Federal Circuit Court Press Release March 22 2013

  • Upload
    jim

  • View
    214

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/29/2019 Federal Circuit Court Press Release March 22 2013

    1/3

    March 22, 2013

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

    Contact: Cathy Cuddy, Executive Coordinator

    Tel: (202) 587-5708

    Email:[email protected]

    Federal Circuit Court of Appeals Upholds NOVA Position toPreserve Veterans Due Process Rights

    Orders VA to Show Cause Why Sanctions Should Not Be Imposed on the Responsible Officials

    Washington, D.C .The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit yesterday ruled in favor

    of the National Organization ofVeterans Advocates, Inc. (NOVA) in its case against the

    Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) involving due process rights for military veterans

    before the agencys Board of Veterans Appeals (BVA).

    In its Order, the Federal Circuit confirmed that the VA acted unlawfully in 2011 when it

    promulgated a regulation that eliminated certain procedural and appellate rights for

    veterans appearing before the BVA. The Court also rebuked VA for failing to live up to its

    promise to stop enforcing its unlawful rule on March 5, 2012. In an extraordinary move,

    the Court ordered VA to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for the failure to

    keep its word.

    As a result of VAs actions, a substantial number of cases may have been decided using an

    illegal rule that deprived veterans of critical due process rights, potentially costing those

    veterans the benefits they had earned. The Order called VAs conductentirely

    unacceptable, highlighting its harmful effects on NOVA, its attorneys, the Court, and most

    importantly of all the veterans affected by the illegal rule.

    As the Order explained, [t]he unwarranted denial of benefits means real-world

    consequences to veterans. Promises of hypothetical relief do not pay for food or provide

    needed medical care. The Order went on to note that VAs conduct and written

    communications refute its assertions that its violations were unintentional, concluding

    that VA was well aware of [its] commitment and intentionally elected not to fulfill it.

    NATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF VETERANS ADVOCATES, INC. (NOVA)

    1425 K St, NW, Suite 350

    Washington, DC 20005

    www.vetadvocates.org

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 7/29/2019 Federal Circuit Court Press Release March 22 2013

    2/3

    The Order also made clear that the Court was considering imposing sanctions as a result of

    VAs conduct, and it required the agency to show cause why sanctions should not be

    imposed on the responsible officials. It noted that sanctions may be needed to motivateVA in the future to treat its commitments and representations to this court and opposing

    counsel with the seriousness to which they are entitled.

    The Court indicated that it will take VAs efforts to remedy the harm it has caused veterans

    into consideration when determining whether sanctions are appropriate. The Order grants

    VA sixty days in which to present a plan by which it will remedy any harm suffered by

    veterans as a result of its unlawful conduct. The Court emphasized that VA should confer

    with NOVA in developing its plan.

    Yesterdays ruling reaffirms NOVAs stance on preserving due process rights for veterans

    with hearings before the BVA.

    As Roman Martinez of Latham & Watkins LLP, NOVAs Counsel of Record in the case,

    stated: The Courts favorable decision is a big win for veterans. Its a testament to theprinciple that our government must keep faith with the brave men and women who have

    served their country in uniform.

    Over the course of more than a year, NOVA has sought to protect these critical due process

    rights and ensure that all veterans have the opportunity for a meaningful appeal, Martinez

    added. We are gratified that the Courthas declared VAs conduct unlawful and is taking

    active steps to ensure that VA now remedies the harm it has inflicted on veterans.

    The rule change occurred on August 23, 2011, when VA promulgated a new regulation that

    exempted the BVA from certain due process procedures outlined in 38 C.F.R. 3.103,

    governing claimant hearings before the agency. VA made the new rule effectiveimmediately, without the formal public comment period required by law. The resulting

    rule change stated that Section 3.103 rights would extend only to hearings conducted by

    the Agency of Original Jurisdiction (i.e., regional offices) and no longer apply to BVA

    hearings.

    Under Section 3.103, VA employees who conduct such hearings are required to fully

    explain the issues and suggest the submission of evidence that may have been overlooked

    by the claimant and could be advantageous to the claimants position. Also, VA is obligated

    to assist a claimant in assembling facts to support their claim.

    On September 9, 2011, NOVA filed a Petition for Review in the Court of Appeals for theFederal Circuitopposing the VAs denial of due process rights at BVA hearings. On behalf of

    NOVA, Mr. Martinez argued that the VAs rule failed to comply with the Administrative

    Procedure Act (APA) because it had been promulgated without the mandatory notice-and-

    comment procedure. VA originally intended to defend its regulation, but the Department of

    Justice concluded that NOVAs arguments were correct and refused to defend the August

    2011 regulation in court.

  • 7/29/2019 Federal Circuit Court Press Release March 22 2013

    3/3

    VA then began the process of repealing the invalid rule in March 2012. When VA informed

    NOVA that it was repealing the invalid rule, it promised NOVA and the Court that the BVA

    would stop applying the rule on March 5, 2012, even before the repeal formally took effect.

    Despite this promise, the BVA continued to apply the rule. The repeal of the rule took effect

    on June 18, 2012.

    On November 7, 2012, Mr. Martinez urged the Federal Circuit at oral argument to hold that

    the repeal was retroactive to August 2011. He also asked the Court to hold VA accountable

    for its broken promise to cease applying the invalid rule in March 2012. Shortly thereafter,

    VA promulgated a Final Rule that accepted NOVAs position that the repeal ofthe rule

    should be retroactive to August 23, 2011, the date it was unlawfully promulgated in the

    first place.

    To view the Federal Circuit's Order in its entiretyclick here.

    About NOVA

    The National Organization of Veterans' Advocates is a not for profit educational membership

    organization incorporated in the District of Columbia in 1993. NOVA is a national

    organization of attorneys and other qualified members who act as advocates for disabled

    veterans. Our goal is to provide excellent representation before the U.S. Court of Appeals for

    Veterans Claims, the Board of Veterans Appeals, and the Department of Veterans Affairs, to

    veterans who have disability claims against the government resulting from their service as

    members of the armed forces. Offices are at 1425 K St NW, Suite 350, Washington, DC 20005.

    Phone: (202) 587- 5708, Fax: (202) 587- 5600, Email:[email protected] .

    ###

    http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/images/stories/opinions-orders/11-7191.Order.3-18-2013.1.PDFhttp://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/images/stories/opinions-orders/11-7191.Order.3-18-2013.1.PDFhttp://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/images/stories/opinions-orders/11-7191.Order.3-18-2013.1.PDFmailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/images/stories/opinions-orders/11-7191.Order.3-18-2013.1.PDF