17
EVIDENCE-BASED POLICYMAKING: SMALL-DOLLAR LOANS Jonathan Zinman Dartmouth College, IPA, J-PAL July 11, 2013

Evidence-Based Policymaking: Small-Dollar Loans

  • Upload
    morton

  • View
    29

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Evidence-Based Policymaking: Small-Dollar Loans. Jonathan Zinman Dartmouth College, IPA, J-PAL July 11, 2013. Scope and Approach for Today. - Conceptual : not a literature review But happy to address questions about specific studies or literatures -Focus on payday loans to fix ideas - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Evidence-Based Policymaking: Small-Dollar Loans

EVIDENCE-BASED POLICYMAKING:SMALL-DOLLAR LOANSJonathan ZinmanDartmouth College, IPA, J-PALJuly 11, 2013

Page 2: Evidence-Based Policymaking: Small-Dollar Loans

2

Scope and Approach for Today-Conceptual: not a literature review

• But happy to address questions about specific studies or literatures

-Focus on payday loans to fix ideas• But happy to address other products

Page 3: Evidence-Based Policymaking: Small-Dollar Loans

3

The Evidentiary Basis for Rulemaking: Key Questions

1. What do we need to know?2. What do we know?3. What should we do, in light of 1 and 2?

Page 4: Evidence-Based Policymaking: Small-Dollar Loans

4

Key Takeaways1. Humility

-We don’t know much2. Restraint

-Hard to improve outcomes if we don’t know much3. Innovation-Weak motivation for standard “protections”

• Quantity restrictions• Point-of-sale disclosure

-Many “surgical” approaches hold promise-Punchline: a 21st-century agency should approach this space with a direct (social) marketing and R&D mindset

Page 5: Evidence-Based Policymaking: Small-Dollar Loans

5

What Constitutes “Evidence” for “Evidence-Based Policymaking”?-A methodology that convincingly addresses the classic social science problem and plausibly identifies cause and effect-Tempting to abandon this standard in the small-dollar space.

• So much seems/feels broken• Everyone has a story, pro- or con-

-Microcredit serves as cautionary tale of story-based policymaking

• Pro-small-dollar “movement” built on theory, anecdotes, rigged evaluations

• Little causal evidence of transformative impacts• Now backlash

Page 6: Evidence-Based Policymaking: Small-Dollar Loans

6

Insufficient Evidence

- Ban Enacted and Lending Falls• What happens to consumer well-being?

- Payday borrowers fare worse than non-borrowers• People who go to the E.R. fare worse…

-Expensive• So is hiring a plumber

-Serial borrowing• Should we outlaw serial borrowing in the repo, commercial paper

market?

-Loans finance “recurring expenses”• Money is fungible! Example: borrowing to pay rent today because I

paid cash for emergency last week

Page 7: Evidence-Based Policymaking: Small-Dollar Loans

7

What Do We Need to Know?To Decide Whether Should Intervene-Does small-dollar do more harm than good?

• Evidence on this from rigorous studies is mixedEven within-Zinman studies!1a

Tilts “good” if include evidence from developing countries1b

• Why mixed evidence?Substance: true heterogeneity in impacts, studies across different

settings reflect thisMethods: some flawed

-Punchline: evidence does not move us away from standard priors

• More good than harm (revealed preference)• “80-20 rule”

Page 8: Evidence-Based Policymaking: Small-Dollar Loans

8

What Do We Need to Know?To Decide Whether Should Intervene

-Is market on its way to providing alternatives that marginalize the payday model?

• Reducing Distribution Costs• Employer-intermediated lending• Online

• Improving Risk-Based Pricing• Underwriting based on new data sources• Behavioral approaches for advantageous selection

• Reducing Credit Risk• Contracting innovations (flexibilty, maturity, dynamic pricing)• Monitoring innovations (referral bounties, peer support)

-Related: why gap in the “lending ladder”?• Asymmetric information?• Regulatory barriers to entry

Page 9: Evidence-Based Policymaking: Small-Dollar Loans

9

What We Need to Know?To Decide How Should Intervene-Why do people go wrong?

• *Repayment expectations: overly optimistic, or inattentiveMann and Pew evidence on this suggestive, but shaky, and neither finds

that majority are overly optimistic• Price perceptions conditional on expectations

Problem if interest compounds (e.g., with rollovers)2

• *Temptation

-Fixes should target these biases

Page 10: Evidence-Based Policymaking: Small-Dollar Loans

10

What We Need to Know?To Decide How Should Intervene

• How effective will fix be at changing behavior?• Of consumers• Of regulated lenders• Of unregulated lenders

• How costly to implement a fix?• TILA example: costly enforcement leads to limited enforcement3

Smaller lenders, loan sharks

Page 11: Evidence-Based Policymaking: Small-Dollar Loans

11

Evidence-Based Policymaking in the Shadows: What Should a 21st-Century Agency Do?

Objectives:1. Reach people early, at decision point2. Rely on incentive-compatible 3rd parties instead of

enforcement3. Preserve access for those who do themselves no harm

Page 12: Evidence-Based Policymaking: Small-Dollar Loans

12

Evidence-Based Policymaking in the Shadows: What Should a 21st-Century Agency Do?

Strategies:1. Beta-test to generate evidence

• “Soft” vs. “hard” launches

2. Try scalpels before sledgehammers• Identify problems and target fixes

Page 13: Evidence-Based Policymaking: Small-Dollar Loans

13

Solving for Asymmetric Information20th century: subsidies

21st century: “Catalyst”-type approach• Support evaluation of promising underwriting/business

models• Help solve standards, legal barriers to information

gathering and sharing

Page 14: Evidence-Based Policymaking: Small-Dollar Loans

14

Solving for Optimism Bias20th century approaches:• Restrict rollovers, mandate disclosures

Enforcement costs daunting in fragmented market, low entry barriers

21st century approaches:1. “Engagement”2. Beta-testing: iterate to proven solutions • Outgoing direct (social) marketing:

“Have you thought about how to repay?” “Imagine a friend is deciding whether to use a payday loan… what

would you advise them to do?”• “Smart” disclosures based on prior behavior, predictive

modeling

Page 15: Evidence-Based Policymaking: Small-Dollar Loans

15

Solving for Temptation20th century approaches: bans, mandatory cooling off periods

21st century approach: Beta-test voluntary versions of these (“commitment devices”).• (Can think of this as voluntary licensing)• Self-cooling: “Don’t release $ for N days after I apply”• Self-banning: “Cut me offs”

After X loans in a calendar yearOn Fridays

Page 16: Evidence-Based Policymaking: Small-Dollar Loans

16

Closing ProvocationHow should a 21st-century regulator move forward in small-dollar space?• Set a high evidentiary bar• Beta-test: soft vs. hard launches• Try scalpels before sledgehammers• Rely less on lawyers, examiners• Rely more on marketers, researchers

Page 17: Evidence-Based Policymaking: Small-Dollar Loans

17

Innovating in Small Dollar• Distribution channel

• Employer-intermediated lending• Online

• Underwriting based on new data sources Employer data Social media Peer referrals Spend and other transaction data Recurring payment histories beyond prime credit “Shockumentation” of emergencies

• Contracting innovations• Flexible repayment schedules• Maturity sweet spot• Dynamic pricing

• Monitoring innovations• Referral bounties• Peer support

• Behavioral selection• More-favorable terms for delayed disbursement• “Pay Yourself Back” post-loan