13
Ethics Part I: Ethical Relativism and Ethical Objectivism

Ethics Part I: Ethical Relativism and Ethical Objectivism

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Ethics Part I: Ethical Relativism and Ethical Objectivism

Ethics Part I: Ethical Relativism and Ethical Objectivism

Page 2: Ethics Part I: Ethical Relativism and Ethical Objectivism

Ring of Gyges (Ji-jeez)

Grants total invisibility.

No one knows you have it.

Totally free to act in anyway you desire without suffering social or legal judgment.

Would you use it?

Would there be limits on its use?

Why not use it to satisfy your every desire, gain power, and crush enemies?

Page 3: Ethics Part I: Ethical Relativism and Ethical Objectivism

You’re Not Who They Think You Are

They think you’re Mother Teresa but you’re really Hitler.

Why not be immoral?

They think you’re Hitler but you’re really

Mother Teresa.

Why be moral?

Page 4: Ethics Part I: Ethical Relativism and Ethical Objectivism

How Did You Learn about Morality?

Questionnaire on page 430.

How did you arrive at your ideas of morality?

Would different life circumstances have caused you to develop different moral ideas?

Page 5: Ethics Part I: Ethical Relativism and Ethical Objectivism

Ethics: What Ought We Do?

Descriptive vs. Normative Ethics.

A situation, a motive, an action, and a consequence.

Page 6: Ethics Part I: Ethical Relativism and Ethical Objectivism

The Situation and the Act

What makes an action “moral” or “immoral?”

Is truth-telling a moral act?

Thought Experiment page 421.

Page 7: Ethics Part I: Ethical Relativism and Ethical Objectivism

Motives and Intentions

Does motive matter?

Can motive alone make a seemingly good act bad and/or a seemingly bad act good?

Thought Experiment page 422.

Page 8: Ethics Part I: Ethical Relativism and Ethical Objectivism

Do consequences of an act matter?

Do consequences determine whether an action was morally right or morally wrong?

Thought Experiment page 423.

Page 9: Ethics Part I: Ethical Relativism and Ethical Objectivism

Ethical RelativismSubjectivism (individual relativism)

Conventionalism (cultural relativism)

Is the basis for moral claims individual taste, cultural norms, or something else?

Philosopher’s Notebook: Why not use you as a test

subject?

Page 10: Ethics Part I: Ethical Relativism and Ethical Objectivism

Ethical Conventionalism (Cultural Relativism)Different societies have different moral codes.

There is no objective standard that can be used to judge one societal code better than another.

The moral code of our own society has no special status; it is merely one among many.

There is no “universal truth” in ethics—that is, there are no moral truths that hold for all people at all times.

The moral code of society determines what is right within that society.

It is mere arrogance for us to try to judge the conduct of other peoples. We should adopt an attitude of tolerance toward the practices of other cultures.

Page 11: Ethics Part I: Ethical Relativism and Ethical Objectivism

Implications of Ethical Relativism

No cultural practices are any better than others (FGM?).

Actions are right /wrong only by the standards of the culture in which they take place .

No such thing as “moral progress.” (spanking, slavery).

Page 12: Ethics Part I: Ethical Relativism and Ethical Objectivism

Ethical Objectivism

Objectivism.

Absolutism.

Are there some moral standards that exist independent of individual taste and cultural norms?

Page 13: Ethics Part I: Ethical Relativism and Ethical Objectivism

“Where” Do Objective Standards Exist?Golden Rule. (page 445)

Logic.

Human flourishing.

Biological necessity = individuals need society.

Divine Command.

How do we acquire moral knowledge?