Files Everything won’t fit in RAM (usually) Hierarchy of storage, RAM, disk, tape

Clustered vs. Unclustered Index• Suppose that Alternative (2) is used for data

entries, and that the data records are stored in a Heap file.– To build clustered index, first sort the Heap file

(with some free space on each block for future inserts).

– Overflow blocks may be needed for inserts. (Thus, order of data recs is `close to’, but not identical to, the sort order.)

Index entries

Data entries

direct search for

(Index File)

(Data file)

Data Records

data entries

Data entries

Data Records

CLUSTERED UNCLUSTERED

Page 26: File Organizations and Indexing Chapter 8. Review: Memory, Disks, & Files Everything won’t fit in RAM (usually) Hierarchy of storage, RAM, disk, tape

Unclustered vs. Clustered Indexes

• What are the tradeoffs????• Clustered Pros

– Efficient for range searches– May be able to do some types of

compression– Possible locality benefits (related data?)– ???

• Clustered Cons– Expensive to maintain (on the fly or sloppy

with reorganization)

Page 27: File Organizations and Indexing Chapter 8. Review: Memory, Disks, & Files Everything won’t fit in RAM (usually) Hierarchy of storage, RAM, disk, tape

Clustered Files

• We usually refer a clustered Index using Alternative 1 as clustered files

• Pages are usually about 67 percent occupancy– No. of physical data pages is about 1.5B (if

B pages is required for storing all the data)

Page 28: File Organizations and Indexing Chapter 8. Review: Memory, Disks, & Files Everything won’t fit in RAM (usually) Hierarchy of storage, RAM, disk, tape

Cost of Operations

B: The number of data pagesR: Number of records per pageD: (Average) time to read or write disk page

Heap File Sorted File Clustered File

Scan all records

BD BD 1.5 BD

Equality Search

0.5 BD (log2 B) * D (logF 1.5B) * D

Range Search

BD [(log2 B) + #match pg]*D

[(logF 1.5B) + #match pg]*D

Insert 2D ((log2B)+B)D ((logF 1.5B)+1) * D

Delete 0.5BD + D ((log2B)+B)D (because R,W 0.5)

((logF 1.5B)+1) * D

Page 29: File Organizations and Indexing Chapter 8. Review: Memory, Disks, & Files Everything won’t fit in RAM (usually) Hierarchy of storage, RAM, disk, tape

Composite Search Keys• Search on a combination of

fields.– Equality query: Every field value

is equal to a constant value. E.g. wrt <age,sal> index:

• age=20 and sal =75

– Range query: Some field value is not a constant. E.g.:

• age > 20; or age=20 and sal > 10

• Data entries in index sorted by search key to support range queries.– Lexicographic order – Like the dictionary, but on fields,

not letters!

sue 13 75

bob

cal

joe 12

10

20

8011

12

name age sal

<sal, age>

<age, sal> <age>

<sal>

12,20

12,10

11,80

13,75

20,12

10,12

75,13

80,11

11

12

12

13

10

20

75

80

Data recordssorted by name

Data entries in indexsorted by <sal,age>

Data entriessorted by <sal>

Examples of composite keyindexes using lexicographic order.

Page 30: File Organizations and Indexing Chapter 8. Review: Memory, Disks, & Files Everything won’t fit in RAM (usually) Hierarchy of storage, RAM, disk, tape

Assumptions in Our Analysis• Heap Files:

– Equality selection on key; exactly one match.• Sorted Files:

– Files compacted after deletions.• Indexes:

– Alt (2), (3): data entry size = 10% size of record – Hash: No overflow buckets.

• 80% page occupancy => File size = 1.25 data size• 0.125B no. of pages for data entries

– Tree: 67% occupancy (this is typical).• Implies file size = 1.5 data size• 0.15B no. of pages for data entries.

Page 31: File Organizations and Indexing Chapter 8. Review: Memory, Disks, & Files Everything won’t fit in RAM (usually) Hierarchy of storage, RAM, disk, tape

Assumptions (contd.)

• Scans: – Leaf levels of a tree-index are chained.– Index data-entries plus actual file scanned

for unclustered indexes.• Range searches:

– We use tree indexes to restrict the set of data records fetched, but ignore hash indexes.

Page 32: File Organizations and Indexing Chapter 8. Review: Memory, Disks, & Files Everything won’t fit in RAM (usually) Hierarchy of storage, RAM, disk, tape

Cost of Operations (a) Scan (b) Equality (c ) Range (d) Insert (e) Delete

(1) Heap BD 0.5BD BD 2D Search +D

(2) Sorted BD Dlog 2B D(log 2 B + # pgs with match recs)

Search + BD

Search +BD

(3) Clustered

1.5BD Dlog F 1.5B D(log F 1.5B + # pgs w. match recs)

Search + D

Search +D

(4) Unclust. Tree index

BD(R+0.15) D(1 + log F 0.15B)

D(log F 0.15B + # pgs w. match recs)

Search + 2D

Search + 2D

(5) Unclust. Hash index

BD(R+0.125) 2D BD Search + 2D

Search + 2D

Several assumptions underlie these (rough) estimates!

Page 33: File Organizations and Indexing Chapter 8. Review: Memory, Disks, & Files Everything won’t fit in RAM (usually) Hierarchy of storage, RAM, disk, tape

Summary

• Many alternative file organizations exist, each appropriate in some situation.

• If selection queries are frequent, sorting the file or building an index is important.– Hash-based indexes only good for equality search.– Sorted files and tree-based indexes best for range

search; also good for equality search. (Files rarely kept sorted in practice; B+ tree index is better.)

• Index is a collection of data entries plus a way to quickly find entries with given key values.

Page 34: File Organizations and Indexing Chapter 8. Review: Memory, Disks, & Files Everything won’t fit in RAM (usually) Hierarchy of storage, RAM, disk, tape

Summary (Contd.)

• Data entries in index can be actual data records, <key, rid> pairs, or <key, rid-list> pairs.– Choice orthogonal to indexing structure (i.e. tree,

hash, etc.).• Usually have several indexes on a given file of

data records, each with a different search key.• Indexes can be classified as

– clustered vs. unclustered• Differences have important consequences for

utility/performance.