20
Experimental Design

Experimental Design. Anecdotal Evidence (and worse!)… What’s wrong with this? Anecdotal Evidence: based on haphazardly selected individual cases. No

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Experimental Design. Anecdotal Evidence (and worse!)… What’s wrong with this? Anecdotal Evidence: based on haphazardly selected individual cases. No

Experimental Design

Page 2: Experimental Design. Anecdotal Evidence (and worse!)… What’s wrong with this? Anecdotal Evidence: based on haphazardly selected individual cases. No
Page 3: Experimental Design. Anecdotal Evidence (and worse!)… What’s wrong with this? Anecdotal Evidence: based on haphazardly selected individual cases. No

Anecdotal Evidence (and worse!)…

What’s wrong with this?What’s wrong with this?

Anecdotal Evidence: based on haphazardly selected individual cases. No attention given to outliers, lurking variables etc. Works from a fallacy of making an un-warranted generalization from a small group of individuals to a larger population. One of the most common “misconceptions” about statistical evidence.

Page 4: Experimental Design. Anecdotal Evidence (and worse!)… What’s wrong with this? Anecdotal Evidence: based on haphazardly selected individual cases. No

Observation vs Experimentation

An observational study looks for patterns, correlations etc in a population without interfering with the population.

An experimental study deliberately introduces a treatment to elicit a response and to observe this in a population.

Page 5: Experimental Design. Anecdotal Evidence (and worse!)… What’s wrong with this? Anecdotal Evidence: based on haphazardly selected individual cases. No

Group Discussion…

Let’s look at 3 questions from your text and discuss them.

Spend 3 minutes discussing each of these in turn (we will discuss as a whole between each one)

Look for problems with the statistical claims or analyze what kind of statistical argument is being made in each case.

The questions: 3.1, 3.5, 3.8

Page 6: Experimental Design. Anecdotal Evidence (and worse!)… What’s wrong with this? Anecdotal Evidence: based on haphazardly selected individual cases. No

Placebo Effect…

Doctor: I’ve got to give you a shot. Do you have private health insurance?Patient: No.Doctor: Nurse, fetch the placebo.

Page 7: Experimental Design. Anecdotal Evidence (and worse!)… What’s wrong with this? Anecdotal Evidence: based on haphazardly selected individual cases. No

Doc Martin’s Amazing Brain Pills…

Suppose you were foolish enough to take on of doc Martins amazing brain pills before a stats exam – and you ACED it!

You said it was the pills but shortly after doc M was arrested it was discovered that the pills were just Smarties!

How do you explain your performance?

Page 8: Experimental Design. Anecdotal Evidence (and worse!)… What’s wrong with this? Anecdotal Evidence: based on haphazardly selected individual cases. No

The Placebo Effect (and variants)

Often the very act of carrying out statistical trial (interview, treatment etc) affects the results

A placebo is a “fake” or facsimile treatment given in place of the real treatment

Page 9: Experimental Design. Anecdotal Evidence (and worse!)… What’s wrong with this? Anecdotal Evidence: based on haphazardly selected individual cases. No

Good experimental design…

Some terms to learn… Subjects/units are the individuals being studied Treatment is a specific experimental condition being

administered Factors are the explanatory variables in the study Comparative experiment follows a simple

Treatment Observe response structure Bias is a systematic trend to favour a specific outcome Control group is a group that receive a placebo treatment

Page 10: Experimental Design. Anecdotal Evidence (and worse!)… What’s wrong with this? Anecdotal Evidence: based on haphazardly selected individual cases. No

Randomized Experiment

Control

Page 11: Experimental Design. Anecdotal Evidence (and worse!)… What’s wrong with this? Anecdotal Evidence: based on haphazardly selected individual cases. No

Principles of Good Experimental Design…

Control lurking variables – compare two or more treatments

Randomize choice between subject/unit and treatment received

Replicate on as many subjects/units as possible

Page 12: Experimental Design. Anecdotal Evidence (and worse!)… What’s wrong with this? Anecdotal Evidence: based on haphazardly selected individual cases. No

Trying to eliminate bias – Double Blind Experiments… Researcher bias can creep into an experiment in subtle

ways Suppose you wanted to test a potentially life saving drug

on a group of very sick children. You were so convinced about the drug’s effectiveness that you really didn’t want to give a placebo to some so…

When you gave the real drug you were up-beat and encouraging but when giving the placebo you were much more reserved…

You get the idea! To avoid this a double-blind experiment would randomize the patients and the drugs so that neither you or the patient would not know ahead of time which drug you were giving.

Page 13: Experimental Design. Anecdotal Evidence (and worse!)… What’s wrong with this? Anecdotal Evidence: based on haphazardly selected individual cases. No

Comparison and looking for Statistical Significance

The purpose of setting up controlled experiments with controls is to test for effected change

A result is considered statistically significant if the observed effect is so large that it is very unlikely to have occurred by chance.

To be continued…

Page 14: Experimental Design. Anecdotal Evidence (and worse!)… What’s wrong with this? Anecdotal Evidence: based on haphazardly selected individual cases. No

Block Design Experiments…

A block design experiment divides the subjects/units into identifiable groups prior to random sorting.

For example, you may wish to divide the group by gender, or religion or political affiliation

Page 15: Experimental Design. Anecdotal Evidence (and worse!)… What’s wrong with this? Anecdotal Evidence: based on haphazardly selected individual cases. No

Sample Block Design: 3 treatments/2 groups

Page 16: Experimental Design. Anecdotal Evidence (and worse!)… What’s wrong with this? Anecdotal Evidence: based on haphazardly selected individual cases. No

Group Work…

Discuss the following questions from your text: 3.10, 3.12, 3.21

If helpful, draw a block diagram Table B refers to the table of random digits at

the back. To see how to use this consult example 3.7 on page 235

Page 17: Experimental Design. Anecdotal Evidence (and worse!)… What’s wrong with this? Anecdotal Evidence: based on haphazardly selected individual cases. No

Sampling and Experiment Design

A call-in late night radio show runs a caller poll concerning funding for private, religious colleges and universities. Callers were asked to vote Yes – they should be funded or No – they should not be funded by the government. The results were 23% Yes and 77% No.

Should policy be based on this survey?

Page 18: Experimental Design. Anecdotal Evidence (and worse!)… What’s wrong with this? Anecdotal Evidence: based on haphazardly selected individual cases. No

Simple Random Sample

If any one subject or unit in a population is as likely as another to be sampled then random selection from this set produces a simple random sample.

Question: does the random sample represent the entire population?

Go to excel example…

Page 19: Experimental Design. Anecdotal Evidence (and worse!)… What’s wrong with this? Anecdotal Evidence: based on haphazardly selected individual cases. No

Stratified Random Samples…

Sometimes (often) a population consists of numerous identifiable sub-groups or strata.

A random sample should include selections from each of the strata.

This is called a stratified random sample.

Page 20: Experimental Design. Anecdotal Evidence (and worse!)… What’s wrong with this? Anecdotal Evidence: based on haphazardly selected individual cases. No

In conclusion…

Make sure you familiarize yourself with the many terms and definitions introduced in 3.1-3.3

Understand what anecdotal evidence is and why it cannot be used as a strong statistical argument

Understand what a double blind experiment is

Sample questions: 3.33, 3.34,3.39, 3.47