17
PHOTORESPIRATION Exercise 10 CHUA, Edbelyn ABENIDO, Shannen VALEZA, John Ruben Group 1 WX-5L

Exer 10 Photorespiration

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

A presentation report in Bot 20

Citation preview

  • PHOTORESPIRATIONExercise 10

    CHUA, Edbelyn

    ABENIDO, Shannen

    VALEZA, John Ruben

    Group 1 WX-5L

  • Energy-converting Processes Photosynthesis

    light energy -> chemical form (organic compounds)

    Respiration energy released: ATP

    Photorespiration does not result to ATP

    intermediate products: glycine and serine

  • Photorespiration

    light + high temperature

    IN: high [O2]

    OUT: CO2 Three organelles:

    chloroplast

    peroxisome

    mitochondrion

  • Figure 10.1. Reactionsoccurring inphotorespiration(Nelson and Cox,2008).

  • Feature C3 C4 CAM

    leaf structure

    bundle sheath

    cells with no

    chloroplasts

    bundle sheath

    cells with

    chloroplasts

    mesophyll cells

    have large

    vacuoles

    enzyme

    for fixing

    atmospheric

    CO2

    Rubisco PEPCase PEPCase

    optimum T 15C 25C 30 40C 35C

    Table 10.1. Characteristics of plant groups exhibiting photorespiration.

  • Feature C3 C4 CAM

    other

    characteristics

    most plants

    efficient at

    midrange T

    where a majority

    of plants grow

    mesophyll cells fix

    CO2 and produce

    glucose

    more efficient in

    hot, dry

    environments

    PEPCase reduces

    photorespiration

    because it does

    not bind O2

    mesophyll cells fix

    CO2, bundle

    sheath cells

    produce glucose

    (spatial

    separation)

    xerophytes

    not as efficient as

    C3 or C4 but allows

    plants to survive in

    arid conditions

    Temporal

    separation of CO2fixation and

    glucose

    production

  • C3 C4 CAM

    ricetobaccosoybean

    cornsugarcane

    pineapplekataka-taka

    Table 10.2. Plants exhibiting photorespiration.

  • OBJECTIVES

    compare the response of species exhibiting high and low rates ofphotorespiration and relate them to changes in carbon dioxide/oxygenlevels

  • METHODOLOGY

    Figure 10.2. Photorespiration set-up.

  • RESULTS

    DAY

    CONTROL PLANT PLANT INSIDE BELL JAR

    RICE* CORN+ RICE CORN

    0high vigor

    green leaveshigh vigor

    green leaves

    green to yellow green leaves

    decresing vigor

    high vigorgreen leaves

    1high vigor

    normal leaveshigh vigor

    normal leaveslight yellow leaves

    decreased vigorhigh vigor

    green leaves

    2normal vigorgreen leaves

    normal vigorgreen leaves

    decreased vigorthinner stem

    high vigorgreen to yellowish

    leaf parts

    * - C3 plant; + - C4 plant

    Table 10.3. Observation of the rice (C3) and corn (C4) plants in two separate set-ups for 5 days.

  • 3healthy plantgreen leaves

    constant vigorgreen leaves

    yellow leavesthin stem

    green leaves with yellow tips

    4healthy plantgreen leaves

    normal vigorgreen leaves

    yellow leavesthin stem

    wilting of some leaves

    decreased vigor

    5healthy plantgreen leaves

    with some wilted leaves

    healthy plantgreen leaves

    yellowing of leavesmany leaves wilted

    thin stem

    wilting leavessome parts healthy

    DAY

    CONTROL PLANT PLANT INSIDE BELL JAR

    RICE* CORN+ RICE CORN

    * - C3 plant; + - C4 plant

    Table 10.3. Observation of the rice (C3) and corn (C4) plants in two separate set-ups for 5 days. (continued)

  • RESULTS

    Figure 10.3. Rice and corn control set-ups (left) and rice and corninside bell jar for photorespiration set-up (right) at day 5.

  • DISCUSSION

    increased [O2]; decreased [CO2]

    presence of sunlight Photosynthesis (PS) O2 produced

    inc [O2]: higher photorespiration rate in C3 C3 plants do not exhibit CO2 conc mechanism

    high [O2] fixation by ribulose 1,2-bisphosphate oxygenase in C3

    no ATP = no Energy for growth and maintenance of plants wilting

  • DISCUSSION

    C4 plants

    spatial separation of enzymes

    useful when [CO2] is low PEPCase in bundle sheath

    fixation of CO2 PS still possible and continued production of ATP

    source of energy for plant growth and repair

  • Answers to Study Questions

    1. Will [O2] in the set-up increase or decrease? Whateffect wwould there be on C3 plants for such changein O2 level?

    increase, since plant continues to photosynthesize

    induce photorespiration since C3 do not exhibitCO2 concentrating mechanism

    rubisco will act as oxygenase

    O2 fixated, NO ATP = NO Energy

    low source of E for growth and maintenance

  • Answers to Study Questions

    2. Define CO2 compensation point and light compensation point. CO2 comp pt: [CO2] in which fixation is ZERO

    Light comp pt: reached evident with net CO2 exchange that is ZERO because of rateof PS or CO2 uptake is balanced with Respiration

    Additional, CCP is the pt at w/c the light level where CO2 is released duringrespiration is offset by CO2 fixation during PS.

  • Answers to Study Questions

    3. With the decline in [CO2] in the set-up, which species would stillexhibit net photosynthesis after one (1) week? Explain youranswer.

    CORN (C4) low CO2 comp pt

    photosynthetic efficiency

    PS is reduced: efficient use of CO2 due to spatial separation ofenzymes bundle sheath cells CO2 fixation

    mesophyll cells PEPCase